Has your GM ever tricked you into a romantic encounter against your wishes?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Has your GM ever tricked you into a romantic encounter against your wishes?
Has your GM ever tricked you into a romantic encounter against your wishes?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Yes, they invited me over and ... wait, do you mean for my character?
Tried to hook me up couple times, and some of the attempts were kinda pushy, but there wasn't any trickery involved.
I cannot imagine trying to get a player's character to hook up with an npc
kinda wish i was shameless enough to enjoy that kind of thing but currently i would never nor has it been done to me
I was in a campaign once where the villain kept a literal love-shrine to my character complete with objects he had stolen from her and bits of her hair and stuff. He then tried to make a magical clone of her as a slave... does that count?
>Rick has clones of his daughter that he can do whatever he wants to
>. He then tried to make a magical clone of her as a slave
Jon Irenicus in da huus.
That just sounds like he stole Jon Irenicus
I play with an old (60+) man online, he DMs and always puts some girl that follows me, i played Exalted and chose a retainer (told him to build it himself for some randomness) and she's some Dragonblood that loves me, we play Aberrant as capeshit teens and there's some other super schoolgirl keeping close to me.
Also played Godbound with some other guy and he kept throwing woman at me, but that was probably because i made a super handsome Fae guy with and CHAmaxxxed, so i guess that's alright.
No, because I want to play games.
Didn't Yahtzee just recently complain about this in his "playersexual romance options in RPGs are fricking stupid as hell" video (which ended up actually being more about how videogames need to decide if you're Mr Sandbox (Wo)Man or an actual character in the world) and how there really should be an option to just sit by the fire and have a drink with your friends instead of "no way gay" or "let's frick"
I like BG3, and that’s a real complaint I have about the game, seems just interacting with the companions in a positive way puts you into the romanic route with them. Like the Mage character is talking about his cat familiar, and your options are “How about I rub your belly? ;)” and “Frick off, I hate cats”.
He even makes the point that Mass Effect Andromeda actually does this better than most RPGs out there, where every companion has a series of quests to like just hang out, get to know them, meet the family, and it all culminates into a group movie night.
And isn't it a sad thing that ME:A actually does something better than BG3
>ME:A
And better than the other Mass Effect games as well, because the previous ME games did exactly the same shit as BG3, where you can either threaten Gaydien by pulling rank, or invite him in, the latter results in a scripted, no back-out sex scene.
But what's really fricky is
>"Frick off, I hate cats"
Is the best way to hit on a girl who likes cats.
>Prove it, what cat is 'cuter' than a dog?
>She shows you her pussy
It's like these virgin ass writers don't know a thing about hitting on strangers and only hit on their friends in a just gay enough to be flirty, but not gay enough to be actually gay way so you can still hit on other people.
I believe the patch that just went out adjusts that sort of thing. I know they call out the cat example in particular.
Kinda crazy how long it took them to adjust it considering how long the game has been in early access.
>your options are “How about I rub your belly? ;)” and “Frick off, I hate cats”.
I guess the ability to turn someone down politely is lost art nowadays.
Everyone playing is expected to be a nerd or a poly-nonbinary game journo, so they just know their audience.
They’re out of line, but they’re right.
BG2 EE had the same problem.
I distinctly remember playing an evil mage and trying to be chummy with the EE blackguard companion whereupon the game decided to take my not telling him to frick off as a sign to trigger a gay romance in which my character's only dialoge options where variations of "gods, I want you now you beast", "take me" and "I love you and I need you but our love must wait".
Wtf man.
As a complete side note i’m actually very worried that BG3’s popularity will lead to a increase in coomers playing TRPGs and more people trying to normalize ERP at a otherwise normal table. I don’t want people trying to coom mid game when I just want a normal game.
as if the problem didn't exist before with Chaotic neutral tiefling rogue
How many chaotic neutral tiefling rogues did you encounter?
session zero moron
>he doesn't know this was always a problem
>pretending to be concerned about all TRPG groups like they're your constituents
>wanting to play with normies
is this bait?
Anders did the same very early in game, it was during his introduction I think, people hated it back then and it's one of the reasons why he's hated so much, it's absurd to me game developers still make the same mistake
I unironically accidentally romanced the gay elf in the 2nd (?) game because the dialogue choice was something innocuously friendly
it’s funny how games went from autistic]ally navigating conversation throughout the game in bg2 where disagreeing with someone ONCE locked you out of the romance to accidentally fricking half the party
Blame Bioware.
ME/DA:O set the standard that sex scenes should be the reward for having a companion, which means it should be easy to get if you put up with the companion and their companion quests.
Before that the games were about roleplaying.
It's kind of amazing that only the fricking PATHFINDER CRPGs actually have companions who have preferences/interests and require some RP to get with.
no, it was just the direction the genre was moving as a whole
jade empire was already basically a romance on autopilot, arguably you could trace it back to ff7
the witcher also came out the same year as mass effect, and clearly the devs reached the same conclusion as bioware at the time
>ME/DA:O set the standard that sex scenes should be the reward for having a companion, which means it should be easy to get if you put up with the companion and their companion quests.
BG2 started the Bioware romance trend.
>It's kind of amazing that only the fricking PATHFINDER CRPGs actually have companions who have preferences/interests and require some RP to get with.
The companions were incredibly mid in the Pathfinder CRPGS and the romance added literally nothing to the games
kek happened something similar to me in wrath of the righteous the cleric (I think), I read all the dialogue as just friendly shit, but then turned out I was romancing him
You guys remember when Fallout New Vegas had perks that let your character seduce people? It added on options to dialogue, making them distinct and obvious. In fact, you can respectfully and bluntly shut down advances from characters if you aren't interested in them, rather than just being a massive c**t about it, and the whole thing is like a side bit of what you have them on your team for. You can help them while not fricking them and they'll still be your ally.
But remember guys, Fallot New Vegas is bad because it's not Fallout 3 or Fallout 4 or Skyrim again, so disregard everything in it, especially since it's the one closest to an actual /tg/ of the four mentioned.
NV was peak homosexualry companion-wise, and you should be embarrassed to have brought it up in the context of romances
fallout 3 did that, moron
>But remember guys, Fallot New Vegas is bad because it's not Fallout 3 or Fallout 4 or Skyrim again
no one has ever ever said that
Not him, but a few years ago I had seen people argue that NV is the black horse of the Bethesda games because it's too different from FO3 and FO4.
It was only during a brief few months, which makes me think some "influencer" was gayging about and getting his followers to do the same
You're letting a single (possibly indian) shitposter on Ganker shape your perception of the world, among actual people NV is far more popular than 3 (in no small part because 3 doesn't run on modern systems and you need to go the TTW route to even play it), and 4 got a far more critical reception than either of them.
>Fallot New Vegas is bad because it's not Fallout 3 or Fallout 4 or Skyrim again
I don't keep up with the Bethesda circlejerk but it sounds like you're taking chronically online contrarian drivel as the general opinion on these games. FNV is remembered far more fondly in the cultural consciousness than FO3/4 and arguably Skyrim.
I haven't played DA2 for a while. Doesn't that game indicate romance lines with a big pink heart icon? Or was the issue that he had a bunch of scenes where not choosing the romance option pissed him off?
>Gay elf
Same for me in DA:O. Lost like an hour or two of progress from resetting.
He flirts with you the first time you meet him and the only option to shoot him down is an angry response that makes you lose rep with him.
>it's absurd to me game developers still make the same mistake
It's not a mistake, it's a conscious decision being made by them.
still cant believe how bad anders got changed between the DAO expansion and DA2
The core problem is that you need to satisfy every fetishist out there these days. Therefore you need lots of different romance options. You can't really make them developed and satisfying since you really don't have the time and budget. The end result is a bunch of hamfisted nonsense where people frick basically after one conversation. This satisfies the coomer part of your audience but is really detrimental. Ultimately, nobody will remember the randos you banged along the way anymore than they remember banging hookers in GTA. I just end up skipping the romance altogether in these types of games.
Personally, I though the Witcher 3 did it the right way. They presented you with 2 main romance options with 2 very different characters that you had to pursue for an extended period. You could even frick up and end up dumped by both. The secondary, more casual, romance options also required you to at least do a quest line for them. The only instant sex option were literal hookers.
>You could even frick up and end up dumped by both.
On the one hand, this is good and fine, "Oh no! consequences of my own actions" and all. On the other hand, I do think if you're going to go all in on such a small cast of romanceable options you should at least include the extra difficult harem route where you have to balance your relationship between the two.
It's the Witcher, you try and two-time someone and either one of the women can smell the difference between you semen levels across interactions and becomes suspicious or one of them becomes a jealousy beast and rapes the second woman with your severed wiener. It's a no-win scenario to aim for harem in the Witcher.
I genuinely quit my WOTR playthrough because the twink wanted my dick but all the options to turn him down were too mean.
>watching Yahtzee in CURRENT YEAR
Dude is shit at games, he's no better than the major site pigeons out there.
He kinda is though. But more importantly, he actually has the sense of perspective needed to not call a game bad just because he's bad at it. Which is apparently not as low a bar as it should be.
>he actually has the sense of perspective needed to not call a game bad just because he's bad at it.
Nah, he does that plenty.
I never got tricked into fricking an npc but I have on two occasions had a DM flirt with me (in character) frequently as well as another DM try to ship me with another player. On the first the DM had a barmaid hit on me pretty aggressively, I played a paladin and I wasn't rping as chaste but I typically don't like rping romances even in vidya let alone with others on a ttrpg. The tavern was our hub for a few sessions and every time we visited they'd have the character hit on me. It was pretty aggressive flirting and I thought a one off joke of his that this one barmaid just wanted my paladin. But he also kept it up with other characters, henches of the bbeg would call him handsome or remark that they'd want to keep him instead of kill him and I once got the party in trouble because the lady of a manor kept trying to flirt with my character and I rebuffed her and so she took offense and kicked us out resulting in our having to sneak back into the manor. The 2nd occasion, different DM, in college I joined a dnd club on campus and the player makeup was fairly balanced between four dudes + dm, and 3 girls one being dm's gf. I decided to play as an in character child hood friend of one of the girls characters, so we were pretty close (in game). I guess he thought our characters were cute when they interacted so he wanted to push us together in game which again I don't want to rp, but he texted me that he thought I was just shy and said "I got your back man" and would suggest her and I should meet separately outside of the group to discuss our characters backstories more. We did hangout twice to talk about dnd, but neither of us have any shared interests outside of it + I was crushing on co-worker so I had no interest in the dnd girl. I ended up letting that character get killed and re-rolling which furthered her rp and character growth and let me escape the DM's ship eventually.
Had a god-awful DM that wanted to ship my character with his self insert so hard that at one point in the game time-travel shenanigans happened and the DM described how my character and this NPC from the future were happily married with and she was a happy domestic housewife now instead of the devoted martial artist who never wanted to stop pushing her limits.
It was honestly kinda creepy and hell, and due to that and a few other instances of weird shit, I eventually found a different group to play with. I always got the feeling some of this stuff was more than just "in-character" things.
Anyone posting a monk is a chad. Your story is very bizarre though. I played a low-cha spaghetti-spilling monk once who the DM seemed to be setting up a potential romance with one of the town nobles but the game died.
Now you know what its like to be an idol in east asia
>Tfw no Kung Fu tradwife
No my GM is too robotic to even consider romance. Honestly the only motivations he understands is Christian morality and greed.
I was planing in a game where the GM’s GF was a player. The whole party got roped into participating in a werewolf orgy after she shoved a charm monster wand up the alpha’s butthole. I just left the cave and went to look for weed.
Sounds like one of those moments where you just know.
She was in fact a white woman with a pet golden retriever, so it’s very possible
I played semi-feral, non-human characters explicitly because my DM was a woman who could not go 1 session without an NPC choosing one of the players to flirt with.
Hard to romance my character when instead of getting sloshed with the rest of the party I'm out slaughtering a family of five.
>Hard to romance my character when instead of getting sloshed with the rest of the party I'm out slaughtering a family of five.
there are people into that kind of thing
What were the campaigns/party dynamic like? Did they not care if your character went on a killing spree, not know, or what?
>Did they not care if your character went on a killing spree, not know, or what?
I was brought into the party mid campaign under the pretense that it was a very non-serious Evil party when in actuality it was just that the paladin was LE and everyone else was some flavor of Neutral. My character's gimmick was basically fiddlesticks. Murderous boogeyman that could mimic voices to lure in prey, implied to have been around for hundreds of years. Technically they didn't know but I wasn't exactly subtle about it. I couldn't actually speak, so other players would ask questions and I'd answer in ominous played-back quotes from various people. Occasionally the DM would let me slip away when we were in town and then some random npc would disappear the next morning.
Most of the time out of combat the paladin kept me on a chain, but after the player left the group the rest didn't bother to keep me leashed. Especially considering I had just got a belt of Giants Strength and otherworldly leap so i had an effective move speed of 140ft per round. The druid occasionally expressed concern that I was a problem but the plaguedoctor kept me around because he thought i was interesting.
Really, it was kind of a fun game, once I got past the initial barrier of it being non-serious. But it's not something i'd like to do again. I'd like to go back to autism dungeoncrawler games.
/blog
>I played semi-feral, non-human characters explicitly because my DM was a woman
You just know
Anon, you're just asking for her to get creative.
I got caught in a bit of political shenaniganery that ended up with my noble character engaged to a distant third cousin, but marriage in general didn't factor into my own ambitions anyway, so I let them think they had beaten me. Basically wasted a lot of their political capital and made it so their side of the family couldn't oppose my schemes in court without looking like hypocrites or backstabbers to everyone else.
Still can't get a date on Friday night, eh?
Even your hand hates you by now.
No, but Fire Emblem did
whats worse, that or this
>NTR
what is this?
are you for real
oh it’s tranime shit, nvm
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=NTR
tldr Cuck porn, Japan.
This one was dodging a bullet because Maribelle's son is shit-tier.
please be nice to fantasy Kanji
If a video game counts, I killed Ashley in the first Mass Effect because I found her flirting disquieting and annoying.
Yes, with my monk/paladin in PF
He tried super hard to make it happen to the point pretty much cutscene it without me having any saying or agency. All so she could stab my and poison me during it
He got mad when he realized my Fort is 25 and passed quite easily his DC 28 poison. I also didn't kill her, just grappled her, tied her and carry her sack of potatoes style through the city to the police office and charged her with non consent poking, I also told them I wouldn't even consider her trying to poison me because she sucked at that and sucked me for that. GM retconned it next session so she jumped off the window to her death so we couldn't get intel from her
At that point, plus other stuff that happened prior, I realized this was a choochoo campaign
Played with the same group for years, only time I felt the GM tricked me was when he grew frustrated he didn't get to use an ability.
>In a fight
>Say I end my turn
>GM goes "You're starting to get low on health, do you wanna heal before you end your turn??"
>"Sure"
>"Oh, too bad, these guys have a psychic ability that cancels your healing and deal psychic damage to you in place of it."
>Gee, thanks, dickhead.
Yes, but not in game. It's a long story.
Tell us, it can't possibly make this thread any worse.
Anon, what part of "it's a long story" do you not get?
Stupid Black person?
Fine, short version
>My group's forver-GM was dating my ex BF (we broke up amicably)
>He and my ex ended up breaking up themselves, and it was a very messy breakup
>Forever-GM is depressed as frick, cancells that week's session
>To cheer him up, me, another player, and that player's cousin all invite forever-GM over to my place for some good old fashioned beer-and-pretzels gaming
>Boardgames and Commander and pizza and a bunch of booze
>We play for a couple hours, forver-GM is feeling a bit better, but he drank way too much to drive home at the end of the night
>Tell him he can sleep on the couch
>The others leave, and we're chilling on the couch late watching anime, and drinking more when we really should stop
>One thing leads to another and we're both cuddling on the couch
>One more thing and we're making out
>I wasn't really into it but I didn't really mind it either, and was too drunk to really protest
>He half-heartedly tried to give me a handjob but I couldn't get hard
>Keep kissing anyway for a bit, before some sense trickles back into my brain and I end it
>We try to go back to watching anime but 5 minutes later I just awkwardly say I'm going to bed
>A bit of an awkward converstion happens next morning but we walk through it and we're still friends
>Forever-GM ends up dating other player's cousin like two weeks later
the end
cute
So was ww2 but I can still summarize it as "Germany won a bunch then got clapped"
>run Werewolf campaign
>watch Carnival while preparing
>shamelessly steal Clancy Brown's character for the villain
>he interacts with one of the PCs via dreams multiple times
>PC does a lot of persuasion and manages to undermine villain's resolve
>after the game player thanks me for the romantic subplot I gave her
>mfw I didn't realize that's what was happening, I just like Clancy Brown
Nah, but I do it to the GMs because I think relationships are an important part of the living experience and people who act prudish need to go trip in a ditch of shallow water.
If I have to listen to several people with lisps or who trip over their words and moan at the end of their sentences like St. Cloud, I'm going to inject some fricking actual human desire into a situation.
>muh dick
>was gonna upgrade PC to get BG3
>my intuition said hold off
>game is designed for long rests in dungeons
>characters complain when you long rest in dungeons
Fricker, everyone's spell slots are expended, people are in single digit hp, and you're going to b***h that we rest? Frick off
At l;east people have actual faces though unlike in owlcat games
I was the DM and one of my ex players accused me of rape. But she was naked in front of me on all fours as we were fooling around. So i got behind her asked
>Is this okay
Wirh my dick at the entrance of her pussy. She said
>yea
So I fricked her doggy style and came inside without a condom. Later she accused me of rape (not to the police) and that gaming group fell apart.
>Be barbarian
>Wild man, live in jungle
>No other woman, no other people
>Use club smash monster
>Adventure group find me, good people
>Give me things to beat with club
>Elf woman in party wants make 'sex'
>Me not know this
>She explain it to me
>Me know this because me use old tree stump with hole
>Me ask if same
>She say is same
>She get naked, get on all fours
>Kick her in the c**t
>Me smart enough to check for bees first
underrated
No, but one of my GMs did decide to comedically use my very uninterested wizard as a target for jokes of such a romantic flavor.
>Dwarven Queen who thinks that he wants her when he approaches her for a favor
>Sphinx wishes that the androsphinxes could be as clever as him when he solves her riddle
And so on.
I have a bit of a story along those lines
>be me
>playing homebrew game, mostly designed to squeeze capeshit and magical girl shit together
>aware I have a crush on one of the players, and that the GM doesn't know this
>try to not let it get in the way of the playing
>still end up playing really well with their character, getting along great and given our flexible group ending up together remarkably often
>in fact, it seems we're being tagged up deliberately
>why are we being tagged together so often
>ignore it, continue on, start to click that other player had crush on me
>don't let it get in the way of the playing, for the LOVE OF GOD
>flash forward to the end of the first season, have gotten confident enough to admit that was into co-player, they admit the same
>DM claims he knew we could do it, admits to putting us together for "looking cute as a team"
>kick DM out of group before season 2 starts
>DM helps your dumb ass
>kick him
for what purpose
for directly admitting that he shipped players to their faces
ah its moronation
>this is your brain on autism
Denying players their agency is bad DMing.
>anons overlooking the "someone else trying to orchestrate two other people's interactions" angle and skip straight to DUDE WINGMAN
The DM had no knowledge of either of their affections and was doing things for his own gain. That isn't fricking wingmanning. If either of them were involved in the setup, it would be, but without that communication and resolve it's just the DM playing matchmaker and admitting to it. That doesn't become not-creepy just because the two ended up into each other, it's still unsolicited interference for personal motivation.
>oh no, bad friend pushed me outta the comfort zone how horrible how dared he
Who cares if it was "solicited" or not, you moronic c**t.
have a nice day. Yes, really, kill your worthless self.
>who cares about what somebody wants, the DM did the right thing for what he needs
Great work anon, say who made the DM the one in charge of what the OP needed exactly? What makes you in charge of that?
Take your autism medication, dude, stop making your mental illness someone else's problem.
>literal autist cripple tells someone to take their medicine
The lack of self-reflection is truly showing, mental moron.
It's exactly your mental illness is making it everyone else's problem because you didn't get something the "right" way you imbecile.
>waaah, waaah, my friend didn't give me a twenty-page consent form to sign before helping me get a gf!
look homie, unless he's putting viagra into your soda-can, the dude was completely within bounds hitching you two together. even if it didn't work it wouldn't have mattered, shit was still thoughtful and unless there's some actual boundaries he's crossed, i don't see anything wrong with it.
unless the DM was putting you in fricking Jigsaw traps where the only way out alive was the bang the other player you're a fricking moron
Gentlemen... You are both in a square room, 30 x 30 feet with solid stone walls. To the east is a locked door. There are no other exits, and the walls are otherwise smooth and unmarked. As you look around, you notice the room is slowly filling with a slick, slimy liquid through small cracks in the ceiling. At the current rate of flow, you estimate it will only take 30 minutes for the room to fill completely.
The door is magically sealed and can only be opened by the noise of a man experiencing a prostate orgasm. You have only a half-hour to decide whether you will cum... or go. Will you take the initiative?
>Abe faked his own death so he could become Gettin Jiggysaw With It and force Japan to have kids
kino
motherfricker he was wingmanning you
I mean, fair points, but can't you admit that essentially putting players together because you want them to bone is at least a little creepy? and that isn't even getting into the fact he got caught making erotica of the PCs
man I hope this is bait
encouraging people who you think like each other to spend time together is perfectly normal human behavour, unless you're implying both parties involved are so moronic they can't not get together at the slightest push and want to cry coercion
>unless you're implying both parties involved are so moronic they can't not get together
anon, I am one of the parties involved.
yeah and you're not doing yourself any favours
Yes, and we're calling you a spaghetti-spilling sperg.
I would say you should castrate yourself for the sake of the human race, but I doubt you could put it in without a third party coaching you that you would then cry about them "raping" you.
>dude literally sets you up with your crush
>kick him out for the effort
you ungrateful twat. genuinely, frick you.
>helping two people (presumably straight) who are explicitly into each other hook up
>predatory homosexualry
Are you unwell anon?
>friend tries to help you score with a girl
>RRREEEEE I'M BEING GROOMED! FRICKING homosexualS RRRREEEEEE!!!!!
You'll die alone, and it will be 100% your fault.
looks like they're pretty deep in your head as no one else was talking about them
>sperg reminds the thread that spergs are literally mentally malformed subhumans
Have been on the GM end of it
>Playing DnD
>Party has a medusa girl that they basically adopted because she was sad and lonely
>Her role in the party is to be the person who stays on the ship when they go adventuring on islands, because it's a pirate campaign
>A player misses a couple sessions and I have her character, who is a man, stay on ship with the medusa girl. This character was also the first one who was nice to the medusa when the party met her
>Decide that it makes sense for Medusa girl to develop a crush
>When they go to an island with a good sized city, Medusa girl asks him on a date
>Date happens
>It's mid. There's no spark.
>PC turns down any future dates.
Medusa girl did end up getting to kill her evil father though so it works out.
>turning down the medusa girl
blasphemy
The PC had a lot of baggage from his family being held hostage by a villainous lord and some other shenanigans so he just wasn't looking for a relationship
>Maid
>Deusa
>maideusa
Oh it's such a silly dumb pun but I love it so much.
They hated him because he told them the truth.
All homosexuals should be killed messily.
You're advocating for your own death, then.
didn't the Roll20 SJW cuck get into trouble because of this?
Yeah, I suppose so, although it wasn't quite romantic. It was an android going in for an upgrade or something and the GM described it as sexually satisfying without the player's consent, and of course that went about as well with their blue haired audience as you'd expect.
What's funny is that he was a big advocate of X cards, and the situation was a textbook example of when one of those could be used and nobody did. They let him go on and on about how great it feels and only afterwards did they call him out.
Yes, we were forced into a dream where we either got raped and had some cash thrown our way or not. My dwarven monk certainly didn't go for it, but the party sorcerer did, and I was forced to listen to the guy describe an impromptu abortion. Mind you, this was my first session with them and I was given nothing close to a content warning. yeah.... I never played with that group again lmao
People talk shit about X-cards and content warnings but that shit's important for a reason. Jesus.
One of my characters saved a noble who turned into a stalker for my character, the problem was they were both dudes, several times the dude tried to drug my character with a magic gender bend roofie (some of them actually working temporarily), eventually my character managed to convince the noble to drink it instead in exchange for my character marrying them. I knew the DM well and everyone in the group thought it was hilarious, so I guess I can say my character was tricked into sexual encounters against their wishes, but I didn't mind since I'm capable of understanding tricks and insults my character receives are typically directed at my character and not at me.
Yes, legend says my traveller marine is still being milked by the psychic duchess to this very day.
Same GM wed my traveling priest to a succubus he was forced to try to redeem through his travels; in hindsight it was a fun idea.
Another GM, my fighter was drugged with a love potion and fell in with a sorceress. All of these were when we were high schoolers playing though, so it's been a while since that happened.
i had one GM take the entire scene out of my control, insist than an NPC lady seduced me successfully (zero die rolls for either side), and then robbed me in the night or something like that.
And then the GM smirked and had her NPC make fun of my character for being so "easy" to trick. As if there was something I was supposed to be able to do differently.
This may go without saying, but my friends and I never played with that GM again
If you reciprocated the advances, and never made any checks of your own volition, you should try not to play in a way that demands the DM spoonfeed you.
However, if you didn't play into it, your GM was a gay.
I refuse to DM romance. Outright.
You want to have your horny fantasy? Do it in your own time. The rest of the party does not want to see you shift your weight to try and hide your boner while you attempt to make the barmaid your forever waifu.
Many moons ago, during college, our longtime DM lost his DM status and friendship status by raping our favorite NPC for absolutely no reason. We were playing a PF1 campaign of about 8th or 9th level.
Events had transpired that one of the gods of this universe had fallen from grace and taken a mortal form, deprived of her powers and memory. I think the Goddess' name had been Saeren-re, or something. They had been our patron until that point (in every way but officially) so we felt somewhat responsible for taking care of them since we played a part in their downfall. They had this big 'phoenix' motif going on and we pretty much were assuming that they would rise from the ashes, given time. No such luck.
The very first session after this was established and we took her under our charge, a gang of 3rd level bandits abducted her into an alley and raped her. One of our players, ironically the one who was their champion, was the one who discovered it, when he went searching for them to check up on them only a few moments after we'd gone away to discuss a story matter with another character.
There had been no checks or warnings to account for her disappearance, no perception rolls to overhear her crying for help or struggling. We were in the next room over, not six miles down the road.
The DM described that the bandits had torn her clothes off and were taking advantage of her, one of the bandits positioned over her slumped body and performing the very obvious act of rape.
That was the last session of that game.
Anyway, to answer your question, no. That would be pretty weird. Good question, though.
Remarkable Recovery
TDCSR
p190
Your body has the ability to recover quickly from terrible injuries, and is unusually receptive to healing magic. You gain the following benefits:
Increase your Constitution score by 1, to a maximum of 20.
When you are successfully stabilized while dying, you regain hit points equal to your Constitution modifier (minimum of 1).
Whenever you regain hit points as a result of a spell, potion, or class feature (but not this feat), you regain additional hit points equal to your Constitution modifier (minimum of 1).
>be paladin with con 20
>lay on hands myself for 1(+5) every 6seconds when out of combat until i´m full health again
these critical role frickers need someone who reads over their shit.
the classes they released have some neat ideas in them here and there, but some are just powercreep beyond salvaging
>yeah sure the moon cleric gives you advantage on attack rolls for 10minutes and can concentrate on 2 spells at once
wrong thread chief
I'm starting a game this week with a DM that apparently did that in the last campaign their group ran. Had some noblewoman capture and rape the party's human male fighter for information (???).
He's like a parody of a horny basedboy virgin and despite me warning him to tone that shit down I know he's going to ignore me. I have a felling this will be a short campaign for me.
>See pic related
Sounds like that anon made a huge Freudian Slip. The correct answer for dream guardian is clearly the default female dwarf milf.
I am the tricking GM
>eberron
>aberrant mark PC sent to prison for political frame job
>spends a few years as a statue in dreadhold
>broken out at the start of a new campaign
>spends a while in hiding
>chance meeting with dragonmarked half-sister
>tearful reunion
>lots of drinking
>wake up in bed together
>she's trying to bear an aberrant child by him
i am above your judgment, the dirty himbo was just asking for it
>Pussing out by making her a "half"sister
Judging you anyway.
Never got why people do this in fiction. "Oh, don't worry, they are not really related" b***h, they are not really related because they are not even real. It would be like if the DM told you "So about this orc ambush, all of your characters and enemies are actors and all injuries are special effects, so don't worry you are not actually hurting anybody" Is play pretend, I already can emotionally detach enough for my character to kill all these fictional beings, What does this matryoshka of untruth accomplish?
>PC is aberrant because father was dragonmarked and fricked someone who had the wrong mark
>half-sister is from a legitimate dragonmark pairing and thus has a full dragonmark
It's plot/setting relevant. I forgive your ignorance.
half siblings are still related by blood you tard
Not me but another player
>Star Wars Saga
>Our characters operate out of a space station which acts like a hub and is full of NPCs
>One of the NPCs is described as a mole woman
>This amuses one of the players
>GM decides he's going to set up a romance with the mole woman and the player's character
>Every time we come across this NPC, GM describes her flirting with the PC in question
>Player visibly uncomfortable
>Player vocally annoyed
>GM actual sadistic dickhead
>Scene set where mole NPC gets between PC and a door
>Won't let him by without a kiss
>Player decides the best course of action to avoid this romance is to have his character shoot himself in the head
>GM forces him to burn a force point so he survives
>Mole visits him in hospital
>PC doesn't have his guns on him due to being in intensive care
>Player does not let another scene play out. Calls GM every gay slur you can think of until he makes the mole go away
>Running joke for the rest of the campaign was "you're going to need two guns for this one" because GM turned mole NPC into a villain who was always two steps ahead of the party
No, he did add my character's silver dragon girlfriend to the story just like I secretly wished he would.
He's a good DM.
In a campaign where we all started as amnesiacs, it was revealed that my character was the wife of one of the GM’s characters.
I was not happy about it.
I once played a Shadowrun game where I was a dying street sam whose schtick was to do one last good thing before he carked it (I even took the dying disadvantage). So one thing he did was buy a child sex slave out of kindness to free her. GM apparently thought I wanted to romance her and basically said she would kill herself if I didn't let her stay in my house and have sex with her. The campaign ended with him getting a cure for his condition and having kids with her.