Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty

Keep slurping that polack cum, Pawel

That isnt what moving the goal posts means
Nobody gave a shit about 76 before it released whereas Cyberpunk was massively hyped by fricking everybody.

I accept your concession, shill

Straight out of reddit

they were still promising features when they were showing gameplay where the features were obviously not in the game

Anon, I'm not sure you're being intentionally moronic or just weren't there, but Witcher 3 was almost as buggy as CP2077 on release.
The difference is, Witcher didn't have half the hype 2077 did, so people didn't really care about the bugs.
2077 was marketed a lot and so ecelebs got on it, and all ecelebs want is clicks. What's a good way to get clicks? Controversy. So of course everyone got on it and started making fun of it, even though Witcher was just bad, nobody was interested in actually looking at the good parts of the game.
Ironically enough, I played on release and only ran into the occasional visual bug, which I could care less about.

>had no good parts
I know I'm wasting keystrokes but there's plenty of good things about it. One of the coolest open world cities in gaming, the story beats hit pretty well and are high fidelity, and honestly, for an RPG, the shooting is pretty decent. The game also had a great soundtrack and a pretty diverse set of characters (in a good way, not the woke, look at me I'm black and gay way) A lot of the side stories were pretty good too, like Judy and Kerry. I personally liked Keanu and I think his shitty acting fit there character, funnily enough, and the schizo trope of having someone stuck in your body was done well.
I get not liking the game, plenty of reasons not to, but saying there's nothing good in it is just being moronic.

Out of all the points you could've contested me on, you pick that one?
Let's hear it then, this should be funny. Surely you can name 1 (one) city in games that's visually better realized and more interesting than Night City.

I'm still waiting for that answer, anon. If the city sucks so much, naming a better one should be insanely easy.
always the same shit with you morons. Talking out of your ass.

>rockstar game
Oh yeah, I remember all the times I drove around a GTA city and stopped to look at the buildings or found something cool.
Oh wait, that never fricking happened.
If you were going to go with just pure visual fidelity at least say Novigrad or some shit, not garbage ass 'realistic' towns from Mafia or GTA with literally nothing to see or do in them.

works on my machine, bud
EVEN without the sidequests, lore weapons and shit you find all over the city, literally walking by and just looking stores, ads and designs around the city, it has more attention to detail and worldbuilding than all GTA games combined.
Cope.

You're trying too hard.

I'm new in this thread, I haven't said shit beyond you're trying too hard.

When all you've had to say is
>drag out minor issues
>ignore statements
>post webms of bugs from the trash ps4 release
>letting trannies live rent free inside your head.
Either you're intentionally shitposting and you've gone a bit too hard, or you're unironically just extremely moronic.
You aren't convincing me you have a point to argue so much as you're disgruntled and have had nothing of value to say in your entire argument.

Once again I am a different person, I was just reading the thread and saw your tantrum and decided to call you out on it.

Oh, you weren't actually confused?
That's even more sad.
I'm not going to waste my time on you like that other guy did because all you do is ignore arguments and shitpost.
Consider castration, although I doubt that's going to make a difference in the grand scheme of things it's still better safe than sorry.

Black person homosexual troony. Keep blasing shit all over your own face, it's funny to watch.

>t. mind numblingy furious
lmaoing @ ur life

You first, maybe you can push that 41% to a whopping 42%.

At least my parents will be able to bury me instead of having to hire an excavator for your turbo lard fat ass.

You must have shed a few pounds trying to come up with that.
Also I called you a troony first, no backsies Black person.

We're talking about video games, what does it fricking look like?

>wah wah wah I haven't dilated today so i'm grumpy

No I was quoting you silly 🙂

Yes you did.

Who are you even talking to?

I thought it was bad.
"style over substance" is the message of the game yet everything and everyone looks ugly as shit.

I've been playing the game for a week now, and only autists would notice those type of glitches. The game looks amazing on my rig, and it feels quite alive compared to 99% of the games released in the past decade

>accuses an anon of being an /vg/tard
take your meds

here you go, you massive fricking homosexual

>It most certainly is not.
It is, you can use environmental objects and other special weapon features like ricochet
to navigate through instances in whatever way you like.
>Story is either completely flat
It's not flat at any point, every gig and mission gives you significant information on the lore, location and characters within that specific scene. And there is plenty of NCP dialog to hear while you sneak into position. The main story itself is dry.

>Asinine
You're arguing with 2 different people, moron.

Not yet, I likely will get it. I don't pre-order games.

>nothing in that post is gendered
Sure, if you decide that all writing is purely at face value with no reading comprehension.

You are mentally broken. What the frick is "posturing" about that post? Telling people to face their problems?

First of all, that's not what posturing means.
Second of all, cutting your dick off and chemically castrating yourself is clearly not conquering anything.

>I hate all of you that will spend your entire life on this earth chasing peace by usage of shortcuts, you will only fall deeper into the void
face your ailments, conquer your ailments
Pathetic teenage tier motivational speech that only enamors other insecure teens or literal morons with needlessly grandiose imagery and shallow revelations.

[...]
Thinking they understand what both the problem and solution are by projecting their insecurities.

>that only enamors other insecure teens
Since that was targeted at trannies that seems to fit then.

Don't double down on misusing a word. There was no posturing in his message.
> I don;t particularly care what these people do
And what does that matter? You not caring about them chemically castrating themselves doesn't mean their actions are right.

>I provided you the correct context
Anon, you replied to a post about a guy telling people to face their fears as "posturing". There is no posturing in that post. You can say it's facebook boomer advice sure, but there's nothing posturing about it.
>I disagree with your assumption of universal rights and wrongs
kek so it's good because of moral relativism?
>If this helps those people, the care is there, the doctor is willing
Argument from authority. If you'd been born in the 1800's you'd also agree with lobotomies.

>the exclusion of any way to face your fears but his own
He didn't mention fears.
>I don't know, is it?
Why ask me when you're the one that said it?
>Hence the PATIENT-doctor approval.
So as long as the patient agrees then it's all cool?
If someone walks into a doctor's office and wants their arms cut off cause they suffer from apotemnophilia and the doctor agrees, you see nothing wrong with that?

So then you inherently disagree with the concept of mental illness.

>In this case, fears are interchangeable with your own personal issues
No they aren't, but I'm gonna drop this point because it's not going anywhere and you'll keep doubling down.
>I said I disagree with the notion of universal rights and wrongs.
Nobody was talking about universal rights and wrongs.
>Quite literally yes
[...]
So I repeat, you inherently disagree with the concept of mental illness.

You're talking to 2 or 3 people my guy.

>He didn't mention fears.
In this case, fears are interchangeable with your own personal issues. Fear is a primary motivator for the things we hide or expose to others around us.
>Why ask me when you're the one that said it?
I didn't say that it was good due to moral relativism, that was you. I said I disagree with the notion of universal rights and wrongs. Good and bad is meaningless without a greater context. Like dropping a a nuclear bomb on Japan being one of the greatest enduring topics of net-good v. net-bad.
>So as long as the patient agrees then it's all cool?
Quite literally yes, a patient cannot and should not be forced into something against their will unless they have a medical POA for decision making purposes. It's also why I can't stop someone from leaving a hospital AMA after telling them their diabetic foot needs to come off or it will kill them.

>No they aren't,
There's a greater discussion about mental illness and fear able to be had here. What is anxiety but the irrational fear of being exposed?
>I'll drop this point
Ok.
>Nobody was talking about universal rights and wrongs.
Fair, then its useless to say something like "doesn't mean their actions are right" because that context takes out the desire of the participant and implies that, innately, their action is wrong or right. You can't make that statement without believing in some innate moral compass to the world.

>No, the context is a mentally ill person attempting to harm themselves by self-mutilation.
Like I said with lobotomies, physical castration is not the end goal of treatment here nor the predominant patient outcome. There is a majority you are not considering that are happily being treated with gender affirming care and hormone supplementation. Testosterone, estrogen, it works.

>Castration is not just physical, it's also chemical.
Yes, I agree. However, the "self-mutilation" point the other anon keeps returning to conjures images of scalpels.
>Lupron is a drug given to children to "stop their puberty". That's the same drug given to pedophiles to chemically castrate them.
Yes, we also give ice cream to children and serial killers as their last meal on death row.

I fail to see how linking chemically castrating pedophiles is also the same as elective therapy for someone transitioning, considering that Lupron is nowhere near as common as you have been led to believe. Again, there's also the patient-doctor approval part of this messaging.

>We are talking about children now.
No, we are not. I see now you realize you couldn't out-talk your way from the adults realm, so you have to drag it back to the moral panic of "Think of the children!"
>Should children be able to choose chemical castration?
Like I said with the medical POA earlier, if that POA has all of the facts, and the doctor is in approval, and guideline recommendations have been attempted before this, then I have to follow this line of my own thought to its conclusion and say no, it still doesn't bother me what another person does to themselves. If it has even the smallest chance of preventing that kid from killing themself, I say go ahead.

>we got
LOL. You got there, I am perfectly aware of mental illnesses and the advantages and drawbacks of treatment.

>No, we got there
You need an explicitly written out form with the things I disagree with you on?

>I have no idea which of the 5 troons that reply to me you are.
Weird, you had no trouble keeping up with that right up until this post.

>Or did you forget?
Again, do you need a written list of everything I disagree with you about?

>You're right, saying that a drug is given to late-term cancer patients therefore it's ok to give to kids is a non-argument.
Thank you for agree with me. It's more than drug have multiple uses referred to as "on-label" and "off-label" and can be used for those reasons with backing documentation. Hence why the argument hold no water.

Nope, its like not giving lisinopril to a patient because it might cause hypotension and kill them. The benefits here outweigh the risks. Cancer patient may survive. Pedophile physically prevented from relapse. Transitioning person receives supportive care they need.

How is that an argument in your favor?

It's the equivalent of saying "the potassium replacement you get at a hospital is the same thing we give as a lethal wienertail to death row inmates". It's meaningless other than to try and raise a quick panic out of you by the association.

So you don't care, you're just posturing to come across as open minded and supportive
Lol what makes you any different?
They will chop their dicks off and 10 years later kill themselves when they're still struggling to feel "normal" and the system has no other way to help them, society rejects them and the door to revert back is closed because they mutilated their bodies for a brief moment of ecstasy
But keep swinging that banner of progress, you already admitted to not caring, might as well look cool amidst all the corpses of the untreated mentally ill

I don't think you realize just how dangerous you are

Yeah because you don't care, they are not your direct family so if they kill themselves it's whatever.
If they want to frick their lives up you're okay with it because short term it'll make them happy and you can look cool by supporting that, you don't have to deal with the aftermath
Your lack of empathy is incredibly dangerous and sadly very common

No I'm considering the individual which is why I oppose general solutions by doctors that see hundreds of patients every day and won't know the personal history of someone wanting to mutilate their bodies
If you go to a doctor with mild signs of depressions you will simply be given anti-depressants, no one is gonna help you tackle the issues that surround you like abusive friends, classmates or family members much like no one will help you if the issue stems from economical hardships. You will only ever receive generic help and the minimum of effort.
People that don't feel happy with their own body will never achieve happiness by mutilating it, this is apparent by all the plastic surgery that has been going on for decades now and the eternal obsession for flawless beauty that causes women to kill themselves with implants and botox.
The fundamental way to fix your mental issues is by facing them and conquering it but that's been branded as problematic and something to avoid. People will die in droves in the very near future.

I agree castration is mentally ill. If you want to be feminine, man up and have a feminine dick. But you're also mentally ill if you like different video games than me. Doesn't really fricking matter. Different life experiences.

wow how many more insults can you fit in a single post
you sure do come across as a stable person people should listen to, instead of the other anon lol

vegana pics, please.

>But you're also mentally ill if you like different video games than me.

wow how many more insults can you fit in a single post
you sure do come across as a stable person people should listen to, instead of the other anon lol

Definitely don't want to "grow up" to be like you lol you're so bitter and hateful

Low-level doesn't mean inexperienced. He can know what he's talking about and still be low on the pecking order. And in all of the prologues he's clearly a working merc that's been at it for at least a little while.

Isn't that what the story of the DLC is going to be about? Whatever shit that happened in Pacifica that turned it into basically a wasteland?

Maybe, it's mostly set in the real bad parts of Pacifica the locals call Dogtown (I think it's refereed to as "the Combat Zone" a few times in game already). You can actually see parts of it now, it's just all fenced off and shit.

Pretty sure Dogtown is that big island west of Night City currently inaccessible by a connecting bridge and not Pacifica.

River guilt tripped you into his whole bullshit life

Relic Tree is it's own thing that opens up once you start Phantom Liberty, kinda like the Mutations from Blood and Wine.

It uses a different resource called Relic Points, and while there aren't a lot of options for these perks they all tend to be powerful and game changing, and are all tied to cyberware options in some way.
Some examples I've found online was;
>Monowire:
-gains the ability to silently decapitate someone if you are in stealth
-gains the ability to apply certain quickhacks on hit while in combat

>Gorilla Arms
-Guarding now blocks all bullet damage
-Gets a dashing charge attack that knock backs targets
-Gets an AoE Stomp that stuns targets close to V

>SmartLink
-Gains the ability to be temporally overclocked, which can get multiple bonuses such as improved headshot lock-ons, multiple target lock-ons, improved rate of fire, etc.

It's literally in the game, it's called Cyberware Malfunction and only costs 6 base RAM.

That's a hacking thing, right? I don't want to actively have to stop the gun fight just to hack their cyberware so that I can continue the gunfight. It's much better to just stop using Smart guns entirely, the other guns don't have this bullshit.

There is also the nano machines tattoo you get from the granny fixer. I think it works in a similar manner.

that probably stops THEIR smart guns from locking on to YOU, right? I just want something that lets me use smart guns without having to check if I can or can't use them in a fight.

that old asian chick fixer gives you tattoo that is a cyberware doing that. pay attention

Kek

Youre not. The system for how NPC Sandevistans work is also really lame, since they just dash towards you. It should impose the slowness on the player until its over or they activate their own Sandi. That would be way more scary then the goofy stuff they do now.