Be smarter and ignore it. And hardware, especially monitors will be bought used, I will never own a gamer shit monitor, I will always stick to used 1200p eizo flexscans.
It might be true, but it might be true in the same way there are massive increases (!!!!25%!!!! in cancer chance (the regular chance is 0.00038%) when doing/eating x.
that was never a thing anon. it's been disproven and barely referenced anymore, if you use the expression "jacking off til you go blind" they have no idea what you're talking about.
These articles are usually the result of journalists skimming research papers for a single line that vaguely points to their preferred conclusion and basing the whole article around it.
Why would you ever use a 1080p or 1440p monitor when FSR and DLSS exist?
You are willingly and intentionally limiting your computer outside of gaming for no reason.
If you want a games console just go buy one. PCs are for people who do actual work alongside their gaming.
moron. Then again I'm talking to someone who intentionally buys a 1440p monitor to play games for "performance" when DLSS 1440p -> 4k looks better, while not gimping your monitor for literally everything else you'd want to do on a computer.
Imagine thinking you're superior for buying shit Ganker tells you to even when it's advice that's 10 years out of date.
Prove to the world that using DLSS to AI upscale 1440p to 4k is objectively better than 1440p
4 months ago
Anonymous
1440p -> 4k often looks better than native 4k.
So that means it looks better than 1440p.
4 months ago
Anonymous
what am i looking at?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Split screen. Look in the top corners.
Here's 4k with no AA.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Here's 1440p upscaled to 4k using FSR, which is INFERIOR to DLSS but at least you don't have to buy nVidia.
FSR and DLSS are actually useful on 4k, unlike when you try upscaling on a 1440p or 1080p monitor and it looks like absolute slop.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Split screen. Look in the top corners.
Here's 4k with no AA.
And this is 4K with TAA.
4 months ago
Anonymous
now get a screen of all of this temporal garbage in motion
4 months ago
Anonymous
Here's 1440p upscaled to 4k using FSR, which is INFERIOR to DLSS but at least you don't have to buy nVidia.
FSR and DLSS are actually useful on 4k, unlike when you try upscaling on a 1440p or 1080p monitor and it looks like absolute slop.
[...]
And this is 4K with TAA.
Ima Keep it real with u chief. I cant tell any fricking difference.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Blind bros we are so winning (can't see shit aswell)
4 months ago
Anonymous
Exactly. Upscaling 1440p to 4k actually is passable. There's some shit you can notice if you really look hard, but at worst it looks similar and at best (game has TAA if you're not using DLSS/FSR) it looks BETTER.
Open this
[...]
And this is 4K with TAA.
and
Here's 1440p upscaled to 4k using FSR, which is INFERIOR to DLSS but at least you don't have to buy nVidia.
FSR and DLSS are actually useful on 4k, unlike when you try upscaling on a 1440p or 1080p monitor and it looks like absolute slop.
this post in two tabs, zoom in on the exact same spot in each image, and cycle through the tabs with your keyboard.
Look at the hair and trees and grass, you'll see the FSR version has more detail than the Native 4K + TAA slop.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Can't tell if this is a shitpost or if the morons jerking off to the 50 different lights in their pc actually believe it.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Bad bait. If you can't see the difference you're blind. That'd explain why you would buy a $300 1440p monitor instead of a $500 4k monitor.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Not him but I'd probably buy a 1440p 144hz monitor over a 4k 60hz monitor as well.
Also sometimes lower rez is nice if you use older programs cuz they won't be really tiny.
4 months ago
Anonymous
That's why you buy 4k 144hz 32", then you get all the benefits. You can even do mild scaling if you want.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>TAA
Bit disingenuous aren't we
4 months ago
Anonymous
Read the thread homosexual
1440p -> 4k often looks better than native 4k.
So that means it looks better than 1440p.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You're still slapping shitty TAA on a 4K image, nothing native about it anymore you mouthbreather.
ACTUAL 4K > upscaled sharpened 1440p
Next you'll tell me FXAA is amazing anti-aliasing as well.
4 months ago
Anonymous
That's native 4k without TAA moron. Again, read the thread
Split screen. Look in the top corners.
Here's 4k with no AA.
Here's 1440p upscaled to 4k using FSR, which is INFERIOR to DLSS but at least you don't have to buy nVidia.
FSR and DLSS are actually useful on 4k, unlike when you try upscaling on a 1440p or 1080p monitor and it looks like absolute slop.
[...]
And this is 4K with TAA.
There's no point to buying 1440p these days unless you're strapped for cash.
4 months ago
Anonymous
My bad, misread, I thought the TAA screen was to prove FSR 1440p was better than the 4K image for some reason. It's been a long day.
You would not believe the amount of cope people here have to stick with 1080p or dive into 1440p while 4K is clearly superior and achievable these days. The anon saying there was no difference threw me off hard.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You're primed to argue against moronation. You're on Ganker.
You are here forever. We all are.
4 months ago
Anonymous
There is no escape.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Here's 1440p upscaled to 4k using FSR, which is INFERIOR to DLSS but at least you don't have to buy nVidia.
FSR and DLSS are actually useful on 4k, unlike when you try upscaling on a 1440p or 1080p monitor and it looks like absolute slop.
[...]
And this is 4K with TAA.
Ok so native (first) has aliasing artifacts, FSR (second) is slightly blurry but there's no artifacts and TAA is even blurier.
Sorry this just looks the the old FXAA crap from before games stopped having normal graphics options.
So 1440p upscale isn't "better" it just sucks less.
4 months ago
Anonymous
If 4k FSR looks almost as 4k without TAA, then it's going to look better than 1440p.
You're paying more per pixel just to virtue signal about having a lower resolution.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Oh I wasn't aware that was the argument.
I thought you claimed 1440p upscale looks better than 4k.
I was a bit of a luddite growing up and refused to get a smartphone for ages. Only used laptops and desktops until late 20s when I was gifted a smartphone. Well, I got hooked on its portability and lightweight convenience so I began to use it heavily. Its been only about 3 and a half years using it but I've noticed my eyesight dramatically degenerating, exactly in line with my smartphone usage. Ima ditch the phone for anything other than music and calls/messages and ill get a samsung tablet for portable reading and watching video.
Kill experts. Behead experts. Roundhouse kick a expert into the concrete. Slam dunk an expert's baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy researchers. Defecate in a expert's food. Launch experts into the sun. Stir fry experts in a wok. Toss experts into active volcanoes. Urinate into a expert's gas tank. Judo throw experts into a wood chipper. Twist expert's heads off. Report experts to the IRS. Karate chop experts in half. Curb stomp pregnant experts. Trap experts in quicksand. Crush experts in the trash compactor. Liquefy experts in a vat of acid. Eat experts. Dissect experts. Exterminate experts in the gas chamber. Stomp expert skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate experts in the oven. Lobotomize experts. Mandatory abortions for experts. Grind expert fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown experts in fried chicken grease. Vaporize experts with a ray gun. Kick old experts down the stairs. Feed experts to alligators. Slice experts with a katana.
Movie theaters project to their gigantic screens in 2K, everyone is happy, nobody ever complains about it being low-res, but sure, your 30" desktop monitor definitely needs 4K
i'm literally shitposting on a 4k 144hz monitor right now. my nephew bought a 1440p 240hz monitor and he keeps saying he wishes he went for 4k instead.
More like OP wrote himself a fake first paragraph to an article.
The only article posted on that site by that author on that date using that image has nothing to do with screen resolutions at all.
It's a 4Kgay coping that no one cares about joining in on the FOMO.
[...] >Why would you need anything more than a CRT? It's like natural anti-aliasing! Humans can't see over 1080p anyway
[...] >wait till you find out about the research groups that only get paid if their study comes to predetermined conclusion.
I always hear about this, yet no one can name any groups or grants that stipulate this. Can you?
You are just as capable of looking into the people behind it. No one needs to inform your lazy ass.
You can keep believing all you want that Coke just so happens to be nearly as good as water at hydration, but normal people will see a study run by a group set up by Coca Cola, still funded by Coca Cola, and whose current president's last job was as a marketing exec and see nothing wrong with it, everyone with a brain in their skull will.
Your eyes don't do SHIT about that, that's your BRAIN. Maybe you've looked at too many low resolution pictures and your brain strain is getting to you.
while I'm aware of israeli marketers trying to push shit down our throats, in this case it's not bs, obviously you need to scale UI so it isn't for ants.
For a long time I had two monitors, both 24 inch, both 144hz, both TN and both of very comparable class. One was 1080p and the other was 1440p. I spent tens of hours comparing games on both screens and the higher resolution was way easier on eyes, just scale the UI.
sad time we live in. everything is malicious disinfo. good luck learning anything about the world at all without spending hours researching the subject yourself
But we were paying at 720p and 1080p for years on the PS3 and PS4 and it was fine. Why do current gen games needs to be played at 4k to avoid eye damage?
Lower resolution on a higher resolution screen is an issue. Did they specifically test different monitor sizes of they were all the same with different res settings?
So a bunch of hardware manufacturers are annoyed that too many people are stuck at 1080p hardware and paid "experts" to create fake studies.
Yes and what you gonna do about it b***h boy?
Not buy over priced tech? Are you moronic anon?
Be smarter and ignore it. And hardware, especially monitors will be bought used, I will never own a gamer shit monitor, I will always stick to used 1200p eizo flexscans.
nuke taiwan to completely halt the production of new GPUs and Monitors
It might be true, but it might be true in the same way there are massive increases (!!!!25%!!!! in cancer chance (the regular chance is 0.00038%) when doing/eating x.
Trust the Science
Edward Bernays invented this technique by the way
More like OP wrote himself a fake first paragraph to an article.
The only article posted on that site by that author on that date using that image has nothing to do with screen resolutions at all.
It's a 4Kgay coping that no one cares about joining in on the FOMO.
>Why would you need anything more than a CRT? It's like natural anti-aliasing! Humans can't see over 1080p anyway
>wait till you find out about the research groups that only get paid if their study comes to predetermined conclusion.
I always hear about this, yet no one can name any groups or grants that stipulate this. Can you?
The very first post calls out industry trickery
And they hated him for it
This, so much this, but remember when it comes to the pharmaceutical industry this is impossible and you should trust the science.
fippy bippy.
Yeah, this is how capitalism works. Why do you keep voting for capitalists?
yep, time for the government to convert that tax money into my new gaming pc
Who is going to sue Nintendo?
>Harvard
I don't care what those plagiarizing dullards have to say.
yes goyim, buy more pc screens so you can upgrade your GPU and CPU again!
I will go for Team Red this time and buy €2500 7900 XTX, surely they are the good goys, unlike evil Team Green!
>buy more pc screens so you can upgrade your GPU and CPU again!
1440p 140hz is all you need. 1080p was good for its time but 1440p is the new standard.
Seeing poorgays sneed over basic things they can't afford never gets old.
Frick off Shlomo
Or don't, at least you're not bombing schools if shitpost here
Good morning Sir.
Yeah this research totally wasn't paid for by tv companies.
lol.
I just saw the Harvard logo and immediately knew it was sus.
>PLEASE buy these new monitors and GPUs for extremely diminishing returns
Graphicsgays are a joke
Ohhhh yeah, now everything make sense.
I'll spend 5K in a new 8K monitor and the latest Nvidia GPU TI model so I won't lose my eyesight!
*posting from a i7 gen 4 + gtx 970 playing every current gen game available.
I jerk off every day, I'm gonna go blind anyway.
that was never a thing anon. it's been disproven and barely referenced anymore, if you use the expression "jacking off til you go blind" they have no idea what you're talking about.
How much did the researchers pay the ~~*experts*~~ for these studies?
>sissy male
Eggs are Objectively Healthy tho
I heard you're only supposed to eat the whites and dispose of the yolk.
If you have cholesterol problems, sure.
Note: You will not gain cholesterol problems from eating eggs. Something else caused that.
it's almost always sugar, if you want to fix heart issues eat real foods simple as.
only for old people
also why are you racist against yolk people?
Those Egg Council creeps got to you too, huh?
These articles are usually the result of journalists skimming research papers for a single line that vaguely points to their preferred conclusion and basing the whole article around it.
that's most of nu-"journalism" and nu-"science" though
wait till you find out about the research groups that only get paid if their study comes to predetermined conclusion.
consoom
thirdies mad
>Resolution
Do they mean refresh rate?
>1080p with 20/20 at 30
WHERE ARE YOU AT MY FELLOW BROTHERS OF CHRIST.
Why would you ever use a 1080p or 1440p monitor when FSR and DLSS exist?
You are willingly and intentionally limiting your computer outside of gaming for no reason.
If you want a games console just go buy one. PCs are for people who do actual work alongside their gaming.
I can buy 3 1440p, 165hz monitors with excellent colors for the price of 1 4k, 120hz with mediocre colors
No you can't. A 144hz 4k monitor these days is like $500.
With benq tier trash colors
moron. Then again I'm talking to someone who intentionally buys a 1440p monitor to play games for "performance" when DLSS 1440p -> 4k looks better, while not gimping your monitor for literally everything else you'd want to do on a computer.
Imagine thinking you're superior for buying shit Ganker tells you to even when it's advice that's 10 years out of date.
Prove to the world that using DLSS to AI upscale 1440p to 4k is objectively better than 1440p
1440p -> 4k often looks better than native 4k.
So that means it looks better than 1440p.
what am i looking at?
Split screen. Look in the top corners.
Here's 4k with no AA.
Here's 1440p upscaled to 4k using FSR, which is INFERIOR to DLSS but at least you don't have to buy nVidia.
FSR and DLSS are actually useful on 4k, unlike when you try upscaling on a 1440p or 1080p monitor and it looks like absolute slop.
And this is 4K with TAA.
now get a screen of all of this temporal garbage in motion
Ima Keep it real with u chief. I cant tell any fricking difference.
Blind bros we are so winning (can't see shit aswell)
Exactly. Upscaling 1440p to 4k actually is passable. There's some shit you can notice if you really look hard, but at worst it looks similar and at best (game has TAA if you're not using DLSS/FSR) it looks BETTER.
Open this
and
this post in two tabs, zoom in on the exact same spot in each image, and cycle through the tabs with your keyboard.
Look at the hair and trees and grass, you'll see the FSR version has more detail than the Native 4K + TAA slop.
Can't tell if this is a shitpost or if the morons jerking off to the 50 different lights in their pc actually believe it.
Bad bait. If you can't see the difference you're blind. That'd explain why you would buy a $300 1440p monitor instead of a $500 4k monitor.
Not him but I'd probably buy a 1440p 144hz monitor over a 4k 60hz monitor as well.
Also sometimes lower rez is nice if you use older programs cuz they won't be really tiny.
That's why you buy 4k 144hz 32", then you get all the benefits. You can even do mild scaling if you want.
>TAA
Bit disingenuous aren't we
Read the thread homosexual
You're still slapping shitty TAA on a 4K image, nothing native about it anymore you mouthbreather.
ACTUAL 4K > upscaled sharpened 1440p
Next you'll tell me FXAA is amazing anti-aliasing as well.
That's native 4k without TAA moron. Again, read the thread
There's no point to buying 1440p these days unless you're strapped for cash.
My bad, misread, I thought the TAA screen was to prove FSR 1440p was better than the 4K image for some reason. It's been a long day.
You would not believe the amount of cope people here have to stick with 1080p or dive into 1440p while 4K is clearly superior and achievable these days. The anon saying there was no difference threw me off hard.
You're primed to argue against moronation. You're on Ganker.
You are here forever. We all are.
There is no escape.
Ok so native (first) has aliasing artifacts, FSR (second) is slightly blurry but there's no artifacts and TAA is even blurier.
Sorry this just looks the the old FXAA crap from before games stopped having normal graphics options.
So 1440p upscale isn't "better" it just sucks less.
If 4k FSR looks almost as 4k without TAA, then it's going to look better than 1440p.
You're paying more per pixel just to virtue signal about having a lower resolution.
Oh I wasn't aware that was the argument.
I thought you claimed 1440p upscale looks better than 4k.
You can't see the difference between 1080p and 4K and if you claim you can you're lying
0/10 bait. This would have worked in 2014 but it's 2024 now.
I was a bit of a luddite growing up and refused to get a smartphone for ages. Only used laptops and desktops until late 20s when I was gifted a smartphone. Well, I got hooked on its portability and lightweight convenience so I began to use it heavily. Its been only about 3 and a half years using it but I've noticed my eyesight dramatically degenerating, exactly in line with my smartphone usage. Ima ditch the phone for anything other than music and calls/messages and ill get a samsung tablet for portable reading and watching video.
phonegays are the real luddites, you can do far less on a phone than a desktop PC
Truth
Kill experts. Behead experts. Roundhouse kick a expert into the concrete. Slam dunk an expert's baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy researchers. Defecate in a expert's food. Launch experts into the sun. Stir fry experts in a wok. Toss experts into active volcanoes. Urinate into a expert's gas tank. Judo throw experts into a wood chipper. Twist expert's heads off. Report experts to the IRS. Karate chop experts in half. Curb stomp pregnant experts. Trap experts in quicksand. Crush experts in the trash compactor. Liquefy experts in a vat of acid. Eat experts. Dissect experts. Exterminate experts in the gas chamber. Stomp expert skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate experts in the oven. Lobotomize experts. Mandatory abortions for experts. Grind expert fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown experts in fried chicken grease. Vaporize experts with a ray gun. Kick old experts down the stairs. Feed experts to alligators. Slice experts with a katana.
Next article will be
>Playing with a GTX series cards will give you cancer
what deteriorates your eyesight is starting at what is essentially as bright as a lightbulb for 10 hours a day
Do you know what "the sun" is? Have you ever tried using a phone or a tv screen outside? Sunlight is way brighter than any of your screens.
But you need like an 80 inch screen to get the best out of 4k.
No, even 32" is pushing 4k's usefulness. 42" is the absolute maximum for a 4k monitor.
Experts also said the vaxx would protect you from covid and prevent transmission. So no thank you, I'll stick with my current build.
Shitch LITERALLY confirmed to be a health hazard, LOL. Playstation stay winning.
>me on my way to pick up my medically prescribed RTX 4090 and 4k monitor (The Government payed for it.)
Okay, Harvard Health. Tell that to my medical insurance so I can get a medical price cut for my 4090 super.
whole lot of poorgay seething in here
4K gaming is for chads
1080p has like the smallest letters on a sight chart tho. I know my blurry laptop screen is not good to use but plugged into the big tv its fine.
and screen shake and low frames makes you a mouthbreather
There's no fricking article you fricking dumb homosexuals
Indeed.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-health-effects-of-too-much-gaming-2020122221645
here it is, date and author like in oppic.
Movie theaters project to their gigantic screens in 2K, everyone is happy, nobody ever complains about it being low-res, but sure, your 30" desktop monitor definitely needs 4K
>Buy new shit or else your eyesight will go bad
I love israeli capitalism
240p bros....
i'd actually play more games on the ol' tv if more of them had bigger readable text fonts at 240 and 480 pee
Ah yes surely there is so much empirical data to support these claims with long term research done to people gaming at different resolutions!
Science is fake and has been fake for about a 100 years or so.
i'm literally shitposting on a 4k 144hz monitor right now. my nephew bought a 1440p 240hz monitor and he keeps saying he wishes he went for 4k instead.
>24” IPS, 1920x1080, 100Hz monitors are like $90 new
>NOOOOO 1080P IS BAAAAAAAAAD YOU CANNOT USE IT GOY
This “industry” is a joke.
>NOOOOO 1080P IS BAAAAAAAAAD
it is tho
Why?
because it looks like shit compared to 4k
Wtf 1080p is plenty. People used to game at 144p
just get glasses with blue light filter, my eyes have never hurt ever since I started to use them
Wasn't this shit known for ages? If you play games or watch low resolution pixelated videos you strain your eyes to correct the image to look properly
You are just as capable of looking into the people behind it. No one needs to inform your lazy ass.
You can keep believing all you want that Coke just so happens to be nearly as good as water at hydration, but normal people will see a study run by a group set up by Coca Cola, still funded by Coca Cola, and whose current president's last job was as a marketing exec and see nothing wrong with it, everyone with a brain in their skull will.
Your eyes don't do SHIT about that, that's your BRAIN. Maybe you've looked at too many low resolution pictures and your brain strain is getting to you.
the more time passes the more i think the 4090 being stuck on dp1.4a is just as bad as that 970 3.5gb bullshit
while I'm aware of israeli marketers trying to push shit down our throats, in this case it's not bs, obviously you need to scale UI so it isn't for ants.
For a long time I had two monitors, both 24 inch, both 144hz, both TN and both of very comparable class. One was 1080p and the other was 1440p. I spent tens of hours comparing games on both screens and the higher resolution was way easier on eyes, just scale the UI.
sad time we live in. everything is malicious disinfo. good luck learning anything about the world at all without spending hours researching the subject yourself
Remember when Ganker used to argue that IPS was a meme and that TN was better?
>law school pretends it has a health department and isn't just ran by scheming israelites wanting me to buy $100000 32k oled monitor
I see through your tricks
funny because i played games for decades on crt and my eyes are fine
Same plus handhelds at even lower resolutions than CRTs and my eyes started going to shit before I even cared about games.
Poorgays are coping so fricking hard.
You mean FOMOgays who literally created a fake article to get people to join them.
But we were paying at 720p and 1080p for years on the PS3 and PS4 and it was fine. Why do current gen games needs to be played at 4k to avoid eye damage?
I literally cnanot see the difference between 720p and 2k...
>No information or sauce on this "research"
Lower resolution on a higher resolution screen is an issue. Did they specifically test different monitor sizes of they were all the same with different res settings?