I don't remember if Gunvolt deliberately did this or if it just got swept up in it by being associated with Mighty Number Nine, but that series ended up getting really good (even if the first game was subpar).
>t. >"FROM THE ORIGINAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDERS OF [ACCLAIMED OLD FRANCHISE] WHO HAVE REPLACED ALL THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPERS WITH DIVERSITY HIRES AND BAD ACTORS"
We hate it because it had shit level design
They leaned way too hard into the worst parts of Tooie when what we wanted was more Kazooie
Also all the character designs were fricking HIDEOUS
Assuming it's ALL of the creators and not just a portion or one single person who was on the dev team, then it's a sign of quality.
You aren't going to get that in the AAA space though. You're just going to get one or two of the people responsible and it ends up being a Daikatana instead of Doom
arisu
dicky
Sexo
How did they drop the ball so hard on Outer Worlds? They had a ton of disgruntled Bethesda drones thanks to 76s debacle and they fuxked it all up
cause its insanely mediocre. just like starfield.
>They had a ton of disgruntled Bethesda drones
You literally answered your own question.
The only good obsidian games were built off the work of other studios.
Name one game with this advertising method that actually delivered.
Bloodstained Ritual of the Night.
Any asiaticjima trash
I mean, it sucks but you can't deny it's popular
I don't remember if Gunvolt deliberately did this or if it just got swept up in it by being associated with Mighty Number Nine, but that series ended up getting really good (even if the first game was subpar).
Yooka-Laylee and the Impossible Lair was genuinely good
I love my wife arisu
I will now buy your game.
Please don't shitpost with my daughter. Thank you.
you have a SEXY daughter
can i wife your daughter?
My wife on the right
Your daughter is my onahole
>>"FROM THE ORIGINAL CREATORS OF [ACCLAIMED OLD GAME]"
Name two games.
One that turned out good.
One that turned out bad.
>One that turned out bad.
Back4Blood.
One that turned out good.
Into the Breach.
70+ team
vs
2 man team
That's the difference.
>One that turned out bad.
Death stranding
>t.
>"FROM THE ORIGINAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDERS OF [ACCLAIMED OLD FRANCHISE] WHO HAVE REPLACED ALL THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPERS WITH DIVERSITY HIRES AND BAD ACTORS"
...
yooka-laylee was good. people just hate it cause they removed jon
We hate it because it had shit level design
They leaned way too hard into the worst parts of Tooie when what we wanted was more Kazooie
Also all the character designs were fricking HIDEOUS
people got what they asked for
they only like banjo because nostalgia
But Banjo is good
as good as dk64
Never got the heaping disdain for DK64. The backtracking could be annoying but never found it a dealbreaker
>"FROM THE ORIGINAL CREATORS OF [ACCLAIMED OLD GAME]"
>it turns out its just 3 guys one of whom was a bug fixer
Assuming it's ALL of the creators and not just a portion or one single person who was on the dev team, then it's a sign of quality.
You aren't going to get that in the AAA space though. You're just going to get one or two of the people responsible and it ends up being a Daikatana instead of Doom
>from the producers of [INDIE SHIT]
>from the co-writer of [ACTION GAME]
>FROM THE GUYS THAT BROUGHT YOU DOOM AND QUAKE
i never trusted this advertising again
agreed, video games aren't art so we need to stop pretending game directors and the like are on par with those in actual adult media