Does AI art have a place in game development? There's a huge push against it right now. How long do you think it will be before AI art wipes out most human illustrators, if it ever will?
Does AI art have a place in game development? There's a huge push against it right now.
>AIslop
Eh it's fine if you know what you're doing. The furry porn models are surprisingly robust. Check out their general on /trash/ and it will blow your mind.
I've seen those generals. Not exactly impressive. It seems people in their late 30s and 40s would find it amazing, but overall it's just a dumb gimmick once you understand how the technology works behind it. Ignorance truly is bliss here.
>dururruru if u understand da technology. hmmm if only u were smrt land hip ike me then mayb u wouldnt be impressed
holy shit you're a homosexual
Take your meds, grandpa.
>once you understand how the technology works behind it
all games can be boiled down to a finite state machine and that doesn't make them any less impressive
as long as the technology allows me to make images that follow my requirements I don't care how dumb or gimmicky it is
I wanna frick the lizard men and be gay with them
If you are less creative than a robot which can only copy and rearrange shit then you shouldn't be in the industry
You are an extreme homosexual and moronic to dismiss AI which can cut development time considerably.
yay more cut corners I love it when games are rushed to shit and have no oversight and now we get them with even less human element behind them. I can't wait to see all the nightmarish errors AI games have because the third worlders making them lack enough awareness to realize human beings have more than six fingers total. imagine the GTA remakes but for EVERY game! so cool!!!
You are an uncreative person.
Frick big companies, i was mentioning it for solo and small indie devs.
>implying indie devs would do some clean up
lol Indiegays are the ones flooding the scene with asset flips, most indie devs are lazy
Everyone is less creative than a robot that can draw any kind of existing art and everything in-between. Literally no human could possibly be more creative.
>arranging fuzzy logic
>creativity
lol
>creating different things isn't creative
No, it isn't, robots have been "creating" stuff for decades, but it's a set of instructions, that's where the creativity lies, on the base of the program, the action of creating AI is "creative", whatever it pumps out, is merely a result of this.
I'm speechless.
Show me the AI that can animate like Tex Avery.
AI isn't good at animation yet.
Soon
It'll be a while until AI is doing crap like looney toons.
I use AI for all my games textures because it can generate anything I want for free, in seconds, upscale, seamless etc etc.
Now why should I pay someone to make textures for me again?
Who asked you to pay someone else, texturing is easy as frick, you should be doing it yourself but do the bare minimum, that displays what kind of a person you are, and what kind of thing you produce.
>texturing is easy as frick
Post portfolio
based
>texturing is easy as frick
it's time consuming and the ai can do a better job
>ai can do a better job
Depends, if the job consists in coming up with whatever as fast as possible, yeah, it will pump out an interpretation of what you want, but anything specific needs to be curated.
>your games
I'm sure I'll be buying your special game any day now, anon.
>putting him down for no other reason than to cope
You seriously think the people wageslaving away doing video game textures are some kind conduits of creativity? They do exactly the same thing as AI, they just cost more
you shouldn't get to dictate what people can do and infact you do not. indie distribution platforms exist.
spbp.
>all the aijeets seething in the replies
kek.
The only place AI has in games is the sort of stuff NVIDIA is developing.
Nvidia is developing everything though.
What the frick is he holding in his left hand?
hands
So what model did you use? It looks interesting but a bit weird on the character.
broken hand but perfect breasts
post more breasts
this is the 'trigger discipline!' reddit comment of AI posts
>serious issue with anatomy
>pointing it out is reddit
issue
It is, moron. Anatomy is important.
Only to abject autists who act like random images mean anything.
It's a tool. It's not going to replace every other form of art development nor have zero use.
Even literal solo artists will find uses for it. Some chick I know uses it help make the in between frames in her gay furry animationd
>How long do you think it will be before AI art wipes out most human illustrators, if it ever will?
Since humans are slow to adapt i still give them 4-6 years in business but realistically everyone that is not braindead knows its already over.
>Does AI art have a place in game development?
Yes.
>There's a huge push against it right now.
lol no there isn't.
>How long do you think it will be before AI art wipes out most human illustrators, if it ever will?
It never will but Dalle-3's release will further dull the blade artists had.
>Dalle-3
Didnt know openai still even gave a frick about their art project considering DALL E 2 has been dead in the water ever since Midjourney came out with v4.
3 is immensely better and will be much more useful than anything else for money related projects.
>DALLE 3
LOL. This shit was dead before it launched.
What?
>DALL-E 3
imagine paying for something censored that you can do on your own system with complete freedom and for free
DALL-E cucks will never understand...
Sure
It's a great model, obviously we won't be using it because we only care about anime girls with huge breasts
>He shills DALL-E 3 as he posts something that not even midjourney can do.
It was a good bait i guess.
Could be him, who knows, there's a lot of sick people out there these days
Dalle-3 is miles above anything else because they have billions of dollars and literally all the data to train it. And Midjourney is getting a motion model soon. You're being a gigantic homosexual, chill out.
The base model is, absolutely. The issue is that after all of the ethics training, neutering racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic/ageist/ableist/whateverist content, and so on, you end up with a supremely weak model that can't do much because it's been intentionally prevented from doing much.
It's much like the American soldiers back in a memoir I read who kept getting mogged by children who would walk up to them, throw a grenade at their position and then run away, only to do it again a few minutes later. Even though the soldiers were far and away better fighters, the excessive amount of restrictions made them worse than literal kids. They couldn't open fire until the kids became combatants, and then as soon as the kids ran they couldn't engage anymore because the kids were unarmed.
that ended when they were reinforced by some special forces marines who had completely different rules of engagement; after the kids did it one more time and the marines saw it they gunned down the kids the next time they approached and it completely stopped
>special forces marines who had completely different rules of engagement
Why not give normal soldiers those rules of engagement?
Don't tell me, bureaucratic bullshit
And media and diplomatic relations etc.
It never looks good shooting children regardless the reason or justification. Kids are always victims and even if they ran at you with a nuclear device you'd get fricked internationally by media and people if you shot him.
It's fine for a VN background to not make all that much sense when you look at it too long or have Hitlerisms in the buildings, but you're not getting an AI to generate specific characters on its own and then draw the exact same characters in the same outfits performing some specific act with eachother.
Dunno for sure though since every game I've seen that uses AI also seems to be made by complete brainlets who use stock NovelAI or midjourney for portraits.
>but you're not getting an AI to generate specific characters
This is literally how character LORA's work and if trained correctly can keep them extremely consistent throughout generations, provided you're using the same prompts or only editing them very slightly.
It's completely neutered. Forced diversity weighting, cutting out artist names from prompting as well as cutting out "violent" images (this includes shit as basic as an explosion or a tank or attack helicopter). Stable Diffusion will always be better. I have about 5000 images on my PC to show you why but I'll get banned if I post them.
Guys look closer
https://huggingface.co/spaces/AP123/IllusionDiffusion
>People were too moronic to do their own illusions using stardard img2img
>There's now a specific model to do it
>It's been a year since i2i illusions were funny
now that's just grim.
>illusions using stardard img2img
What the frick is an illusion. Pls fill in a slowpoke.
The classic, the thing that brought a lot of people into Stable Diffusion in the first place, basically take an existing image and then use the Img2img part of the software to change the image and make it a different thing but similar enough to what it used to be, that way when people see it's thumbnail their brains fill in their blanks and believe that the illusion is the existing image until they look at it closer and see that it's actually something else.
You should have been on the early days of /sdg/ there was a guy that made all of the lady politicians.
Hillary, RBG, AOC, Merkel, Queen Elizabeth, Thatcher, Kamala, poor dude was obsessed
can you do some of this lady with the face of hillary clinton, ty
someone on /b/ is using politician faces for porn today lol
As long as its using copyrighted work for training it wont. Big companies will have their own in house models trained on their own ip but they wont be as good as the ones that scrape the internet. Indies will do whatever because they dont have legal teams advising against it
AI can only do concept art right now, artists still have to do the actual implementation of it which is the hard work
It's the most labor intensive work but concept arts have a huge influence on what the game will look like.
You will never be able to afford hiring Daniel Dociu or Viktor Antonov to set the art direction of your game but you can get an approximation.
>the capabilities of AI art are absolutely limitless! it can do anything!
>uhhh actually it can only make anime slop and thats about it
oh no no no sisters...
"sike that's the wrong number" is just god tier
the image that killed anti-AI trannies
The best I ever saw was when an /ic/ moron was on Ganker criticizing a literal photograph of a granny with flabby skin, pointing out errors supposedly caused by AI. I was laughing so much at the damage control when the anon proved it was just a photograph he used to troll him.
>and then everyone stood up and clapped with their 6-fingered hands
You know the rules anon. Your story is bullshit until you bring up the archive link.
It's a story from back when Ganker had like 50 general threads a day, I doubt I could find it.
>back when Ganker had like 50 general threads a day
I remember that!
It's too bad the hype died down afterwards.
I actually found it instantly heh
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/89394762/#89395166
i was literally in that thread, most people were calling it out and the others were samegay false flags
I just checked the thread and you're a liar.
what drives a man to lie like this
He looked at the timestamps and saw the posts are at cool down times. And kids draw sanicor sornic, not on model sonic, so it's already suspect.
>it can only make an-AAAAACKKK
It can do other styles reasonably well, just gotta train loras for them
Is it just me and this place has infected me too much or do the trees attempt to spell out Black person in the thumbnail.
you're just a chud sweaty
kek
poor AI had to check the original image to create this, rip
post coinslot, I dare you
take meds. now
No, you clearly have eyes, you're not racist.
Automatic tools are hurting the industry right now, tons of games simply use the models that some program shat out, hence the terrible optimization, and AI will only make it worse.
>mentally ill moron talking about multiple things he literally has 0 idea about.
AI is the same as procedural generation. If used properly it can be fantastic. Imagine old games revamped to have more content and virtually unlimited art.
>Imagine old games revamped to have more content and virtually unlimited art.
A decade ago I would have been all over this but now I'm completely against it, if anything the fact that we as a society keep trying to double down on shameless indulgence should be cause for concern. Old games happened, they were good and fun, that doesn't mean we should keep regurgitating the same IPs and brands over and over ad nauseum
He's saying you'll be able to get more of what you want but you apparently don't want anything.
I don't want a Contra with procedurally generated levels, yes.
I want more new and unique ideas being created by people willing to put in the time and effort to make them rather than perpetuating the same things over and over again using tools made to push out the bare minimum fast and easy
Currently I'm not. This appeals to the 1% of shit standards. And before you think 1% is too small, 1% of 8 Billion people is still far more than 1 million people. 1 million people with shit standards for AIslop is still a LOT of pointless people shitting up human standards with their shit taste.
Pandering to the one percent that isn't helping to advance humanity shouldn't be allowed.
Since when did the majority have good taste? I sweat to god anti AI people are actual morons, you never post anything it's all just tears.
>I sweat to god anti AI people are actual morons
>I sweat to god
Oh the ironing. It’s always ESL third worlders pushing AIslop.
t is right beside r
>Good taste
Every single time someone says this, I picture them with socks and sandals
I could tell it was AI immediately from how incoherent it was.
>The smartest anon on Ganker
>Falls for the illusion and only sees one thing
>The illusion is this good
Damn
What illusion? That they tried to hide Black person in sihtty AI zeldashit?
>had to go back and find the illusion because he reacted too quickly
what the frick does "CoHEsiOn" have to do with a shitpost
The post was shit.
>those grapes suck
i trust AI more than millennials to code and write a good game
>Mc Donald's is gonna take over home food, YOU ARE GONNA BE REPLACED
lol
>Food analogy
lol
Nice, BotW style LoRA?
>It took him this long
Bravo anon!
>BotW style LoRA?
yep
catbox me familia.
Don't care, I enjoy every second I spend on fapping to AI slop.
Its a bummer about the backlash. The use of AI absorbing assets, code and art and being able to use prompts to print out content would be in the long run a huge improvement for gaming.
No more months/years spent rigging animations, simply load the style you want and edit it with AI. No more years spent developing games, now smaller teams can do more in less time.
Its on par with any machine. It can be misused and the amount of slop will for sure increase, but its continuing existence and improvement would be overall a good thing. This whole backlash gives a "exporting jobs" vibe.
Given the choice, most will take the easy road, google had this problem back in the 2000's, schools were scrambling to accomodate the new tool that could provide with the entire course in a click of a button. Instead of relying on it for reference, everyone learned to copy/paste and twist, it is happening right now again, only ones using it are lazy unskilled people, doing all they can to do the least.
Dall-E is an image model.
Yeah, pretty drunk atm and I think I need to stop posting and go back to lurking.
Using AI for texture work isn't a bad idea but unless the people using it know what they're doing when prompting (they don't) artstyles and colors will clash when putting it all together and it will look like shit without being able to point a finger to why.
Everything will just end up looking like unreal asset store slop, because why would they hire talented artists and then use AI?
So far the only reason I could ever think to use AIslop is in things people care little for the "random imperfections" that come from nature. Like how dirt is arranged or how a stylized tree or cloud is shaped.
Anything man made is off limits, because it doesn't get the intentions of human minds.
Ai isn't going to "wipe out" humans. Purely AI generated stuff, more often than not, will never look quite right. There'll always be something a little off.
What IS going to catch on is "ai assisted art", where AI doesn't take over, but rather becomes another tool in the arsenal of artists. AI can generate an image, then the artist can go in and change it, fix mistakes, add more details, flesh it out. Or they can use the ai generated image as inspiration. Or they can draw their own image then use an AI to spruce it up. There are lots of options, none of which include "wiping out human artists"
You misunderstand what AI is aiming to do, and it will achieve that goal.
You can see the where the most value lies, instead of creating a model that calculates topology and optimize it, they made one that shits out photogrammetry crap, with no regard for topology. And I doubt they'll ever try to come up with one, judging by the way the current users talk, they are happy with the results.
are you drunk?
I've fiddled around with some of this stuff before. Kind of neat.
>LOOK WHAT I FOUND ON GOOGLE SEARCH
Everyone hated that kid
I used an image generator for these, not google search.
Ehhh I just tinker around with this stuff. I'm not serious enough about it to increase the resolution or anything like that.
Have fun 🙂
This looks awful.
Sorry is this any better?
>inb4 crooked hands
nta but the right hand could use some work. Have you tried inpainting?
Yea but it's often unreliable, haven't mastered the inpainting of hands. I'm sure there's a way to get it right the first try but i haven't really tried
it's just luck
I get you.
I've probably only inpainted like once or twice. Usually, I just make edits in Photoshop and use img2img at low denoising, even though that slightly changes the whole image.
Use controlnet. It has an option called Openpose which lets you pose a framework of individual fingers, hand rotation, wrist rotation, etc and it can create great hands.
Try using Hires fix, nobody renders 512x512 these days
>512x512
>not rendering in 128×128
Ngmi
AI slop is very uncanny and unnerving to a white person's eyes, so it's never going to see wide usage outside of asset flip VN trash.
>AI IS BAD BECAUSE IM WHITE AND I SAY SO
I've been laughing so much at the seethe this past year.
https://files.catbox.moe/kpju2a.png
Eventually it'll be useful but for now it's shit. Give it another decade or so.
I tried using it for inspiration and it sucks. It doesn't even know what a cyclops is, even if you describe one it can't generate it.
https://civitai.com/search/models?sortBy=models_v2&query=cyclops
These are all tranime.
if you can't use a lora to do whatever you want you are mentally challenged
No they aren't, frick you
>ai shill thread
>its just garbo spam of shit images
>and larping morons pretending they are creating something
Which one did you use?
Even better, here's a bunch of images of cyclops and one eyed characters.
https://civitai.com/search/images?sortBy=images_v2&query=cyclops
How bold and power this ai image is, how the internal message can definately help the push for AI to take over without any pushback for its support.
Just imagine devs using any old AI image only to be canceled for it. Then all that would be left is actual artists and actual game devs making hand made kino like the days of yore. I can't wait for the "AI upbringing".
Nigel?
>ai is the best for gaming
>just dudes posting ai softcore porn
Why am I not surprised
Be the change you want to see. This is why AI is so cool. I only make elves, that other anon only makes ugly hags, then there is the third anon making gruesome scenes. And then OP who was just looking to post a stupid image. What do you like and why aren't you sharing it?
The promise of AI is being able to create vidya you want to see.
The outfit is so much worse than the hands here.
>almost exposes shoulders in a cute way, but fails
>looks like she has a big ass wallet under her tiddies
Why does it say Nioh...?
Have you ever thought of how awesome a Nioh-styled Zelda game would be?
>nioh style
shit
Nioh is great go frick yourself
>AI can't make this
KWAB
train a model, use IP adapter, or reference it with controlnet
I'm using AI for small icons and buttons. They are too small so it's impossible of scrutiny them lol.
>I dont want my game to have sovl
based
>No more months/years spent rigging animations, simply load the style you want and edit it with AI. No more years spent developing games, now smaller teams can do more in less time.
it will happen
what moron will say no to this
moron
You can already use stuff like this for games, I saw a company selling some AI animation tool the other day. Nvidia is working on something much larger, they'll eventually put out a universal animation system to go along wit that universal model system they have.
Like they said in that video they want people to be able to simply direct npcs to move like they want, like you would a real person. They want to invalidate motion capture actors basically.
>invalidate motion capture
Thats pretty amibitious. Motion capture is a lot cheaper these days and people can do stuff like that v tuber puppet shit incredibly easy. I wonder if they're considering how accessible mocap could be by the time they roll that out.
It's just a milestone towards ultimate AI. And teaching AI to animate themselves will help with any CG. Also "cheaper" doesn't mean much to some jobless neet making his dream game, he can't afford a martial artist.
Animation libraries already exist, this is just a variation.
An artist's job is to show the audience something they need to see. That is very rarely what the audience wants to see. Audiences do not know what they want. If they did, they would be artists. The problem with AI art, is that it can only operate on art that has already been made and requires large quantities of it at that. Thats why you all post porn, because there is so much pornographic content online to make datasets out of. Porn is the ultimate thing that audiences think they want to see and because of that it is very, very rarely challenging or memorable. I think these ai tools are great, but the thing holding it back is this discussion of a false dichotomy of tech bros and butthurt artists. Artists are the ones with the skills to look at any image, generative or not, and instantly identify what makes it look uncanny, but they have to be at least a little technically adept to find or create a dataset that suits their needs. Meanwhile, techbros get so excited to share prompts with increasingly sophisticated visual fidelity, but they shrug it off when people point out basic anatomical and perspective mistakes - when it would only take entry level digital art production skills to scrub out an extra finger or realign a subjects eyes.
Is this a real post?
Thanks, this is exactly what I'm talking about. You could spend a little time studying digital art techniques and correct all the flaws in your prompts. Likewise, artists intimidated by ai tools could spend a little time learning how to prompt and increase their output ten fold. But like most internet communities, proompters and artists alike have let this incredible oppurtunity for growth and change devolve into an endless shit flinging party.
You're implying artists naturally have magical abilities and can "fix" any error when their own art is evidently garbage most of the time. And I don't know why you think growth is so important, how are your skills doing?
Yes, good artists have the capacity to do that. What is the point of pursuing any creative hobby without making an effort to produce something better than your last work? I'm pleased with my skills. I've had some success using AI to produce backgrounds and in between frames for animation work. Obviously I won't post it here as I've already indentified these threads as cesspools of stagnation and unwarranted hubris.
uh huh
>how to prompt and increase their output ten fold
AI is worthless for any real artist, and no AIgay is going to learn how to draw because if they did why the frick would they use SD shit?
They'll call you a troony, but I'll show you respect and call you a narrow minded fool. AI is a fantastic tool for any visual artist clever enough to use it effectively, without compromising their style. People said exactly what you said about photography and they were as wrong as you are. Some of my favorite manga and comic books use lots of photobashing techniques and I hope to find great works in the future that use clever applications of Ai tools.
I want to reply to this but I can tell you're an unreasonable troony so there's no point. People suck these days.
Considering how god awful art is made by "professionals", yes.
It will happen, and we're going to get a new age of the worst slop you've ever seen. Whatever crumb of quality was left in videogames is going to be replaced by soulless garbage and the normals will slurp it up.
>How long do you think it will be before AI art wipes out most human illustrators, if it ever will?
It wont. Got nothing against it personally but it's major cope to ever think real art is going anywhere.
I only make art to see what I am capable of personally creating. Translating the stupid ideas in my head to the screen as close as possible. There's no satisfaction from pressing a button and getting something dispensed to me. Although it is fun for making images like "Donkey Kong meets an alien ww2 historical photograph"
99% of ai looks the same. once youve seen one, youve seen them all. but i dont really care if you like the taste of shit, more power to you.
but jjesus, the animations are the worst. you cant look at them and say in good faith that it does NOT look like an amalgamation of slop, and i mean that in the literal sense. its like a bowl of random slop being stirred without rhyme or reason, its soullessly eldritch. its mass produced slop made for quick easy consumption. admitting to liking it, even ironically to pwn le artists (crab mindset) is still consuming slop.
do not bully me
>soullessly eldritch
oxymoron, all eldritch is soul
When it becomes good it will be used. It's still not good. Simple as.
yes, eventually everyone will cave when they can't tell the difference, probably 2 years
I will be using AI to generate art and textures, because I can't find someone to draw full time, and I have nothing to pay them, and AI would do a better job anyway by exploring many different concepts and revisions without getting annoyed at my requests
eventually people will rely on AI to generate models, do topology, texturing, etc
anyone not using AI tools will just not be able to compete as anything they do will cost 20x more than someone who does use AI for a productivity boost
>probably 2 years
Oh shit, its not 2 weeks anymore lmao
>2 more years
Nobody unironically says "two more weeks" for AI besides shit-stirrers.
smells like cope here
when its going to be 20 more years?
Eh, who knows? I personally am more interested in textgen, but Stable Diffusion still has a long way to go before it's suitable for asset production.
Progress is going along, though it's admittedly slowed down over the past few months, and the censorship that the newer models have is concerning.
For characters no. It's been over a year since stable diffusion release and image gen still has problems with anatomy, artifacts, and consistency.
I've tried all the tricks with making my own LoRAs, controlnet, editing in photo editing software etc. AI can't maintain character consistency
Try recreating a character with a different expression, or different outfit, and you start to see the issues. One thing will be right, but something else in the image is off-putting. For characters it doesn't have a place unless your standards are low.
The only reason to use Aislop at this point is for textures in games no one cares about like dirt or clouds. Nothing man made, because it doesn't get the intentions of human minds.
Yes its a tool like anything else and It will always have a place. It will probably never wipe out human illustrators because large projects are going to need art directors and at least a handful of illustrators to at least create some rough idea of what they want the world to look like you cant just half ass it with ai Like you can with your pictures of anime breasts
>It will probably never wipe out human illustrators
If we're talking about in the workplace then yes it will. People will always draw for fun though.
I don't really care about AI but I love how mad it makes some absolute losers so I'll hype it for free
>Does AI art have a place in game development?
Yes.
> How long do you think it will be before AI art wipes out most human illustrators, if it ever will?
It won't ever happen because we live in a capitalist world where art is owned by the one who made/bought it.
I'm 100% AI will get censored in the future. It already started to happen with online services like AI Dungeon and pretty much all image generators out there censoring even basic stuff like "girl" prompt. So I enjoy current moment as much as I can, now is the golden time when sjw homosexuals didn't regulate it yet.
good luck censoring something which runs on local computers and is finetuned privately
Yes, but who knows what will happen in the future. Maybe they'll enforce shit like certain censored BIOS in new Nvidia cards which will prevent you from generating certain stuff or something like that. Or some advanced new models which will be censored by default. Those homosexuals always find a way to ruin the fun. Always.
>He doesn't run models locally
I do.
please stop listening to mentally ill trannies desperate to delete AI
AItrannies deflecting are always hilarious
>literal who, probably you
speaking of desperation
>sheher
>male avatar
Nah, I'm hopeful for the future.
It better be finetuned privately on linux. Windows could require an internet connection to run and thoroughly track your activity at some point.
>IT WILL BE LITERALLY 1984 THIS TIME GUYS
>TRUST ME!!!!!
Pretty sure Stable Diffusion and Meta's chatbot models can be run offline with no censorship
>He doesn't run models locally
Well aren't you a special one
I don't care for the polarized arguments, just the technology.
>Anime breasts is technology
You are moronic
weird ass perspective
Not yet, it isn't good enough yet. Although I guess a reap artist could touch it up so never mind, yeah, it can be in games, I don't care
How does pixai compare? Its the only one I have tried and it never really makes anything I like. Is it shit or am I shit at using it?
Never heard of it, online service?
Yeah its online. Just want to know if its considered a typical example of a generator, in which case I can give up or if its bad, in which case I will try something proper and local instead.
I think you should try something local, it looks a bit "off"
>had fun generating stuff with unstable diffusion for weeks
>finally got myself a powerful card
>can't recreate the style of stuff I used to generate
Damn, I expected it to be super easy but none of the models I tried produce similar style.
What models did you used to make the stuff you liked?
I used Unstable Diffusion, online service.
Okay and what models did you try after getting the GPU?
these
Not sure how to help you, there's a lot of models based on unstable diffusion on Civitai, the closest one i found to your results is Unstable Barbie (yes it's a complete shitpost)
https://civitai.com/models/117861/unstable-barbie
Nah, looks too realistic. Unstable diffusuion's digital art model use a nice mix between digital and realistic style which I just can't recreate.
The only place AI has any place in is game translation/adaptation.
you're a funny guy
AI has a place in anything as a resource. Not a finished product, but an item to use to ease up part of the creative process.Make a cool background, use a real person to remake that image without the AI errors, and bam; you have the steps between concept and application done in FAR less time.
Anything made by AI, at least in the foreseeable future, is NOT a final product, and should never be treated as such unless you're just trading lewd images with friends.
why say something so wrong
it's good for miniscule background props and assets that you can cover up with a good shader and post process settings, but not for anything cohesive.
you can maybe run some cc0 assets through an ai to modify it, but raw asset creation is still hard to pull off and assemble into a polished product if you don't already have an art background.
This is the first AI thread in a while that didn't get deleted, auto-saged, and/or hit the bump limit really quickly because of all the shitposting.
will AI ever be able to create fresh art styles that have never been seen in vidya or in other media before? Perhaps, but not for another decade at least. In the meantime, we depend on people like pic related to keep innovating in the medium. Having said that, there have been very few truly original concept artists/designers in vidya in the last 20 years.
It can create new illustrated art styles and will eventually be able to convert those to 3D.
post examples/proof please
Is there even a point? You're obviously either feigning ignorance or you haven't seen any AI art which is unlikely.
POST EXAMPLES/PROOF PLEASE YOU FRICKING MASSIVE SHITSTAIN
Yeah no point. You'll just say that isn't new and act like a moron after every reply.
in the meantime I'll keep posting sovlful concept art and you can riposte with something equally good, but AI-generate :3
thankyou, I'll do that!
https://desuarchive.org/g/search/subject/sdg/
4000 threads with 150 images each
Have fun
this. AI is still wildly uncreative, even if it does make beautifully clean images. I'm not even knocking it I just don't think it can do everything people claim it can.
What is wildly creative art?
>4000
Can't believe, that number was less than 100 just last year
4000 + unmarked threads. Thinking about it that's probably the most popular general Ganker has ever had.
don't forget thats JUST for Ganker, there are stable diffusion threads on loads of boards. mostly the porn ones. Ganker is the main hub and /b/ is the main hub for people with no limits.
Bump, literally most interesting thread on Ganker rn
Then go back to your shithole general spamming AI garbage instead of samegayging
stop seething and return to twitter luddite.
>Leave my shit hole alone and go back to yours
I see no difference anon
They aren't shitholes you salty loser. Being witness to the birth of a new art genre is something most people don't get to experience. Especially one as important as this.
yes anon, all the AIslop posters in this thread are actually just one guy who's samegayging across several dozen IPs because he wants to piss (You) off
Literally cannot do anything besides 'single character in a generic pose' lmao
literally open source so I know from experience that you have a skill issue and parroting things from a year ago when things change every week.
It can have a place. There's a small push against it, but it can easily be bypassed. I don't think AI art will wipe out most artists because some people don't just draw art for attention and money.