>Considered the worst games in their respective series

>Considered the worst games in their respective series
>Still mog 70% of the games that regularly get discussed on this board in terms of actual quality
Legitimately sad indeed

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    FF VIII has not been considered the worst FF in ages though. Pretty much since XII came out... Now it sits right were it´s always belonged by the side of VII, IX and Tactics as one of the great ones.

    As for CC it´s only considered inferior to CT, which honestly is nothing to be ashamed of to begin with. Besides there are layers on the criticism, some don´t consider it inferior at all while others only consider it mid in comparison and claim that if evaluated by itself the game is very good.

    We do agree that the games are far superior than most current modern games though.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think Chrono Cross is a great game, not sure why it's so hated

      FE4 is worse than Conquest.

      Stop replying/bumping blatant shit threads.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Now it sits right were it´s always belonged by the side of VII, IX and Tactics as one of the great ones
      Yeah it really doesn't, but you're right that it's not anywhere as disliked as modern entries

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think Chrono Cross is a great game, not sure why it's so hated

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is the remaster any good on Steam or is it buggy?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        the steam remaster has pretty bad reviews about its technical flaws. just go read them.

        I think Chrono Cross is a great game, not sure why it's so hated

        it's not so hated. most people who talk shit about it haven't played it. its battle engine, while not good, is better than shitty xenogears, and its story and characters are generally better than final fantasy 7. the hate you see is just concentrated stupidity that the internet makes possible by allowing vocal minorities to appear more massive than they really are. chrono cross is fine as a psx jrpg.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's hated for not being Chrono Trigger. If it had been a standalone game it would probably have a dedicated base of fans like FF8 or Xenogears, but it has the misfortune of standing next to one of the most beloved JRPGs ever made.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        You mean one of the most overrated RPGS ever made

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    FE4 is worse than Conquest.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chrono cross is one of the greatest games of all time. Anyone who dislikes that game doesn’t have a soul.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    conquest is not even close to the worst, birthrate is worse, awakening is way worse(probably the worst of them all) and even 3 houses is worse(tho its closer)

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chrono Cross apologists haven't played the game. It's a garbled mess of made-up bullshit and asspulls. The battles aren't tense at all. I wanted to like it, got it on ps1 20-some years ago.
    The shit is garbage. Garbage. I'm sorry.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >It's a garbled mess of made-up bullshit and asspulls
      So you're telling me you lack the ability to read, got it

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >So you're telling me you lack the ability to read, got it
        He's saying the opposite. Being unable to understand the story is a sign of poor reading comprehension. Being able to pick up on 'made-up bullshit and asspulls' indicates that not only has he been able to understand the plot, but he also comprehends it to such an extent that he can identifiers outliers and inconsistencies within the narrative.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Being able to pick up on 'made-up bullshit and asspulls'
          Which demonstrates your lack of understanding or making shit up because you never actually played the game

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >you never actually played the game
            At no point did I say I had played the game. If you're misinterpreting what I wrote there's a good chance you would have also failed to pick up on any 'made-up bullshit and asspulls' in Cross.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              I wasn't addressing you specifically but the anon I originally replied to's post.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >battles aren't tense at all
      Not like Chrono Triggers battles are tense.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    CC gets hate because it's not CT and it kind of tacks on/disrespects the characters of CT as well. Which is really too bad because it's a beautiful game in it's own right.

    FF8 gets hate because the junction system is jank as hell and easy to break thanks to card mod. The level scaling and the "weird" story also seem to be points of contention. 8 is a solid game regardless.

    Fates is hated because it's shit.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand why Fates is still used as the punching bag of the franchise this much when Awakening does almost the exact same things but worse in every department that isn't storytelling/writing.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Awakening sort of gets a pass because it's a series reboot. It also didn't release as 2 generally sub-par games with a 3rd "true route" that drops the ball completely. The characters/storytelling/writing is a big thing, too, Awakening at least tries to seem competent in that regard and it almost works. The future kids mechanic, while moronic either way, at least makes sense in Awakening, while in Fates it was clearly just shoehorned in.
      The only thing that's genuinely better in Fates is the map/mission design in Conquest, and even then it's not like every map is a masterpiece.

      TL;DR: the only thing that Fates actually does better is gameplay in 1/3rd of the game and it manages to do many other things worse.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fates having 3 story paths as separate games while also not making getting to know the characters practically mandatory made people give its story a bunch of shit. Mix that with the dozen or so random exceedingly stupid plot points and it makes it easy for people to call anything involving its story crap. The 2 mainline games around it both have plenty of the same problems (Awakening and 3 Houses) but get accused of it less since they were both many player's proper introduction to the franchise and those new players enjoy putting their game on a pedestal. Engage gets the same flak since everyone came from 3 houses "deep" story engage having a pretty normal fire emblem plot along with-it having the outwardly quirky characters being too anime in their designs turned people off. Engage's quirky character complaint is especially funny to me since other games have had way more absurd characters in them, they just didn't have characters that look like V-Tubers.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The other two Fire Emblem Fates games and Awakening are much worse than Conquest

    I don't think anyone considers Conquest to be the worst FE game

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    CC and FFVIII are the best games in their series. Same goes for Zelda 2 and Simons Quest (at least on NES)

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    peri is hot

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *