yes, indeed, indubitably. ramming it down your throat with relentless regard to your mental ability to comprehend the media programming your masters were forcing onto there slave force is efficient but not very fun for you im afraid. it will be ok go back to your videogame you only have to see the big scary black man that lives in your head when we allow it so dont worry and just do as we say and we will make you better games for you to buy from us 🙂
Don't care. Its tongue in cheek, and you know they got a boner making that shit advertising. This coming on the heels from "le white christians are evil". I stopped playing 5 (free) halfway through because I agreed with joseph too much. Game played shittier than 4 anyway. Eat a dick nu-ubishit.
Doesn’t matter, bad publicity is still publicity. Most people just see the first part where Black folk are “lE hEcKiN sCaRY aNd bAdAsS” and that’s what they’ll remember. I had so much fun torturing the negresses at the end.
Oh no, levels were introduced in New Dawn. Enemies gained more HP based on their level, for no reason other than it obscures the game being incredibly short because you have to grind.
I'd say yes, but keep in mind that there's worthless "rpg" mechanic and the map size is smaller. I like it though but then again I loved 5, so take my words a pinch of salt.
If the gun variety in FC5 were better it'd be at minimum an 8/10 game to me. 9/10 with a couple urban/semi-urban environments to break up all the fields.
And before you say the game has plenty of guns, most of the guns are the fricking same with different skins. There's very little incentive to use most of the different shotguns, there's like 12 of them but they're all 3 archetypes with the exact same stats in each archetype meaning it's more like there's 4, and of those 4, 2 are useless. This problem then applies to all the other gun types, except even worse because some of them are just completely useless in EVERY category like the SMGs.
Honestly, if it were closer to FC3's gun variety or only the unique guns for each category were implemented, it'd be much better.
If the gun variety in FC5 were better it'd be at minimum an 8/10 game to me. 9/10 with a couple urban/semi-urban environments to break up all the fields.
And before you say the game has plenty of guns, most of the guns are the fricking same with different skins. There's very little incentive to use most of the different shotguns, there's like 12 of them but they're all 3 archetypes with the exact same stats in each archetype meaning it's more like there's 4, and of those 4, 2 are useless. This problem then applies to all the other gun types, except even worse because some of them are just completely useless in EVERY category like the SMGs.
Honestly, if it were closer to FC3's gun variety or only the unique guns for each category were implemented, it'd be much better.
>there are people on Ganker right now who unironically like far cry 5 >far cry 5
kys
Yes it does.
it effectively turned the Far Cry franchise into this godawful lite RPG garbage where enemies have health bars, and gear which has levels.
They doubled down on this shit in 6, which removed the skill trees in favor of piece of clothes with skills tied to it.
The skill trees were perfectly fine, and actually gave you a good sense of progression, you really felt like your character turned into this one man army over the course of the game.
I don't give a frick what everyone says about 4 and 5, it was the peak of the formula IMO.
And for the contrarians saying 3 was better, you are dead fricking wrong.
I suggest these people actually try replaying 3, coming from 4 and 5, the gameplay and controls felt fricking clunky. The map in 3 is also pretty meh, the outposts were boring, too easy, lacked interiors.
4 and 5 took 3's formula, and improved virtually everything in it.
And in hindsight, I hate how much of a whiny b***h Jason was, despite his character arc.
I much preferred 4 and 5's stoic and silent approach to the main character, felt more immersive.
I also hated how 3's villains were underused.
Really poor bait, Youngblood was the same garbage where they turned a SHOOTER into this slop with health bars, there is no fricking fun in a SHOOTER game when you shoot an enemy and he doesn't drop down because magical health bar
>HEY DEPUTY, WE'RE GONNA KIDNAP YOU AFTER EVERY 3 QUESTS WITH AN UNSKIPPABLE CAPTURE SCENE
>WHAT'S THAT? YOU"RE CURRENTLY RAZING A PEGGY BASE WITH AN ATTACK HELICOPTER? NO BIG DEAL, THESE BLISS ARROWS FROM MY FRICKING ARCHERS WILL KNOCK YOUR ASS RIGHT OUT OF THE CHOPPER
>3 fricking games since far cry 2 >you still cant be near a road for more than 3 seconds or an enemy car shows up and it's nonstop >they barely increased the encounter variety
If it's that much of an issue for you, there is a mod where you can personally configure the conditions for those MARKED things. It also lets you unlock all the bullshit that's otherwise permanently locked.
Also, there's a winter mod.
Yes it does.
it effectively turned the Far Cry franchise into this godawful lite RPG garbage where enemies have health bars, and gear which has levels.
They doubled down on this shit in 6, which removed the skill trees in favor of piece of clothes with skills tied to it.
The skill trees were perfectly fine, and actually gave you a good sense of progression, you really felt like your character turned into this one man army over the course of the game.
I don't give a frick what everyone says about 4 and 5, it was the peak of the formula IMO.
And for the contrarians saying 3 was better, you are dead fricking wrong.
I suggest these people actually try replaying 3, coming from 4 and 5, the gameplay and controls felt fricking clunky. The map in 3 is also pretty meh, the outposts were boring, too easy, lacked interiors.
4 and 5 took 3's formula, and improved virtually everything in it.
And in hindsight, I hate how much of a whiny b***h Jason was, despite his character arc.
I much preferred 4 and 5's stoic and silent approach to the main character, felt more immersive.
I also hated how 3's villains were underused.
When this game was nothing but a few ideas wrote on a paper, the Ubi executives had a meeting where they asked ourselves: How do we make Far Cry even more like an Assassin's Creed game? After all, AC is our best franchise!
And thus New Dawn was born. And Far Cry 6. And Wildlands. And Breakpoint. And Immortals Fenyx Rising.
The gameplay loop of Far Cry 3 and Assassin's Creed fricked games for a long time. 5 had a great story and amazing atmosphere but the game is mediocre.
every far cry after 1 is shit. it's not fun, it's not kino, it's just shit. they just get weirder and weirder and not in a good way, 5 had this bizarre UX that felt like it was in the wrong game
far cry 4 should have let you join Pagan as his personal hitman and kill Yuma, Amita, and Sabal before letting you get an ending where you ascend to the throne.
been playing 5 on game pass. ga
mes great so far. really interesting story setting. the religious nuts are cool enemies. but my gamepass ends soon and theres no way i can finish that game in time so i will be buying it.
question is, should i get new dawn and 6 while im at it?how do they compare? im a singleplayer, no coop for me.
>lame-ass villains show up >scroll out in the open within range of the front gate and the watch-towers >nobody picks up a rifle and blows their fricking heads off
New Dawn has the worst villains. Period. No charisma at all. Completely detestable without a single saving grace and annoying as hell. It is only above 3 and BD on my ranking because of the returning characters from 5 where it sort of tricks you into giving half a damn.
Also, in my opinion Vaas is the only good character in 3 and that's sort of why it drops like it does. Vaas, Hurk, Sam, and Earnhardt are the only characters I liked. Like the setting, hate the pacing, hate most characters including the one I was playing.
>fun janky weapons >you can straight up shoot both of the black girls in the head after they b***h about their lives in the end
I had fun, much better than FC6
I played FC5 and New Eden. What I liked about New Eden is halfway through the game you get double jump and you feel like a superhero. It's one of my favorite things from any FarCry game.
I tried replaying FC5 but the cutscenes are unskippable. AInt got time for that.
Yes, 1 is still the best btw.
*2
yeah, mostly because I'm racist and tired of blacks though
the majority of the enemies you kill are blacks
I would prefer not to see them at all
yes, indeed, indubitably. ramming it down your throat with relentless regard to your mental ability to comprehend the media programming your masters were forcing onto there slave force is efficient but not very fun for you im afraid. it will be ok go back to your videogame you only have to see the big scary black man that lives in your head when we allow it so dont worry and just do as we say and we will make you better games for you to buy from us 🙂
absolutely
forced diversity deserves it
>forced diversity
you know they're the villains, right?
Yes and shit ones at that. Which means you can't criticise it
Don't care. Its tongue in cheek, and you know they got a boner making that shit advertising. This coming on the heels from "le white christians are evil". I stopped playing 5 (free) halfway through because I agreed with joseph too much. Game played shittier than 4 anyway. Eat a dick nu-ubishit.
You may as well keep playing. Because Joseph was right all along.
Funny, agreeing with Joseph is why I kept playing
Also the killer tunes
You're meant to agree with the villain in every other FC game, are you telling me this one's different?
You still agree with Joseph Sneed in New Dawn
>Is the only villain in the whole series who actually wins in the end
Holy based
Doesn’t matter, bad publicity is still publicity. Most people just see the first part where Black folk are “lE hEcKiN sCaRY aNd bAdAsS” and that’s what they’ll remember. I had so much fun torturing the negresses at the end.
you are mentally ill
Black folk aside, isn't this the game that introduced leveled guns into the series? So yeah, absolutely.
I think that's 6
This one is a standalone co-op focused expansion to 5
It's was fun, worth pirating
Oh no, levels were introduced in New Dawn. Enemies gained more HP based on their level, for no reason other than it obscures the game being incredibly short because you have to grind.
It's weird that I literally don't remember seeing anyone even talk about or play this game
I liked 5 despite the stupid shit, would I like this one
I'd say yes, but keep in mind that there's worthless "rpg" mechanic and the map size is smaller. I like it though but then again I loved 5, so take my words a pinch of salt.
It was a good epilogue to 5's story and had an equally great ending
doesn't matter. even if it was good people would just ignore it for their own headcanon.
yes, it had a moronic enemy 'level' system which made enemies bullet sponges
"For me, it's the immersive fauna"
?t=497
Lite RPG shit ruined Ubisoft and gaming as a whole.
Animals were always tanky in Far Cry games since 3, but not that much
Imagine going from the kino that was FC5, to this shit
The fricking sovl, holy shit.
THEY CAN SCREAM AND THEY CAN SHOUT
BUT THEY WILL NEVER SMOKE US OUT
KEEP YOUR RIFLE BY YOUR SIDE
If the gun variety in FC5 were better it'd be at minimum an 8/10 game to me. 9/10 with a couple urban/semi-urban environments to break up all the fields.
And before you say the game has plenty of guns, most of the guns are the fricking same with different skins. There's very little incentive to use most of the different shotguns, there's like 12 of them but they're all 3 archetypes with the exact same stats in each archetype meaning it's more like there's 4, and of those 4, 2 are useless. This problem then applies to all the other gun types, except even worse because some of them are just completely useless in EVERY category like the SMGs.
Honestly, if it were closer to FC3's gun variety or only the unique guns for each category were implemented, it'd be much better.
the vietnam and zombie dlc added some pretty good new weapons in the main game
FC3 weapon variety was garbage, FC4 is where it's at, moron.
I didn't play Far Cry 4 because I don't give a shit about mountain Asians.
You got BTFO, frick off.
bad gun variety was nothing, the real problem was how fricking awful shooting felt. it was like the guns were throwing lethal paintballs
Huh? How does the shooting feels bad in 5?
I'd avise you play 6 if you want truly awful shooting.
>there are people on Ganker right now who unironically like far cry 5
>far cry 5
kys
Yes it does.
it effectively turned the Far Cry franchise into this godawful lite RPG garbage where enemies have health bars, and gear which has levels.
They doubled down on this shit in 6, which removed the skill trees in favor of piece of clothes with skills tied to it.
The skill trees were perfectly fine, and actually gave you a good sense of progression, you really felt like your character turned into this one man army over the course of the game.
I don't give a frick what everyone says about 4 and 5, it was the peak of the formula IMO.
And for the contrarians saying 3 was better, you are dead fricking wrong.
I suggest these people actually try replaying 3, coming from 4 and 5, the gameplay and controls felt fricking clunky. The map in 3 is also pretty meh, the outposts were boring, too easy, lacked interiors.
4 and 5 took 3's formula, and improved virtually everything in it.
And in hindsight, I hate how much of a whiny b***h Jason was, despite his character arc.
I much preferred 4 and 5's stoic and silent approach to the main character, felt more immersive.
I also hated how 3's villains were underused.
Thanks for reading my blog.
yes, i'd rather play wolfenstein youngblood than this
Really poor bait, Youngblood was the same garbage where they turned a SHOOTER into this slop with health bars, there is no fricking fun in a SHOOTER game when you shoot an enemy and he doesn't drop down because magical health bar
I got this on sale recently, only because I want to see 5's crappy ending get fixed
i like it better than 5, i don't care about either's story
Shit taste, frick off.
I enjoyed New Dawn but
>better than 5
It's nowhere near to being as good as 5
>HEY DEPUTY, WE'RE GONNA KIDNAP YOU AFTER EVERY 3 QUESTS WITH AN UNSKIPPABLE CAPTURE SCENE
>WHAT'S THAT? YOU"RE CURRENTLY RAZING A PEGGY BASE WITH AN ATTACK HELICOPTER? NO BIG DEAL, THESE BLISS ARROWS FROM MY FRICKING ARCHERS WILL KNOCK YOUR ASS RIGHT OUT OF THE CHOPPER
Far cry 5 was shit
>3 fricking games since far cry 2
>you still cant be near a road for more than 3 seconds or an enemy car shows up and it's nonstop
>they barely increased the encounter variety
If it's that much of an issue for you, there is a mod where you can personally configure the conditions for those MARKED things. It also lets you unlock all the bullshit that's otherwise permanently locked.
Also, there's a winter mod.
>there is a mod where you can personally configure the conditions for those MARKED things
>tune the game so none of those cutscenes ever happen
>kill every peggy down to the last man
>no nuke ending
based
https://downloads.fcmodding.com/fc5/
It's the Resistance mod package.
rookie numbers
Its all just Far Cry 3 DLC. Has anything changed other than more guns and vehicles?
see
fricking contrarian.
I liked 5 well enough. I'll probably never play New Dawn because it seems obnoxious. I might pick up 6 in a few years when it goes on a huge sale.
When this game was nothing but a few ideas wrote on a paper, the Ubi executives had a meeting where they asked ourselves: How do we make Far Cry even more like an Assassin's Creed game? After all, AC is our best franchise!
And thus New Dawn was born. And Far Cry 6. And Wildlands. And Breakpoint. And Immortals Fenyx Rising.
The gameplay loop of Far Cry 3 and Assassin's Creed fricked games for a long time. 5 had a great story and amazing atmosphere but the game is mediocre.
Specifically Far Cry 3 and AC3.
Believe it or not, Ubi has been doing nothing but re-release those two games for a decade.
every far cry after 1 is shit. it's not fun, it's not kino, it's just shit. they just get weirder and weirder and not in a good way, 5 had this bizarre UX that felt like it was in the wrong game
far cry 4 should have let you join Pagan as his personal hitman and kill Yuma, Amita, and Sabal before letting you get an ending where you ascend to the throne.
stupid zoomer idea from a stupid zoomer
Found the shit flinging monkey
that's a mirror
been playing 5 on game pass. ga
mes great so far. really interesting story setting. the religious nuts are cool enemies. but my gamepass ends soon and theres no way i can finish that game in time so i will be buying it.
question is, should i get new dawn and 6 while im at it?how do they compare? im a singleplayer, no coop for me.
new dawn and 6 get rid of the godawful cutscene gating but add godawful level scaling
so just 5 it is. 5 and new dawn are like 5 bux a piece so i wont go bankrupt getting them
New Dawn is bad and 6 is worse. Far Cry 6 might be the biggest piece of shit Ubisoft put out in the last 10 years.
it's a shame because the guns (the regular ones) look and sound good, and the map looks nice I guess.
i originally beat far cry 5 completely on ubisoft plus back when ubisoft gave it out for free, took me like 12 hours, still ended up buying it
>lame-ass villains show up
>scroll out in the open within range of the front gate and the watch-towers
>nobody picks up a rifle and blows their fricking heads off
Primal is the best recent one.
1 > 2 > 3 > Primal > 4 > 5
if it's worse than 2 then it has to be the shittiest games ever made
filtered
gladly
Rating them against one another is hard. The different games have different strengths.
I'd say 4 > 5 > Primal > ND > 3 > BD > 1 > 2
that's a fair rating. Although 5 had a gay UI and was sort of boring to put above primal IMO. Never played new dawn is it fun?
New Dawn has the worst villains. Period. No charisma at all. Completely detestable without a single saving grace and annoying as hell. It is only above 3 and BD on my ranking because of the returning characters from 5 where it sort of tricks you into giving half a damn.
Also, in my opinion Vaas is the only good character in 3 and that's sort of why it drops like it does. Vaas, Hurk, Sam, and Earnhardt are the only characters I liked. Like the setting, hate the pacing, hate most characters including the one I was playing.
>Bright blue colors
>Purple/pink colors
>Black people
YEP, ITS A ZOOM ZOOMER SHOOTER!
>top-tier music
>fun janky weapons
>you can straight up shoot both of the black girls in the head after they b***h about their lives in the end
I had fun, much better than FC6
I played FC5 and New Eden. What I liked about New Eden is halfway through the game you get double jump and you feel like a superhero. It's one of my favorite things from any FarCry game.
I tried replaying FC5 but the cutscenes are unskippable. AInt got time for that.