Did you upgrade your PC yet?
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Did you upgrade your PC yet?
Did you upgrade your PC yet?
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
>troony game
mindbroken /misc/ster
which isn't one in 202x?
>Everything I don't like is troony's and reddit!!!!
Friendly reminder that homosexuals that post shit like this only play visual novels and hentai games. They have no real arguments and will pick from about 10 buzzwords as a response
I love buzzwords
bast poast
if i find trannies in the game they will be shot. survivors will be shot again. if they're deemed "essential" i'll console command it away and blast them anyway.
To what?
No I don't have a spare 2k
Anon I built an entire PC in September that exceeds the recommended specs for less than 1k, in what universe do you need 2k to upgrade?
Post parts
I built one for $1200 with crazy thirdie markup too. RTX3060, 32GB RAM, i5-13600, 1TB NVME SSD
Yeach i did upgrade from gtx 1660s to RTX 4070 and from i5 4460 to i5 12600k
Nah should be fine with my 970 and i5 4690K
>5600x CPU
>6700xt GPU
>16gb RAM
w-will I be fine? still rocking a 1080p monitor btw. should 60fps be achievable?
Wow I have the same build as you (except 32gb ram) but I'm sweatin because 1440p
you are more then fine you will run that at 60fps easy same with 1440p and shit it will even do 4k if you understand how to play with settings and use the upscaler like fsr or rsr
Yeah but this is Bethesda we're talking about, not exactly known for optimization
That would effect GPU (resolution) performance rather than CPU, which is more of my concern.
The Series X equivalent CPU is roughly a 3700x, which isn't far off from a 5600x. And CPU limits are almost 100% the reason they're not pushing for 60fps
explain how a PC build equivalent to the series x will hit 60fps when the console is locked at 30
Pc has something called settings and if you have an and gpu you have something called fsr or rsr pretty simple
FSR is actually pretty cool, I was messing around on my buddies SteamDeck was pretty impressed FSR, only issue was text became a little fricked up looking.
DLSS is far better than FSR, hopefully they include both
>when the console is locked at 30
Only when playing on 4k
No it's locked at 30fps regardless of resolution
get more ram its not expensive
>Ultra
X
i kneel
i kneel
My parts are coming in next week
3060ti, don’t need to
I will be pirating since they are apparently putting in body type A and B nonsense
It's close enough to black friday I'll just wait for that. By then there will probably be enough mods or patches to make the buggy mess playable.
I bought a prebuilt during the component pricing surge a couple of years ago for £1200. It has a 3080 in, it's going to run Starfield on Ultra forever.
I downgraded my pc so I don't play this game
I start a new job on Monday and want to save 3k for a new PC by the end of October. I'll be cutting it close but I think I'll be fine. I want to save for a new phone, too, but I can wait longer on that.
Nah, bought a lenovo ideapad with a 3050 and ryzen 5 6600 months ago. Stuck another stick of ram in there. I’m done with pc building tbh it’s always been a pain to move desktops around and with these specs I can play any game at 1080p. Don’t really care about ultra quality graphics.
4070TI here. can’t wait for the 5080 though
>RTX 3070 with SSD ready
Am I gonna make it
nah
easily unless you use painfully moronic settings
No, I’m in a weird place where I want to upgrade my pc but I can’t really justify it just for a Bethesda game and no other games announced look good to me. Makes it hard to drop a grand or more into my rig. I mostly play games I played as a teenager these days and killing floor 2 and 1080 ti perfectly good for that. I pretty much have to upgrade everything in my pc besides storage.
Nah, I'm good with my Series S.
>i5 11400, 1650 super, 16gb, SSD
Someone will make a mod to turn the graphics down so I can get smooth 30fps I'm sure of it. My CPU is fine for the game.
>fast SSD (passes the meme "can it run PS5 games" test)
>i5 12400
>rtx 3060
hoping for 60FPS as long as I don't have to go sub 1080p
Nah, I have an xbox
Enjoy your 30fps and nomods
I will, thanks
I don’t see why console mods won’t be coming back
Literally not possible
>no 128 gb
>game still runs at 30 fps because Bethesda can't optimize
76 is capped to 144hz, do you morons still live in 2014?
>getting the inferior 7950x3D over 7800x3D
lmao lets hope your specific for that cpu driver actually detects you are playing starfield and turns off half your cores making it a 7800X3D anyway (but with bugs lol)
I use process lasso so yeah not a problem. I set my bios to make the cpu prefer frequency cores on everything by default, and I use process lasso to set games to the cache CCD, works perfectly fine.
process lasso gets fricked by anti cheat software
I wouldn't know because I don't play those shit 'competitive' games anyways.
is the 7800X3D really good? I had my eye on it for a new PC I want to build (
is me) and I wanted to pair it with a 4090, since the 5000s won't be coming out until late next year and my PC is already failing in some places hardware wise.
will i really *NEED* an ssd?
>require an SSD
it's because it use the same loader as FO4, wich with the HD textures dlc made your loading times skyrocked
>locked fps
chances are some parts of the physics will be tied to fps like older bethesda games, remember ghouls going at mach 3 if you had too much fps?
>base building
starfield outposts sound and look just like FO4 settlements
Todd will manage to sell at an absurd price a fallout reskin, truely a great con artist i gotta admit
>fallout reskin
This is so moronic. Starfield looks like more substantial an iteration in Bethesda games than 90% of sequels or new franchises produced by other studios today. Just because it evolves the same mechanics does not make it a "fallout reskin", especially when the worst elements of Fallout 4 (shit tier dialogue, annoying voiced character with forced background and backdrop, total narrative disconnect with the world and gameplay mechanics, etc.) all appear to be gone
>chances are some parts of the physics will be tied to fps like older bethesda games
Not anymore.
I bought a 3060 12 GB for AI porn, hopefully it can handle Starfield as a bonus
and 1080ti
Probably gonna be fine for 1440p
10700k 3080 ti, may get a 12700k and try out the ddr5 48gb kit
Yeah I remember when you Black folk said the same about Cyberpunk, where not only was it a pile of shit to the point its redemption is taking a massive overhaul three years past launch, but even richgays with R/i9s, 3090s and Gen 4 NVMe drives at the time were having it stutter and struggle to keep 60fps.
The fact this full-priced AAA game is expected to be hard to run on decent hardware is a fricking joke and an indictment on its poor quality. It's not a compliment to Bethesda, it's proof of their archaic, antiquated technologies and their utter ineptitude in implementing them properly.
Fallout 4 launched fine. Story was underwhelming but the game was very playable and fun.
>Fallout 4 launched fine
>the game was very playable and fun.
Bethesddrones are mentally broken
He's not wrong, just because you're 14 and heard memes about Bethesda doesn't mean Fallout 4 was broken on launch. 76 absolutely was but Fallout 4 was pretty stable compared to all their previous launches and had minimal bugs/performance issues especially on PC
>Fallout 4 launched fine
it did you sperg, Fallout 4 and Skyrim SE were the most stable launches due to their 64 bit
>The fact this full-priced AAA game is expected to be hard to run on decent hardware is a fricking joke and an indictment on its poor quality. It's not a compliment to Bethesda, it's proof of their archaic, antiquated technologies and their utter ineptitude in implementing them properly.
lmao no everyone cries about bethesda's technology but no one can actually point to an example
>300 mods
>Still plays and runs like shit
Frickoff shill
>>300 mods
plays and runs like shit
that's a you problem
Go get pegged
did you take a picture of your monitor?
>300 visual mods
>Still looks like shit
Bethgays are mentally ill
I play Stalker too Anon
Thank you St. Nick
>I play Stalker too Anon
Yeah, plenty of redditors do unfortunately
>even in the zone zoomer can't let his phone go
Looks cool!!!
Then stop playing on a potatoe pc anon
>>300 mods
plays and runs like shit
I wonder why
No, you see, people say mods have bugfixes and patches to make the game run better, so obviously downloading 300 of them means I could play this on a ti84.
I still game on 1080p @ 60hz because I honestly don't think it's worth the hassle to upgrade from that, the requirements jump is stupid for the same performance. I have a very powerful computer, too.
5800x
rx 6800xt
32 gigs ram 3600
2tb nvme ssd
2tb sata ssd
my monitor is a 1080p @240hz
idk what a sensible upgrade would be
i might just save up for 14th gen intel or 8xxx3d amd
the machine is fine get a 1440p monitor with exceptional color and contrast
Why do you play at 1080p with that spec you faking idiot
I'll wait until mods make it good.
>RTX 3070
>Ryzen 5600
>16gb RAM 3600mhz
I need to upgrade my CPU asap. Also just bought 2x16gb yesterday. All I want is to run it at 1080@60. Is that too much to ask?
If it doesn't run at high on those specs, the game is fricking absurd.
Wait, I have the exact same specs except I'm on 1440p. You tellin' me we can't run this game well?
I'd get more ram but otherwise if your computer doesn't do it Bethesda fricked up real bad.
Genuinely wondering if it's worth upgrading a bog standard 6gb 2060 to a bog standard 12gb 3060?
Will an RTX 2080 be able to run this game at 1080 60fps?
The big one will be CPU, if Bethesda goes elden ring levels of laziness with the optimization it wont run on anything
SSD is in the mail. Just 250 gb since I only intend to play Starfield and Starfield mods on it
If I'm upgrading it a huge fricking increment to ddr5 and the price is not right. My computer already meets the specs they want so I'm not in a hurry.
3080/5800X3D
I am worried about the fricking 60hz shit that BGS games always have, yeah 76 does not have that issue but its like saying Starfield will get a MP update because of work on 76 easily allows it.
Anon, they're moving away from 60hz, they capped the creation engine to 144hz now because higher fps creates faster load times with an SSD
I got the same machine and I'm just worried about the vram.
It WILL run on my 1060 6GB and HDD
My machine will firm it.
Based. 1070 and hdd here. i7 4790. Thing runs everything because I'm not a troony and therefore use 1080p 60hz.
I have an iphone 14 pro max that goes up to 120hz and i havent once cared about the refresh rate on it
Yeah its weird man I ran Cyberpunk on low with this 1060 at 1080p, only had to do an ini tweak
Im hoping this game will be another classic bethesda 'we made it a decade in advance so you dont need crazy hardware'
Probably will be. The only thing about this game that could possibly do you in is draw distance, especially of foliage, which can be turned down
I swear this computer is magic. Every single game ive thrown at it, it handles with no issue. Medium, low, whatever. I beat tears of the kingdom recently and it ran at a stable 30fps
i upgraded my pc just for you, todd
at the end of the day, bethesda games are a safe bet, because fans will fix them up anyways
5600x, 32gb 3600+ ripjaws, nvme+ssd BUT 1660S. Think my GPU will frick me over..
>Ryzen 9 7950X3D
>64gb DDR5
>RTX 4090 24GB
I'm really worried about this, do I need to upgrade lads? I'd be happy with 1080p/60fps
Yes, you're going to need 192GB DDR5, 13900K and a 4090TI with a liquid cooled SSD.
I'm playing with an ssd, 1060 6gb, 40 gb ram, and i7-7700k. I should be fine on low settings.
Have a 2080 in it with an i7-8700 that's about 3 years old now
Tempted to spec it to an i9-13th gen and a 4090 to play at 60fps/1080p
Yes.
the only games worth upgrading for are Todd's
>Pentium G2358
>GeForce GTX 750 Ti
>8GB RAM
Is it actually time to upgrade?
I'll just play the console version
enjoy 20 fps, not that you can tell the difference with all the untogglable motion blur and TAA
Why?
>doesn't have experimental 14th gen CPU
ngmi
>minimum is 1070TI
>I have a 1660 Super
I'll still be able to run it, right?
>5950x
>3090
>mfw I don't need to upgrade anymore since I don't use the meme res
Only res that matters is 1080 144hz
>tfw 1080 240hz monitor
oh god
>minimum req is 1070Ti
>have a 1080
Nah I'm good.
this is me but I still want to upgrade. Frick playing at 60fps
9700k
32gb 3200ram
3080ti
4k
Am I gonna make it
>3060 ti has the same or worse performance as a 1080 ti
>it's the same msrp
>half as old
>4060 ti is just marginally better than 1080 ti
>literally just came out
>$100 more msrp
>3080 again barely beats 1080 ti
>$500
>3080 and 3080 ti practically identical
>4070 ti is somehow twice as fast as 1080 ti
>$900
>4070 ti has the same performance as 3090
>3080 is $1200
>u upgrading bro?
>>3090 is $1200*
Just get a 3090, shit won't have melting cables and it has enough vram to mass produce stable diffusion waifus
I always go for the moronic oddball cards that literally no one asked for and aren't even competitive price wise.
>why
The demand for them is functionally 0 meanwhile the supply is greater than 0. Whoever is holding them in a warehouse knows they're wasting space so when they go on sale they go on SALE. During their sale period they become the highest value/dollar you will ever see, sometimes going lower than a different second hand card which performed comparatively worse when it was new.
wtf are you talking about lmao, 3060ti is 21% faster than a 1080ti. and 3080 is 70% faster than a 1080ti.
>3080 is 70% faster than a 1080ti.
and still can't get a stable 60 fps at 4k with dlss (so technically 2k) for $8-900
what absolute trash
> GTX 1060 6GB
> R7 2700X
> 32GB DDR4
I'll probably grab a 3060 12GB and a bigger PSU and I should be good for the next few years ...;-;
>I will pay a premium for a worse 1080 card in current year
lmao
What do you suggest so wiseguy?
I suggest grabbing a 4060 ti from newegg for $500 which just came out before the scalpers harvest all of them and drive the price up to $700, then you're getting a 1080 ti for $500, which is where the industry was 6 years ago
>
what
Aside from the 40 series being a massive disaster and complete failure to advance performance for a reasonable price 4060 ti is the first card released in the last 6 years to rival 1080p 1080 ti performance for $500
is there something I don't know about them blowing up or...
>tfw a brand new 60 card is the same price and performance as an 80 card from 6+ years ago
1. look up inflation
2. 1080 ti can't do raytracing or any DLSS which can double performance for 1% visual impact
3. Sneed
>1080 ti can't do memetracing
>DLSS
DLSS? You mean the card rendering the piece of shit unoptimized trash at a lower resolution so devs don't have to optimize their games?
Please tell me there's another reason for this feature than to try and get poorly optimized games to run better by taking an axe to the resolution (which you can do without DLSS)
If you'd ever actually used DLSS before you'd know it looks nearly identical to native res, especially in 4K with the quality setting where it usually looks better than native due to replacing worse looking TAA for antialiasing. I turn it on in every game I can even if performance is otherwise very good because it still boosts things by at least 30-40% normally and improves the image more than I've seen it hurt it.
>DLSS looks nearly identical
4k? That's another meme, the fact that you defend DLSS which is basically lowering your resolution to 2k for a "fake" 4k means you can't even tell the difference, right?
Imagine paying 2-3 times as much for a card so you can play fake 4k for no noticeable fps increase over 60, what an absolute scam for morons
>WAHHH I PLAY ON SHIT TECH BECAUSE IM POOR!!!
Im sorry.
I've got more than enough money to build the best gaming pc money can buy many times over, I jsut don't see a reason to when the industry has literally been running in place for 6-7 years and literally only in the last 3 weeks has another gaming GPU been released that delivers the same performance of GOATed cards from 6-7 years ago for a reasonable ($500) price.
There is absolutely no excuse available that brand new $500-$1400 cards shouldn't be vastly outperforming 6-7 year old cards at 1080p
Because I know what value is and that infuriates you, doesn't mean the industry isn't an absolute trashfire
>especially in 4k
you mean only in 4k cause in everyhing else NATIVE is simply better, and then AGAIN, DLSS looks " better " because native AA is shit in everygame. but at 1080p(lol) and 1440p DLSS is not that great.
DLSS does not look better then native.
can't you just turn off taa?
>3600
>16gb
>2060 8gb
Yeah, I'm thinking based
Getting my RTX 4080 next month
7700X/4080 and I'm actually scared it might not hold 60 fps in 1440p
well no but I literally bought a series X due to Starfield and sold my series S kek
nice man that means you went from 30fps to 30fps!
Why should I?
I'm finna play it on my PS5. Suckers.
How reliable are Bethesda's "recommended specs" usually?
I meet their recommended specs exactly. Yet I'm still worried
>upgrade my PC for 1(one) game
>a bethesda game
No lol
1070 at 1440p here, will see how I fare. The rest of my PC is all modern parts though, might finally be the incentive for me to upgrade. Don't want to give israelitevidia my money on a new part though, what's a good stopgap used GPU I could get?
Why do I need upgrade my PC for a game that vastly inferior on every tech and graphical level to RDR2?
waiting for a rift in time later this year to see if my 2060 can run it
really weird, as i can play dad of war and spider-man no problem, but dying light 2 and dead space remake got me fricked up with 40 fps
how big of a ssd should i get for my new pc?
1 tb sounds like plenty but with 100 gb being the new standard i'm also thinking 2 tb which sounds way too fricking much
get a 2tb ssd
>OCed and liquid metal'd 8700k
>3070
>32GB RAM
>2TB nvme SSD
I may not be getting the most exquisite food, but I'm still eatin' good.
>vertical water cooler with the pump at the same level/above the cooler
bruh
>What is perspective?
The pump is the lowest part of the loop.
no it's not, and even pretending that it's only the part you think is the loop, all it takes is for a bubble to get in there once and get kinda stuck
look, you wanna act stupid and risk your own stuff, by all means, go ahead, not my problem
Is 32gb ram necessary? Currently have 16gb.
What will it help with?
Don’t listen to these fools. No real game on any setting is using anything more than like 10gb max
>rx 580
>amd 3600
>32gb ram
go ahead without me bros, it's been a good run
all you need is the gpu, you can make it with a RX 6600-XT
>5600X
>GTX 1080
>1080p
am I gonna make it Toddbros?
No, I'm going to run it on Steam Deck at 15 frames
Is there even RT in Starfield?
worth selling my 3060ti and getting 3080ti for about 200 eurobucks in total?
>PC
eww no thanks
>Finds 30fps acceptable
Why are you such a moron?
i bought a 3060 in december and i'm not falling for the meme resolution israelite so I'll be fine
No. An RTX 3080 and Ryzen 5800x should be enough for 2k.
>1070
I'm buying a Series X.
Don't care how much I have to spend. I'm not playing a fricking SHOOTER on a controller. What drugs are you on son?
Didn't someone leak what the ending will be?
There will be a choice to fight the villain or use your speech skill to convince him to commit suicide.
Yeah, your character will find the ancient aliens and can choose whether to destroy them, take control of them, or merge their brains with humanity
Is Starfield able to run above 60fps even?
Yes ||480p and all low settings||
I meant engine-wise. Does the engine still have that issue where the physics go all fricky if you go above 60?
It most certainly is still capped at 60
F76 was eventually capped to 144 wasn't it?
Yeah its not locked to 60 but its hard to tell how much that transfers over to a full BGS game. Like are modders going to find an easier method to make Starfield multiplayer, because of underlying FO76 gruntwork?
I doubt it. Both games were in production at the same time.
I dunno. Im just making assumptions.
Don't need to. 5800x3d is on sale which is the "endgame" of my AM4 motherboard but honestly the 3700x is shockingly close in paper-stats so I just don't care to spend $400 leaf rubles on theoretically a relatively minor upgrade instead of running this motherboard into the sunset as is.
I got a 7700X in February and I added 4TB extra space a few days ago. Still waiting for a good price on a 4090.
My parents wont upgrade my PC cause I'm 24 now I might have to get a job to play this. Frick.
I genuinely screamed at my mum when she brought home a 1660 instead of 1660super. Didn't feel bad about it at the time but at her funeral everyone was commenting about how nice it was for her 34 year old son to move back in with her after she became ill.
I've never left home in my life. She must've told everyone I moved back in with her...still have that 1660 in the box...
I hope you are trolling..
I hope you have a nice day
have a nice day and tell her you are sorry
Can I have it? Me and your mom go way back
it's heartening to know that this game will stimulate some neets out of their basements
>Did you upgrade your PC yet?
I don't know what the minimum specs will be, though I was just planning on getting it for Series X.
How do you figure out how gpus compare to each other? Do you just look them up on a gpu benchmark website and compare there?
I need to build a new pc soon and it'd be nice if it could run starfield ok.
just bought a 32gb kit of ddr5. otherwise ive got a 3080 that should handle it fine ine 3420x1400
>gamebyro
I had more fun modding Skyrim than actually playing it, I think I'll pass on this one.
Am I going to upgrade from a 3700X? because frick me then im going to have to upgrade mobo and everything.