They fricked with us. Now we frick WITH THEM.
TO OVERWHELMINGLYNEGATIVE WE RIDE, BROTHERS IN ARMS!
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Creative Assembly's time is UP
They fricked with us. Now we frick WITH THEM.
TO OVERWHELMINGLYNEGATIVE WE RIDE, BROTHERS IN ARMS!
|
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
So what did they do?
hyenas
JOIN THE PACK
>JOIN THE ACK
Double down on shitty DLC. With reused assets.
So the same shit they have always done in the past 10 years?
Go check the DLC prices for Warhammer 1. Still the same as on release. Pretty sure their fricking Shogun 2 DLC is still the same too.
Creative Assembly just does that.
If you don't like it, then stop playing their games, simple as.
Except what you pay for in the WH1 and WH2 DLCs is far less money for far more content.
They keep getting away with it because of soulless cattle like you
people who talk like that have long since stopped buying that shit
at some point, the blame is on the braindead customers, since "just stop buying it lmao" is a legitimate tactic
you could, of course, muster up the energy to b***h and moan about gamefreak or paradox or CA, but sometimes words are not enough
Charged $25 for a DLC with less content than a previous $10 DLC and when people complained they wrote a passive aggressive post blaming inflation and saying if nobody buys this they’re going to stop making TW:W3 DLC
>We won't make shitty games anymore
Is this a promise?
damn if only i could not-buy DLC several times i've never wanted to not-buy a DLC more than now
Is this why they made Hyenas?
No, Hyenas is why theyre doing this, devs have been pulled out of WH and likely put to work there aswell, CA is basically setting themself on fire and betting their existance on a hero shooter, a game type CA is not proficient in AND is known for failing hilariously.
no lizardmen
>Increase price of a new lord pack to $25
>Threaten their customers saying if they don't buy this, they will cancel all future development for Warhammer 3
>cancel all future development for Warhammer 3
Please do this so we can have old Total War back and not the fantasy chink slop
There's no way they can make good games anymore. They've gone way too long churning out garbage.
Raised dlc prices by 150% in one clumsy manouver, then threatened the players support would stop if they didn't buy it.
Sega have been killing themselves for a good a while as other Japanese game companies have surpassed them. Don't be surprised if Microsoft acquires them for a discount soon as they were on Microsofts Acquisitions Leak.
>Microsofts Acquisitions Leak
Oh cool, historical accuracy will never be a thing again if Microsoft gets CA and they make Medieval 3:
>TW now have simplified UI
>LGBT
>Will have female warriors along with male warriors
>Black Knights
All in the English faction
Microshit buying Sega would legitimately be a net boon for Sega.
Phil would save Phantasy Star and Jet Set Radio
Anon sega is merged with sammy
sega+sammy is worth 4.7 billion. microsoft paid 68.7 billion for activision.
Sega has been dying a slow death since the 90s, so I'm not surprised.
They would have been in the grave after cancelling Dreamcast if they didn't get bailed out and get their debt loans pardoned.
Created without exaggeration the greatest strategy game ever made.
Announced a DLC pack and now poorgays seethe.
For real, going to the movies is more than $25, the YouTubers are the worst crybabies. Especially that spit full little Aussie Legend of Total War
unironically have a nice day you shameless corporate wienersleeves, braindead wienermonglers like you are the reason why this industry is in such dire state
>raise the price of your lastest DLC to be more than half that of the actual game
>said DLC has much less content than the previous one which was a race pack and wasn't as expensive either
>people complain
>CA says that if they don't buy the DLC they'll stop working on TWH3 (even tho they barely patch the game to begin with)
>dlc packs are now twice as expensive as originally
>still have the same content
>old bugs never get fixed
>instead SEGA now make them work on their billion dollar fortnite clone Hyenas
It was all downhill from Empire tbh.
napoleon, shogun 2, and fall of the samurai were all really good games. napoleon still has the best multiplayer of all the total war games to date. it is the only one where i actually stuck around because it was really good
One day, they decided to up the price of DLCs by 150% while delivering less overall content compared to previous ones. The community collectively went "wft?" so hard a high executive of CA did the unthinkable and actually released a letter to the community personally. Problem is said letter basically said "We need to price gouge you so the money can go into Hyenas, so buy it or we'll cancel our promised future support like we did with Three Kingdoms", and that's when the reviewbombing began.
gave volound the win
only snowflake chuds like high fantasy so it's no surprise that they got their fee fees hurt.
Same thing happened at release.
It will be positive in few weeks again.
Oh right, NOW you're gonna get mad
They've been selling blood as dlc for years but NOW it's too far
give me a fricking break, chump, you twits let them get to this point and now that they keep doing the same thing they always do, you get mad?
the only dlc ill buy. paradox games can suck my penis
>paradox games
TW isn't made by Paradox
sorry, city skylines devs
Blood as DLC is not a bad thing. That's actually a moronic fricking stance to take.
Your existence is a moronic fricking stance to take
have a nice day you stupid moron.
Blood dlc was always controversial, but it's so unnecessary normal people don't buy and don't care. This is content locked behind a clearly unfair paywall and people won't buy it.
>goys have been satisfied getting assfricked for years so they won’t mind a 150% price increase
The blood dlc was probably exactly what was on their mind as they were formulating if they could get away with this blatant israeliteery
$25 is nothing though…
Lemming
Nothing will change. This isn't even their first time fricking up with a total war game. Just like with the launch of Total War: Rome II, people will move on and forget.
Rome II is why they're making fantasy games now, because they pissed off fans of the historical games and had to find new customers somewhere else.
>people will forget
we who were around before and when it came out constantly remind people. the newbies just dont listen because they dont like what we have to say. you could tell a warhammer fan that they are buying warhammer brand drinkable bleach, and they would chug the bottle regardless of any warnings you try to give them.
i thought everyone was using cream api......
I would never want to make a game for PC-exclusive genres because you frickers are truly unbearable and entitled.
Yes good goyim, addons that add 2% more content to the game are definitely worth 40% of the price of the base game
Count the days until gaben deletes them again.
Well, get buyin', or do you guys think modeling a drag queen i exquisite detail is free?
holy lmao
I had to go and check the trailer stats, 1.8k+ to 18k-.
What a fricking joke.
i fricking hate all the fantasy shit, so it is satisfying to see goyslophammer fail. i vehemently hate the soulless bugmen known as the warhammer fanbase.
Is the game even good or should I stick with WH2?
The game is good, but IE still has a lot of bugs. You can fix a lot of them with the community bugfix mod.
Uhm, reviewbombing has become such a common practice that nobody really gives a shit anymore.
All they've accomplished is that people stop looking at user score altogether as its lost its purpose as a metric when every other game gets reviewbombed these days.
Ultimately, you're only hurting yourselves in the long run by throwing your endless autistic tantrums.
Wrong.
Right
They should be, it's brain-dead easy.
It's not just the reviewbomb
The DLC's performing like shit
For comparison, the chorf DLC stayed high on the steam best sellers throughout the entire pre-order period.
Stay mad. Objectively speaking the blood DLC is not really a bad practice even if you disagree. It's completely superfluous.
I clocked 2 thousand hours into this game before a friend bought me the blood DLC since it was one of the few I didn't have. There's barely a difference with or without.
There's always good info in the negative comments during a reviewbomb, unless it's some inane chinkshit. Usually it's also a "straw that broke the camel's back" situation where all the pent up frustrations are brought forward. It's not just loads of angry "I HATE THIS" posts or something. This has been my experience with reviewbombs at least.
It's not reviewbombing if there's a legit complaint behind it. Raising DLC prices 150% overnight is fricking bullshit.
cope
>nobody really gives a shit anymore
you couldn't be more wrong about that bucko
sorry your scam practices FINALY backfired on your scummy ass
gonna be fun trying to explain to your board of director's why your game is getting trashed in reviews in tomorow's meeting
You know, now that you say this I recently noticed basically ever game with 10k+ reviews has the little * beside it showing the review bomb was purged.
I don't agree with your conclusion however, as there is no way to communicate with these large corporations practically, so people turn to reviews as a method since its one of the few things they will actually look at.
corporate bootlicking israelite.
People tend to check reviews before they buy a game and these reviews that have recently been posted share critical information as to why not to buy the game. This is bad for sega since they will lose those sales from potential buyers now. They give a shit
True, but when people become aware of the fact that the user review section has been reduced to nothing but angry morons brapping out their downvotes in droves because [recent thing that makes me le angry], they'll stop checking them, and instead have to turn to journos and paid shills on youtube as their only source of information on the game itself.
Except every single review either just says it's the DLC price or if they go into detail even praises the game itself but says the DLC price lead to the bad review
So you're expecting people to manually sort through thousands of shitposts in review format to get some actual information on the game, and repeat that process for every game they're interested in buying?
That seems downright delusional, and is never going to happen. People will simply turn away from User Scores, as they've just became a pain in the ass to deal with.
I don't need to make up a logical justification
People are already not buying it
They had to beg for people to buy it and they still don't.
I am right, it's something you can check for yourself.
You're right, I'm not buying it, and I never intended to buy it when I saw that $24,99 price tag.
But I made that decision because I have a functioning brain, not because some angry aspies screeched at me not to buy it.
Most people new to the game would not even realize about the drama going on without reviews.
Seeing a game in mostly negative is an instant warning to check what's going on.
If you think steam reviews don't affect sales just because they don't affect (you), someone who spends time debating videogames on an internet forum (so a very passionate minority), you are stupid and not looking at the average buyer's perspective on these things.
I could just buy the game, skip the drama and the most recent DLC, and get hundreds, possibly thousands of hours worth of fun out of it, as it's still a solid game. How is the negative user rating justifiable in any way when it boils down to people getting angry about a completely optional piece of DLC?
Be less obvious.
If negative reviews didn't work steam wouldn't *
Except when you open the reviews you see the complaints are legitimate.
Paid content like nakai has not been working properly for over a month now.
Most of the content is locked by DLCs that increase in price with every new release.
The AI has not been improved for the last year even though it still sucks.
There is a reason they had to release a a statement begging for people to buy. It's affecting them, and they are losing this exchange. A wh dlc hasn't performed this badly since wh1
>review section has been reduced to nothing but angry morons
This is concise and accurate. Why cope?
Because hes a shill or actual CA employee.
No normal person would be astroturfing like that.
>reviewbombing has become such a common practice that nobody really gives a shit anymore.
Your panic damage control says otherwise.
"Reviewbombing" doesn't exist.
People voice their opinions and troons and shills such as yourself disagree with them.
>All they've accomplished is that people stop looking at user score
Lmao you are a delusional Black person, if I see a game having less than overwhelmingly positive I won't even bother because its either trash or the company behind it its fricking the fanbase extremely hard, steam reviews are the best indicator to the average user that's why these Black folk get so mad at bad reviews because it hurts them, and its the only thing they can't censor beyond asking Valve to disable the reviews momentarily
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
have a nice day.
based AND true
>Uhm
are you a narc
what lords/factions were added in the new DLC? why did they jack the price on this one in particular?
Changeling for Tzeentch
Some baba yaga b***h for Kislev
Some pencil pusher dragon with a big sword for the bugs.
Kislev gets monsters and wild men but no lord to support them.
Oh and the bugs are also getting harpies (Chineseum)
>games get worse and worse over time
>nobody cares because fanbase gets completely replaced with warhammergays that don’t know any better
>fans only now get mad because their loregay dlc got price hiked
Years of mediocrity and now we won’t even get a Medieval 3. I curse all warhammergays with eternal suffering.
How is it warhammergays fault?
the soulless warhammer fanbase would buy 30 year old crusted dog shit if it had a piece of toilet paper with "warhammer" on it. they ruined total war for us history fans who kept the series running for most of its lifespan. they ruined what we enjoy, so we will remind people of the blight that is this cancerous fantasy fanbase that encourages companies like CA to do this shit. these communities also cemented the downfall of games like magic the gathering. look at how much crossover shit is being shoved due to their endless indulgence.
lmao nerd get your sensitive ass back to Ganker we cast magic up in this b***h
your kind already started shitting up /vst/ a while back. you see something we enjoy, and like women, you decide to infiltrate it to ruin our fun.
>copium
you are delusional if you think CA was going to suddenly start making good historical TW's again if warhammer didn't exist. also funny hearing you gays complain when you're getting a new historical TW in 2 months
And Pharaoh will be shit just like Troy and Thrones of Britannia
Without the fantasy games, CA either starts making decent games again or they go bankrupt. The entire reason they went all in on fantasy, including turning "historical" games into fantasy ones, is because fantasy gays proved to CA that they have a much higher tolerance for gobbling up shit.
Total War Warhammer is a mechanically superior game to both Shogun 2 or Med 2
You fundamentally do not comprehend that which you are critiquing
maybe if you're a soulless bug man who thinks numbers increasing with no limit = good gameplay
Again, you do not comprehend what you're critiquing.
Stay mad.
giving units warcraft 3 skills does not make the game better. Some units being able to fly doesn't make the game better since they're too frail to do anything but harass archers 90% of the time. Giving hero or monster units far more attack or armor than the other units does not make the game better. Your hero characters being able to level up so they become broken in comparison to the other units in the game does not make the game better.
Fantasy total war is worse than the historical games they were making fifteen years ago.
Not an argument against gameplay or mechanics. Keep trying though. Maybe go ask your cuck leader Volound for better arguments.
>n-n-no you are. your just like this eceleb no one has heard of!
>I-I'm n-not a voloundgay r-really
>the fact I'm r-repeating his moronic talking points means nothing!
Even just the fact that you dismissed the tactical impact of being able to basically break formations through fliers that harass archers and artillery means you're a blind shitposter.
But here's the kicker. Even if you take out the fliers, heroes and magic, the Warhammer games are STILL better than Med2 or Shogun2 or anything else. Just the controls and UI improvements between the games would put them above.You could at the very least point to very real issues WH3 specifically has such as poor pathfinding in corners or line of sight issues.
But no, you rather focus on homosexual non issues like "hurrr durr why to crossbows curve, never mind ignoring the fact that realism here is not what was being aimed for and criticisms such as this are basically pointless pedantic frickery by a homosexual buttmad Shogun 2 is an inferior game (even amongst the old TW games it's the worst, compared to Med2 or Empire)
Medieval 2 is a better game than Total Warhammer 3. Obviously some shogun 2 players have been bullying you pretty hard but I don't care about asiatic shit so I'm not one of them
No it isn't. Have you even played Med2 recently? The battles handle like ass. The only advantage is cavalry movement, that's it.
completely disagree, and i dont need to go any further because you dont know enough about the previous games for any of my explanations to make sense
>completely disagree
So again, you simply do not understand these games.
>b-but muh realism, but projectiles have a curve
Irrelevant. Realism does not necessarily inform good gameplay and good mechanics. This is what histsissies and cucklound fail to comprehend.
>the soulless warhammer fanbase would buy 30 year old crusted dog shit if it had a piece of toilet paper with "warhammer" on it.
How's age of smegmar? Oh right.
Because warhammergays never demanded any better. They knew they could milk you homosexuals forever but I guess that backfired kek.
they were getting worse before long before warhmmer, moron
>HOW DARE THEY CHARGE $5 EXTRA FOR A DLC? WORST GAME EVER!
I get that it's a shitty practice, but pretending the game just magically turned to a steaming pile of shit because of that seems a bit overblown and childish, especially when you could simply decide to not buy the DLC and carry on.
>5 extra
We're past that argument. That was the discussion for the chorfs. And the issue was never just the fact it was five dollars extra, it was that they also had one less legendary lord than the vampire coast and the tomb kings. At the time I personally had no issue because the dlc is excellent otherwise, but in retrospect the fact the chorfs did so well is what likely convinced them it was okay to do this shit now.
As for the present situation, they're charging you the same fricking price as the chorfs for 3 lords, a hero, 12 units (4 for each faction) and 9 ror
It's a fricking shit price.
And on top of all that. The game barely gets any support or bugfixing despite the price hikes.
>Just shut up and don't buy it
Consoomer psyop, this "maybe this product isn't for you this time" is a distraction technique used by corporations to try and disregard actual critisim.
Like when WOTC sold $1000 proxy magic cards for their 30th anniversary, this was the exact defense they used.
I can decide not to buy the dlc and leave a negative review as well, as it takes no effort either.
>increase the price of a DLC by $15 (150% increase)
>put less content in it than the $10 DLC
>when people complain tell them if
nobody buys it they’re just going to stop supporting the game like they did for Three Kingdoms
You have to be utterly mindbroken to support Creative Assembly. I’m kind of shocked after burning basically every bridge with their historical crowd they’re now trying to israelite the warhammergays keeping them afloat. Everyone with a modicum of intelligence at CA probably left sometime around Medieval 2
how bouts i just leave a negative review and gift you a Jester, gay
NOOOOOOOO
I used to play the shit out of Rome and Medieval 2. Tried to play Three Kingdoms when it was on gamepass and didn't like it. Tried again with Total Warhammer 3 and again it was trash too.
When did the games become so soulless? The generals don't even make speeches before fights anymore
the last one i think has soul is shogun 2 + fall of the samurai. they started with the shitty overhaul of several things in rome 2, and its only gotten worse from there.
I don't understand why the factions all have annoying gimmicks now too either. What's fun about having the same amount of ying buildings and yang buildings? It just.
Why can't the available units and buildings just be different between factions without being railroaded into playing a certain way
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING???
Peter Moore once told Yuji Naka to frick off. Now Yuji Naka is in prison.
Indeed, what were they thinking.
No idea what's happening, but given GW history of being fricking homosexuals, of literally putting a twitter post that said Warhammer is not for people not in the left, because they're inclusive by being exclusive of roughly 50% of all the earth population, by banning randos for no reasons, and for trying to stiffle the creativity of random artists by having them banned...
I'm sure whatever GW and CA did to frick up, this time, they did it massively, they did it frankly, and they did it moronicly. So as long as you don't kill a CA dev, because that's illegal and unproductive, that's more or less your right to answer like that.
What the frick did CA do? We follow "Hitler" and we're inclusive by banning you if you're not following "Hitler" today? Something on that level?
>Coming January: The Future of Total War: WARHAMMER III
Brainlet question regarding CreamAPI, but is it normal for my antivirus to regard the dll as a trojan? Reading online people claim that it's normal due to koaloader being mistaken as a trojan but I'm still worried.
>but is it normal for my antivirus to regard the dll as a trojan?
yes
Thank you boys, that's a weight off my chest.
Yes, Windows Defender tends to be a bit oversensitive
These days, even my legit steam.dll is getting some false positives.
>but is it normal for my antivirus to regard the dll as a trojan?
Yes, tis called a false positive and also because you are using a program for auto cream api instead of doing it manually with the texts files
I wonder who is behind these decisions and if they have ever even played video games. This doesn't make sense, even from a business perspective.
Suits have been trying to push their luck with prices for a while now, chorfs was already more than usual, but still "justifiable" (controversial but most people still accepted it). Now they have made the step longer than the leg
people who are successful don't play videogames
buttholes... dude, stop supporting them. I get that you Fantasy Warhammer fans don't have much to cling to. But do you really want to give in to "these" people? CA is being rude and greedy, doesn't that mean anything to you?
There's nothing quite like tw warhammer on the market, it's a shame to see it go down the shitter like this.
Dominions 5
Not your personal army, Black person.
What compels someone to become a shill for a multi million dollar company?
Either a paycheck, or actually being a mindbroken goy who can't help but defend companies because their self worth is dependent on the media they consume
US mentality. They love shilling for companies for some reason. They even call normal everyday objects with Brand Names(tm) instead. Like tissues are Kleenex (tissue brand), elastane is spandex (brand name), and so on. They live to shill.
>Knew WarHam 3 was going to be buggy and incomplete on launch
>Didn't care cause WarHam 1 and WarHam 2 were the same way but became amazing
>2 years later, WarHam 3 is still buggy and incomplete
What The Frick?? It's like they entirely gave up on the game. WarHam 1&2 got tons of free updates, free stuff and large DLCs every other month. I was 100% dead certain WarHam 3 was going to be the same way, but NOPE. It's like the game has been abandoned after release.
>It's like they entirely gave up on the game
yup.
I'm surprised that the TW youtubers aren't getitng more flak for covering the dlc. They all pretended to be upset for their clickbait videos and then went straight to shilling for the dlc as usual.
I have the first 2 games and most of the DLC for them but I've held off on this one, is it actually bad or are people just review bombing it because the dev is scummy?
Its a pretty mediocre game.
bad game
If you haven't done everything you want to do in WH2 then there is no point in buying 3 yet, the bug list is insane.
Warhammer 3 is just 2 but the whole planet. The reviewbomb is because the latest scummy practice and executive letter to the community just revealed what we dreaded about the game's development but was never outright said by CA until now. Quality wise its still standard stuff you can see in any of 2's DLCs.
It's bad because there's no content and it's a buggy mess, two years after release. What makes it "decent" is all the past games' DLC that carries over. If you don't have the two prior games and $150 worth of past DLC, the game sucks ass. A new person buying WarHam 3 would have a handful of serviceable lords, with a lot of NOTHING on a barren map.
Worse in fact, a new player would have to contend with the old races and all of their years worth of DLC which makes them over powered enemies, cause the base races of WarHam 3 are very weak without DLC that adds the stronger utility units.
Depends.
Some stuff in WH3 is better than WH2, other stuff is worse.
If you enjoy Warriors of Chaos for example WH3 is a better game, but dark elves arguably play better in WH2.
Also the bug issues isn't as big as people say because the mod community does help mitigate a lot of it.
The hidden commedy with this happening with tww is that the zoomers throwing the tantrum over extra 15$ spent years celiming they totally would have paid GW prices for Bretonia or some other shit that conveniently isn't in stores
He's laughing at us....HE'S LAUGHING AT US.
>dabs on fantasoys and nu-CA
>dabs on uKKKranian globohomosexual nazis as well
IT'S NOT FRICKING FAIR BROS
we should have never doubted him...
>Pharaoh will most likely be the last total war game
>Medieval 3 will never happen
Who even wants it to happen at this point. All the factions will have stupid gimmicks like "le austrians can only get new territory through marriage because of le hapsburgs!"
Good. Frick Med2 gays, they are bloody unbearable. Without mods it is barely playable. But sure, it has "m-muh SOVL" so it has to be a perfect TW game in the entire series, right?
Now, Med1... That one is a really fine game
the gall of those people, comparing their good game to our bad games.
I'd take a med1 remake as long as they don't touch the music
Nah, these games print money.
CA is going to have do a lot more than just release some israeli DLC to sink their money ship.
>CA is going to have do a lot more than just release some israeli DLC to sink their money ship.
Like trying to produce a hero shooter, years after that trend died and basically had most released be a disaster for the companies?
Even that probably isn't enough, but it might kill one of their child branches like forspoken did.
Theyre actively channeling developers and money off of the one thing thats still making them money (Warhammer) into it, if it doesnt outright kill its a death spiral.
Nothing beats shogun 2 so I shall stick to that
Total War died the day they added female generals to Rome 2
legend of total war here
Dudes a gay because he’s not getting his beak wet anymore by CA