coomers won
https://www.psypost.org/2022/06/sexualized-video-games-are-not-causing-harm-to-male-or-female-players-according-to-new-research-63388
coomers won
coomers won
https://www.psypost.org/2022/06/sexualized-video-games-are-not-causing-harm-to-male-or-female-players-according-to-new-research-63388
Well no shit, still don't want it in my games though
gay
Literal gay.
bot post
Don't let
near him!
It's too late for that. Time for some metal lovin'
poofter, gayboy, bender, woofter, nancy.
Die homosexual/troony
Based. Degenerate coomers need to go.
What people like you always fail to realize is that there's a group of people out there who view your favorite passtime as degenerate. Do you like football? D&D? FPS? Someone out there wants to ban it, and they're not interested in hearing about how functional you are. And just like you, they're hypocrites who don't want to be treated the way that they treat others.
The people who need to go are the people who attack other people's fun. We need a revival of the 80s metal mindset. You deserve our anger.
This.
Not something you like? Too fricking bad, frick off and stop ruining my fun.
then stop throwing a fit when something doesn't cater to your degenerate tastes you gamer
The problem is that people who want to get rid of anything that nerdy, white males like have all the power and there's no pushback of any kind against it.
>The people who need to go are the people who attack other people's fun. We need a revival of the 80s metal mindset. You deserve our anger.
This and next year they will feel our wrath.
Ooo anon what are you going to do?
Get rid of the gays.
That sounds like you're attacking their fun, not the other way around
You don't understand anon.
Things I like are good and wholesome. Therefore anyone who doesn't like those things is bad and degenerate and wrong.
Thinks I don't like are bad and degenerate and wrong. Therefore anyone who does like those things are also bad and degenerate and wrong.
This is something people like
really don't get. There are people whose tastes are so, for lack of a better word, inoffensive to everyone that they have absolutely zero reason to take a principled stance for material they disapprove of because there's no possible way for public opinion to shift enough for it to come back on them in their lifetime.
This means that any argument that we all need to take principled stances for material we don't approve of, in order to defend material we do, doesn't really hold up. Not all of us are in glass houses here.
>There are people whose tastes are so, for lack of a better word, inoffensive to everyone
Name those tastes. Let's rule some more things out first, though. Social media? Bars? Lifetimes shows? For all of those, you can easily gather a group that isn't any smaller than the group that legitimately believes that hot girls in games are harmful to people. For social media and bars, it would dwarf the gender studies majors.
Now here's what you fail to realize: There's a large group of people who's sole joy in life is kicking up drama and making other people miserable so that they can feel like victims (directly or by proxy) and crusaders. They get validation and a sense of spiritual fulfillment from it. In the 1980s, these people were Bible thumpers. In the 2020s, they're SJWs. They'll latch on to whatever authoritarian movement is strong at the time. I'd argue that this group is significantly larger than the people who legitimately believe in their heart of hearts that they're actually helping anyone.
>within their lifetimes
Have the past fifteen years not shown you how quickly things can shift? This current environment would have been unthinkable in 2003.
I can't believe you unironically agreed with my obviously contradictory stance. That's amazing
You might have been taking the piss there, but it's something to sincerely consider. It's inherently harder to go to bat for things many people consider unwholesome, and you'll have fewer allies.
Cooking shows. There's one. If that's the sort of thing you're interested in, then you don't have much to worry about in terms of those frickers coming for your shit. I don't disagree that for any given thing you can often find organized and vociferous opposition. However to frame all such opposition to all things as being roughly equal in social leverage is simply misguided and ill-informed. We are not all on a knife edge. Some are far more precarious than others. This is why Patreon can get away with banning artwork depicting incestuous bestiality rape, and will never ever do the same to people who post tutorials on how to play the ukulele. And again, if that's all you're into, then you simply do not have the same concerns about free expression because the things you want are not, and will not be under threat.
>Cooking shows
Cultural appropriation!
Get canceled, bigot.
>Cooking shows
How dare you have a foreign person showing people how to make foreign muck on my good and wholesome Christian TV network!
>Cooking shows.
These stereotypes are harmful against wimmin!
>But it's watched by men!
Man caves! REEEEE!
not reading that coomer cope
Sorry homosexual
The problem isn't you having fun with it, but furiously refusing to accept any critique of it.
Your "critiques" are slander for 99% of the people that you aim them at. Liking to look at CG boobs doesn't mean that you view women as nothing more than sex toys, and male sexuality doesn't exist to validate women's self image, any more than female sexuality exists to validate men.
It's as much of a valid critique as calling GTA fans muggers and murderers, or claiming that GTA turns them into criminals. Except worse, because there's nothing amoral about liking large breasts, any more than there's something amoral about liking men who are over 6 feet tall.
good post
Homosexual morons
homosexual
homosexual
Well I want it. How about we just stick to what we like then, live and let live as far as game content goes?
That kind of attitude is how you end up with a county like america which is simultaneously the most prudish and degenerate country on the planet.
So what would you prefer anon? I'm confused
Have both sides kill each other until only one remains.
that's not things work you moronic idealist
Get the frick out of here foreigner. The only true way to make everyone happy is to ban promiscuity and celibacy simultaneously.
It's material I consume privately in my own home, I see no problems with it. There is no reason to strike it down, nor is there any reason for us to come into conflict about it.
I'm not sure why the US does the things they do, and I don't want to know, but it's probably just because of the vast size and divided areas with differing views on it.
The US isn't the only country struggling with the issue.
Yeah, I see it here too. Too many people can't just "I don't like that" and go, instead opting for "This isn't for me, ban it/stop making it" as their go to. I suppose social media is more to blame overall.
It is, I wish it never became big, we need a worldwide political ban on everything but the news.
>I suppose social media is more to blame for a problem that has existed for as long as human society has existed
More for an increase in traction for it. Before social media people did not have the same reach for their views.
I'm not sure that would fix anything. These are often just general viewpoints not tied into any particular politics standing.
>More for an increase in traction for it. Before social media people did not have the same reach for their views.
Yeah man. Before the internet there was famously no huge movements of people with the express aim of creating homogenous societies where everyone believe the same things they believed
You're thinking about something completely different. Massive social movements are not what I speak of. I am talking about singular people whining about minor issues and managing to get traction for that due to how social media works.
Prior, they would have only gained support within their own social circle simply because no one else cared. For example, if Tom the Toolmaker was mad about a motorcycle brand's new logo, only his friends would care. If Tom the Twitterposter was mad now, he could drum up a big fuss about it to everyone. It's like the difference between a man with a megaphone and a man on a live TV broadcast.
And there would be nothing wrong with that if we could get both sides to quit shoving their agendas onto the other.
homosexual
ultra homosexual
frick off, the coom cinematic is the best scene in the Mass Effect trilogy
you dont want sexy character in games, but you want in school that kids learn about the 100+ gender bullshit.
damn....in the 90´s no one would actually listen at any point to such nonsense, social media gave to much mental brain fricks a plattform to spread their bullshit.
common sense lost.
Keep California out of video games
This. Sex scenes in games are cringe and there's never been a single good one.
This thread and the article has nothing to do with sex scenes in games you israelite rat.
People just like seeing beautiful people in their media, and we can no longer have that because the globohomosexual agenda includes brainwashing everyone to think that beautiful women don't exist, so that trannies will become normal.
YWNBAW
homer sexual
homosexual
gay
frick off homo
You can just tell that Ganker is porn addicted
>not wanting ugly american characters in your vidya is the as being addicted to porn
The sad realization is that he's projecting onto you because he can get off to those ugly atrocities which is something only someone with no standards could do.
No I want beautiful characters but not sexualised characters, which is obviously a foreign concept to someone who has his brain fried with degeneracy
then go make games or play games that fill your needs instead of trying to change other peoples games, homosexual.
>Don't you dare do what I do
I’m not trying to change games this is simply my suggestions for future games. Women and men with a modest and honourable dress code with nicely designed facial features. So I can focus on the gameplay.
If breasts keep you distracted from the gameplay, then that's a you problem.
Sex should be kept to the bedroom.
I’ll twist the argument on you and say why don’t you just focus on the gameplay no matter how ugly she is?
Wasn’t there a study recently that demonstrated that pornography shrank an area of the brain?
>Sex should be kept to the bedroom
sexy =/= sex
Bingo.
I encompass sexy into sex. Problem with society nowadays is the propagation and overconsumption of sexual content everywhere. Perhaps it’s a reflection on the abyss loss of community has caused in the modern world.
Man, I hope you don't ever go out in public during the summer time. You might not be able to control yourself with all the young, attractive girls walking around.
Yes the dress code for girls nowadays is abhorrent. I assume their fathers are their pimps.
I disagree. Refer to my other reply.
Disagree all you want but I was not presenting an opinion but a fact.
Seeing hot women in skimpy clothes doing non sexual things is not harmful.
Its only tricking your brain with sexual content that you just impregnated a woman that is damaging to the brain, especially if your brain thinks you just impregnated 20 super hot b***hes because thats how many tabs you had playing.
Its not even close to being the same.
>I encompass sexy into sex.
again, thats a you problem.
normal, healthy humans can (and do) appreciate beauty and absolutely differentiate sex and sexy.
theres a lot of ugly sex out there.
>why don’t you just focus on the gameplay no matter how ugly she is
because I enjoy beauty alongside gameplay.
holy shit, how little control do you have over your mind?
So then why is it a problem for me to not want sexualised characters?
I like games like dwarf fortress
>So then why is it a problem for me to not want sexualised characters
it isnt. idgaf what you like.
my problem is that people LIKE you coerce devs into removing/changing sexy designs as opposed to just finding content that appeals to them.
>I like games like dwarf fortress
I also play Skullgirls, DOA, and other assorted games featuring prominent bouncing cartoon breasts without ever getting distracted by them.
>why don’t you just focus on the gameplay no matter how ugly she is?
Sorry, I don't play western games.
>I’ll twist the argument on you and say why don’t you just focus on the gameplay no matter how ugly she is?
I play Dwarf Fortress. Frick outta here.
Yes, porn is poison and all pornographers should be executed.
But what mental illness makes you equate a sexy character in a game with porn and its effects? Its nothing alike. No one is fapping to a game, they are playing the game and enjoying the sight of beautiful people, this is good for your mind even. Whats harmful about porn is seeing sex, because your subconscious interprets it as having fulfilled your biological goal of breeding, and being over exposed to the sight of dozens of hot women being fricked in the single porn session releases abnormal amounts of dopamine and wears out the dopamine receptors,which leads to lethargy and depression.
The dopamine release from just seeing a pretty, even slightly clothed woman is small and gradual just like from seeing hot women in skimpy clothes during summer, its not harmful.
only morons think people coom to games that are not PORN games. they always bring this shit. people coom to porn made about those game. is not the same. people want to see porn of their sexy characters. is not the same.
>So I can focus on the gameplay.
sounds like a you problem, bigot.
>So I can focus on the gameplay
Why don't you just focus on the gameplay no matter how she's dressed?
99% of humans are not as peabrained as you and have zero problem enjoying the sight of hot people while 100% focusing on gameplay
sure, because there totally isnt a history of people forcing their desires on developers under threat of social media persecution (that threat actually works too, lol).
i guess youre just one of those people that sits by and never complai.... oh wait.
homosexual
Based gameplay oldgay making all the rotten coombrains seethe
Will this make Sony finally reconsider their ugly protagonist strategy?
No because it still triggers people with mental illness
No. That only happened because trannoids don't want to feel ugly as frick and roasties don't want competition even if it's data.
neither demographics you mentioned actually buy games
let that sink in
They don't need to, they just need to be appealed to, in order to get those Blackrock bucks
that hasn't mattered yet either because they can afford it or because the people that should stop buying games keep buying them
until that happens it's Black folk, trannies and ugly femoids in every single piece of interactive media
~~*investors*~~ disagree with you
Are you confused? Are you pretending games in the past 15 years have not been catered exclusively to people who don't play games?
>Research are not causing harm to mare or female
>BUT NOT TRANNIES tho, they still get triggered with dysphoria upon looking at people they will never look as good as
Based
i never understand why you people think its trannies when trannies are the biggest coomers around
That's easy. Everything is trannies if they live in your head
Because despite being coomers they hate things that are beautiful, cute or pure. They despise beauty and love corruption. Notice how they have problems with anime fanservice but none of them made a fuss about an out of place sex scene in a western AAA game. The western AAA game's scene looked like it was two gorilla's fricking each other. It's repulsive. But they hate girls that look like pic-related because it's not ugly, it's beautiful and that's what they hate the most.
that's a lot of words to just repeat the post i replied to originally. Trannies are more likely to self insert as hot girls than hating them.
Just look any troony avatar on twitter
You really suck at understanding intent. They're doing that to force association. If you see pic-related and think of trannies your associating the last remaining source of feminine women to fugly men in dresses. I shouldn't need to point out how that makes you fricking moronic and incredibly gay.
>thread is about trannies
>anon is surprised we talk about trannies
i just said most trannies self insert as hot women instead of hating them, not that if i see a hot woman i think of trannies.
That's just you projecting
>thread is about trannies
It is? I'm sorry where were they mentioned in the OP?
first day on Ganker newbie?
>Just look any troony avatar on twitter
90% are anime girls of dangerouly childish looks
why? because they are all child rapists
Because all it takes is for them to look in a mirror, look at a video of someone making fun of them, or look at a hot chick to see that they'll never be a woman or hot and then they want to kill themselves for making poor life decisions.
Are you kidding? Trannies play tons of games. They’re literally just reddit and Ganker dudes that went hollow.
Meant for
Sony still demands diversity within studios and diversity muddles up a strong lead focus. Wokeness will still thrive and the trend of adding unattractive token minority characters will still be pushed to get progressive points. Meanwhile, those who actually enjoy games and want to make them will be pushed to the background while agendas are implemented into every facet of gaming media.
I kinda feel like purposely making unattractive character designs will only make racism worse than it already is. As much as people hate the coombrain mindset, I feel like designing characters of any race with that in mind will actually help everyone in the longrun. People need to be reminded that it's okay to be hot, and that goes for both men and women.
>People need to be reminded that it's okay to be hot
Are you hot? I'm not, so why would I care for hot people when I could just bring aesthetics down to my level?
What if they go with a compromise and start having butterfaced protags?
>Butterface
anon, a butterface has a decent body, none of the workstation protagonist have that, they'll never will.
I'd be okay with that as long as they had rocking hot bodies I guess. You know you can make weird or unconventionally attractive people too, the French have a word for it that means like ugly beautiful. They can't even give us that?
lol
People never change their stance on things because of evidence, only when it starts hitting them in the wallet
Console coomers didn't win because game journalists will give bad scores to allegedly sexist games. Steam games on the other hand don't need critic reviews anymore: they sell by userscore.
Technically if you replaced the protagonist from every game with the fortnite guy it wouldn't "cause harm to players" either
That's exactly the point.
"I don't like it" isn't grounds to say it's harmful. I certainly wouldn't like what you just said, but it wouldn't hurt me.
>according to new research, water is wet
well Ackchyually!
Water isn't wet, because the wetness comes from...
Water molecules binding to X = X is wet
Water molecules bind to each other extremely well
Water is wet
The only time water is not wet is when there is only one singular water molecule floating in a perfect vacuum
I know you're just making jokes anon but some other misinformed pedant is going to show up
what if the water binds with my skin
Then your skin becomes wetter. Skin is already wet, but adding water makes it wetter.
>according to new research, water is wet
no fricking shit Black person.
videogames aren't the main cause for crimes and shit.
I hate America so much it's unreal
>sexualization doesnt cause misogyny
no shit, it turns you into a dumb horny simp
>logical fallacy isn't true
>commits logical fallacy
thats it. i'm gonna jerk off to vidya game girls while listening to Cygnus - Laser Mode (2022) in a leaking canoe in Kuramo
What scape goat will degenerated use now?
Beta males will pretend they knew this all this time and try to brush off the last 8 or so years of them simping for Sarkeesian.
They will use pretty black girls instead for a while.
Looks like Project Diva or whatever is called the new bayonetta like hack n slash is getting permission to land.
Sounds pretty good, better than the characters with baggy "Buscemi" eyes that western games keep adding lately. If future female characters look anything like Halle Barry or Hilary from Fresh Prince, then that's fine by me.
Holy shit I was just watching this scene yesterday. For some reason this scene came into my mind and I was compelled to watch again. collective consciousness is real
The future is gonna be bright if people can finally design characters that look like that again. Japanese waifus are okay, but nothing beats an american bombshell full of confidence and spunk.
I can agree on that. I mean I can fap to nips, but I still prefer them to be homegrown.
>lately
Steve Buscemi has been the alpha male vidya standard for quite some time.
Not good. It might indoctrinate some White men to race mix. Which in reality leads to hideous abominations that should not exist. Race mixing is a genetic downgrade for Whites.
>They will use pretty black girls instead for a while.
Yes please/
B-but... if we have sexy characters in our games, we are just reinforcing societal standards of beauty that I can't live up to! PLEASE THINK I'M BEAUTIFUL I KNOW i"M BEATIFUL NO NO NO NONOONONONNONONONNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSDDflkJNHDFKJNLAKJNHF;ALODS;IOA;OIL Kqw3liue n4rhof98i qlsau;dflikj UFCK FRICKING FRICK FRICK YOU! I AM BEAUTOIFUL!!!!!!! FRICK!FRICKFRICKFRICKFRICK FRICK YOU I AM MORE BEATIFUL THAN NY CHGARACTER POLEASE THINK IM PRETTY FUCCKKKKK
Please let this be pasta
Bot post
yeah, troony groomers are
>psyop.org
It's about "fighting sexism" just as much as abortion bans are about "saving children" and "Christianity".
China's bans and mandates should have clued you off to this.
>b-but let me tell you why actually unborn babies should die again if you like looking at sexy women so much, goyim!
Damn, Moloch's getting fussy, huh?
groomers won
“The major caveat is simply that many of the studies just aren’t very good,” Ferguson said. “The good news is that the higher quality studies were less likely to find evidence for negative effects than lower quality studies.
>In some cases, scholars probably interjected their personal moral opinions into the studies, if unintentionally.
Granted it’s still a fairly small research area, but this initial data has been so underwhelming that I’m not sure there’s much to be mined here.”
These buttholes were always interposing their moral opinion on everything, their studies and affirmations have always been wrong, any idiot could see it, but as always, the cattle was afraid to speak the truth and be cancelled for it.
I love how 'researchers' get government grants for literally anything.
If you got good grades in high school, you could have had a cushy "researcher" job too.
yeah right they just hand out those jobs to anyone
nobody actually believed this that's just the excuse they use to make everything gay.
Oh shit. Are studies being pushed now because they want to put in more homosexualry in vidya? Is this shit not yet fricking over?
No shit.
I really want sony to add the web browser back but I feel like Im the only person in the world refreshing and searching pornhub on my PS5 browser so they cant force the noporn statistic onto their platform.
Pls help me fight sony by searching porn on your ps5. Maybe if they dont get what they want we can have a browser.
What?
yeah no shit, what harm would they cause?
but mutt femenazis will still hate on attractive women characters
Women love Tifa tho
Jews don't like this outcome moron
They do you fricking fed
lol first its "jews want to make the west immoral hyper sexualized, corrupted, and depraved! Look at how many porn studios they own!?!?"
Then its "jews dont want sexualized video games!"
God I hate you people and youre israeli boogey men to blame for whatever the frick you want.
I hate israelites
Nice reddit spacing btw, rabbi
making society at large sexually liberated and making male oriented fantasy content like the babes hugging conan the barbarians thighs in 70s comic book covers
jews want to push ugly fat trans ethnic people in media for their agenda more than sex so games including sexualized attractive fictional characters hurts them
It's Schrodinger's israelite
Its maintaining the principle of not allowing appeals to authority to shape your worldview
You don't need an elite class to tell you that something is or isn't so nor should you accept it just because it was said
99% of people in this thread won't even click the link even though it was posted
>Its maintaining the principle of not allowing appeals to authority to shape your worldview
>You don't need an elite class to tell you that something is or isn't so nor should you accept it just because it was said
Automatically going against whatever is said just because it's from an authority isn't any better.
you are beyond fricking moronic
Experts making predictions and recommendations and research results are two separate things. The media contorting the results for a better headline is also a completely different matter.
Not like that's going to stop the journo's from blaming games for sexualized characters when the next controversy comes around.
I come to vidya to escape reality and watch pretty girls not to watch disgusting woMAN who look like a Ganker Ganker poster
This will change nothing. The female body will still keep getting censored.
Supports previous findings.
No fricking shit, in fact it gives them ideas on what to dress up as on Halloween/conventions/wherever. Girls sexualise themselves. Some of the most over the top horny characters of all time were designed by women. Look at how hard Birds of Prey flopped when they decided Harley Quinn wasn't allowed to be hot.
>“As a purely ‘public health’ issue, this doesn’t appear to be much of a concern at all. That doesn’t mean people can’t advocate for better representations of females in games. They just need to be cautious not to make claims of ‘harm’ that can be easily debunked, thereby calling into question what might otherwise be reasonable advocacy goals.”
Probably too late for the findings to matter now, but at least I'll be able to rub this shit in liberals' faces.
Sexualized video games do not cause sexism, but they do cause bad games as a result. For example, look at Xenoblade. Half the characters are blatantly sexualized, and do you know why? They had to use something to hide the obnoxious, overtly cinematic gameplay that consists of 20 minutes of cutscenes and 5 seconds of quick time events, and then 10 hours of walking down hallways. The same can be said of Nier, Bayonetta, Elden ring, Fire Emblem, you name it. Coomers don't care about good gameplay, and they're lying when they say that they do.
Why else do gacha games make record setting profits every single day? Why else do you think garbage like Gachin Impact makes billions off of lootboxes and pay2win game mechanics?
Genshin makes more money than more heavily coom-oriented gacha games because it has actual gameplay.
>mash x to watch pretty fireworks and watch your character zip around like a DBZ character
>actual gameplay
>acgay
Stop embarassing yourself.
>elden ring
>sexualized
the frick?
Way too many threads about people wanting to jerk off to the blue 4 armed waifu thing, that's probably a doll like the over-sexualized doll from Bloodborne. If people can't stop jerking off for 5 seconds to discuss the actual GAME, then the game sucks.
that doesnt mean the game's sexualized Black person
It means there's coombait in it, and there should be less because it's all anyone talks about.
just because people coom to something doesnt mean its coombait moron. It's just an immensely popular game and its the most prominent female character in it.
Your original point was good it just doesn't apply to elden ring and you're a seriously autistic moron with a weird grudge about a video game or something
Then maybe the coomers should stop ruining threads. They don't exactly make a strong argument. It's not even restricted to elden ring or Bloodborne, they've been doing this since Demons Souls.
ok so you're admitting Elden Ring isn't a coombait game then?
When the fans stop being obnoxious spammers, then sure.
but there's barely any elden ring threads in the catalog? so the game's not coombait then?
When they made the threads, they were spamming. Even now, when one tries to talk about the game, all they do is jerk off to the waifus.
>When they made the threads, they were spamming.
they're spamming dead memes, yes.
>Even now, when one tries to talk about the game, all they do is jerk off to the waifus.
this is the gayest shit I've read in this board. how the frick do you even know these random strangers are jerking off or not? you obsessed with dicks homie?
>this is the gayest shit I've read in this board. how the frick do you even know these random strangers are jerking off or not?
It's not hard to deduce.
>go into Elden Ring thread
>"hey guys, what's the best strat for dealing with [x]"
>20 replies show up, telling me "OMG SHUT UP I NEED TO TALK ABOUT MALENIA OMG I CAN LE SOLO HER XD"
Wonderful.
Holy shit you're so mad
You have the most incredible selection bias I have ever seen
motherfricker are u moronic?
have u even played the game?
ranni isn't sexualized in the fricking slightest
either is the lizard girls name I don't rememeber
people coom and draw fan art of them because they became attached to the characters because of their characterization and the dialogue you have with them, not because of their sexualization
u absolute dumb frick
look at this picture and tell me how sexualized this lady in a dress is
*because they're subhuman pedophiles
how would someone lusting over ranni make them a pedofile?
shes a very dominant character who is perfectly willing to sacrifice others for her objectives, she has quite a strong personality.
I don't understand what childlike traits she even has that would make one think that?
shes never visually depicted as a child either?
>people coom and draw fan art of them because they became attached to the characters because of their characterization and the dialogue
Holy crap, that just makes it worse. Not only do you spend all of the threads cooming over a character, but it's not even for a gameplay reason. It's because you've become enamored by the game's shoddy attempts to be the next hollywood marvel cape flick.
Protip: "characterization" and "dialogue" do not belong within 100 feet of a video game.
How do you not realize your opinions are unique? It must be so weird thinking that you're in the majority when you're in a tiny, tiny minority
This article nuked you, ACtroony.
The article agrees with me. I never said that sexualization caused sexism or misogyny or whatever. I always cared about the impact it had on gameplay.
Maybe try reading next time, ehhhh?
>not denying that he's ACtroony
>ehhhh?
Christ. I think
is more your thing, acgay.
nah, all sexualization is gross. The sooner we all become robots that can remove our disgusting sex drives, the sooner we can advance to the stars, unimpeded by human weakness. And I mean that 100% unironically.
is this your way of saying you're impotent?
Is this your way of saying you can't think of anything besides sex?
>implying robots wouldn't have even more extreme sex drives or even more powerful emotional drives
such is the thinking of lesser machines
>NOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST HAVE THINGS I DONT LIKE IN YOUR GAME EVEN THOUGH IT LITERALLY CAUSES NO HARM NOOOOO IT MAKES THE GAME BAD BECAUSE I SAY IT DOES AHHHHHH
Thus but unironically.
Bayonetta is genuinely good and has no need to use sex appeal as some sort of “cover up”. It’s there to supplement the game, not to drive attention away from any cracks.
Same can be said for Xenoblade 1 and X. 2 is a disgusting abomination that drove the series to degeneracy and it fricking peeves me that that the average person like yourself sees 2 and 3 as the whole series.
>go into Xenoblade 1 thread
>GOLLY GEE I WANT TO FRICK SHARLA MM DELICIOUS CHOCOLATE
>LOL FIONA'S FARTS MUST SMELL LIKE DIESEL LOL!
>I WAN TTO FRICK MELIA
Real big change from XC2.
>drove the series to degeneracy
3 is literally as tame as 1 was, if not less so because it doesnt have Sharla's big fat flopping breasts.
>but they do cause bad games as a result.
this homie has never touch a woman
>Elden ring
You didn't even play games right trannoid? please KYS
>Also
Daily reminder when you see some homosexual whining about "sexualization" is probably some of this trannoids
Wtf is wrong with you people??
Why do you have a screen cap of a random Twitter post with zero retweets or likes
Are we supposed to care about this gay's opinions?
How did you even find these tweets?
Name a good game
My game
Greta bait.
That is not a cause, reason or motive, you are being irrational. Is the reason why cinematic games exist because of coomerbait games? Every cinematic game is a coomerbait? What game popularized the cinematic trend that started in the 7th gen? Did that game have sexualized girls?
Answer this without being disingenuous
Oh boy
Who gives a shit, homosexual?
>Violence in video games don't cause violence in real life
>sexual things and alledged sexism in video games don't cause sexism in real life
Wow
Whoda thunk
I wish there will be a legit anime/videogame in baalbuddy universe.
>Paladins will avoid all sexual activities with succubuses, female elves, kitsunes etc. And they only frick their own personal goblin onaholes they carry around.
>Female knights and female elves are incels and despite of they efforts nobody fricks them.
>Succubuses get energy from cuddling and handholding.
>Orcs and ogres refuse to rape anything and are actually nice towards females.
Goblin female x Paladin gigachad is a pairing I did not expect
Better let Sony know.
The beginning of the end, 2019
what parameters are they using to define what "harm" means in this context?
by its nature, sexualization is a moral harm.
and i can't imagine children being exposed to sexualization from a young age isn't harmful.
so what's the catch?
>and i can't imagine children being exposed to sexualization from a young age isn't harmful.
well that's the purpose of ESRB ratings.
>ESRB
>purpose
This is some leftism shit. All games are for everybody or none of them are. No more arbitrary rules upon arbitrary rules.
>by its nature, sexualization is a moral harm.
Sexualization by its very nature is a biological imperative, it's not moral or immoral, it just is.
>by its nature, sexualization is a moral harm
there's people that actually believe this
how brainwashed you got to be
There's no right way to introduce sexualization to a kid. Sex and sex drive are part of life and one's development. When a kid starts getting ahrd, what's the right thing to do? Most of the time, let the kid discover it on their own. If you raise it properly, it will be able to understand and redirect the desire as it sees fit.
Nobody tells animals that it's too soon to frick, they just do. Morals aren't part of nature. Something being covnenient for a society doesn't imply it is for the individual.
> Morals aren't part of nature.
they are. most social animal have some form of morals. it may not be a very good one but they do have it. the problem with one one is that it tends to be pretty arbitrary. also humans are animals, apes. after all.
Animal "morals" are directly tied to their instinct. These morals are not based on introspection or beliefs, but to the primal manifestation of their impulses.
Many monkeys who live in a society have an alpha who gets all the b***hes, but the female monkeys may seek out more calm men and frick the, aware that they're "cheating". But ultimetly they're obeying their instinct while trying to avoid the alpha getting mad, there's no sense of culpability or immorality. There's no morality at play here, just an understanding of what to do to avoid conflict.
You may argue that human morals are similar, but we're way beyond that and be base our morals over individual beliefs we try to argue as general rules.
For animals, "morals" are just a tool for survival, for humans, it's a tool for population control.
>For animals, "morals" are just a tool for survival, for humans, it's a tool for population control.
at the end both are for the benefit of the group.
Not really, the main difference is that one comes from subjective, arbitrary reasoning for your own benefit while the other is so basic and simple and directly connected to their primal desires that it actually works.
Monkey morals help them stay calmed while everone gets what they want: the alpha fricks, the betas frick, females frick.
Human morals rarely benefit society as a whole, and instead benefit some individual. Let's not kid ourselves, a lot of morality regarding sexual impulses is based around the idea of trying to prevent people from fricking each other, birth from a time where you didn't want your wife fricking someone else or your kid (which were and still are used as a coin) fricking someone you didn't want to because forcing a marriage was a fit strategy.
Basically, humans realized they can use morals to control how others act for their own personal benefit, while animal morals are still exclusively based around the benefit of the group.
Enlightenment era philosophist morality is a false god.
They were wrong all along. To be truly human is to live according to your biological instincts in all cases. We need to return to the ways of our ancestors. Patriarchy, women disallowed from decisionmaking outside the home, putting our own races members above all others, violent attitude towards foreign races. That is what it means to be mortal. Real morality, born from evolution.
*means to be moral
Typo
Actually, women fricking around is the biological conclusion. Animals are driven by making offsprings, ones that carry their own gene. For males, that means getting as many women pregnant as possible, for women, that means getting pregnant by the biggest male around. Technically, a chad getting all the females would be the best outcome for our species. Monogamy is commonly archieved in order to prevent males from killing offsprings that aren't their own (which may put the species in danger) rather than being the logical biological outcome.
What you're asking for is ltierally morals: a way to control people and females so you don't have to stay constantly on guard fighting other males. You know, what every other animal in the world does? It's convenient for us as individuals, but it's really going against our biological predisposition.
>Actually, women fricking around is the biological conclusion.
No it isn't. The prerogative of the female is to bear strong children. The prerogative of the male is to sire the children and maintain his territory.
Women find one strong male and breed there.
Males find multiple satisfactory females to bear children.
And what do you think happens when you're not the strong male women want? Or also, why should the one strong male be different for every woman? If there's a gigachad in the clan, why should he impregnate a single female? why not all of them? That's the best outcome for the species, a bunch of kids from the best genes.
Well, that already happens in nature, and we know the result: males try to overcome that. They'll attempt to rape female, they'll hide and sneak a frick here and there, and other techniques to also get a piece of that ass, because not being the strongest male doesn't mean you can't force yourself or convince the female, even if that's not the best for the species.
The human individuality and rationality come into play and something funny happens: we can argue chad doesn't deserve to be the alpha. He is, he should be the one making kids, but because that pisses me off, I'll find a way to get rid of him. I'll come up with something called "morals", religion or other to justify that behavior, I'll claim that females looking for the alpha is bad because we should be monogamous so every male gets a chance, even if that means weak males will have kids too. We can use economics and other non-natural concepts to be seen as the alpha, because we created a non-natural context where that's seen as the alpha.
But at the end of the day, it's still about primal, animal instinct and passing the best genes. And having a lot of money doesn't mean jack shit at a biological level.
You're mad because you're a beta that can't get shit, and it's way easier to enforce some arbitrary rules that force them to obey than becoming the alpha enough to be desired. That's why the ones most obssessed about morality have always been religious people: individuals of weak wills.
If one man impregnated every woman in the clan then the entire next generation would be siblings and would be the last generation, moron.
God you feminist israelites are dumb.
incest takes several generations of inbreeding to become relevant enough, and these are half-brothers and sisters.
You think animals in nature don't frick their mothers or sisters, that they have some mroal code in their heads that prevents from doing so?
No. Women being subjugated by men to be their loyal wife servants is womens biological imperative, its what they evolved into. Women are literally only butthurt about being captured by some viking for like a week and then accept their new life as his concubine. Its how female mentality works because it was the most efficient way to stay alive for them throughout history.
Who are we to deny women what they really want, to be owned by men.
Female hypergamy has never been a thing in history until recently, its unnatural.
I'm too smart to like women though. They're disgusting and should be censored whether it's harmful or not.
they don't, but this is going against the narrative so it won't be acknowledge
video games are only a benefit
so i keep playing them, it means im a good and intelligent person
If the headline said they found the opposite result people would be here telling everyone they are morons for believing israeli lies, but since it agrees with them the coomers will claim this is irrefutable proof that installing the big tit no clothes extra jiggle physics mod is nothing but healthy
>t.jew
>installing the big tit no clothes extra jiggle physics mod is nothing but healthy
It is, according to this study. Feel free to prove otherwise, troony.
coombrains are the trannies anon
I dont think the article is wrong I just know if the thread was exactly the same with the opposite opinion there would be nothing but israelite discussion.
With all of the HRT and "surgery", you'd be hard pressed to find a troony with a healthy libido.
trannies are only convinced to buy hrt and "surgery" because of cooming to the most degenerate nonsense
if the headline was the opposite I would of joined in with the anti semitic discussion
>I just know if the thread was exactly the same with the opposite opinion there would be nothing but israelite discussion.
And if the headline was the opposite, the reaction you had would be opposite too.
>I dont think the article is wrong
Nowhere I said that. I said that you think is dumb which is a fair assumption based on your initial comment.
Or would you say the same line if the headline agreed with your own agenda?
>"yes i would"
sure you would lol
could shoulda woulda ey bud?
>I dont think the article is wrong I just know if the thread was exactly the same with the opposite opinion there would be nothing but israelite discussion.
you're wrong, no matter the opinion the thread will always devolve into israeli israelitery discussion
Thank you for your constribution, goyim.
>If the headline said they found the opposite result people would be here telling everyone they are morons for believing israeli lies
but as that is not the case, the one saying it's dumb is you because the article doesn't agree with your own view
>Wdym i cant enjoy gaming anymore because my dopamine receptors are severely damaged after receiving unhealthy amount of dopamine from cooming to pixels 3 times a day ? Its clearly because of the decline of gaming
Shalom
>if the headline stated something that's obviously wrong you guys would all disagree with it!
Yes?
time for more renpy games about banging high schoolers
"trust the science" was never a two way street and you know it
The end of woke era is near! At least here in the US.
But what harm though? I don't get it, what is the counterargument?
Sorry but feelings > facts, and feelings say that sexualization(in ways I don't agree with) is evil and must be purged. Sorry, but you still lose 🙁
Bro it said "male or female", didn't include the other in between abominations. And those are what you should be wary of.
Great! More sexy males!
Gay
Why do the hottest white men waste their genes on being a homosexual? We could create an umbermensch ethnostate if they all reproduced.
>umbermensch
is also a state of mind, something the israelites made a a spectacle out of
Be honest. If you were a homosexual, would you get with other hot gays or waste your time and money on a 7/10 social media addicted bimbo?
>Why do the hottest white men waste their genes on being a homosexual?
Have you spoken to women?
Feels nice knowing we've being fighting the good fight.
this is just a sensationalist article that tickles the "I hate feminists" mantra of Ganker.
in reality if you made a game today with boobs the reason why people won't buy it isn't because feminists will review bomb it (maybe in 2016 they would though), it's because games with boobs were a game of it's time.
Make the game today it would be dated.
But nothing is stopping boobs from existing, it's just that a very specific ~80's style of sexualization in video games.
People don't wear clothing like that anymore, and if you put that infront of a 10 year old (the main demographic of all video games), they probably won't know what to think about it, they might even say "it's weird", because nobody wears clothing like that (but they did in the past).
Of course nostalgia is a factor, and even 10 year olds are into nostalgia games even though they never played the original, but this is a niche market.
>People don't wear clothing like that anymore
Girls are dressing bawdier than ever dickhead. Maybe go outside once in a while.
>Girls are dressing bawdier than ever dickhead
It's not about "bawdiness" it's about "male fantasy".
Even if a woman wears a crop top and tights or micro shorts, it's in the name of being a "strong independent woman". The definition of what words mean can be different for different people.
Like I said it's a sensationalist article made to generate clicks and here reply's on Ganker, perfectly vague enough to allow any anon to give an opinion (including me).
Sadly the article doesn't even describe examples of video games to properly make an argument of whether or not a game is "sexualized" or not.
If the article is trying to argue that tomb raider is "sexualized" I am wrong, because she isn't even wearing weird 80's clothing or the cliche bikini girl / stripper you see in games, and the article is just talking about how "girls with big boobs and well toned body are sexist", which is just a discussion of "body positivity" which has nothing to do with video games.
>seething over bayonetta
>it's because games with boobs were a game of it's time.
Lol games with boobs were the norm until the 2010s when the SJW panic suddenly made it a taboo even looking at early 2010 games like Mass Effect 3 and see how sexualized all the females are, also nobody has ever worn clothes like that in any decade woman fighting with huge boobs that dress like strippers has always been an (awesome) fantasy and nothing more.
you are right, we're in the ass era right now
>People don't wear clothing like that anymore
So what happens when science comes into conflict with pozzed ideology? Will those pushing for ugly women and "de-sexualizattion" admit their mistake and finally back off? How will they respond when science says their main argument for "de-sexualization" is bullshit?
>what happens when
This has been happening forever. Women ingoring the differences in genders, choosing what's mental illness and what's not, ignoring FBI statistics, etc. Nothing new.
Good questions. I'm willing to bet no major video game site will relay the news and liberals will ignore/block anyone that links the original article. The few Twitter trannies that do respond will just call anyone who considers this good news an incel.
That said, this isn't going to stop me from spamming this shit whenever and wherever I can.
>So what happens when science comes into conflict with pozzed ideology?
Ignore it and increase marketing for their agenda
same thing that happened every other time science conflicts with ideology - ideologues ignore it.
Women want to be put in line. Feminism is what happens when someone feels sorry for women and lets them have a bit of freedom.
>Will those pushing for ugly women and "de-sexualizattion" admit their mistake and finally back off?
Anon, their ideas were never based on science.
>How will they respond when science says their main argument for "de-sexualization" is bullshit?
Deny it or ignore the science. These same people will write essays explaining why diabetes research doesn't show any link to obesity. They just create their own experts if they have to. They operate the same way creationists or any strong ideology reacts to scientific evidence that contradicts them.
>At the age of 42, Pausé died suddenly in her sleep at her home in Palmerston North on 25 March 2022. Her cause of death has not been made public.
>At the age of 42, Pausé died suddenly in her sleep at her home in Palmerston North on 25 March 2022. Her cause of death has not been made public.
Fantastic news.
>Will those pushing for ugly women and "de-sexualizattion" admit their mistake and finally back off?
Its never been about statistics or any meaningful research, it's always been about feelings and perrsonal impulses. Look at Sarkeesian and her moronic following, they never ever cite anything academic, it's just tumblr blog posts presented as universal facts about how sexism is bad (which is absolutely a personal opinion from those who state this).
It's about the agenda and how gamers are an easy as frick target for these leeches.
How will they respond when science says their main argument for "de-sexualization" is bullshit?
They will claim that any scientific field that debunks their message and ideas is sexist and presents only what males think
Time to unban videogame butts threads
Also the vidya tiddy threads.
Will the world ever go back to the based 2000s? Or are we stuck here
Normies flooding the internet has changed things forever. I'm not being dramatic either, the web being integrated into the average person's life changed everything. Nothing short of a whole technological reset will make things go back to the way they were.
why would sex cause "harm"? I'd love to hear the mental gymnastics in support of that theory.
If "unnecessary" content like a good story, soundtrack, or over the top violence are fine in games, then so is fanservice.
What?
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/vm7xff/sexualized_video_games_are_not_causing_harm_to/
There is no end to it until every last israelite is ashes
Okay, but I can rightly call your taste in fictional depictions of women shit if you think that
if it has no effect, why do they get mad when devs decide to make characters sexualized?
>troony looks at conventionally attractive woman
>"What the frick? I look nothing like that this is totally unrealistic"
>"realistic"
AKA "not pretty or even remotely endowed because that makes me upset :("
lol
Women looking like men isn't realistic, the hypersexualized girls actually looked more realistic than the shit we get today.
Don't tell this guy to google "sexy woman", xe'll lose their mind
die die die die die die you fricking c**t
pure frickin evil every single on of them
>coomers
Begone, invader!
Yeah, homosexual coomers won.
Coom is very often a smokescreen to hide a lack of something kngame : if a game is stilll good if you remove that excessive fanservice, it's a good game.
Same thing with cutting edge raytraced graphics.
Leftists will do what leftists always do and try to gaslight, but the line that they use to morally justify censorship has always been that it "promotes harmful stereotypes". And of course, the new line is that everyone who likes hot girls in games is a porn addict who thinks of nothing but sex. Another thing that leftists don't like to think about is that cause and effect applies to human behavior and life outcomes.
If these so-called "harmful" "stereotypes" were actually harmful, it would manifest in unhealthy relationships with the opposite gender that ruin the lives of both. Likewise, if everyone who liked hot girls in games was a mindbroken porn addict, that'd be reflected in their broken lives, too. You're not helping anyone, leftists. The only thing that you're doing is taking away other people's fun.
I have no problem with sexuality.
It's the forced homosexualry I can't stand.
Idiots think that homosexuality is good because culture medias had it.
I hate gay, it's not ok.
That's fine man, we all hate gays, glad they're next on the Supreme Court chopping block.
If gays can't marry, it still won't stop gay people existing. The only way gays will stop existing is if straights stop having gay kids. It's the only way really.
First is gay marriage and then they'll start taking away the rest of your rights, you'll be removed from jobs, all forms of entertainment, education, the police, the military, and the government. You're going to be back to square one but far more hated.
Anon i dont get how you didnt realize by now this type of coomer behaviour is what created and enabled homosexuals in westren societies. They jerk off so much they dont get hard anymore unless its a cp, furry porn or troony homosexualry
This late stage coomer behavior is a dangerous perversion of male authority and dominance.
It can be remedied with enough fasting and beatings, but before the otaku goes feral and attacks someone vulnerable.
No shit. God I hate China so much it's unreal.
Doesn't matter the industry still got hijacked by the mentally ill
Did it take these morons this long that drawings are not pedophilia?
>an ideological stance is purely ideological
Amazing, next your going to tell me that violence in video games doesn't create real world violence.
Now hold on a second, video games definitely cause violence
>muh science
frick you all. have you gay c**ts not learned anything
>Cake doesn't kill: obesity does
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/vm7xff/sexualized_video_games_are_not_causing_harm_to/
Some of the comments here are seething
I'll fap tonight to celebrate.
Here the paper
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563222001637
>preprint study
>cited by no one
Nice science you got there morons. Why are conservatives addicted to preprints? Remember ivermectin and Hydrocloraquine?
It's funny considering that gender studies papers are basically blogs that nobody reads, much less cites, including other gender studies professors. One of the big criticisms of neo-Marxist ideologues in universities is that they behave nothing like a group of scientists who are concerned with building coherent models to reflect reality so that they can analyze it. To begin with, they don't even believe that there are objective truths to be analyzed.
>neo-Marxist
They're derived from post-modernists. They will sometimes include anti-capitalist influences, but they are primarily derived from authors like Michel Foulault.
Marxists and Liberals are like brothers who hate each otehr. Both come from the enlightenment, and both believes in the concept of science, objective reality, and rationalism. Marxists hate capitalism, liberals love it.
Post-modernists are like weird cousin who hates everyone.
Did this really need a fricking study?
The only people who actually believed this were white feminists and incels.
>white feminists and incels.
the same c**ts trying to standardize state approved vasectomies and hormone laced water and cry about piracy
these """people""" are psychos and you giving them the soapbox is why we need these studies to shut them up
Yes
>The only people who actually believed this were white feminists and incels
And normalgay, since they don't give frick about censorship
>tfw chuds will accept this research but would've renounced the opposite conclusion as paid for by israeli academia
Meanwhile, I can accept either conclusion.
>would've renounced the opposite conclusion as paid for by israeli academia
that's the thing, this study WAS funded by israeli academia. The fact that it failed to find a favourable conclusion for them even with all those biases built in makes it all the better to rub into their faces
the same reason why corporates funded that biased study into piracy which they pretend never happened since it couldnt prove their claims either
Your ideology makes no sense. If israeli academics can alter any study to support a narrative why would they randomly not do it here? Is it maybe more likely that you're a dimwit wienersucker who believes in conspiratorial garbage to "own the libs"?
>why would they randomly not do it here?
my dear moron, can you not read? It failed IN SPITE OF their attempts to do so.
>why didnt they do it harder?
so it would be easier to discredit and write it off completely as blatantly biased?
Maybe you shoudlnt believe academia like they cant be influenced to push narratives, hmm?
>well, uh, you see, the reason they didn't do the thing they always do is because now it supports my narrative
ah of course
>my dear moron, can you not read? It failed IN SPITE OF their attempts to do so
>they didn't do the thing they always do
kek you really cant read, huh? or are you just in severe denial?
Now if only wokism would die entirely. I want my vidya back.
We will never give you your videogames back
A comment I found on this video
HWNBAW
There better be a comment replying to her saying, "Says the Sarah White."
People who hate this are either
>brainlets who can't separate fantasy from reality
>someone trying to cover up their own actions
Why the frick would it cause harm?
Did they think if someone saw boobs they would spontaneously combust or something?
trannies cant stand looking at mirrors without cutting themselves so they probably did think that, yes
Same reason they think fapping to porn will make people rape women IRL
COOMCHADS WE WON
I never said it was harmful
Just unnecessary and stupid
Videogames are unnecessary.
It sure is weird that all the same people who happily make threads about how coomer games are evil and are corrupting people see this study as a win
is this an example of the the famed "left vs right" mutt mentality I've heard about?
Of anyone here thinks this study will mean anything then they just don't know how reality works
I don't want coomer shit in my game
I want to play not coom
>all the "e-girl is pedo!" homosexuals seething ITT
is this boner because of cathersis? or schadenfreude?
stop fapping to children homosexual Black person pedo
i'll keep fapping to drawings. seethe harder
>IT'S JUST A DRAWIN MAAANE
some people.....
Aren't conservatives strictly soccer moms and all about god and shit? That was the depiction in the 90s. When did the rhetoric become that the libs are the ones censoring everything.
look up the horseshoe effect
What people are actually talking about when they talk about "horseshoe theory" are leftist elements (that is to say, a belief in violent interference in the market, and the policies that are needed to enforce that control; the right is the opposite of the left) in the conservative movement. There are actually some topics where the conservatives are further left than the neoliberals, like drugs and porn.
An extreme far right objectivist isn't going to behave anything like an extreme far left communist.
>here are actually some topics where the conservatives are further left than the neoliberals, like drugs and porn
What? Feel free to elaborate on that anon
The conservatives believe in violent interference in peaceful commerce when it comes to drugs and porn.
drugs and porn are a net negative on society
Deeming your behavior harmful to society is how the left always justifies violent interference in commerce.
You buy cocaine.
You go back to your apartment.
You take the cocaine.
Nobody gets hurt, except maybe you if you overdo it, but that's a massive rabbit hole that can hit almost anything.
Peaceful.
Look at things objectively instead from the box of modern western politics. Most of the violence around drugs is created by the black market environment that conservatives have created.
Tax subsidies are what sustains neo-Marxism. Make students pay for college out of pocket and the gender studies majors will dry up.
>Tax subsidies are what sustains neo-Marxism. Make students pay for college out of pocket and the gender studies majors will dry up.
Ah yeah, college degrees. Famous for being free and affordable
>Most of the violence around drugs is created by the black market environment that conservatives have created.
yeah and its certainly not because crackheads are violent addicted psychopaths looking to get their next hit, all else be damned. or, y'know, Black folk
If they cross the line into violence, that's when you get to use your second amendment rights. Should we ban parties because lots of rapes happen there?
Again, very leftist mindset. You're just too trapped in your box to see how it's the same line of reasoning as banning guns because that means that some bad actors will have them.
>You're just too trapped in your box to see how it's the same line of reasoning as banning guns because that means that some bad actors will have them.
guns are tools. How they're used is is on the people who use them. compare that to drugs that fundamentally change the people themselves. And that's not even getting into the health issues. And this is also why you dont get medical narcotics over the counter without proper presciptions and whatnot
but we both know you're arguing in bad faith to get an epic win or whatever
Remind me again how many crimes are committed due to drug abuse again. Even people hooked on painkillers which are legal commit crime to feed their addiction.
truly and improvement to society
>Even people hooked on painkillers which are legal commit crime to feed their addiction.
Actually no. There are some, of course, but the vast majority of crimes committed to support an addiction are for addictions to a small number of narcotics and legal painkillers ain't one of them. Nobody really goes out and commits massive amounts of crime to support addictions to prescription meds, pot, alcohol, even stuff like cocaine. It's all the very heavy stuff like heroin and fentanyl that is driving crimes to support addiction. To borrow a phrase, 15% of drugs are responsible for 90% of the drug crime.
>drugs
>peaceful commerce
.....what.
Drugs is the cause of many issues here in the US, lgbtq+ porn should outright be banned like pedo porn.
Violently preventing people from doing drugs and consuming porn is not a leftist position. You don't make any sense.
Sure it is. Individuals so thoroughly consumed by their addiction that they are a detriment to the whole of society, as well as profiteers who seek to exploit them with no regard of the expense to the People, must be brought to heel by any means.
See you're not sounding very left there
>peaceful commerce
>drugs and porn
why is it that when someone tries to discredit the horseshoe theory they say the most mind numbingly stupid shit
Around the time they booted enough bible-thumpers out of office to take power, and as soon as the cheering died down started telling the crowd what the new list of banned words and ideas was going to be. It doesn't matter which side has the wheel, the instant you try to dial to the wrong radio station they're going to scream at you to get out of "their" car that you paid for.
>Around the time they booted enough bible-thumpers out of office to take power
How are you this detached from reality? Bible-thumpers still hold all the reins of power
>finally we can have coomer shit in vydia again
>HUH TOLD YAH e-girlS ARE JUST DRAWINGS
The fact that a research is required to establish something so obvious makes me lose whatever faith i have in this stupid race i belong to.
They actually turn my mood for better.
Women are rapidly becoming lesbians for some reason. That’s why they don’t give a shit what men are focused on anymore.
Well fricking duh, feminists just hated on it because men liked it.
homosexuals talk about "coomers" but when you think about it a coomer would be someone with no standards. Anons jacking it to cute anime girls have standards since they aren't busting a nut to fuglies. It's the western AAA gays projecting their actions onto us since they jack it to man-faced and man-bodied "women."
The real coomers are degenerates that love things that are ugly not things that are c**te.
I don't know what happened in the last 20 years, but we used to just like game girls because they look cute.
Man being attracted to sexy women wasn't offensive, it was the normal.
And girls had their husbandos too.
Now is just sexy muscle men not wearing shirts.
Because they hate men being happy. It's not complex. They hate us and want us to be miserable. If we can find happiness in the fictional world then they can't control our happiness and make us miserable because they wouldn't want to frick people like us.
They want control over our lives and girls like pic-related take that ability away from them because who cares about some used up hole if you can look at a cute girl instead.
play more games instead of reading about them on Ganker, coomable women aren't gone even in western games
>coomable women aren't gone even in western games
Why do you lie? What do you gain from lying on a mongolian throat singing forum?
off the top of my head i can point out to Io from paladins and cp77 had some cute hotties like panam. Fortnite has plenty of cooomer skins as well, but the game isn't particularly good.
some of the best dicky came from western games like hat in time and tlou
you just need to know where to look.
> “At least with fictional media, the evidence often reveals that we’re probably scapegoating media and fiction rarely causes social problems. Again, to be fair, advocating for better representation of females in games can be a worthy cause even if the games don’t cause harmful effects. I support those efforts, just hope advocates don’t misrepresent the evidence as a part of their efforts (which, unfortunately, is all too common among advocacy groups).”
I wonder if slowtaku will repost this, and if they will try to give it a new spin.
I have seen some blender animations with those characters, meaning those character at their supposed highest sexyness, but they feel rather disposable to me, like they are not meant to have an identity on their own, they look like a vague idea of a person so that is easier to digest, I don't hate them just don't find them arousing.
>coomable women aren't gone even in western games
lol
in related news, Sky is blue, Water Wets and we all will die
Sexualized video game characters. If a videogame was sexualized itself, i'd want to stick it right into its CD-holepussy
the full article hasn't even been published yet
The vast majority of people aren't screaming about shit on twitter about sexualized vidya. People think morons screaming are a sample of anything besides morons screaming on twitter.
to victory
Anita-bros, Zoe-bros... First abortion ban, now this? How? Why?
Spread the word, homosexuals. Spread the fricking word, and get people to read this shite. Its time to bring the paradigm shift hard, just as the red wave is coming, and I don't mean to make this a political post but just saying, so will society's attitude change towards content. I'm hoping its for the better and it likely will, since evangelical right, while they were shitty Black folk, were nothing compared to the fricks we have now. Dunno what to call them but they deserve a name to be remembered for the ruination they brought toward society.
Anon. You know facts mean nothing to someone arguing from an emotional standpoint right?
because facts matter on Ganker amirite?
It'll piss them off. That's enough for me.
Not gonna happen, feminist gonna debunk it soon
>feminist gonna debunk it soon
I'd love to see them try. Besides, they've got FAR bigger things to worry about now.
>Women told their actions have consequences
>Women shit their pants in fury over being told this
What the hell is wrong with them? Just have some accountability and awareness, it's not hard.
The people with the strongest opinions against abortion tend to be women. Roe herself was outright emotionally haunted by her decision to be the plaintiff in that case. Most women aren't offended by boobs, either.
You shouldn't use "woman" and "feminist" interchangeably. That's an important step towards defeating the feminists. You have more allies and potential allies than you realize.
Your guess is as good as mine. At first, I thought they were genuinely concerned over loosing rights, but after seeing news footage of incensed women throwing hissy fits, it's clear all they care about is sex.
I dunno why right wing amerimutts are so happy about abortion getting banned, most abortions are done by nonwhites. You are only shitting up the country with far more Black folk this way.
Abortion should be legal and should be mandatory for all nonwhites.
This isn't going to change anything. People will still make the games they want to make and design characters however they want.
This was always common sense but troons and sjws seethe at good looking characters because they'll never attain those looks while healthy people see hot characters and want to aspire to become like them
a) thats common sense
b) these same 'journalists' were insulting you for years for thinking this way
c) they still hate you - they just need your money
d) >not archiving it
frick journalists. just because it now gets more clicks to say what ive been saying for decades doesnt mean we're cool.
journos swing from trees like politicians on the day of the rope.
Based journalists milking gullible morons on Ganker for rage clicks.
>clicking on the link
never ever homosexual
not unless its an archive, like I said in the post
moron
Just because you didn't click it doesn't mean everyone else in the thread did the same Black person.
everyone else in the thread isnt angry at the article fricking moron. most people are forgetting that journos are cints and only see "this agrees with me... must be BASED".
you sure are frickin dumb.
>journos swing from trees like politicians on the day of the rope.
do you hate news so much? Noticed that you did not identify a specific newspaper or person, you said journalists in general (implied), you rather rely solely on Government announcements and advertising? And then never hear anything about anything else?
>you rather rely solely on Government announcements and advertising
why is that the conclusion you come to?
How do you find the news otherwise? You would have to follow every single, government website of every nation, follow every science journal
>How do you find the news otherwise?
Liveleak et al.
Going out and seeing what's happening in the community.
>You would have to follow every single, government website of every nation, follow every science journal
You say that as if the new sources (that you seem to think are legitimate) do that as well.
lol
be more naive.
Well that's why you check for sources, you it makes you smart not relying on anyone? People make mistakes, everyone will always have some bias, is not so cut and dry, I like the Guardian ever since their coverage of the Snowden leaks, but I find a lot of their opinion pieces awful recycled stuff from other news.
Routers, and Bloomberg can have some interesting stuff regarding economics.
Also, Liveleak doesn't exist anymore, guess you should have kept up with the news oh oh oh.
doesn't exist anymore
>he doesn't know
laughinggirls.png
Modern Journalism is just another arm of the ruling Liberal elite wtf are you talking about.
There are no good journos
Sexualization isn’t the problem here. If I can drop my character’s armor and stare at her feet, then I’m already good. The problem is ugly white women who shove their ugly white mugs in my games. Stupid c**ts can’t handle attractive women, they need them to be ugly like themselves.
>The problem is ugly white women who shove their ugly white mugs in my games. Stupid c**ts can’t handle attractive women, they need them to be ugly like themselves.
They literally face scan professional models and all you do is b***h and moan about character being made "deliberately ugly". The problem, anon, is you. You're completely disconnected from reality.
>They literally face scan professional models
you left out the part where they change the result of the scan to be ugly.
be more disingenuous bro.
it's called uncanny valley. Did zemeckis teach you nothing?
>you left out the part where they change the result of the scan to be ugly
They don't do that. What you mean is they don't modify the scan to be some utterly unreal fantasy character. Perfect example is Yennefer from The Witcher 3. They face scanned a model. Perfect recreation of her face. What was the result? Incels whining she was "too ugly". CDPR actually had to "fix" a supermodels face because it didn't meet the incel standard. Like I said, you people are completely and utterly disconnected from reality.
>They don't do tha
its almost like escapism doesnt need face scan technology fricking it up. it i want to see imperfection, Ill go for a walk.
you're frickin stupid bro.
Sorry, incel, you're a small portion of the market. Your insane impossible standards are not worth pandering to.
>gaslighting this hard
try harder troony
>gaslighting
Dude, if you incels counted for shit then it would all the Jap coomer pedobait crap making the list for highest selling games. It's not. It's the "woke troony western shit" you guys think everyone hates. Everyone doesn't hate it. Just you incels do. You incels are a very small portion of the market. That's why nobody cares to pander to you. There's no money in it.
its gacha that makes money. gacha with sexy anime b***hes.
you live in some demented reality where trannies who enjoy seeing ugly things make up more than 0.01% of the population of the earth, and where western shit is enjoyed.
Cope, 0,1% plays your gacha shit lmao
>roblox is a western movie game with ugly, photorealistic females in it
>nothing unrealistic in ROBLOX
you aren't helping your position.
Roblox itself is not a game, it's a platform for thousands upon thousands of user generated games. Roblox is the website/store that hosts them and allows for item trading and such. Genshit is a singular gacha game from China. I'm not sure what would elicit this comparison. It'd make more sense to compare Roblox to a site like Neopets or something.
Probably better to compare it to the source engine (and steam).
But you're right.
Genshin isn't a game as well
genshin impact made 3 billion in a year.
And isn't it amazing that these games that aren't topping the charts are talked about as if they outsell every single big AAA title and is a severe issue the industry needs to fix? Don't you find that strange? Going by how journos act you'd think Senran Kagura was outselling FIFA, COD and GTA combined instead of tens of thousands of copies.
Sexy anime girl gacha rapes console games in revenue. PS brand is dying in Japan too.
>sex doesn't sell, incel
>millenia of activity to the contrary doesn't exist
join reality.
sure.
great job. on the male.
clearly they edit the females scan to be ugly.
They either find someone ugly or they purposely make them look ugly.
They always edit the female face scans to become ugly, stop lying so much
>adults playing games with big booba characters is bad and dangerous!
>kids watching nude men in gimp masks, and dragqueens flashing their asses on pride parades is good and healthy you nazi! now shove a $10 into the panties of that twerking 12 year old draqqueen or else!
All lefties are pedos.
I hate women and hope every one of them dies painfully. None of them are innocent.
It does "cause harm" in a way, but not due to sexism.
Women simply dislike anything that gives men sexual relief because it makes them less desperate for their attention.
>sexualized characters not causing harm
>every male mc ever has a flat board ass
Well you have to buy it. If you buy it and get mad you're literally moronic.
I don't think this will change anyone's minds.
I just don't want people to keep trying to take away the things I enjoy. Hate it all you want, but I like it and I still want to look forward to more in the future. And I hope that people stop with the all or nothing hyperbole. I can enjoy games with pretty anime girls like Devil Survivor 1/2 or Etrian Odyssey, and I can enjoy games with none at all like Subnautica or Spybotics, but I want to have the choice to enjoy both types.
>coomers won
whats more important is that SJWs lost
it makes my happy that have my divk in my hand ready to bust and there's absolutely nothing a femoid can do about it
>nooo I'm american and I can't play games with cute male and female characters like some kinda queer homosexual, I have to play MANLY DEATH HETEROSEXUAL WARFARE and SPORTSBALL 2023
So, uh, can we now have decent looking characters in western games once again?
No, because all these homosexuals do is double down
stop buyin burger shit. make them go broke so they stop having money to waste on propaganda. they need to require to sell shit in order to exist again.
i think the message should include "and buy shit with sexy b***hes too". its one think to starve out ugly games, ,but the good shit needs to flourish.
yeah.that too.
>https://www.psypost.org/2022/06/sexualized-video-games-are-not-causing-harm-to-male-or-female-players-according-to-new-research-63388
>preprint
Hmm nah
Women expressing their sexuality =/= women being sexually objectified
One is a problem, one is not
Exactly, some bawd fricking everything that moves is damaging to society as a whole, a man or woman making a cute fictional girl with a nice body is perfectly fine.
Frick off you feminist c**t. You deserve to have your head bashed open
Being okay with meeting the opposite sex's standards for what's attractive + expecting them to meet your standards in return != objectification.
Taking a hedonistic approach to sex and romance by expecting the opposite sex to be attractive to you AND allow you to dictate what they find attractive sure is, though.
As always, the left accuses its targets (who may or may not be guilty; usually not) of doing what its doing.
>real women being objectified for money is less harmful than CG breasts bouncing on a screen
Pretty much.
I don't get it either.
You need to think like a Marxist. Strike negotiation and thinking of the other party as a human being with his own desires, problems, hobbies, relationships, and goals from your mind.
Men are the ones placing conditions on women in relationships (in return for meeting their conditions, but nevermind that; subhuman, remember?), which makes them the oppressor class, and the vehicle through which they oppress women is male sexuality. A CG character doesn't even involve a real woman receiving validation. In their egocentric world view, it's a pure expression of oppression, as opposed to the 50/50 split of liberation and oppression that is a woman sexualizing herself before men.
>Act like a moronic prostitute
>Others see you as a moronic prostitute
>Well this is clearly the fault of everybody and everything but me
Imagine living your entire life, constantly seething about someone you have never met and will never meet disagreeing with you.
Just imagine having [group] stay in your mind rent free, such that you will say, do and believe anything to spite them.
But this is the internet, so we don't have to imagine that.
I know right, imagine losing your mind over a video game simply existing. Talk about pathetic
>seething about someone you have never met and will never meet disagreeing with you
the problem is that this person makes it petsonal when they go after your job etc. because you have the wrong opinion.
they then use this tactic to push for laws that absolutely do affect you.
look at the rioting because of the abortion shit.
literal terrorism (the threat or use of violence as a means to political ends).
its naive to think that we're still in the age of "lets just agree to disagree". Social media killed that horse.
What they mean to say is that because media id absolutely full of porn anyway, video games aren't really any different. Reminder: Modern society at large is incredibly addicted to pornography/sexually gratifying content.
But that doesn't make it a good thing. It's why relationships and families are falling apart. Evil always disguises itself as something good.
Also: You're an idiot for posting this political commentary on Ganker. You are the cancer.
imagine thinking the people pushing desexualization care about research
you think trannies will stop being trannies or pushing for troony rights if research discovered it is indeed a mental illness that should be treated?
No fricking shit.
>Violent games don't make people violent!
>B-But boobies will turn them into rapists that hate women!
reminder there were a lot of people who unironically thought like that.
>not posting the webm
>B-But boobies will turn them into rapists that hate women!
In reality porn has made men uninterested in women if not afraid of them.
every time I think I want a girlfriend... I also think that she will require me to jerk off less but she wont give sex me as much in exchange.
is it worth?
Getting a girlfriend for the coom is simply not worth it. You get all the bullshit that comes with her, and sex with women versus masturbation is more of a sidegrade than anything.
like the other anon said, real women are almost a sidegrade.
Blowjobs are great and hard sex can be awesome if it's done raw and she's significantly hot.
Otherwise, there will be situations where you just want to jerk off still.
My girlfriend doesn't really care since she doesn't see masturbation or porn as cheating.
I coom every night, with or without her. She only needs to coom once every 2 nights usually unless it's a special occasion.
Frick off normalgay.
It depends, a friend of mine just got out of a really shitty relationship that was pushing him to depression since the b***h was a coniving little rat that didn't respect him. So it's not just less jacking it for an exchange for sex, it's also taking the gamble on the girl being somewhat mentally stable(let's be honest, mental stability isn't common in women, the best you can hope for is somewhat stable otherwise your better off looking for a unicorn because a 100% mentally stable woman doesn't exist).
It depends on if you want that risk, also according to him sex isn't all it's cracked up to be. The people making sex seem like it's some amazing god like thing that you can't live without are either virgins trying to get gbp from a woman in hopes of losing it or only just recently lost their virginity and think it's the best thing ever before reality sets in that it's no big deal.
Just set up a room where you can have some privacy. The bigger problem is that you're walking the path of being at the mercy of her and the family court system.
i guess. I've been into the bullshit they come with. why found I sane coomer woman is so hard. I'm not even asking for a very high standard of beauty. let me coom and hug. I just don't want to become a normie.
>let me coom and hug. I just don't want to become a normie.
too late for that.
I'm not saying don't try at all just so you know Anon. It's more don't make it your identity. Make sure you're happy with your life first and foremost so if you do find a bad one you won't feel bad or weird for walking away. If you aren't happy with your life you may feel dependent on your happiness being the relationship which can lead to those unhealthy aspects coming to bite you.
Try if you want but know it's not the end of the world if you fail and that it's ok to walk away if things aren't working out with her because that's just unneeded stress on your part.
Try but look after yourself first.
jist look aheaf.
remember you'll need to invest time before you have kids (if thats your thing).
no need to rush into gf stuff, but necessarily part of planning for future.
depends on the person
jerking off and having sex are two different pleasures
had gfs that wanted to frick multiple times a day every day, and gfs who had enough with 2 or 3 times a week
had gfs who didn't jerk off themselves, had some who did, I even had one that wanted to watch me every time I wanted to jerk off, and another who just wanted to be in control of that and did it herself whenever I wanted
every person is different, just be sure to communicate verbally and try to understand the other person's point of view before reacting
After lgbtq+ lose their rights, Larry Fink is next.
Nice. Time to log on to f95.
of course coomers won
there is nothing wrong with watching porn all day long and listening to porn asmr while you sleep
the only issue is we're not allowed to do it in public, like it's some kinda secret everybody knows but doesn't acknowledge
My pp hurts if I fap too much. I need let my pp rest. at least i can control my porn intake.
Hmm, kind of like this.
The people who think they know best for you never do. Booth babes suffered the same fate simply so journalists wouldn't be embarrassed at trade shows by women earning a decent living.
Even funnier is that those same journalists all openly support sex work.
>Even funnier is that those same journalists all openly support sex work.
see
Women expressing their sexuality in real life is not the same thing as being sexually objectified.
Reminder that the people trying to shame you for liking sexy women look like this 100% of the time.
Meanwhile, actual women are too busy on OF, dressing up as sexy video game characters like 2B or Samus and love sexy girls in games.
>no harm to male or female players
>Blackrock money dries up
>ACKSHUALLY GUYS SECUALOZATION IS NOT AS BAD AS WE THOUGHT
heh
Why do people get so bothered by others touching themselves anyway? Guy has a fricking stroke if he imagines his son is jerking off like he's turning into a monster.
because is a Sin. but coomers don't give a frick about shit that's not real.
Being a homosexual is also a sin. Anti-coom don't seem to care much about that though.
nah.. they are still seething that 2 people can consent to love each other even they are the same sex. people just don't give a frick about many of their bullshit.
>500 posts thread about seething that people can look at sexy (depiction of) people
Fantastic
WTF I love the science now?!