Genuine question, do you think there's any merit to this?

Genuine question, do you think there's any merit to this?

That Nidoran comparison seems like something, but then others are just animals so of course they're going to look similar.

But I don't know how many monsters exist in the first game, maybe some overlap is inevitable. Thoughts?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The point is that they're just based on the same animal, just like how Palworld didn't copy anything from Pokemon but has pals based on the same animal as Pokemon does. No one is actually saying Pokemon stole the designs, they're using the image to make a point that similarities are inevitable and neither Pokemon or Palworld copied anything.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      See [...]
      No one is actually accusing Pokemon of stealing from Dragon Quest.

      People aren't accusing Palworld of making designs from the same animals, they're accusing Palworld of literally ripping off design elements directly from Pokemon (possibly using AI). Yokai Watch was also a Pokemon "rip-off" but no-one had a problem with it because it clearly had its own distinct style.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The blue blob shell looks far more like Slowbro's Shellder tail than Omanyte, the others are a stretch

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Dragon quest invented bats and crabs anon, don’t you know?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You're THIS close to getting it. You're able to understand that Dragon Quest didn't invent those animals, now think about this idea and how it could be relevant to the past week...

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's harder to defend frenplanet when so many of their designs use the same color schemes and charm points. The cinderace clone is indefensible, there are lots of ways to make a cartoon rabbit.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah you’re right pokemon didn’t invent Electivires either, how could I be so blind

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you or morons like you have posted this image daily for months
    frick off

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's pure moronation. The controversy isn't over drawing the same animal, it's over tracing an existing drawing of said animal

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This accusation has been debunked by actual artists.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Dude, come on.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >gamefreak owns hair
          Frick off moron

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >mom said it was my turn to post it
            Here's your participation (You), enjoy!

            Your image literally proves they aren't the same model. Very, very similar yes but you can see that they aren't the same. If you're having a hard time, look closely at the shape and length of those tufts of hair. The one on the right is thinner and longer.

            It's literally the same design. 5 minutes in Blender to retopologise and reshape very minorly.

            Even if it were made from scratch, it's a complete rip-off.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              It's not "literally the same design" and if it was this game would have been taken down almost instantly by Nintendo. It's almost the same but there are slight differences and the model is 100% made from scratch.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >draws Pikachu
                >it's not literally the same pixels!!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Your image literally proves they aren't the same model. Very, very similar yes but you can see that they aren't the same. If you're having a hard time, look closely at the shape and length of those tufts of hair. The one on the right is thinner and longer.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >mom said it was my turn to post it
          Here's your participation (You), enjoy!

          [...]
          It's literally the same design. 5 minutes in Blender to retopologise and reshape very minorly.

          Even if it were made from scratch, it's a complete rip-off.

          Why are you defending evil and anti-consumerist billionaire corporations like Gamefreak and Nintendo?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >company isn’t as well known so they’re good!
            Delusional, your palslop was made by freemasons too don’t kid yourself.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Worse. Made by Chinese and Indians.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Those monsters have completely different artstyles. The fact that they're based on the same animals is entirely irrelevant, all that matters is the art since that's what is covered by copyright/IP laws.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Aren't Dragonite and the Great Dragon both supposed to be based on dragons? How come they don't have the exact same proportions? They could have at least used the same colors to show that they are both dragons but they didn't so clearly something is wrong here

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      See

      The point is that they're just based on the same animal, just like how Palworld didn't copy anything from Pokemon but has pals based on the same animal as Pokemon does. No one is actually saying Pokemon stole the designs, they're using the image to make a point that similarities are inevitable and neither Pokemon or Palworld copied anything.

      No one is actually accusing Pokemon of stealing from Dragon Quest.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *