GAMEFREAK

GAMEFREAK

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    KANED~i mean-NINTENDO! ! !

    • 4 months ago
      catfucker

      I hate this shitty website sometimes

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        SOUL

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        OOTOMO

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >proportions are completely different
    wow it's fricking nothing

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >palw0rld lel

    people are such lemming-tier morons its unbelievable
    literally downward spiral race to the bottom dystopian nightmare
    absolutely disgusting

    >its indie devs guise!
    >actual budget is 19 million for a ripoff clickbait meme game
    >probably a chinese data laundering scam again
    >check playerbase 65% bots in asia

    there used to be a time my young summer fricking homosexuals when you on these boards were able to DETECT the forced meme

    now fricking zoomers fall for it and pay money every single time

    mouth breathers
    >manufactured consensus
    >dead internet theory is literally true

    also your homosexual thread is off topic
    go back to Ganker

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      calmest spastic on /vp/

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        hes right you know

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >anime poster agrees with shameless reddit spacing homosexual
          sasuga etc etc

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >talking about yourself in third person

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      10/10 bait made me reply

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lycanroc looks generic enough that they can get a pass for this one.

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Gamefreak invented wolves

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      PACK IT UP, CHUDS. ANON USED THE MAYMAY COLORED FONT

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >heh I used a blatantly false equivalence comparison, I win!
        I wonder what twitter calarts moron was assblasted enough to make this image

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >calarts
        Your post has been disregarded and tossed into the garbage bin

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    From an assets perspective right doesn't look anything like left. The vertices don't coincide the ears and snout are different the hair is different. Only similiarity is the legs and even then the proportions and amount of points is different.
    Obviously they made a lycanroc knock-off in design but at least this asset looks like it wasn't made from the original.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      They most likely took the Lycanroc model, adjusted it proportions, then manually retopologized parts of it that they wanted to keep for Not Lycanroc. Parts like the fur tufts were likely redone from scratch during the process.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Actually, I take this back. Parts of the model, specially the huge mass of loops near the foot, look auto-retopologized as frick. Do you have a side comparison?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        People have to be pretending to be moronic, so many of the Pals are just edited Pokemon and people are just like
        >nah dude they ended up with the exact same core shapes for the body and legs because they’re both wolves

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          >nah dude they ended up with the exact same core shapes
          it doesn't though

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          They made their own models from scratch, but used the Pokemon as references.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don't believe these models were made from scratch, because of the parts I've circled. It's probably hard to tell if you haven't done CG modeling before, but these areas have a REALLY unusual concentration of polygons. You can see on the rest of the model that whoever made this has a pretty good understanding of how many polygons are needed, but then he uses a ridiculous on the forepaws, ears, and head spike for some reason. It's the kind of thing a human wouldn't do, but an auto-retopologize would.

            I believe most of the head and the fluff around the neck were modeled by hand, but body and ears were made by "tracing" over an existing model. Probably Lycanrok for the body, but the ears might have come from somewhere else.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I don't believe these models were made from scratch
              Why are pokegays so fricking moronic?

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Here's a better illustration of what I mean about the ears. The red part is noticeably higher poly than rest of the head. In the blue area, you can see the tris awkwardly splitting up to match the number of vertices on the red part. The ears were clearly done separately from the rest of the head.

                Although it's possible he had some ears laying around from a previous model, given how similar the body's proportions are to Lycanrok (and the feet have a similar thing going on), it's more likely that he pulled the ears off another model, messed with the proportions a bit, then hit the retopologize button before connecting it to the head.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Which Pokemon has this general shape?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Genies

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Female child body
              >Male adult muscular body
              They are absolutely not the same shape.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >bro, what if Mini was purple and on a cloud
            What a bunch of hacks

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          some are even just head edits. which is even stranger

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Hahahha what the frick

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          It’s mostly bots. You can check a lot of twitter accounts on X shilling the game and see that they have no post history outside of promoting Palworld.

          The one exception seems to be YouTubers who don’t play Pokemon anyway.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't want every fricking cake to be vanilla flavored just because it's the most popular flavor. There are other fricking creature games, if you reward people for copying Pokemon THEY WILL ALL JUST BE POKEMON

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Literally just a lazy cartoon wolf
    >Literally just a lazy cartoon wolf again
    it's impressive how both pokemon and palworld don't know shit about monster designs

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >NOOOO WHY AREN'T THEY OVERDESIGNED LIKE MY DIGISHIT

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >NOOOO DESIGNS CAN'T BE ORIGINAL THEY HAVE TO BE GENERIC AND BLAND!!!
        Poke/paltards ladies and gentlemen

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOO A BURGER THAT RESEMBLES A MCDONALDS QUARTER POUNDER NOOOOOO COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT CANCEL JACK IN THE BOX CANCEL FIVE GUYS CANCEL CANCEL CANCEL

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    My issue with it isn't copyright infringement, it's that the palworld devs looked at pokemon and were like "yeah I can make one of those" without even bothering to try hiding how lazy they were about it.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want to frick Lycanroc
    I don't want to frick Direhowl

    It's really that simple
    Palworld is still fun though

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *