I don't like that she has the white part of the eyes.
1 week ago
Anonymous
They're unfortunately necessary for Namco to fully get AtGames off their ass, otherwise they could potentially just say "all you did was make her pinker, give her thicker lips and swap her bow for a hat, she's still Ms. Pac-Man GIVE US OUR FRICKING MONEY YOU homosexualS".
1 week ago
Anonymous
No they aren't. The Jr. Pac-Man replacement doesn't have them. Namco Bandai are just moronic.
1 week ago
Anonymous
Honestly I wonder if NowPro (Re-Pac and Museum+'s developers) intentionally made her design bad to create further backlash in hopes that Bandai Namco finally cave in and try to get those rights back.
1 week ago
Anonymous
I think it's just to compliment her most known appearance as Ms. PAC-MAN
I prefer her 2000's design, thank you. Also "Pac-Mom" is a stupid as hell name that led to a bunch of edgy conspiracy theories and controversy that people tried to pass off as canon. Absolutely hate it.
Bandai Namco are a multi-billion dollar company. They have more than enough money to buy the full rights permanently.
They're just too cheap and prideful so they're rather pretend she doesn't exist.
Depends on the legal nightmare coming to an end or not
I would've loved for her to be a alt in smash, also, it should've been the 3ds stage in ultimate, not the wii u stage
>IP was giving to some greedy israelites who want to milk someone else's IP >Namco fed up to the point they're just goinf to move on and rewrite history
She's gone, visually at least.
At least PAC-MOM has a nice MILFy factory going.
*Almost 20 years.
The legal bullshit started when GCC sued Namco in 2006.
All this only got worse in 2019 when AtGames bought the royalty rights from GCC.
>>the current owner of Ms. Pac-Man's copyrights/trademarks/whatever is a manufacturer of shitty plug and play TV games
He’s a Hong Kong/Taiwan dude iirc
>people blaming Bamco when it was out of their hands and the courts had a strong anti-Japanese sentiment in the 80s >pos asking bamco for a billion dollars to hand her over
Yeah nah, frick him. And you can’t expect bamco to use her and give this con artist royalties. Let’s stick to pac-mom until his company dies. Just please don’t buy these fricking overpriced pinball and handheld arcade products they make and they’ll die soon
come back from where?
Copyright hell
okie dokie. just checked. she was replaced with pac mom. pac mom is superior
Pics or it didn't happen
Oooo mommy
I always liked them round and yellow
I don't like that she has the white part of the eyes.
They're unfortunately necessary for Namco to fully get AtGames off their ass, otherwise they could potentially just say "all you did was make her pinker, give her thicker lips and swap her bow for a hat, she's still Ms. Pac-Man GIVE US OUR FRICKING MONEY YOU homosexualS".
No they aren't. The Jr. Pac-Man replacement doesn't have them. Namco Bandai are just moronic.
Honestly I wonder if NowPro (Re-Pac and Museum+'s developers) intentionally made her design bad to create further backlash in hopes that Bandai Namco finally cave in and try to get those rights back.
I think it's just to compliment her most known appearance as Ms. PAC-MAN
Scandalous dame
Okay but why
Does anybody actually like that
Unless you have a normie mindset, yes.
Contrarian detected.
Pac-Mom is one of the ugliest characters I've ever seen.
It's not copyright, It's royalty rights. It's fricking stupid as hell and Namco deserve to be shamed.
ugly.
e-girlgay tastes
I prefer her 2000's design, thank you. Also "Pac-Mom" is a stupid as hell name that led to a bunch of edgy conspiracy theories and controversy that people tried to pass off as canon. Absolutely hate it.
That's boomer fanbases for ya.
>Namco deserve to be shamed.
Black person, it's not their fault a couple of yank buttholes wanted to ripoff a rich japanese company
Bandai Namco are a multi-billion dollar company. They have more than enough money to buy the full rights permanently.
They're just too cheap and prideful so they're rather pretend she doesn't exist.
The court doesn't care if you're rich. They even stopped Namco's "marriage" with Nintendo.
Also, they're not paying millions for a thought lol
Depends on the legal nightmare coming to an end or not
I would've loved for her to be a alt in smash, also, it should've been the 3ds stage in ultimate, not the wii u stage
>IP was giving to some greedy israelites who want to milk someone else's IP
>Namco fed up to the point they're just goinf to move on and rewrite history
She's gone, visually at least.
At least PAC-MOM has a nice MILFy factory going.
>this shit has been going on for over 20 years
actually fricking nuts
*Almost 20 years.
The legal bullshit started when GCC sued Namco in 2006.
All this only got worse in 2019 when AtGames bought the royalty rights from GCC.
>the current owner of Ms. Pac-Man's copyrights/trademarks/whatever is a manufacturer of shitty plug and play TV games
>>the current owner of Ms. Pac-Man's copyrights/trademarks/whatever is a manufacturer of shitty plug and play TV games
He’s a Hong Kong/Taiwan dude iirc
orb sexo
>people blaming Bamco when it was out of their hands and the courts had a strong anti-Japanese sentiment in the 80s
>pos asking bamco for a billion dollars to hand her over
Yeah nah, frick him. And you can’t expect bamco to use her and give this con artist royalties. Let’s stick to pac-mom until his company dies. Just please don’t buy these fricking overpriced pinball and handheld arcade products they make and they’ll die soon