Even a Game """""Journalist""""" can be right sometimes.
Honestly, remaking Johto in an HD-2D style could be a perfect testing ground. Kanto re-remakes were taken up by Let's Go, so Johto would be next for experimental re-remakes.
Title is right, rest is random shit, as usual with these clickbait articles.
Annual releases are absolutely not necessary. Games back then were good because they took their time to program them instead of rushing them. Why do you think they were able to tease some gen 4 mons like Munchlax Lucario etc so long in advance. This barely ever happens nowadays because the games and dexes are rushed, we only know about them a few months in advance at best. Pokemon was already one of the most successful franchises of all time during gens 3/4, so that’s not an excuse either, they absolutely do not need to go for annual releases
>they absolutely do not need to go for annual releases
Here's why you're wrong. I'll present a scenario for you to explain >New Pokemon game is announced >Fans go nuts >Game Freak/Nintendo release trickle of information to keep fans interested >[Game takes 4 years to release] >Everyone has lost interest
>I know everyone complaoms about how rushed and shitty the new games are but >Le you will buy it anyway hehe smugpepe >Except if they make you wait, then you won't
?????????????????
Then, maybe they should stop announcing games 4 years before release? Sounds like that would be the solve for that issue. Maybe 6 months before at most? That would pretty much solve the entirety of that issue.
>New Pokemon game is announced >Fans go nuts >Game Freak/Nintendo release trickle of information to keep fans interested >[Game takes 6 months to release] >Everyone is still interested
Ta-da! New Pokemon games that aren't annually released are fine.
Just don’t announce them right away. Start with introducing new shillmons in the anime, movie, why not even some spinoffs. Only announce the games when they’re like 1 and 2 years away. Not that hard, again, just look what they did in the past.
>yet another "moron manchild 'adult' reporter cries about growing up and discovering the kiddy behemoth does not give a monkey's shit-toss for him or his ilk" episode >world revolves regardless >Tune in Pokémon day for the latest video of news and information
Colosseum alone is proof you can have a good 3D game. It's not the end result that is indicating failure, but the method. If Ninty properly put their foot up GF's ass and made them take their time and delay the release, i'm confident we would have had a good modern 3D game by now.
I dunno, something tells me that if GF shat out a 3D game with only 50 catchable Pokemon, a linear as frick campaign that lasts less than 10 hours and consists only of walking in towns, slow as frick animations you can't turn off, and basically every other feature from the games being cut you would whine about that being shit too.
>I dunno, something tells me that if GF shat out a 3D game with only 50 catchable Pokemon, a linear as frick campaign that lasts less than 10 hours and consists only of walking in towns, slow as frick animations you can't turn off, and basically every other feature from the games being cut you would whine about that being shit too.
Oh? You mean colosseum? Yeah I played that game yesterday, very good.
>I dunno, something tells me that if GF shat out a 3D game with only 50 catchable Pokemon, a linear as frick campaign that lasts less than 10 hours and consists only of walking in towns, slow as frick animations you can't turn off, and basically every other feature from the games being cut you would whine about that being shit too.
Oh? You mean colosseum? Yeah I played that game yesterday, very good.
>I dunno, something tells me that if GF shat out a 3D game with only 50 catchable Pokemon, a linear as frick campaign that lasts less than 10 hours and consists only of walking in towns, slow as frick animations you can't turn off, and basically every other feature from the games being cut you would whine about that being shit too.
Oh? You mean colosseum? Yeah I played that game yesterday, very good.
>MUH LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE >WHY ARENT THEY PANDERING TO MEEEEEEEEEEEE
That’s whatcha get for investing/subscribing to slop, enjoy it or find a new trough.
Honestly, to gamefreaks credit, an open world pokemon game would be pretty hard. But that’s made even more so on the switches lacking hardware. It’s hard to play SV correctly without running into issues every now and then. As someone mentioned before a linear game with less pokemon might work, but it would have to be on a better console. Maybe the Switch 2 will be better. I mean the switch released when ps4 and Xbox one were still around and couldn’t even beat them.
There are plenty of working open world games on the switch. This shit has nothing to do with the power of the console, SVs issues can be entirely blamed on GFs incompetence and TPCs draconian scheduling. A stronger console in the hands of a shitty dev doesn't mean a game is going to be better. A bad game is still going to be a bad game with infinite computing power. PLA wound up being pretty good and that was due almost entirely to GF not being the only dev working on it.
The journo is a whiny homosexual but even a blind pig can find a truffle sometimes.
Gen 4/5 were absolutely beautiful. 3D overworld, especially 3D OPEN world just pulls the curtain back to much. You see the wizard and no longer see Oz. 2D affords greater suspension of disbelief, 3D Open World doesnt.
I also feel the bar is astronomically higher for anything 3D open world because of stuff like BotW or Elden Ring, so it makes Pokemon look even lazier and shittier.
>Gen 4/5 were absolutely beautiful. 3D overworld just pulls the curtain back to much.
So were Gen 4/5 beautiful or were they not? Make up your mind, schizo.
This is peak nostalgia.
Nobody was asking for more 2D Pokémon when those games were actually on store shelves. Gen 5 did worse than all of its predecessors and interest was waning. There was constant expectation for this series to grow in scope and try new things, and now they should go back to muh good days. Back when less people cared…
3D games have struggled, but running back to the old games won’t solve any of that. Just look at BDSP.
They really can't. The majority of people are always going to scoff at 2D. The best 2D game, visually, will always have a stigma and Pokemon will never go back to 2D.
>underestimating how much people want graphics to evolve
Id love to go back to 2D cause the sales figures would be used in every fricking thread >why did you not buy our game? >best game in years no one bought it
Cause no one except maybe 10 of the 100 users per hour on here want 2d anymore.
I'll stick with my indie games thank you.
i dunno, i feel after this shitfest of a generation you could plausibly blame 9&8 as a reason for a 2D 10 making less money. i really dont expect pokemon to ever become less successful though, especially if it continues its current trend of compensating for its poor quality by baiting christmas cake and homosexuals.
3D isn't the problem. The only terrible 3D games are SV by virtue of just not working properly and having a shit artstyle. If anything the problem was falling for the open world meme rather than sticking to the formula that worked with the previous 8 gens.
There has never been a Pokemon game that has looked better than other games released on the same console in the same year and I'm tired of pretending otherwise
Nintendo is not going to steal Square Enix's art style just to make their loss leader run even worse than it is now.
No. Frick off Ben.
Even a Game """""Journalist""""" can be right sometimes.
Honestly, remaking Johto in an HD-2D style could be a perfect testing ground. Kanto re-remakes were taken up by Let's Go, so Johto would be next for experimental re-remakes.
>TL;DR
>journo is such a wiener sucking homosexual that he blames 3D and not Gamefreak's lack of competence
Title is right, rest is random shit, as usual with these clickbait articles.
Annual releases are absolutely not necessary. Games back then were good because they took their time to program them instead of rushing them. Why do you think they were able to tease some gen 4 mons like Munchlax Lucario etc so long in advance. This barely ever happens nowadays because the games and dexes are rushed, we only know about them a few months in advance at best. Pokemon was already one of the most successful franchises of all time during gens 3/4, so that’s not an excuse either, they absolutely do not need to go for annual releases
>they absolutely do not need to go for annual releases
Here's why you're wrong. I'll present a scenario for you to explain
>New Pokemon game is announced
>Fans go nuts
>Game Freak/Nintendo release trickle of information to keep fans interested
>[Game takes 4 years to release]
>Everyone has lost interest
>I know everyone complaoms about how rushed and shitty the new games are but
>Le you will buy it anyway hehe smugpepe
>Except if they make you wait, then you won't
?????????????????
Then, maybe they should stop announcing games 4 years before release? Sounds like that would be the solve for that issue. Maybe 6 months before at most? That would pretty much solve the entirety of that issue.
>New Pokemon game is announced
>Fans go nuts
>Game Freak/Nintendo release trickle of information to keep fans interested
>[Game takes 6 months to release]
>Everyone is still interested
Ta-da! New Pokemon games that aren't annually released are fine.
Just don’t announce them right away. Start with introducing new shillmons in the anime, movie, why not even some spinoffs. Only announce the games when they’re like 1 and 2 years away. Not that hard, again, just look what they did in the past.
I remember the buildup to gen 4 too
>yet another "moron manchild 'adult' reporter cries about growing up and discovering the kiddy behemoth does not give a monkey's shit-toss for him or his ilk" episode
>world revolves regardless
>Tune in Pokémon day for the latest video of news and information
>game freak is bad at making game therefore they should make the games even worse
most intelligent 2dtard
looks like the calosperm janny didnt like this post ..
>HD-2D
Colosseum alone is proof you can have a good 3D game. It's not the end result that is indicating failure, but the method. If Ninty properly put their foot up GF's ass and made them take their time and delay the release, i'm confident we would have had a good modern 3D game by now.
>[game that's worse than every game GF has ever made] is proof you can have a good 3D game
what did schizo mean by this
Excellent bait.
I dunno, something tells me that if GF shat out a 3D game with only 50 catchable Pokemon, a linear as frick campaign that lasts less than 10 hours and consists only of walking in towns, slow as frick animations you can't turn off, and basically every other feature from the games being cut you would whine about that being shit too.
>I dunno, something tells me that if GF shat out a 3D game with only 50 catchable Pokemon, a linear as frick campaign that lasts less than 10 hours and consists only of walking in towns, slow as frick animations you can't turn off, and basically every other feature from the games being cut you would whine about that being shit too.
Oh? You mean colosseum? Yeah I played that game yesterday, very good.
Samegay
all of these posts are me
>i'm confident we would have had a good modern 3D game by now.
Well we already have PLA and SV so you're correct
Well we already have BW and SM so you're correct
colosseum isnt an open world game though. futuremore theres no actual wild pokemon spawns.
Stop listening to youtubers, Colosseum and XD both suck ass and no amount of click bait nostalgia is going to change that.
I played the game when it was new you fricking underage newhomosexual
>He thinks giving more time will make the games not shit
Legends was a rush job yet graphically superior to Scat and Vomit
>MUH LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE
>WHY ARENT THEY PANDERING TO MEEEEEEEEEEEE
That’s whatcha get for investing/subscribing to slop, enjoy it or find a new trough.
Honestly, to gamefreaks credit, an open world pokemon game would be pretty hard. But that’s made even more so on the switches lacking hardware. It’s hard to play SV correctly without running into issues every now and then. As someone mentioned before a linear game with less pokemon might work, but it would have to be on a better console. Maybe the Switch 2 will be better. I mean the switch released when ps4 and Xbox one were still around and couldn’t even beat them.
There are plenty of working open world games on the switch. This shit has nothing to do with the power of the console, SVs issues can be entirely blamed on GFs incompetence and TPCs draconian scheduling. A stronger console in the hands of a shitty dev doesn't mean a game is going to be better. A bad game is still going to be a bad game with infinite computing power. PLA wound up being pretty good and that was due almost entirely to GF not being the only dev working on it.
The journo is a whiny homosexual but even a blind pig can find a truffle sometimes.
Gen 4/5 were absolutely beautiful. 3D overworld, especially 3D OPEN world just pulls the curtain back to much. You see the wizard and no longer see Oz. 2D affords greater suspension of disbelief, 3D Open World doesnt.
I also feel the bar is astronomically higher for anything 3D open world because of stuff like BotW or Elden Ring, so it makes Pokemon look even lazier and shittier.
>Gen 4/5 were absolutely beautiful. 3D overworld just pulls the curtain back to much.
So were Gen 4/5 beautiful or were they not? Make up your mind, schizo.
Both gen 4 and 5 look good for the DS.
Meanwhile, both gen 8 and 9 don't look good for the Switch.
Gen 5 looks worse than some GBA games. Sword and Shield looks perfectly fine outside of the Wild Areas.
This is peak nostalgia.
Nobody was asking for more 2D Pokémon when those games were actually on store shelves. Gen 5 did worse than all of its predecessors and interest was waning. There was constant expectation for this series to grow in scope and try new things, and now they should go back to muh good days. Back when less people cared…
3D games have struggled, but running back to the old games won’t solve any of that. Just look at BDSP.
They really can't. The majority of people are always going to scoff at 2D. The best 2D game, visually, will always have a stigma and Pokemon will never go back to 2D.
>underestimating how much people want graphics to evolve
Id love to go back to 2D cause the sales figures would be used in every fricking thread
>why did you not buy our game?
>best game in years no one bought it
Cause no one except maybe 10 of the 100 users per hour on here want 2d anymore.
I'll stick with my indie games thank you.
i dunno, i feel after this shitfest of a generation you could plausibly blame 9&8 as a reason for a 2D 10 making less money. i really dont expect pokemon to ever become less successful though, especially if it continues its current trend of compensating for its poor quality by baiting christmas cake and homosexuals.
3D isn't the problem. The only terrible 3D games are SV by virtue of just not working properly and having a shit artstyle. If anything the problem was falling for the open world meme rather than sticking to the formula that worked with the previous 8 gens.
There has never been a Pokemon game that has looked better than other games released on the same console in the same year and I'm tired of pretending otherwise
Buy an ad, Ben.