DLC/expansions should not add new areas completely annihilated from the base game, and instead new mechanics and content alongside the base game.
Like Binding of Isaac.
I have no interest in doing the DLC content that adds 4 hours of a micro-campaign since I already finished the main story. It just feels like filler and unimportant.
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
goddammit
See, it worked. My most successful threads was because I attached a shitty twitter print to it but had actual vidya discursion on the body of the post. Always reach the bump limit.
You're not clever nor original
>is coffee good for you?
Has been a meme for longer than you've been alive zoom zoom
Amazing imput.
>Click thread
>Reads Twitter meme
>Leaves
I only care if they are quantifal and quality as buying dlc means i probably enjoyed the base game alot. But new gameplay is very nice.
Souls games and nioh 2 have very fun dlc because they expand on builds ontop of added areas
If I have to go out of my way to reach these areas, like in Fallout New Vegas. I just don't feel like doing it at all, especially when I have to commit myself to completion until I can return to the main game.
Expansions are better if they are played during your playthrough rather than an aftermath, so my experiences were better because it just added to my playthrough instead of after i beat the game. So i guess expansions are best played if you havent experienced the game before
>I have no interest in doing the DLC content that adds 4 hours of a micro-campaign since I already finished the main story
*blocks your path*
I've finished Dishonored campaign 3 times, and had a platinum on my PS3. Never touched any of the DLCs.
The DLCs are better than the main game
Daudbt
Entered the thread specifically to post Daud's DLCs, great to see another chad ahead of me
Frick you all. You made me rebuy this game on Steam just so I can play this extra content. I hope you are happy.
Won't be until you get all cheevos including Dunwall City Trials
jk have fun anon, it's one of a kind
>this game is 1/10th the size of a modern isometric RPG
wtf
discursion?
it's gaming time
What a letdown. Time to go seek out an actual off-topic thread.
What is this discussion you speak of? Sounds foreign
I think the exact opposite. Any DLC that expects me to play through the same content a second time with some differences only makes me feel like I got ripped of and wasted my time playing the "incomplete" version of the game. Same shit for early access for that matter.
It depends on the game. I mentioned Isaac for this reason, you can finish it in less than an hour, and is meant for repeated playthroughs.
A linear game would not benefit from an expansion that added more content to the base experience, but an open game would.
Expansions should add a comparable amount of content to the base game so possible a new campaign.
They should be both since they are asking you to pay again so the new crap better be worth it
Of course it depends on how expensive the DLC is
Granted I don't dislike dlc which only add areas. I loved the ship from tbh ex HR
I like when the content is meaningful like DAO Awakening
I always struggle to get the motivation to finish dlc content. Even if it's a game I really like I barely ever finish the dlc.
idk why.
Because it's filler
frozen wilds was dlc perfection, and it is how expansions should be done
convince me otherwise
you can't