>Even after dropping to UU, more players are clamoring for Kommo-o to be banned from the tier and Ceruledge and Iron Hands to be banned again, Garchomp is considered one a trick pony whose only good set is Loaded Dice Scale Shot
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Kommo-o is more threatening now that it got Boomburst(zero drawbacks in the tier) and can Tera for STAB.
>fanfic meta
Yeah, because I'm sure Garchomp is KILLING it right now in VGC.
>competitive troons
>shifting the subject
I accept your concession.
Pokemon is a single-player game
Correct, but only if we're talking about the spin-offs.
Trading and battling with other people has been a major part of the series' identity since the very beginning and they're why they've been able to get away with selling two versions of the same game since 1996.
with multiplayer being a massive selling point*
multiplayer was added at the last second during rb. shut up cucks, you were never the main point of the game and you are just big whinny shitters who get appeased because they know you buy it anyway. Also you still b***h about having to play the games and buy them, which is ironic.
>Getting this mad over people talking about multiplayer in a series whose biggest selling point is the multiplayer
Lmao had a bad day? Need a nappy?
The reason Pokemon was on the gameboy and that the series started is that Taijiri came up with the idea to trade creatures using the linkcable because he felt the thing was not utilized properly in other games.
he put trade first and the multiplayer was added last second. He actually thought about not adding it, at all.
The only reason multiplayer was added was because Nintendo wanted a way to make shillmons look better, now look where we are.
imagine arguing something wasn't ever intended when the game was made in the 90s and could barely support shit
>Pokemon is a single-player game
incredibly based
Hey verlisify. Also, wrong.
Why the ">"?
You know shit's fricked if Garchomp is not in OU.
tera was a mistake, simple as that
OH NO NO NO
Chompbros......we can't even catch a break in UU.....
>scale shot will sav- ACK
>dumb phone poster posting thumbnail
Its fricking over
>refuse to ban terastalize
>it passes 2 suspect tests with 'do not ban' despite the majority of the OU council wanting it banned
>general power creep + terastalize making HO giga rape literally every other archetype creates a seesaw meta where you either have to play screens HO, hazard stack + goldengho, or stall to be relevant
>garchomp gets completely dicked by stall and is too slow for HO, completely invalidated by iron valiant ninetails-alola clefable and great tusk just to name a few
If they just banned Tera and ended the seesaw HO vs Stall meta then garchomp would rise back up to ou naturally.
>le just ban tera!!!!
You're a fricking homosexual. You're in every single thread like this behaving like a gay.
Most bans this gen only happened because Pokemon can instantly change their counters at the start of a turn.
>clown meta
if you played the real game you'd find more usable sets for garchomp
Garchomp in UU is a bad sign. Very bad.
Landorus-T dropping to UU will be worse. Much, much worse.
I wouldn't be surprised if you could interpret a verse or two from Revelations as a prophecy of his fall, because it'll be a shitstorm of Biblical proportions.
Good frick those genies.
Garchomp was bound to drop at some point. It hasn't really had anything going for it in a long time, the lack of DD hurts it as does the existence of a fairy/flying Pokemon.
This. Garchomp's fall was a long time coming. You could see the signs as early as gen 7 when the offensive sets were losing their luster and Chomp was largely reduced to a Stealth Rock setter. Scale Shot gave it a new lease on life but that alone wasn't going to keep it relevant forever.