>Every time I iterate my game preferences I get called a "nogames" because "It won't work it can't be done"

>Every time I iterate my game preferences I get called a "nogames" because "It won't work it can't be done"
>I'm just describing the games I have been running the past few years
>tfw people cannot even believe that games as good as mine exist
Am I really this powerful?

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    You are a liar and a homosexual unless you post receipts.

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Post it. What kinds of systems and procedures are you using? Those of us who like to tinker with the rules will appreciate it even if the 5e gays whine.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Those of us who like to tinker with the rules will appreciate it even if the 5e gays whine.
      This, 100%.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, I keep getting this same shit. I had a rather lengthy talk with an anon in some thread or other about it where he told me my experience was so wildly impossible for others I shouldn't give advice.
      https://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/89132405/#89136519
      Kind of just accepted that honestly.

      NTA but at this point GURPS, or at least heavily houseruled GURPS, pretty much exclusively.
      Procedures are very ad-hoc. Mostly very basic b***h hexcrawl or adapted hexcrawl components where relevant, or just basic logical timekeeping more often.
      I do have some sort of 'clocks' thing I do to keep track of back-end shit, but depends heavily on the campaign, all in all.

      I'd so the most important bit overall is the mentality that the rules arbitrate reality, reality isn't described by the rules. Which is most of why GURPS; a simulationist approach makes it very easy to just make a consistent ruling on whatever's going on.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Someone remembers one of my posts well enough to find it in an archive.
        Holy shit, I never expected anyone here to actually listen to me. Hope your ivory tower is still intact, anon.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          The phrase 'ivory tower of gaming opulence' was hard to forget.

          Bit of a Hiatus due to moves and life stuff, but getting things started back up. Folks decided they wanted to just head east and see what was out there that might influence their territory, so I'm hastily drafting up some hexcrawl procedures. People reformatting some characters since I talked it over with the most mechanically savvy of my players and have opted to tell them to just throw the chargen rules away and do whatever. Not like gurps points balance shit anyway. When I get around to redoing the rulebook I'm probably not even going to include the damned things.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'd like to hear about your game.

      As expected, OP turns out to be a liar and a baiter that abandoned the thread after posting it

      AD&D 1e RAW
      Human only
      Sandbox
      High level politics
      Anti-freakshit
      Mudcore
      level 0 peasant start
      Chudcore
      basically anything that gets people called nogames I run it

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Define "anti-freakshit" in the context of your campaign.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          You know what freakshit is. If it's an animal-person in human clothes, a bullshit hybrid race or anything at all from anime it's freakshit, same with any monster races as PCs

          >Human only
          Who in the world told you a human only campaign can't be done? That stands out as the most blatant, because obviously such a game works.

          This feels more like you tossed together a random list of things that could theoretically get you called any sort of buzzword, rather than things that people have legitimately complained wouldn't function at a table.
          And here I was hoping that this thread might have some actual insight into running what might otherwise be unintuitive game styles.

          >Who in the world told you a human only campaign can't be done?
          /tg/ because apparently I'm a /nogames/

          That list isn't unique or special but if you have games why does it matter what other people think?

          >tfw people cannot even believe that games as good as mine exist
          Possibly your game is good... Or possibly your gaming group isn't invested enough to explain to your self-congratulating personality that they dislike it. That's a possible version of this chain of events too.

          I never thought my games were special until reading on this board

          >this basic b***h set up it's impossible
          Implying, they just called you boring

          Nah, they said nogames

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            >anything at all from anime
            humans are freakshit?

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              human's aren't from anime moron

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                I dunno about that, humans are pretty much just anime apes.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Anyone who says freakshit makes it hard to believe they interact with people at all

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Human only
        Who in the world told you a human only campaign can't be done? That stands out as the most blatant, because obviously such a game works.

        This feels more like you tossed together a random list of things that could theoretically get you called any sort of buzzword, rather than things that people have legitimately complained wouldn't function at a table.
        And here I was hoping that this thread might have some actual insight into running what might otherwise be unintuitive game styles.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        That list isn't unique or special but if you have games why does it matter what other people think?

        >tfw people cannot even believe that games as good as mine exist
        Possibly your game is good... Or possibly your gaming group isn't invested enough to explain to your self-congratulating personality that they dislike it. That's a possible version of this chain of events too.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >this basic b***h set up it's impossible
        Implying, they just called you boring

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nice buzzwords nogames.
        Answer the fricking question next time.
        I'll even give you some time to make shit up cause I know you dont play.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone can do that, but few are autistic enough to want to.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          No Anon, I can believe your game exists. But with what you've said about it, and how you talk about yourself, I can't believe it's good.

          The game does not exist not because what he mentioned can't be done (though I question the validity of "chudcore"), but because I genuinely do not think anyone would tolerate being near OP for more than one second.

          Mudcore sucks

          Players keep coming back and enjoying themselves after 5 years so maybe it's just you who can't enjoy superior chudcore gaming

          >high level politics
          >in AD and D
          AD and D barely supports hexcrawl fort building, let alone high level politics. How about you post a map, bullshitter?

          What about AD&D prevents game-of-thrones style play

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            >5 years
            Half the buzzwords you champion weren't made until /qa/ imploded. Mudcore and freakshit hadn't entered the /tg/ lexicon before 2020.
            Shit anon, I know you don't have anything else going in your life, but at least try to make your bait be somewhat plausible.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            >popularity equals quality
            That makes McDonalds the world's best restaurant.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              >popularity equals quality
              >That makes McDonalds the world's best restaurant.
              Wouldn’t it make Subway the worlds best restaurant?

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not the best, still the most successful and accesible.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Looks neat anon

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you tell them you go online to act like this game is somehow an impossible feat and get into screaming matches with strangers?

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            Mudcore still sucks

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >high level politics
        >in AD and D
        AD and D barely supports hexcrawl fort building, let alone high level politics. How about you post a map, bullshitter?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Mudcore sucks

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'd like to hear about your game.

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    As expected, OP turns out to be a liar and a baiter that abandoned the thread after posting it

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    No Anon, I can believe your game exists. But with what you've said about it, and how you talk about yourself, I can't believe it's good.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      The game does not exist not because what he mentioned can't be done (though I question the validity of "chudcore"), but because I genuinely do not think anyone would tolerate being near OP for more than one second.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *