yep, if you draw a person as distinct in an MSpaint comic and that distinction has no relevance to the point, then you've failed to communicate, since the distinction would indicate to the viewer that it's relevant. happy to teach you something.
yes. Look at all the popular video reviews on youtube. People think they are getting something completely different from what it is. You can find 3 hour reviews of King's Field where you might think you've been missing out on the greatest thing ever.
Most people love the things they liked in high school. I listen to literally the exact same music as I did then. Same goes for games.
This isn't universal though. Some games are legitimate filters. You can appreciate what something is but not enjoy it.
Homm3 still holds up
aoe2 still holds up
Deus Ex still holds up
BG 1 & 2 hold up
almost every single early DQ and FF game hold up, and most of the best versions are on the GBA. 25 years ago.
I've only mentioned games that I personally vouch for. I don't think anyone can argue too much of this in good faith.
i cannot in good faith vouch for dragon quest
it's mashing A through combat and the story is incredibly basic, generic and shit. you get to look at the map but you can just google dragon quest map and get the same experience but condensed not spread over hours
i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something ChatGPT would generate
maybe you just had to be there. maybe you need a particular kind of autism. All I know is that you have been unironically filtered. Please review the OP image 🙁
>dude wtf if you turn the game into a checklist that you follow from point a to point b it becomes boring?!!??!?!! >this game's so boring if you look up a guide what the FUUUUCK
zoomersissies... are WE the problem?
if the only appealing part of the game is looking at the map then you can just google what the map looks like and then you don't have to sit through 8 hours of filler to see it, yes, I stand by what I said. nothing to do with guides.
1 month ago
Anonymous
batshit moronic assumption to make lmao
1 month ago
Anonymous
okay let's say that you have a 9 hour game that isn't very fun for the first 8 hours and in hour 8 you can open a book and there's the entirety of hamlet in there
you could play through the 8 hours of chore to get to the good part or you could download hamlet.pdf and skip the charade
in this case, it would still be a bad game to play even though it contains all of hamlet, because the book is experienced best outside of it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
sure, fortunately dragon quest isn't like that. no idea why you think the fun part of dq is the end of it or "the map" or whatever the frick. maybe you should try playing games and THEN talking about them rather than the reverse.
>complaint: game is too simple and basic >anon: zoomers need guides! they just can't handle real gaming!!
anon complains about the exact opposite of what you're accusing him of??
Closest case scenario was when I played FF8. All my friends just accused me of having my opinions about it tainted by internet discourse, or because I got too bogged down in the drawing/refining/junctioning system instead of just playing the game. Regardless, I still thought the gameplay sucked and the characters were shit.
It wasn't until some years later that a couple of my friends replayed FF8 and realized I was right. They were very much operating off of their rose-tinted memories of the game, back when they were angsty high school students who saw the game as a weird self-insert fantasy.
This is a huge part of the problem. Too many people get into old video games riding partially or even entirely on a wave of opinions from modern youtube content regurgitators who try to make everything seem timeless and flawless just because THEY like it. You even have the weird phenomenon where people become "fans" of games and series they haven't even played themselves. Strange times.
i cannot in good faith vouch for dragon quest
it's mashing A through combat and the story is incredibly basic, generic and shit. you get to look at the map but you can just google dragon quest map and get the same experience but condensed not spread over hours
i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something chatgpt would generate
>i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something chatgpt would generate
Dragon Quest came out in a far-off year called "1986", where universal access to a network of thousands of free flash games wasn't a thing, and even the simplest writing had to still be done by a human being. Hope this helps.
>youtube content regurgitators who try to make everything seem timeless and flawless just because THEY like it
and the flipside of that coin is zoomers like
i cannot in good faith vouch for dragon quest
it's mashing A through combat and the story is incredibly basic, generic and shit. you get to look at the map but you can just google dragon quest map and get the same experience but condensed not spread over hours
i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something chatgpt would generate
who refuse to see how anything could have ever had any appeal just because they don't like it right now.
>these games hold up nowadays >i dont see how it holds up seeing how *thing that's different now* >uhm filtered homosexual zoomer kek lmao git gud
saying dragon quest still holds up nowadays because you didn't have internet in the 90s is like saying sunglasses still make sense to wear at night because 6 hours ago the sun was up
the anon just doesn't like DQ. he wasn't even a homosexual about it yet you call him out as a zoomer? cringe.
>these games hold up nowadays >i dont see how it holds up seeing how *thing that's different now* >uhm filtered homosexual zoomer kek lmao git gud
saying dragon quest still holds up nowadays because you didn't have internet in the 90s is like saying sunglasses still make sense to wear at night because 6 hours ago the sun was up
it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia. There are so very few good jrpg where you can swap jobs and weapons from the very beginning. It just feels free but without the complexity of a D&D system. I like the simplicity, I love the graphics. It's a good game and I'd play it before most new releases if I had to pick one.
Any game that feels better when you take notes and make your own notebook map is timeless in my book.
>it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia
lmao this has to be bait
i dont think it has to be bait i think anon just happens to like the type of game that takes very little effort and creativity to make
it's like if someone told you they like their books written in simple english. nothing wrong with that, good for him 🙂
>it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia
That's not what it means to hold up. I can do the same and totally not feel as you do
Closest case scenario was when I played FF8. All my friends just accused me of having my opinions about it tainted by internet discourse, or because I got too bogged down in the drawing/refining/junctioning system instead of just playing the game. Regardless, I still thought the gameplay sucked and the characters were shit.
It wasn't until some years later that a couple of my friends replayed FF8 and realized I was right. They were very much operating off of their rose-tinted memories of the game, back when they were angsty high school students who saw the game as a weird self-insert fantasy.
This is a huge part of the problem. Too many people get into old video games riding partially or even entirely on a wave of opinions from modern youtube content regurgitators who try to make everything seem timeless and flawless just because THEY like it. You even have the weird phenomenon where people become "fans" of games and series they haven't even played themselves. Strange times.
[...] >i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something chatgpt would generate
Dragon Quest came out in a far-off year called "1986", where universal access to a network of thousands of free flash games wasn't a thing, and even the simplest writing had to still be done by a human being. Hope this helps.
Dragon Quest is bad even by the standards of 80s games, SSI games from the same time period absolutely mog it.
>Dragon Quest came out in a far-off year called "1986", where universal access to a network of thousands of free flash games wasn't a thing, and even the simplest writing had to still be done by a human being. Hope this helps.
I wasn't arguing that it didn't have value back then I was arguing that it doesn't hold up
But it does hold up. The game mechanics are still good and the story is still charming. It's not like the game is overrun with flaws that ruin the experience unless you ignore them. Just because you don't like that style of game doesn't mean it doesn't "hold up".
>almost every single early DQ and FF game hold up
i would not say DQ1 and FF1 hold up
they are very simple and waste your time a lot
if you want a jrpg that holds up, chrono trigger does but i'm told that's specifically because the english localisation (and all translations based on the english localisation) is abridged and skips a lot of useless or redundant dialogue
>i would not say DQ1 and FF1 hold up >they are very simple and waste your time a lot
I would somewhat agree here but I'd also say this problem is mostly gone by about 1991(~FF4) and definitely gone by 1994 (~FF6). Maybe you'll want a few minor QoL hacks for IV but they aren't essential, the original game is still better than a lot of RPGMaker slop. If you still don't like the games the issue is most likely that you just don't like the core gameplay (the combat).
Most people posting here can't distinguish between subjective and objective though or even willfully confuse them.
>most of the best versions are on the GBA.
Was with you until here.
GBA versions usually suck and are only liked by the specific generation who grew up with game boys and anyone dumb enough to listen to their advice. Any GBA port of a SNES game is always going to be superior on SNES.
yes this happens a lot on here, good example is dark sun: shattered lands. actual shit game that gets memed by annoying people on here. the ultima games aside from underworld are also all pretty mediocre, whenever i voice these opinions i get told i was "filtered" despite playing plenty of games from those eras
it's how these people get sucked into contrarian cults, they get attached to stuff from their childhood and break the minds of others who join them to the extent that they lose all touch with what sane people like. when this become apparent like the young person in your pic, then they convince themselves that it's because they have some sort of super refined elite taste when in fact they're just used to drinking sewage
Sure, but understanding that you shouldn't blame people for gatekeeping. I wouldn't like it if some moron who doesn't know every characters name comes into my space and tells me what's good and what's not.
if a game has some massive flaw you dont need to know some random npc's name to point it out, especially if the game was so bad you didn't finish it but the npc is towards the end of the game
if you told me a tv show wasn't good i wouldn't dismiss your thoughts becuase you didn't remember some random guy's name from season 4 episode 7
>there is no such thing as legitemate media criticism, it's all hardwired like sexual attraction
if a game runs at 5fps and i said "this game wouldn't be as bad if it didn't run at 5fps" i wasn't "filtered" by the framerate
>if a game runs at 5fps and i said "this game wouldn't be as bad if it didn't run at 5fps" i wasn't "filtered" by the framerate
If you didn't enjoy it because of the low framerate, then yes you were. That's what "filtered" means. >b-b-but my criticism is correct!
It always is. Even if the reason you didn't like the game was completely moronic, the game still failed to appeal to you. That is the only measure of what makes a game "good". It's entertainment, it should be judged on how well it entertains people, and that's entirely subjective.
>the ultima games aside from underworld are also all pretty mediocre
i agree that the mainline games were buggy shit. but they got better with fan patches.
U1 to 4 are "ancient" by my standards, and my fav rougelike was Moraff's World.
otherwise almost every Ultima was a pioneer in RPGs in one way or the other. DQ probably won't be what it was without Ultimas.
>I used to sneak Donkey Kong Country onto every computer in my highschool via floppy. It was doable.
In elementary school I found Lemmings hidden on the networked drive of the school's Power Macintoshes or whatever the frick they had. I showed the whole class how to launch it. Good times
yes, i am often the guy who is arrogant and unreasonable and make pointlessly belligerent posts. i am also completely incapable of contributing quality discussion to this website
>yes, i am often the guy who is arrogant and unreasonable and make pointlessly belligerent posts. i am also completely incapable of contributing quality discussion to this website
BASED
A
S
E
D
>This was pillars of eternity for me.
Both pillars games are "aggressively mediocre". Even if you have nostalgia for the infinity engine games they're aping (I do), I think the most that can be said for them is someone saying "I liked them and had fun" which is fair. But I cannot fathom of anyone ever saying "it's the greatest game in its genre of all time!" and they're not even old and janky with bad graphics or missing modern QoL features.
poe was literally sold to me as "the best modern crpg" and "if you don't like it you wont like bg because it's older", but I ended up liking the vibe of bg while poe did nothing for me
>poe was literally sold to me as "the best modern crpg"
This is only vaguely reasonable if you torture that qualifier "modern" since the genre was in a pretty bad slump at the time. Either way, I agree with you that BG is better, and I'm glad you found your way to some games you enjoy.
poe was the best rpg of the year during a year when there were no rpgs
it got more publicity that way than it deserved. it was still solid, just not as solid as you'd think
That good reason is that most of the series is not translated. It's a genuinely great series with a first mission that was too hard for people accustomed to anime girls equating easy game.
Ironically the only time it's happened to me is when I've suggested old games to people my own age. I'll show off something that I legitimately enjoy and they will go decry it and go back to something more modern without nearly the same depth. Meanwhile younger people will look at it, mess around with it some, and then either have something click and enjoy it or at least concede it's something that has to be worked at to get enjoyment out of when they just want something that's easy to play.
The most closed minded people are always older which is just natural human biology. The older we get, the less open to new things we are.
The most naive and suggestible people are always younger which is just natural human biology. The older we get, the more we value our time and the less bullshit we'll accept from the stupid and underinformed.
That would be more believable if I didn't see people playing the same games I recommended years later. The desire to avoid things we're unfamiliar with often blinds us to new experiences.
Persona 4
Fatlusgays in general. Though P4 isn't that old and Fatlusgays haven't played anything dating back before DDS
filtered is a newbie buzzword. the comic should be two young people.
maybe he just looks old
then that's a red herring and the comic is a communicative failure.
>most christians look african
>therefore if you draw a christian as white that's a red herring and you're a failure
uh yeah okay
yep, if you draw a person as distinct in an MSpaint comic and that distinction has no relevance to the point, then you've failed to communicate, since the distinction would indicate to the viewer that it's relevant. happy to teach you something.
by that logic this comic is about white poeple specifically and since this has nothing to do with skin color it's suddenly shit
take the L
>Christian goes to heaven
>it's 90% black
how are they going to react?
>Heaven is Oakland/Detroit/Chicago/Atlanta/Houston???
They're mostly LatinX though.
>Autism - The thread.
>Based on a true story.
yes. Look at all the popular video reviews on youtube. People think they are getting something completely different from what it is. You can find 3 hour reviews of King's Field where you might think you've been missing out on the greatest thing ever.
Most people love the things they liked in high school. I listen to literally the exact same music as I did then. Same goes for games.
This isn't universal though. Some games are legitimate filters. You can appreciate what something is but not enjoy it.
Homm3 still holds up
aoe2 still holds up
Deus Ex still holds up
BG 1 & 2 hold up
almost every single early DQ and FF game hold up, and most of the best versions are on the GBA. 25 years ago.
I've only mentioned games that I personally vouch for. I don't think anyone can argue too much of this in good faith.
i cannot in good faith vouch for dragon quest
it's mashing A through combat and the story is incredibly basic, generic and shit. you get to look at the map but you can just google dragon quest map and get the same experience but condensed not spread over hours
i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something ChatGPT would generate
maybe you just had to be there. maybe you need a particular kind of autism. All I know is that you have been unironically filtered. Please review the OP image 🙁
>dude wtf if you turn the game into a checklist that you follow from point a to point b it becomes boring?!!??!?!!
>this game's so boring if you look up a guide what the FUUUUCK
zoomersissies... are WE the problem?
when did anyone mention guides?
>you can just google dragon quest map and get the same experience but condensed not spread over hours
if the only appealing part of the game is looking at the map then you can just google what the map looks like and then you don't have to sit through 8 hours of filler to see it, yes, I stand by what I said. nothing to do with guides.
batshit moronic assumption to make lmao
okay let's say that you have a 9 hour game that isn't very fun for the first 8 hours and in hour 8 you can open a book and there's the entirety of hamlet in there
you could play through the 8 hours of chore to get to the good part or you could download hamlet.pdf and skip the charade
in this case, it would still be a bad game to play even though it contains all of hamlet, because the book is experienced best outside of it.
sure, fortunately dragon quest isn't like that. no idea why you think the fun part of dq is the end of it or "the map" or whatever the frick. maybe you should try playing games and THEN talking about them rather than the reverse.
okay what's the fun part then smartass
>complaint: game is too simple and basic
>anon: zoomers need guides! they just can't handle real gaming!!
anon complains about the exact opposite of what you're accusing him of??
Closest case scenario was when I played FF8. All my friends just accused me of having my opinions about it tainted by internet discourse, or because I got too bogged down in the drawing/refining/junctioning system instead of just playing the game. Regardless, I still thought the gameplay sucked and the characters were shit.
It wasn't until some years later that a couple of my friends replayed FF8 and realized I was right. They were very much operating off of their rose-tinted memories of the game, back when they were angsty high school students who saw the game as a weird self-insert fantasy.
This is a huge part of the problem. Too many people get into old video games riding partially or even entirely on a wave of opinions from modern youtube content regurgitators who try to make everything seem timeless and flawless just because THEY like it. You even have the weird phenomenon where people become "fans" of games and series they haven't even played themselves. Strange times.
>i fail to see what the appeal of dragon quest is, the gameplay is more basic than most flash games and the story is like something chatgpt would generate
Dragon Quest came out in a far-off year called "1986", where universal access to a network of thousands of free flash games wasn't a thing, and even the simplest writing had to still be done by a human being. Hope this helps.
>youtube content regurgitators who try to make everything seem timeless and flawless just because THEY like it
and the flipside of that coin is zoomers like
who refuse to see how anything could have ever had any appeal just because they don't like it right now.
>these games hold up nowadays
>i dont see how it holds up seeing how *thing that's different now*
>uhm filtered homosexual zoomer kek lmao git gud
saying dragon quest still holds up nowadays because you didn't have internet in the 90s is like saying sunglasses still make sense to wear at night because 6 hours ago the sun was up
>like saying sunglasses still make sense to wear at night because 6 hours ago the sun was up
Look at this guy whose vision isn’t augmented
the anon just doesn't like DQ. he wasn't even a homosexual about it yet you call him out as a zoomer? cringe.
it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia. There are so very few good jrpg where you can swap jobs and weapons from the very beginning. It just feels free but without the complexity of a D&D system. I like the simplicity, I love the graphics. It's a good game and I'd play it before most new releases if I had to pick one.
Any game that feels better when you take notes and make your own notebook map is timeless in my book.
>it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia
lmao this has to be bait
i dont think it has to be bait i think anon just happens to like the type of game that takes very little effort and creativity to make
it's like if someone told you they like their books written in simple english. nothing wrong with that, good for him 🙂
Dr. Seuss is pretty cool, though I guess if an adult told me that he only reads Dr. Seuss, I'd think that was a bit weird.
>it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia
hahaha
>it holds up because I can turn it on and still feel the magic I did as a kid. It's not just nostalgia
That's not what it means to hold up. I can do the same and totally not feel as you do
Dragon Quest is bad even by the standards of 80s games, SSI games from the same time period absolutely mog it.
>SSI games from the same time period absolutely mog it.
Name 5
Not him, but:
Questron
Phantasie
Wizard's Crown
Shard of Spring
Rings of Zilfin
>Dragon Quest came out in a far-off year called "1986", where universal access to a network of thousands of free flash games wasn't a thing, and even the simplest writing had to still be done by a human being. Hope this helps.
I wasn't arguing that it didn't have value back then I was arguing that it doesn't hold up
But it does hold up. The game mechanics are still good and the story is still charming. It's not like the game is overrun with flaws that ruin the experience unless you ignore them. Just because you don't like that style of game doesn't mean it doesn't "hold up".
>almost every single early DQ and FF game hold up
i would not say DQ1 and FF1 hold up
they are very simple and waste your time a lot
if you want a jrpg that holds up, chrono trigger does but i'm told that's specifically because the english localisation (and all translations based on the english localisation) is abridged and skips a lot of useless or redundant dialogue
>i would not say DQ1 and FF1 hold up
>they are very simple and waste your time a lot
I would somewhat agree here but I'd also say this problem is mostly gone by about 1991(~FF4) and definitely gone by 1994 (~FF6). Maybe you'll want a few minor QoL hacks for IV but they aren't essential, the original game is still better than a lot of RPGMaker slop. If you still don't like the games the issue is most likely that you just don't like the core gameplay (the combat).
Most people posting here can't distinguish between subjective and objective though or even willfully confuse them.
>Most people posting here can't distinguish between subjective and objective though or even willfully confuse them.
/thread
>most of the best versions are on the GBA.
Was with you until here.
GBA versions usually suck and are only liked by the specific generation who grew up with game boys and anyone dumb enough to listen to their advice. Any GBA port of a SNES game is always going to be superior on SNES.
Yes. Emulate the SNES originals.
I also like things that I would have liked in high school but didn't play at the time
>Homm3 still holds up
correct
>aoe2 still holds up
correct
>Deus Ex still holds up
correct
>BG 1 & 2 hold up
it was always shit
Baldur's gate 1 doesn't hold up lmfao
those two are just me and my brother interchangeably
you sound like morons interchangably
Filtered.
Sounds like you got filtered pretty hard. Which game was it?
yes this happens a lot on here, good example is dark sun: shattered lands. actual shit game that gets memed by annoying people on here. the ultima games aside from underworld are also all pretty mediocre, whenever i voice these opinions i get told i was "filtered" despite playing plenty of games from those eras
it's how these people get sucked into contrarian cults, they get attached to stuff from their childhood and break the minds of others who join them to the extent that they lose all touch with what sane people like. when this become apparent like the young person in your pic, then they convince themselves that it's because they have some sort of super refined elite taste when in fact they're just used to drinking sewage
Sure, but understanding that you shouldn't blame people for gatekeeping. I wouldn't like it if some moron who doesn't know every characters name comes into my space and tells me what's good and what's not.
if a game has some massive flaw you dont need to know some random npc's name to point it out, especially if the game was so bad you didn't finish it but the npc is towards the end of the game
if you told me a tv show wasn't good i wouldn't dismiss your thoughts becuase you didn't remember some random guy's name from season 4 episode 7
It's like. If you don't enjoy the game at all you were unironically filtered and your complaints will fall on deaf ears anyways.
It's more like this:
I like green, you like blue. No logical argument will ever change that I like green more than blue.
>there is no such thing as legitemate media criticism, it's all hardwired like sexual attraction
if a game runs at 5fps and i said "this game wouldn't be as bad if it didn't run at 5fps" i wasn't "filtered" by the framerate
not talking about technical shit just the game itself. If a classic nes spreadsheet job system doesn't get you hard, I can't relate. unironically.
>if a game runs at 5fps and i said "this game wouldn't be as bad if it didn't run at 5fps" i wasn't "filtered" by the framerate
If you didn't enjoy it because of the low framerate, then yes you were. That's what "filtered" means.
>b-b-but my criticism is correct!
It always is. Even if the reason you didn't like the game was completely moronic, the game still failed to appeal to you. That is the only measure of what makes a game "good". It's entertainment, it should be judged on how well it entertains people, and that's entirely subjective.
>the ultima games aside from underworld are also all pretty mediocre
i agree that the mainline games were buggy shit. but they got better with fan patches.
U1 to 4 are "ancient" by my standards, and my fav rougelike was Moraff's World.
otherwise almost every Ultima was a pioneer in RPGs in one way or the other. DQ probably won't be what it was without Ultimas.
couldn't have said it better myself
Morrowind
what are the three colored things in the lower left of the 2nd panel supposed to be? i can never parse these shitty comics
NPC indicators
colored LED fans on a desktop tower
You're jealous because the NPCs look good, while your computer is made of whatever parts give you the biggest numbers.
My cuzzin refused to play Chrono Trigger...
>i put the emulated version on a floppy for him while he was still play emulated pokeymans.
>snes ROM
>on a floppy
Sus.
it barely fits on 1.44MB floppied, all zipped up.
I used to sneak Donkey Kong Country onto every computer in my highschool via floppy. It was doable.
i just installed the Quake 3 demo but that's not RPGs.
>I used to sneak Donkey Kong Country onto every computer in my highschool via floppy. It was doable.
In elementary school I found Lemmings hidden on the networked drive of the school's Power Macintoshes or whatever the frick they had. I showed the whole class how to launch it. Good times
filtered
yes, i am often the guy who is arrogant and unreasonable and make pointlessly belligerent posts. i am also completely incapable of contributing quality discussion to this website
>yes, i am often the guy who is arrogant and unreasonable and make pointlessly belligerent posts. i am also completely incapable of contributing quality discussion to this website
BASED
A
S
E
D
This was pillars of eternity for me.
>This was pillars of eternity for me.
Both pillars games are "aggressively mediocre". Even if you have nostalgia for the infinity engine games they're aping (I do), I think the most that can be said for them is someone saying "I liked them and had fun" which is fair. But I cannot fathom of anyone ever saying "it's the greatest game in its genre of all time!" and they're not even old and janky with bad graphics or missing modern QoL features.
poe was literally sold to me as "the best modern crpg" and "if you don't like it you wont like bg because it's older", but I ended up liking the vibe of bg while poe did nothing for me
>poe was literally sold to me as "the best modern crpg"
This is only vaguely reasonable if you torture that qualifier "modern" since the genre was in a pretty bad slump at the time. Either way, I agree with you that BG is better, and I'm glad you found your way to some games you enjoy.
poe was the best rpg of the year during a year when there were no rpgs
it got more publicity that way than it deserved. it was still solid, just not as solid as you'd think
zoomers don't recommend their games to me
what "zoomer games" even fricking exist?
>what "zoomer games" even fricking exist?
Baldur's Gate 3
anon... Dark souls and the Trails series on PS3 belong to zoomies. I was graduated by the time they came out and I'm young for this board.
Isn't the calm one usually the cartoonist and the maniac the strawman?
Its making fun of op for being a schizo.
Arcanum
Fallout 1 and 2
Never. I have enjoyed every game i've ever played on some level
I kneel to your enlightenment, my lord!
People have been getting filtered for ages, it is what it is.
Man I used to see ads for that game in magazines back in the day and I’ve never heard anyone mention it ever
For a good reason
That good reason is that most of the series is not translated. It's a genuinely great series with a first mission that was too hard for people accustomed to anime girls equating easy game.
I just can't into DOS games but otherwise I'd love to play it
There are Windows ports.
Powerdolls is just shittier Front Mission IIRC.
Not even close. Not even close at all, no. You never played any of them. Totally different.
Maybe, I don't remember though. Why would I dwell on something so petty? It'd make me miserable.
fallout
*Morrowind
you can apply it to literally any rpg with dice rolls
It has to be studied why zoomers get so upset when they miss in videogames.
Someone got filtered and was butthurt enough about it to make this image.
No, because I'm the boomer and I don't recommend games to zoomers because I don't want them enjoying the things I enjoy.
So you just know you have shit taste
lol filtered, sry you missed the golden age but that's your problem
Ironically the only time it's happened to me is when I've suggested old games to people my own age. I'll show off something that I legitimately enjoy and they will go decry it and go back to something more modern without nearly the same depth. Meanwhile younger people will look at it, mess around with it some, and then either have something click and enjoy it or at least concede it's something that has to be worked at to get enjoyment out of when they just want something that's easy to play.
The most closed minded people are always older which is just natural human biology. The older we get, the less open to new things we are.
The most naive and suggestible people are always younger which is just natural human biology. The older we get, the more we value our time and the less bullshit we'll accept from the stupid and underinformed.
That would be more believable if I didn't see people playing the same games I recommended years later. The desire to avoid things we're unfamiliar with often blinds us to new experiences.
ftfy