Fallout map comparison

In your opinon, which game between 3 and NV has the better map?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer New Vegas as a game but prefer the open world and atmosphere of F3 . There hasn't been a game quite like it in those regards

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >map is a square
    Do bethesdafags really?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fallout 4 and 76 too. Its weird considering they have maps like Skyrim that look more natural

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fallout 4 and 76 too. Its weird considering they have maps like Skyrim that look more natural

      it's a military map, they usually are like that

      there's actually a path like that from redrock to jacobstown?

      yes
      it's full of Cazadors though

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        there's actually a path like that from redrock to jacobstown?

        WTFFFFF

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The military made a map so the game must be squared
        but why

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          worked for GTA SA
          well ignoring the top left bit

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              while Los Santos is the superior city, that's not the whole map

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there's actually a path like that from redrock to jacobstown?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i tried replaying F3, NV and F4 after all these years, and they are just pure cringe.
    Plays like a parody of an actual game.
    Especially the dialogues and the writing.

    Didnt have that problem with Fallout 1 and 2, these gems aged like fine wine.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NV
      you mispelled 76

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        NV is the same category of trash as 3, 4 and 76.
        The only difference is the colour filter.
        Its orange instead of green.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You were filtered.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >filtered
            what does this even mean?
            it means they are trash games?
            then yeah, i got filtered hard, hardest ive ever been filtered.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >then yeah, i got filtered hard, hardest ive ever been filtered.
              Seething.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >what does this even mean?
                it means if you dont like what i like then you suck at game

                You think New Vegas writing and dialogue is equivalent to a game with a vault full or Garys and another game where a ghoul lives in a fridge for 200 years. You were filtered.

                Seething NV fags.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >what does this even mean?
              it means if you dont like what i like then you suck at game

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah man, modern /v is just fucking cringe.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You think New Vegas writing and dialogue is equivalent to a game with a vault full or Garys and another game where a ghoul lives in a fridge for 200 years. You were filtered.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you dont even know what filtered means
                fucking retard

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm talking to someone who thinks New Vegas is the same as a bethesda looter shooter. I'm talking to someone who was filtered.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Has nothing to do with OP's question retard

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's 3, NV feels lesser, Nevada isn't such a small place.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    F3’s map sucks. It’s awful and tedious to get through. Constantly forced into sewers/subways. Even the towns are atrocious though too! Megaton is a nightmare.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      almost as if a nuke dropped and destroyed everything

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Have you looked at Hiroshima / Nagasaki a few decades after the nuke? How about 200 years?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >2 nukes vs an actual nuclear war
          8/10 made me reply

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Retard.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fallout 3, without question. New Vegas map was by far it's weakest point.

    Great map to see how infested the map of New Vegas is with invisible walls.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fallout 3 Map is way bigger NV is just a motorway

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Fallout 3: 8.462 square kilometers
      >Fallout NV: 8.502 square kilometers
      come again?

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Both games have their weaknesses, but the NV map was for more interesting that 3. Two years ago I began my first playthrough of 3 and for the most part I felt completely bored by its locations and map. The metro system is by far the worst. Sure, NV can be empty too with its vast desert but I felt much more intrigued.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well, the map of New Vegas depicts and actual organic space. Once where things are placed logically, and create a network of sensible ideas, locations, political and economic relations, and all done with respect and consideration to the reality of the source space.

    Meanwhile, Fo3 is literally just a bunch of literal random garbage. You have subway stations next to country side barns next to endless random boulder walls. There is absolutely zero basic consideration for ideas like "this was a farm land" and "this was a suburb" and "this was downtown urban area" - literally, the assets are placed down randomly.
    Not a single location is placed with any kind of consideration for economical or ecological concerns, and does not reflect any form of political or social or economical order within the world.
    Arefu, town entirely "themed" by fights with raiders, is next to a twon of little children that never had a single raider issue. Cantenbury Commons, a key trade route stop isn't on a route between any other places, does not have caravans, or lodgings, or shops, or bars, or even water and fodder for the brahmins - it's literally placed randomly, just to make sure there is always "equal" density of content everywhere, because of the ADHD customers.

    On top of that, New Vegas has INCOMPARABLY more actual variety, going from arid grasslands to actual sand and dust bowls to massive canyons, to extensive farmlands, to actual ruins of a city that make sense, to dense forest of Jacob's Town.
    And it more meaningful dungeons and POI's with actual thought out stories.

    AND it isn't bathed in green because "lol radiation is green!"
    Seriously, this isn't even a competition. New Vegas's map is good. Fallout 3's map is arguably the absolutely worst I've ever seen in a videogame, period.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NV, because 99% of urban DC is going from metro tunnel to metro tunnel.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are you shitting me? Fo3 had godawful level design. Fnv had its fuck ups too, but it also had tons of interesting quests in almost every location.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    New Vegas has the best map by far, the tunnel-based map of FO3 confused the living fuck out of me. FO4's map is ok but is lacking in unique landmarks, unlike NV.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      FO4 map is miles, miles worse than F76's (yes I actually played it no I'm not todd's shill). They finally hired competent people for its level design, it's a perfect post-nuclear exploration sim.

Your email address will not be published.