Seriously what's the appeal?
so far seems like a rollercoaster of a game that takes absolutely no effort, just mindless button mashing
sidequests are literally fetch quests
progression system is bland
combat is dull
It doesn't help that the game treats your char like some badass chosen one, throws giant but helpless monsters your way, which I think you don't even have to do anything to beat, just let the pawns deal with them
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
It gets good when you quit being a tasteless homosexual.
>Does it get good?
look it's not a rhetorical question
I want to know
>quit being a tasteless
the first 2 sidequests you get are literally fetch errands
if this is your idea of tasteful design, I'll pass
Game starts after beating the dragon.
>Game starts after you beat the prologue
>Game starts after you get to gransys
>Game starts after you beat the dragon
>Game starts after you beat the ur-dragon
>Game starts after you beat Daimon
The game is bad-to-mediocre with a good under utilized gimmick
Its boring
The sidequests are fricking boring and horrible
The main quest is meh
Bitterblack is better, still shit, basically because the pawns suck its basically just a shittier Dark Souls expansion
We are full, frick off
Cursed gear exist, game turns to pimp simulator. You will need those rift crystals to purifiy cursed gear, so better make your pawn kawaii female, and put your pawn in a bikini armor.
It's just a hive mind game, something that is safe to hype-post about that is Ganker-approved.
Pretty bad piece of work other than that, worthless art
>worthless art
that would be a compliment, but no it isn't
it's pretty obviously a mass marketed electronic entertainment product aka goyslop
100%. I got hyped so I played and finished the first one. From everything I've seen and heard people talk is that the second game is just like the first and that's a good reason. Coping hard to boring world with boring travel is somehow good for this game and bad for games like starfield. It really is just shitty goyslop marketing. Lost 5 bucks but saved 65. Well worth it.
I'm with you OP, the game's popularity almost feels like a psyop to me. I've given it a serious go multiple times and I always lose interest.
I install it, think it's kinda cool then burnout and realise how shit it is then remember why I uninstall it
It was more impressive back in 2012. There's plenty of brilliant bits in it. Exploring a dungeon with a lit lantern and a party, the game had that adventure feel at times. I got about 50 hours of enjoyment out of it, and I hope the sequel managed to fulfill the potential.
Didn't you play bbi?
people who dont like Dragon's Dogma are fine. People who hate Dragon's Dogma wouldnt understand they were being puppetteered if they had a stick up their ass and strings tied to their arms.
Theres just something unsettling about people that are so loud about how little taste or eye for quality they have when they drivel on about how they put 30 seconds into it and didnt like it because everyone told them they liked it.
I'd say nobody cares but how someone could not be amazed at this level of moronation is what id like ot know. Consider what type of person could talk about anything and instead decides to say they dont like this thing everyone else likes.
>Theres just something unsettling about people that are so loud about how little taste or eye for quality they have when they drivel on about how they put 30 seconds into it and didnt like it because everyone told them they liked it.
Truly unnerving.
Quads of truth, satan. Sadly, whenever something is popular on this site, some individuals consider themselves enlightened when they can't find enjoyment on the same things their peers do, so the only conclussion they get is that people are pretending to like something to fit in.
I pity them but oh well, I'm going to keep enjoying the games I like regardless of what Anon A or Anon B say.
>30 seconds into
so when does it get good?
Dark Souls is enjoyable pretty much 10 minutes in
In the tutorial
probably 10 minutes into dragon’s dogma is when it gets good
You talk as if DD was the only game subjected by this phenomena.
Basically every single game on that is discussed on this board attracts a special kind of rabid sperg who can't shut up about the things he doesn't like, creating himself new threads to bash the game(s) in question.
If you're a roleplayer and tasteful RPG enjoyer, it is one of the best games ever made.
If you're an unimaginative underachiever in your life, and reduced to wanting to substitute video games for real life challenges and accomplishments you will say things like "mindless button mashing" and bland, dull etc. You should likely move on to your next 'e-esport' and chase a high you just won't grasp there too since you're not as good as you think you are.
Quads of evil truths in this world anon.
There is no roleplaying in dogshit dogma at all. It's not an rpg in any way whatsoever. There is no commitment to the role and your mage can suddenly forget all spells and become a warrior instead. Game doesn't even even have ANY dialogue options. It's just npcs monologuing at you and sending on fetch quests. World map is small, empty and filled with endlessly respawning mobs in MMO style. It's even worse than other singleplayer mmos like DA:I or Amalur
It's unsettling that such a turd of a game is allowed to be discussed on this board.
>There is no roleplaying in dogshit dogma at all.
This is a you problem. Stopped reading here.
Incorrect. It's the game problem that it is an irredeemable turd and in fact not an RPG
We are on /vrpg/
And it's a very, very shit game
this is "mods make skyrim good" levels of cope we're reaching
>There is no roleplaying in dogshit dogma at all. It's not an rpg in any way whatsoever
Who says it has to be an RPG?
It's a good game homosexual.
Yes, it is bizarre tbh. I assume the mods were paid off given the very strange nature of all the posters for the game as well (they clearly were not from this board originally.)
CRY about it mahiro troony
>Theres just something unsettling about people that are so loud about how little taste or eye for quality they have when they drivel on about how they put 30 seconds into it and didnt like it because everyone told them they liked it.
Anon that's called dissapointment you know that human emotion like what your parents feel regarding (you).
1/10 i felt a slight inclination to voice my moderate disatisfaction with your reply. good job.
>ugh its called fashion look it up
lmao
IMO, peak Dragon's Dogma is after you reach the capital city and then the world opens up and you can go explore wherever you want. If you've reached that point, and you're still not having fun, then I think the game isn't for you.
DD does suffer from having "that part" in the beginning, and by that I mean having to escort the slow carriage to the city. But like you said, after that the game finally begins truly.
thanks for a genuine answer anon
I didn't get there yet, so I'll give it a chance
literally first time I'm even in a thread about DD evar
you spergs are being overly protective for something that is just a product, a very feminine trait ngl
You're being overly protective for something that is just a Mongolian basket weaving forum post, homosexual
Bbi is peak, rest is boring slog.
It feels good for aslong as that mirage of "open world" holds up, which isnt long. Aside from the dragon, the world is just full of Cyclops and Chimeras and it gets awfully boring to fight them after you fight each like 3 times.
>combat is dull
Shit taste detected.
DD1 is easily the best RPG of all time, it’s lost on midwits though so it’s a filter machine on this board.
I like the game, but how is it a filter machine on this board?
It's an action game with leveling, a small open world filled with mobs and not much else, and rudimentary simulation elements that amount to belated novelty.
reductionism isn’t a sign of intelligence or perceptiveness. especially when you are wrong on every mark, you come off as a midwit. the exact type to be filtered by this game
troony avi gay spams that its bad because he was filtered, more troony discord homosexuals brigading against dogma2, and even more people that post how they think its shit because the hydra quest takes longer than 5 minutes.
it’s a filter machine, like much other high art
So what am I reducing from, then? The lifelike NPCs? The riveting freedom of choice? The complex and engaging quest design? The distinct and reactive ecosystems? The deep survival mechanics? The innumerable, labyrinthine dungeons? The complex equipment system where each piece of armor or weapon has unique properties and its own pros and cons? Or the deeply customizable classes, where every skill is useful and no two players will play one the same?
It's the curse of feckless lads to ever criticize the good in search of the perfection they will never even begin to come close to. The perfect state that exists only in their head, and that disappears over the horizon for every game they play or every activity they being to engage with lest they show the weakness of actually enjoying an activity. Nothing is ever good enough for them for they are the prince of the gutter they lay in, sometimes even under, looking up at the sky, looking up at passersby enjoying their lives.
>t. Dragon Age 2 enjoyer
So you admit not even one of those things is in the game, despite many other RPGs having multiple. I'll ask again: what am I reducing?
>what am I reducing?
Yourself.
So my take isn't reducing anything about the game, i.e. it's accurate, and pointing out a falsehood is degenerate behavior? What am I being reduced from and to?
you aren't reducing anything
this isn't a math problem, dumbass
This is already an empty non-game, to reduce it further is impossible.
>reddit-spacing Black person samegays over and over again
holy KEK
It's japanese eurojank, you either like what it's doing enough to put up with all the shit that's in it or you don't.
The amount of seething fanbois and their inability to highlight anything the game is actually good at is just hilarious
It doesn't and it's not an rpg
Soon we will bid a fond farewell to Dragon's Dogma: the closest game to a perfect RPG that has existed to date.
It is uncanny and filled with mystical portent even, that it has been the answer to nearly every:
>What RPG does X best?
question ever asked since 2021.
2012 that is, whoops.
I see what you did there
Actually gave this game a shot recently. It is pretty much Dragon Age 2 except at an even lower quality level (art, fluidity, music, writing, etc.)
Solid 2/10
Babies first nonmainstream RPG.
People who praise were most likely 12 year old who just finished playing Skyrim and then went to google with "fantasy RPGs about dragons" and then had their mind blown by something that's not a bethesda slop.
Now a decade later it's a sacred cow with no flaws.
muh button mashing is sovl, muh shitty fetch quests are sovl, muh dull writing is sovl, muh generic fantasy is sovl.
The game plays like a single player MMO with monster climbing gimmick. And instead of tard wrangling real people you tard wrangle your 1000 years old big tiddie wiener slave e-girl healer.
>And instead of tard wrangling real people you tard wrangle your 1000 years old big tiddie wiener slave e-girl healer.
You could just get on grindr instead of sublimating your sexual frustrations into disproportionately angry sperg posts about good video games though.
Too many DDgays on that app. Wouldn't want to catch their shit taste.
I played the game for the first time in 2019. It's a pretty decent game. Isn't the greatest in the world, but climbing enemies and the final dragon fight are pretty epic. Better then most games out there now. DD2 will probably be GOTY if they don't frick it up.
Based dragons GODma STILL filtering plebs in 2024
Anyone have e-girl pawns on PC? I don't care if you don't play the game anymore either, I just want a full e-girl party and the random pawns in the rift are mostly adults or mage e-girl and I already have one.
I'll take any level but I'm low level right now so if you're looking for riftbucks I'm not your man.
kys pedo
No.
Either you get the game or you don't. It is the closest thing we have to an interactive fantasy novel.
>strange cope
I'll give these Ganker-tards one thing, their moronation and insecurity is at least a little funny
>I got filtered by a fun game that alot of people like and now I spend alot of my personal time attacking people that talk about something they like.
Interesting way of enjoying life.
I don't see it that way. It's my solemn duty to sacrifice my time - nay, my very essence and blood and sweat and tears - to make sure these fools and chuds are put in their place. Only through my deeds can superior discussions take place. Destruction begets rebirth, after all.
>coping and seething even harder
kek'd tbh
>fantasy novel
An impressively apt comparison
No, it never does.
this game is a modern classic for a reason but being a moron prevents you from finding what that is
>this game is a modern classic
According to who? No one is going to play the first game now that the sequel is coming out. This objectively makes it not a classic. Classics don't get replaced.
>a wild weeb appears
tis weak to fire arisen
You don't have any argument against what I've said. This is very important to learn so let's think about this logically. What properties does DDDA have that allow it to be completely replaced, whereas something like mega man 3 would not replace mega man 2? What do these properties say about Dragons Dogma as a game?
I played it for the first time last year. Game good. Only filtered midwits don’t like it.
well first off, we're about to see if people even like the second game
meanwhile the previous game has cult following
I can assure you that DD2 will absolutely crush DDDA just as Monster Hunter World crushed every MH that came before it. What does that say about these series?
World is shit because of clutch claw, senpai
Not a single person on earth will ever play anything made prior to MHW again.
I got bored with MHW pretty quickly whereas I thereafter adored FU after getting filtered by it 4 times. I played 3U, 4U, and GU after which were also all good, and I have no interest in tolerating the Handler blabbing some benign crap in my ear non-stop.
I have no idea what DD2 could do worse than DA though.
It's missing vocations so it's already a downgrade
How are vocations actually any different from weapon types?
i'm playing monster hunter for the first time and started with freedom 2, which is still revered, what are you on about?
i agree with you that DD isn't good though
>
what I find interesting however is DD fangoys instantly get all emotional and have only one type of reaction (shit tossing) to even the slightest criticism towards DD
this is something I mostly observe in women irl
maybe has to do something with being low testosterone? go figure
>obviously no game is perfect
what does this even mean? what is it with channer pseudointellectuals and this platitude in particular?
>and probably no game will be enjoyed by everyone
imagine conflating that with lack of perfection
>what does this even mean? what is it with channer pseudointellectuals and this platitude in particular?
The culture on this board, being composed of a majority of depressed nerds, many of whom are somewhere on the spectrum, is to relentlessly shit on every game out of a sense of inferiority (crabs in a bucket), and also in an attempt to prove one's superior taste. If I think every game is shit, then it means that no game can reach my exacting standards for quality. If I poo-poo everything, then it must mean that I really know what I'm talking about. Mix this in with a dash of hipsterism (my favorite game? You've probably never heard of it / You're too young to have played it), and, ironically, a dose of a Reddit-esque hivemind behavior, while decrying Reddit and other hiveminds (e.g. RPGCodex), despite the fact that the anonymous nature of imageboard posting should dispel this need. Posters frequently feel the need to acclaim what they feel are a safe, group-approved set of classic-but-not-too-classic RPGs that they believe the group will accept as indicating that they are a RPG connoisseur who knows what they're talking about.
The net result of this is that many posters feel compelled to criticize games that they like, or point out how they're "flawed" or "imperfect" or what have you. Others do this out of a sense of intellectual honesty ("those other Black folk are dishonest fanboys who say X is the greatest game ever with no downsides, while those OTHER Black folk are dishonest haters who say X is the worst game ever with no redeeming values, and I, who like game X, through the Hegelian dialectic, accurately describe its strengths while also acknowledging its weaknesses").
The funny part is, though, you'll very rarely see posters make the simple subjective statement, "I liked the game and thought it was fun." Or, those wise elder anons capable of saying "I can see why some people like it, but I tried it and I didn't care for it. I don't think it's for me."
>Mix this in with a dash of hipsterism (my favorite game? You've probably never heard of it / You're too young to have played it)
i can't stand this shit, like i can't believe the amount of people on here who think dark sun: shattered lands or ultima VII or whatever is a masterpiece while bg3 and DE are onions reddit games
>dark sun: shattered lands
I've played it for like 5 minutes, didn't stick with it, no real opinion.
>bg3
I haven't played it, but I've seen footage. Aside from the fact that it looks like a video game movie, what with all the cinematics, motion capture etc. BG3 is using the 5E ruleset. This is akin to putting a real shit engine in a Ferrari and going
>Damn, looks good
Haven't played it, will never play it.
>DE
It's not a game, it's a visual novel.
It's fine if you like them, no skin off my teeth, just realize that there are genuine, and depending on the person in question, very, very deep flaws with the the game and the visual novel.
Sounds accurate. It's boring.
>wall of text and cope
didn't read
shit game
I enjoyed DS 1 though
what if not only can't I see what other people would like about it, but 95% of ""fans"" can't communicate what they like about the game either?
That's because you are an obtuse moron
Asking for specifics is the opposite of obtuse.
lol ok
enjoy your goyslop ligma II, hope you are not a PC player
>
i can't stand this shit, like i can't believe the amount of people on here who think dark sun: shattered lands or ultima VII or whatever is a masterpiece while bg3 and DE are onions reddit games
>dark sun: shattered lands
>ultima VII
are masterpieces in context of release date
now they are just pretty fun and solid games, if you can stomach the visuals
>bg3
it's alright
>DE
it's a masterpiece, and it's going to be a timeless masterpiece
>being composed of a majority of depressed nerds, many of whom are somewhere on the spectrum,
I come here to escape my crippling depression, not be reminded of it, you butthole.
Supps?
This site feeds depression, bro. I recommend spending less time here
I'm currently NEETing after 2 years of working a shit job. I wouldn't say I was happy back then, but I was tired. If you can't aim for happiness, aim for tiredness. Point being I barely even posted here back then, gotta find another job soon.
Sorry man, I'm ESL, the frick is a supp?
Supplements
If you dont overdo it, you can change your life.
Oh, I ain't taking any.
Lift weights, lose weight, quit drinking/smoking weed
>t. knower
spare us that holier-than-thou pose
>According to who? No one is going to play the first game now that the sequel is coming out.
I'm playing it right now.
obviously no game is perfect, and probably no game will be enjoyed by everyone
what I find interesting however is DD fangoys instantly get all emotional and have only one type of reaction (shit tossing) to even the slightest criticism towards DD
this is something I mostly observe in women irl
maybe has to do something with being low testosterone? go figure
homie thats a pretty old game at this point, nobody cares
you are honestly better off playing good ARPG games
DeS, DS or ER
DD is 360-kiddos first arpg, that's it, literally no redeeming qualities
I'm Mrs. Vacations and I'm always an upgrade
I enjoyed the game for the first playthrough but after trying to play it again I came to a similar conclusion to OP. Some of the issues are clearly due to time constraints in development but these are the fundamental issues with gameplay that I've noticed that likely wouldn't have gotten better if they had more time to work on the game:
>Most of the combat is just spamming the the best skills over and over and then playing defensively a bit while you wait for stamina to regenerate.
>There's a lot of gear slots but there's not much depth to the gear system itself
>Commanding pawns is very basic so you can't even play as a tactician
>Schizophrenic stat system where stat growth encourages the player to specialize while augments encourage the player to diversify
>A pointless amount of items and consumables, half of them could be removed from the game without affecting gameplay
What the game does well is the sense of adventure and some of the enemies feel epic when you fight them first, of course that fades after the first playthrough when you explore the entire map and these epic enemies start to get killed effortlessly.
It's worth maybe one playthrough and NG+, after that the game gets old very quickly. I'm hoping DD2 fixes some of this but from what I've seen it has actually made the game simpler with less gear slots, the only good thing is that stat growth seems to have been removed.
>only good thing is that stat growth seems to have been removed.
Guess I won't be playing DD2.
stat growths haven't been removed, it's just that changing your vocation reallocates all the stats you've gained from leveling, so you don't have to worry about missing 30% of your damage if you switch from assassin to sorceror, on the downside you can no longer max stamina and then use that for all vocations
>It really is flawed. There's an intricate system of debuffs and skills underneath the hood but none of them are useful. Why bother with debuffs and fancy moves when you can just light attack everything to death.
Torpor is a fantastic debuff, so much so that it trivializes most fights, and certain skills are useful for staggering enemies especially on hard mode. But I do agree that the system is rather lacking and could do more to make debuffs and skills more meaningful
>stat growths haven't been removed, it's just that changing your vocation reallocates all the stats you've gained from leveling, so you don't have to worry about missing 30% of your damage if you switch from assassin to sorceror, on the downside you can no longer max stamina and then use that for all vocations
None of this is a good thing.
What little room for min-maxing existed has now been removed. Horrible change.
>Torpor is a fantastic debuff
Yeah, unfortunately I'm doing warrior with a sorc pawn, if I could do it all over again I'd get a ranger pawn with rusted bow.
sorcerer is way better at applying torpor
>What little room for min-maxing existed has now been removed. Horrible change.
You don't even need to min max though? Level 200 of anything can destroy the game.
It ain't a question of needing to, it's a question of wanting to.
The ability to min-max is a core part of RPGs. Remove that and you end up with Bethesda or Larian slop.
>The ability to min-max is a core part of bad RPGs
ftfy
min-maxing is shitters and for excel autists
>and for excel autists
Correct.
>I don't like thing therefor it's bad
fair enough.
I feel your pain brother.
>It ain't a question of needing to, it's a question of wanting to.
I get that, but even the first why did you want to min-max? Gear is the most important thing in the game. You could level purely as a magick archer from 10-200, swap to warrior and still destroy everything.
>What little room for min-maxing existed has now been removed.
Good
Frick meta-gamers
Yeah its a game with a fantastic foundation but a ton of flaws which is how it became a cult classic. Thats why I'm looking forward to 2 I hope most of them get addressed
>but a ton of flaws
It really is flawed. There's an intricate system of debuffs and skills underneath the hood but none of them are useful. Why bother with debuffs and fancy moves when you can just light attack everything to death.
It's primarily a problem of design and balance.
The vast majority of enemies in Gransys also don't really have any debuffs at their disposal, so getting gear to resist them is also not really useful.
Then there's enemy variety or lack thereof. It's very much a could have been great game.
*I haven't started BBI yet, so hopefully things improve there.
I like the game and I think that these are reasonable criticisms. It’s not a perfect game, it’s just sovlfvl and fun.
>sidequests are literally fetch quests
I've grown to appreciate light story, instead of the typical CPRG storyhomosexualry.
Fetch quests as such aren't a problem. At the end of the day it's all just an excuse to go slay monsters, but I don't really need the excuse.
>progression system is bland
It kind of is, but at the same time optimizing both your character, your main pawn and hiring other optimized pawns is a lot of fun.
Going from a drooling moron sorcerer pawn to a party that can fell everything without your assistance is extremely satisfying.
>combat is dull
I disagree.
Dragon's Dogma fricked my mom and killed my dad
I'll never forgive it for that
It will never get good because it was pure evil from the start
If you're not finding enjoyment in the game by the time you're working on the wyrm hunt quests, I don't think you ever will. To get there, you've had every chance to see what the game is offering.
>DD2 requires 8GB of vram MINIMUM
what the frick
I loved the first game but I'm not buying DD2
why can't devs optimize their shit
why are you poor?
This baffles me, the game barely looks better than DD1, from the gameplay videos it looks like something from the ps3/4 era. Is it because of the ray tracing? There is no justification for the minmun reqs being so fricking high from what i've seen
Open world kneecaps the PS2-era optimization tricks Capcom has been relying on until now + Denuvolol
Moarlike Dragons Ligma amiright?
if you aren't, or are unwilling to make yourself invested in it don't bother
I don't really know how to explain this, but it's an adventure and if you don't care about the adventure as you're going through it it's not really worth it
I say this as someone that easily has over 600 hours in this game between releases/re-releases, and love it with all of my heart and soul.
>first quest
>challenge the dragon
adventure time
>game forces you into roleplaying a chad
Hell yeah
I unironically don't care about the adventure, but still love the game for the ability to destroy giant monsters with a 2h sword and the climbing. There isn't even that much adventuring. You get a circle showing you on the map where to go and all roads lead to gran soren anyway.
No one cares if you have played your MMO (singleplayer) for 600 hours tbh.
It's all the same shit. You mmo-Black folk need to frick off to Ganker and stay there, or go to /vg/
No.
>why do you want to play an RPG
>on /vrpg/
Thank you mods for letting this ridiculous sore fester to this point
How tf do I beat bbi on hard?
Am fighter/sorc (me and pawn) lv80 or so.
2 warrior minions. Every shit and their sister one shot me.
Strength in numbers, Arisen.
Can't hire more than two, apparently.
Oh, fricking hell. I have to beat the game again?
How many stages are there? I beat the eye just now.
Yeah, I pretty much wield starting gear dragon forged and the maxed dragon archistave.
>Oh, fricking hell. I have to beat the game again?
>How many stages are there? I beat the eye just now.
You can either keep plowing through slowly, or go back and grind on some easier stuff. Maybe try the Everfall. I wouldn't start over. I think you're about a third of the way through your first run through BBI, you're supposed to do it a second time after finishing it, and there's harder stuff
I started a new game on hard and I'm still in chapter two.
No way, the whole area resets? Funny. Some guy with a hammer one shots me. I can't unload spells at him, as its too narrow. The damage formula is shit in dd1. I really might need to gear up.
It's simple. attack vs defense. If you're attack is lower than their defense you'll do nothing. If it's a little above you'll deal "enough" damage. If it's a lot higher you'll delete enemies. If you're having trouble in BBI you're probably undergeared. If you haven't done Everfall do that.
If all else fails, eat one or four periapts.
>It's simple. attack vs defense
Exactly what makes it shit.
I skipped 80% of EV and started a new game on hard. Quest flags are atrocious in dd1. It's clear they cut a lot last minute.
I'm 100% undergeared.
Yeah, started demon periapt on this ng+ (hard). Does do the trick, doesn't it? I killed (cheesed) those giant dogs somewhere in bbi. All my pawns died and I got nearly a million xp, almost lv100 now.
How's Dd2?
quests work on main quest stages. finish a main quest before doing side quests for some reason? lose some side quests. simple.
get better gear, upgrade then dragonforge.
>cheese
dd2 is the same game but 70 usd, worse performance, adaptive difficulty, no e-girl pawns, denuvo and less vocations.
You’re too low level and your gear isn’t good enough. I finished BBI at 80 on normal.
It doesn't.
Who is best girl and why is it Mercedes?
I'm not usually the one to engage in waifuhomosexualry, but Goddamn I love it when devs let me revel in my jungle feverism.
Aelinore, Quina, or Selene, imo
I guess Quina is kinda brownish. As for the rest, disgusting.
Bleating she-goat
She's a tanned Frenchie. Her description is more like Joan of Arc, rather than a Sub-Saharan African. Glad you like her, though.
>She's a tanned Frenchie
I've known Algerians who're more pale than her. She's literally gyppo tier, not that I'm complaining mind you.
Some people have already said this but it needs to be said again. Dragons dogma plays like a single player mmo. But worse than dragon age inquisition even. The amount of trash mob type enemies you will encounter on the road is way too much. Not only is traversing the map on foot slow but the numerous trash mobs makes travel a huge chore. And it being an open world game, travel is a big gameplay mechanic you will find yourself using a lot. And the quests in the game are not very deep. The game is an action game. There are no rpg mechanics. No dialogue options. Not many different ways to sovoe quests. And the npcs have as much depth as in Skyrim. What exactly about this game is good? The plot? The plot of the game is very much barebones until the very end of the game.
>The plot of the game is very much barebones until the very end of the game.
The most refreshing aspect of the game.
Storyhomosexualry needs to die out, especially amongst RPGs.
All it ever leads to is "um actually the writing isn't good"
Just give me the fricking dragons and princesses, thanks
Whelp, so much for that
oof, no way big L ong fr, too much cat sex not enough bear sex 5/10...
SMTV was honestly pretty shit and somehow worse than a persona game. I was real disappointed by that one. Also why was the protagonist a troony
Shills have 2 more weeks left on the payroll so bear with it
We need to start beating j*urnalists to death.
>"journalist" thinks BG3 is better
Kino, good game confirmed
Too many enemies on bitter black isle are sponges
also, the fricking horrible gacha mechanic
just kill daimon? kek, it’s literally the simplest mechanic even a child could understand. want the best possible gear? defeat the hardest possible boss. I see this concept was too advanced for you
I hated dragons dogma at first
Try this:
Roll a new character
As soon as the tutorial where you're eventually gonna fight the chimera starts, pick up your pawn and throw him off a cliff. Don't summon the other tutorial pawns when you see the pawn stone, just get to the end of the tutorial alone
Solo the chimera using all the sword and shield skills, enemy climbing, and the shield perfect block.
That is what dragons dogma is supposed to feel like. If you are fighting something and it is less interesting than that chimera fight, you have overlevelled. The rpg design of DD is atrocious unfortunately and it's way too easy to ruin the game or make yourself bored doing stupid rpg shit. You can equip a shittier weapon or strip armor to try to keep it fun
Does starting class matter stat wise in Dd2?
No just whack whack away
Most boring garbage I ever played, literally nothing about it is good. And as this thread proves, its fans can't point out anything good about it either, lol.
filtered
sunk cost moment
never
https://glitchwave.com/game/dragons-dogma/
Uuuuuuuuuuuuh
Yeah its fun. Its one of my favorite games in terms of world building, story and aesthetic choices. The gameplay is also spectacular and is one of the best games for boss/mob fights when playing an action oriented class like the reds or yellow vocations, or their hybrid classes. I am not a fan of caster gameplay, but the game does have some amazing spells like the ability to summon tornados, giant ice pillars or have meteors fall from the sky and hit your targets.
Its not really comparable to most RPGs, and the closest thing that comes to mind is shadow of the colossus. It feels like a PS2 game that made its way to the 360/PS3 in terms of design choices. The story is short, but its intriguing. I have never seen gnostic themes in a video game before. The music is some of the best I have ever heard and something I listen to when relaxing on my porch drinking ale.
I give it a 9/10. Its one of the only games I have gotten all the achievements for on steam. If you want something like Skyrim, this game is not it.
>I have never seen gnostic themes in a video game before
Have you considered playing a JRPG before?
No, I'm not a pedophile.
>thinks it's gnostic
brainlet
>not an RPG
>has never played any of the dozen gnostic themed RPGs
Why do you insist on posting here? Just take all of your discussion of this shitty action game to the proper place.
Fricking bizarre.
Last Rpg I played is Titan Quest Immortal Throne, so this is a great experience.