No, it's still a tranimal. Otherwise it would be stuck as the animal because the actual animals are incapable of transforming or even mentally conceiving of druidic magic.
what if a male archdruid shapeshifted into a female bear cub? and what form would a succubus/incubus take to seduce it?
and most importantly: what tags would i need to use to find such a thing?
Be honest with me, there are anons where who dont side with the dude on the bottom? Shapeshifting is ok, sure its weird as hell to have sex while in some cases but its still an old dude who transdormed, I cant believe that people here would be against it
The guy is extremely left wing.
He goes hard against any suggestions for optional filters to turn off LGBT content.
And then he defends bestiality.
And because he is now cornered with his logic he has to defend e-girls as well.
well then you're gay or at least bisexual because what you're saying is you'd have sex with a troony. the game/real life excuse doesn't fly unless your answer changes between the two.
And that's the normal/straight response. You don't just suddenly become a homosexual given circumstance in the same way that you don't suddenly find sex with animals or otherwise acceptable. You must have a predisposition to permit that kind of stimuli or else your disgust and reason will outweigh your curiosity.
>Ganker will not accept that a troony is a woman >but they will accept that a man is a bear and reeeeee about it
Uh, schizobros? Self-ass ravaging status?
Nobody actually thinks jerking off to e-girl porn is sexual assault of a minor. They just think it should also be illegal (as it should) since it encourages child abuse.
Meanwhile wanting to frick a bear takes cares of itself real quick when
>biggest viral marketing campaign
you have to be moronic to believe this. the implication that somehow Larian predicted culture warriors on this board would latch onto a druid bear sex joke and freak out is pure moronation of the highest level. not to mention im pretty sure no one cared but the obnoxious third worlders here whining over it.
>She's actually a 10 000 year old demon
I don't really give shit if people fantasize about fricking animals - they've been doing it for humanity's entire existence, but the denial meltdown is pretty pathetic to watch.
I understand that your IQ is in the double digits so simple sentences are not easy to grasp for you: but the point is that "it's not an animal, it's a druid" is exactly as moronic as attaching "age lore" to children.
Didn't people start thinking that movie Big was super creepy a couple of decades after it came out because an adult tries to seduce the child turned into an adult?
It's not bestiality because 1. they're pixels, they aren't real 2. even if you ignore that it isn't an actual bear, it's a druid shapeshifted into a bear who has the cognition of an adult human and therefore can consent to sex
Because if it was a druid it would talk to you in druid form first to make sure both parties are consenting to this, before turning into the bear? Like in the game?
He probably would unless they start as an obvious adult and morph into a e-girl for you to see but then you need to explain why you want them to transform into a child, filthy paedo
No I don't have any particular reason for wanting to see them as a bear, it's just funny haha like wouldn't that be weird if they held me down with their big hairy body and rotten meat breath eeeeewwww hahaha I would HATE that
No actually they aren't. The reason why fricking a child is wrong isn't because they have small proportions it's because a child cannot meaningfully consent to sex since they lack the cognition of a human adult to understand the full ramifications of engaging in a sexual relationship. It's effectively a form of exploitation.
A 1000 year old e-girl who has the cognition of an adult human very clearly does possess the cognition to meaningfully consent to sex and isn't being exploited
The problem is if the e-girl *says* they are 1000 years old but there is no evidence suggesting that they have the cognition of an adult, because that's no different from a kid lying about their age.
No actually they aren't. The reason why fricking a child is wrong isn't because they have small proportions it's because a child cannot meaningfully consent to sex since they lack the cognition of a human adult to understand the full ramifications of engaging in a sexual relationship. It's effectively a form of exploitation.
A 1000 year old e-girl who has the cognition of an adult human very clearly does possess the cognition to meaningfully consent to sex and isn't being exploited
The problem is if the e-girl *says* they are 1000 years old but there is no evidence suggesting that they have the cognition of an adult, because that's no different from a kid lying about their age.
You'd still be restricted by physical maturity. If your 1000 year old e-girl had the body of an 8 year old child, veganal penetration would straight up be mutilation. It'd be like trying to fit a dildo in your urethra. No way around child abuse no matter how many olympic gold medals you have in mental gymnastics.
A druid is not an animal, and a 3000 year old succubus is not a child. This is correct, and consistent, and you have no arguments against it.
Of course, it doesn't matter anyway, because fiction is fictional. In fiction you can frick bears and children all you want, because they're not real. Fictional entities have no human rights and deserve no consent.
All morality begins at harm.
>man shapeshifts into a bear >Good because he was originally a man and can consent, he's also not real and is a videogame >Same man shapeshifts into a little girl >Noooo, that is bad, fricking pedo die die die!!!!
Many such cases...
I easily refute your argument by saying that this scene is very easily skippable and avoidable, you just don't pick the "frick the bear" option
Whereas most fanservice in anime is completely unavoidable, they will just shove shit right in your face at every possible opportunity to the point of being obnoxious
Yeah and for every scene that exists that's just someone with visible panties you have millions of other scenes that's some YAAAAA ECCHI shit that involves breasts and panties constantly getting shoved in your face
I'm not saying sex bad I'm saying there is a time and a place for it, having fanservice shoved down your throat all the time isn't "hot" it's annoying and often clashes with tone, aesthetics and thematics. There is a big difference between a quiet scene where you talk to your lover and have sex, and a game where everyone is a stripper with giant distracting honkers that constantly shove them in your face wherever you go, even when you're trudging through dangerous and treacherous lands
>Yeah and for every scene that exists that's just someone with visible panties you have millions of other scenes that's some YAAAAA ECCHI shit that involves breasts and panties constantly getting shoved in your face
Name the game.
I can only think of shit like Senran Kagura where that's the point.
>Whereas most fanservice in anime is completely unavoidable
It's unavoidable because it's a TV show, anon. You can avoid shit in BG3 because it's an interactive video game.
Also, there's a bunch of shows without fanservice. Watching anime with fanservice and then complaining about the fanservice is like watching a gay porno and complaining there's gay porn in it. The fanservice in many anime don't clash with the tone because it was made with fanservice in mind. It's your fault you're a moronic casual who can't even do basic research, bare minimum research. Literally all you need to do 90% is look at key art, character designs and read a brief description if you want to avoid fanservice shows. You're on the same level as a video game journalist with how dumb you are.
when your fans are weebs, the standards of fanservice fall so hard they make a crater >uguiiiiii the cute girl acts like she's talking to meeeee >tee hee hee she fell on her head and now her kawai panties are showing >uooh she accidentally spilled her drink on her shirt and now she is screaming and blushing
Are you seriously complaining about there being things in the universe being made that don't cater specifically to you and therefore they should be removed?
>LOOK LOOK YOU HAVING A JOKE IS LE BAD ME BEING A LITERAL PEDO IS LE GOOD
/pol/tard culture warrior make an argument that isn't NO U challenge level IMPOSSIBLE
>NOOOO I need to spam the board with my culture war shit so I can win
Go woke go bro...
NOBODY wants you here /misc/ tourist since it's clear as day you don't actually care about your pedo shit and just want to own da libs
This thread is worthless bait but I would like you anons to know that I am currently furiously jacking off to toddlerfurs on inkbunny rn I'm only reading this until the rest period is over
This argument doesn't make sense, even if it's not a real bear you actively choose to engage in intercourse with someone looking like a bear. This choice clearly shows come attraction to animals, as such is it bestiality.
Nah it's just that most arguments in favor of that kind of sexual freedom can be argued in the same way for pedophilia, except pedophilia is strongly frowned upon, so it's funny seeing the people advocating zoophilia and other fricked up shit crumble when they realize they therefore also support pedophilia
If they take on the physical aspects of the creature, does that mean they have bear sperm as well? Could a druid in bear form knock up an actual bear? What would the resulting child be? Is this how owlbears came about?
People are aware that its called beastiality when its with a beast, an animal without the intelligence, sentience and communication to deliver intent, right? People also know about the harkness test, right?
It's not a fictional creature, it's literally a bear. According to this logic we could have tons of scenes with people fricking e-girls in a game, so long as the e-girl is "actually 9000 years old".
Interesting how you already acknowledged it was a child. Pedo.
Halsin turns moronic and angry like a bear when he shapeshifts into a bear.
Read the rulebook. Druid wildform retains all intelligence and wisdom.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>rulebook
lol no
Why does halsin turn angry and moronic when he shapeshifts into a bear in the game if thats true? Is he just putting it on?
10 months ago
Anonymous
Halsin is a man of passion. He has a lot of rage and turning into a bear is USUALLY an act of war. It'd be like thinking a warrior turns into an idiot by drawing his sword. The warrior is not any less intelligent, he's just no longer interested in talking.
10 months ago
Anonymous
If he did turn stupid when he shapeshifted would you concede that its beastiality?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>noo you can't point to the actual rules that hurts my epic pedo seethe.
I'm not advocating for anything, I'm just calling out hypocrisy when I see it.
just advocating for an admission that it's the same thing
Sure hypocrites.
>Interesting how you already acknowledged it was a bear. Zoophile.
Pedo absolutely ass blasted.
10 months ago
Anonymous
explain how the two are not the same
10 months ago
Anonymous
Simple ones not pedophilia.
10 months ago
Anonymous
then it's simply zoophilia. explain better
10 months ago
Anonymous
Nope. Nice cope though Pedo hypocrite.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>having sex with a bear in fiction is perfectly fine! >if you suggest otherwise you're a pedophile!
Very interesting debate technique.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Thanks I learned it from you gays.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Interesting how you already acknowledged it was a bear. Zoophile.
Its fiction, age is literally just a number and apperance is arbitary. The only thing that matters for things that are visually human you should be judging them on is their behaviour. If it acts and behaves like an adult and they say its an adult? It's an adult.
>You swap the brains of a bear and a human >You now have a human with the brain of a bear and a bear with the brain of a human
Which case is beastiality?
When they shapeshift into an animal they turn nearly as moronic as that animal. Like Halsin becomes a stupid angry bear when he shapeshifts into one. So I don't think you can fully consent in an animal form, it's like getting drunk.
If you think there are not subconscious things at play when you watch something... well all I'd say is do more research. Here's a tip, your brain can not separate what it sees on screen and what happens in real life. Have you ever seen an action film in the cinema, and felt more awake, energised, excited walking out, and for a significant period of time afterward? Serial killers usually start out hurting animals, just for the joy of it. Child sexual abusers usually start with e-girl and child porn, zoophiles and furries usually start with furry porn, and then do shit to real animals. Acquiring, seeking out, and keeping that kind of porn is a transgressive act that emboldens them if they get away with it. They test the waters, they build up their confidence, then they move on to more serious things.
January 2010 >I find horse porn and entire threads dedicated to sharing horse porn and tips on how to for real frick a horse
August 2023 >The same exact place is going apeshit over a shapeshifting Human shifting into bear form for kinky sex. The west has now fallen and billions must die (not me or anyone I care about)
I don't see anyone here doing that. Your issue are employed people doing a job for money. I'm not those and neither is anyone here. People are shitting on you as payback for your shitting your pants over the bear because you thought your "/v/ros" 100% supported you.
tell the truth now, if I check the archives am I going to find that the frequency of posts containing "that's a child" or "pedo" didn't increase until after the bear trailer day?
You're gonna find a lot of people doing that because you pearl clutched first and they wanted to give you a taste of your own pearl clutching medicine.
No one mentioned furries. Furries are anthromorph people who wear fursuits and talk about their cartoon personas and conventions. Not a literal horse. Are you ok?
I like how quickly this goes from "DEGENERACY! I'M M-MAD CAUSE UM...WHAT ABOUT DA CHILLIN'?! DA CHILLIN' WILL BE CORRUPTED BY IT! #TRADLIFE" to "I'M JUST MAD PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT THE BEAR SEX BUT SOMEONE CALLED ME A PEDO BECAUSE OF MY ETNA DAKI!"
Explain me how a druid is not a bear when he turns. Is it just an illusion? Even if he has druids mind he is still physically a bear! Youre fricking a bear, you put a bears wiener in your ass!
Fricking an animal isn't what makes something beastiality, as humans are animals and fricking a human isn't beastiality. Fricking a stupid animal that can't consent is beastiality. If there was a non-stupid bear it would be ok to consenually frick it.
Im sorry but its wrong and this adding of consent sounds like rationalization. The defenition is plain and simple and you you want to have sex with a non-human animal you are a zoophile
>A druid is not an animal >But a 1000 year old dragon shape shifted into an anime girl is totally irl CP
Why should anybody care what these people think?
No it started off over the bear but later changed to hypocrisy. Had they started with "lol hypocrites" instead of "DEGENERACY" you'd get less people fricking with you. The hypocrisy thing is also weak because you're sort of deciding if this one random journalist from BYTEDANCE or some shit says something, then that means everyone else not you also agreed.
>The hypocrisy thing is also weak because you're sort of deciding if this one random journalist from BYTEDANCE or some shit says something, then that means everyone else not you also agreed.
It started off with the bear but did you really not notice that the bulk of the posts about it were basically paraphased anti-e-girl arguments? It was about hypocrisy before resorting to using the word hypocrisy
>be morons for a week shitting on this site saying you want degeneracy removed and Gankers soul killed >surprised people now just mock you non stop and will forever over this issue
Give it up, you fricked up with the kneejerk /misc/ shit and this topic will never be one people will support you on again. Next time think before doing the knee jerk
and what strawmen are stating this hypocrisy? The trannies? The redditors? Who is praising the bear sex and saying fricking little girls is bad in the same breath? The hypocrisy is about fricking little girls, right?
I haven't played BG3 so all of this for me has been from the sidelines but just about everything I have seen regarding beargate has specifically been about hypocrisy by western devs and game journos who condemn even mild sexually provocative material in games but those same devs and journos heaping praise on BG3 and it's sex scenes.
Now maybe I have things wrong but is it not the case that nearly all the talking heads in the industry that seethe about stuff like DOA or Senran Kagura are now holding water for BG3 doing the same thing?
and what strawmen are stating this hypocrisy? The trannies? The redditors? Who is praising the bear sex and saying fricking little girls is bad in the same breath? The hypocrisy is about fricking little girls, right?
>and saying fricking little girls is bad in the same breath? The hypocrisy is about fricking little girls, right?
What the frick are you even talking about?
>nah none of that happened it's just /misc/tards
Really?
Are you perhaps exaggerating?
So you're telling me that if I were to painstakingly go through every single article praising BG3 and compare them with articles complaining about DOA or Senran Kagara there would be absolutely zero names in common as the writers of those articles?
and what strawmen are stating this hypocrisy? The trannies? The redditors? Who is praising the bear sex and saying fricking little girls is bad in the same breath? The hypocrisy is about fricking little girls, right?
No one takes you seriously because you tried the wrong strategy first. You should have lead with "WHY ARE THESE HYPOCRITES NOT LETTING ME FRICK LITTLE AMY?!?" instead of "SWEET JESUS THIS IS SINFUL AND OBSCENE! IT MUST BE BANNED UNDER THREAT OF MILITARY FORCE AND WE MUST KILL BILLIONS TO SAVE OURSELVES FROM LEGENERECY!"
And there's no problem with that.
It's nothing more than putting on a magical bear costume. >mne mneh dragon e-girls
If your dragons want to put on children costumes, that's all perfectly legal too.
>The penis is shaped like the one of a bear >It tastes like one >It smells like one >It moves like one >It's attatched to a real bear >It's not zoophilia because the druid kept his intelligence ability score!
What are these people on?
In that case, there's no real moral consequence of it being zoophilia.
You can't just say it's bad because it is. You have to explain why things are morally positive or negative.
Hey OP, did you know that the opinions of literal whos from other communities don't belong here?
If I wanted to know what some random stupid frick had to say on the Steam forums, I'd hang out there, but I'm on Ganker because I hate these communities and try to avoid them. Stop bringing your garbage bag to Ganker you stupid fricking attention prostitute b***h.
I hope this is a joke.
People are attracted to the body, not the brain.
It doesn't matter if a e-girl is 10 or 1000, she is sexy in the same way.
>if it looks like a woman it's ok, even if it is a man
10 months ago
Anonymous
If literally the only thing left from the past life are the memories, yes.
I don't support trannies but i'm fine with an unrealistic fantasy.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I don't support trannies but i'm fine with an unrealistic fantasy. >tranime poster
????
10 months ago
Anonymous
Exactly, fantasies are okay, wanting to wake up magically turned into a little girl is fine, putting on a wig and mutilating yourself is not, why is this so hard to understand.
10 months ago
Anonymous
There's trannies that look more woman than your average woman. You just keep making endless exceptions so that you don't have to accept how you are the biggest degen of them all.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>There are druids that look more bear than your average bear
10 months ago
Anonymous
The point is this guy is fine with his fantasy but then the other fantasy is somehow not fine.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>100% a women vs a butchered man
There is a big difference.
Trannie men will always perform like a man, in sports and in science.
I would be fine with killing them and placing their memories in a new body, that's the only proper way that might be possible in the future.
10 months ago
Anonymous
If I saw such a troony and said they were attractive I wouldn't try to take it back afrer learning the truth
Wouldn't frick it but if it looks good, it looks good
10 months ago
Anonymous
If it looks like a woman then it shows the female form you fricking moron
10 months ago
Anonymous
>the form is all that matters
Not only are you gay and delusional, you are also shallow
10 months ago
Anonymous
Literally always has been. The butchering that trannies do to themselves doesn't make them a woman. A magical crown that magically changes your body does.
>Msle human turns into a bear >Bestiality >MALE dragon turtle turns itself into a female human >NOOOO IT'S NOT THE SAME THING BRO!!!
Yeah and I bet it's also not gay.
how many zoosadist logs have to be leaked before people understand that zoophiles are 100% of the time also pedophiles ?
how many more times does it need to happen?
If the guy druid turned into a bear woman with big breasts, ass, thighs and belly like in those furry drawings you jerk off to, Ganker would celebrate and call BG3 a masterpiece
It's not in a way that you don't get banned for being against certain content in videogames.
It's extremely fun to make leftoids seethe to hell and back.
Made several of them admit they are okay with CP in games.
>For gays, being seen means fricking and sucking out in the open and being as promiscuous as possible at all times.
Ya know I'm starting to think that being gay may be a fetish that lumps with others such as humiliation, exhibitionism, voyeurism, and whatever the frick fetish explicitly remove monogamy and romance.
Bro do you actually spend time reading steam forum posts just so you can screencap them and bring them back here to circlejerk with the schizos?
And you have the gal to call anyone mentally ill.
>the freakiest thing they can imagine is "drawings don't have feelings"
Oh boy, I'm so far to the left of this graph you'd go over the res limit trying to draw me.
These people will say the druid is not an animal when he is clearly in an animal form to justify their sickness but will then will say the 3000 year old dragon in human form that just so happens to look like a little girl, aka e-girl, is pedobait.
It's so odd how degenerates fight among themselves to try to claim legitimacy for their degenerate bullshit.
In the recent steam thread a couple of libtards went into the "if they exist they have to be represented" argument.
OP asked them if they would argue in support of pedo representation on that criteria alone.
One of them went into deflecting without answering the question and the second one went >aaahh um welll
And fricking admitted he would be okay with it
You know you're dealing with someone completely derange when they start chanting...
A druid is not an animal the same way a drawing of a child is not actually a child
Makes sense, I mean regardless of physical changes you will always be what you started out as.
A druid can actually turn into an animal in fantasy. In reality a man can never be a woman.
No, it's still a tranimal. Otherwise it would be stuck as the animal because the actual animals are incapable of transforming or even mentally conceiving of druidic magic.
Hey guys did you know that fricking a 1000 year old dragon is not child abuse?
Report him for supporting CP and move on.
a man shifting into a bear is ok, a child shifting into a dragon is not
Let's wait for the mod where you can romance Orin, kek.
what if a male archdruid shapeshifted into a female bear cub? and what form would a succubus/incubus take to seduce it?
and most importantly: what tags would i need to use to find such a thing?
that is correct
>cope
4twitter was a mistake
Be honest with me, there are anons where who dont side with the dude on the bottom? Shapeshifting is ok, sure its weird as hell to have sex while in some cases but its still an old dude who transdormed, I cant believe that people here would be against it
The guy is extremely left wing.
He goes hard against any suggestions for optional filters to turn off LGBT content.
And then he defends bestiality.
And because he is now cornered with his logic he has to defend e-girls as well.
if your girlfriend shapeshifted into a dude, would you still frick him?
Yeah? But then again, its a fiction game and not real
well then you're gay or at least bisexual because what you're saying is you'd have sex with a troony. the game/real life excuse doesn't fly unless your answer changes between the two.
I wouldn't have sex with anything transformed into a dude. I don't get turned on by dudes.
And that's the normal/straight response. You don't just suddenly become a homosexual given circumstance in the same way that you don't suddenly find sex with animals or otherwise acceptable. You must have a predisposition to permit that kind of stimuli or else your disgust and reason will outweigh your curiosity.
All correct except pedophilia isn't wrong
>Ganker will not accept that a troony is a woman
>but they will accept that a man is a bear and reeeeee about it
Uh, schizobros? Self-ass ravaging status?
I'll accept that a troony is a woman if they use magic to actually change instead of telling me to pretend they have
Nah frick off you will never be a real tank. A real healer. Or a real dps. You are a joke.
I wasn't aware trannies had actual magic to turn them into the opposite sex. I immediately retract everything negative I've said if this is true.
Well...
Missclick
was meant for
A druid morphing into a real bear with magic makes him a bear
A troony chopping off his penis using a axe does not and will never make him a woman
They are so close yet so far
So by your account, a man can never be a woman and vice versa. Thanks for clearing this up
Ask them if they also believe that a drawing is not the same thing as a reality, and see how far you can push that rabbit hole until it rips.
Underrated post.
Jesus that'd be good.
Nobody actually thinks jerking off to e-girl porn is sexual assault of a minor. They just think it should also be illegal (as it should) since it encourages child abuse.
Meanwhile wanting to frick a bear takes cares of itself real quick when
Doesn't encourage shit
You're a grade A moron
>order a pizza
>delivery guy fricks up so much that my pizza gets turned into soup
>now I have to drink my soup with a spoon
it's not a pizza anymore
>literally who said some moronic shit
>oh shit!!better tell Ganker about it and farm a bunch of (you)s
kys underage
Yes.
Also fricking a shapeshifter who took a form of a kid (or at least halfling/gnome) is not pedo.
It is already legal to frick a dog in many countries, though.
Do wh*te w*men really.
No, they don't like robots.
That's clearly a man.
Still seething, I got+150h now on bg3 and still enjoying it.
have ever killed a bear and eaten it? super gamey. choose venison instead
>biggest viral marketing campaign
you have to be moronic to believe this. the implication that somehow Larian predicted culture warriors on this board would latch onto a druid bear sex joke and freak out is pure moronation of the highest level. not to mention im pretty sure no one cared but the obnoxious third worlders here whining over it.
>I will paste the same thing multiple times that makes my argument better
>She's actually a 10 000 year old demon
I don't really give shit if people fantasize about fricking animals - they've been doing it for humanity's entire existence, but the denial meltdown is pretty pathetic to watch.
>you should respect me for jerking off to children or ill be mad about your unrelated video game!!!
>Oh I sound like a pedo? Perhaps you're the real pedo then honhonhonhon
Why do pedos get so mad when they're called what they are?
I understand that your IQ is in the double digits so simple sentences are not easy to grasp for you: but the point is that "it's not an animal, it's a druid" is exactly as moronic as attaching "age lore" to children.
>projecting pedo and dogfricker
Lol
Keep coping.
Dont need to cope I have higher IQ and bigger penis than you filthy pedo
>immediate pedo cope post
lmao
WOOOOOOW DRUIDPHOBIC MUCH?
SO A TRANSWOMAN IS A WOMAN AND IT'S TOTALLY STRAIGHT TO FRICK THEM, BUT SUDDENLY I'M NOT A BEAR WHEN I FRICK MY TWINK BOYFRIEND?
A drawing is not a child.
A drawing is not a child.
A drawing is not a child.
it's not a child that is right
a child is made of flesh
a drawing is made of ink
But what if you use FLESH to draw? CHILDFLESH? Checkmate PEDOS
what if a child is transformed into an adult? is that pedophilia?
It's called puberty anon
Didn't people start thinking that movie Big was super creepy a couple of decades after it came out because an adult tries to seduce the child turned into an adult?
only matters if it's a female
A female nonce or a female child-adult? Because that kid was Tom Hanks.
>Hey guys did you know that fricking a bear is not bestiality?
>making them chase you downhill so they tumble to the bottom, dizzy with their ass up in the air
Regardless, humans are animals.
Animals but not beasts
Based. And this is an old man, great that we agree.
It's not bestiality because 1. they're pixels, they aren't real 2. even if you ignore that it isn't an actual bear, it's a druid shapeshifted into a bear who has the cognition of an adult human and therefore can consent to sex
so how do I know the next time I come across a bear that it isn't a druid and what if it presents itself for sex
Because if it was a druid it would talk to you in druid form first to make sure both parties are consenting to this, before turning into the bear? Like in the game?
pure zoophile cope
>A 1000 year old e-girl is not a child
>A 1000 year old e-girl is not a child
>A 1000 year old e-girl is not a child
Thats what he's saying, right? He's not gonna be a hyocritical c**t and deny me my e-girls, right?
I can't believe I had to scroll this far down to find this
He probably would unless they start as an obvious adult and morph into a e-girl for you to see but then you need to explain why you want them to transform into a child, filthy paedo
No I don't have any particular reason for wanting to see them as a bear, it's just funny haha like wouldn't that be weird if they held me down with their big hairy body and rotten meat breath eeeeewwww hahaha I would HATE that
No actually they aren't. The reason why fricking a child is wrong isn't because they have small proportions it's because a child cannot meaningfully consent to sex since they lack the cognition of a human adult to understand the full ramifications of engaging in a sexual relationship. It's effectively a form of exploitation.
A 1000 year old e-girl who has the cognition of an adult human very clearly does possess the cognition to meaningfully consent to sex and isn't being exploited
The problem is if the e-girl *says* they are 1000 years old but there is no evidence suggesting that they have the cognition of an adult, because that's no different from a kid lying about their age.
>she is very mature for her age
You'd still be restricted by physical maturity. If your 1000 year old e-girl had the body of an 8 year old child, veganal penetration would straight up be mutilation. It'd be like trying to fit a dildo in your urethra. No way around child abuse no matter how many olympic gold medals you have in mental gymnastics.
1000 year olds have 10 times body elasticity
ez fix
A druid is not an animal, and a 3000 year old succubus is not a child. This is correct, and consistent, and you have no arguments against it.
Of course, it doesn't matter anyway, because fiction is fictional. In fiction you can frick bears and children all you want, because they're not real. Fictional entities have no human rights and deserve no consent.
All morality begins at harm.
The issue is that, with these people, it was never about being right.
>man shapeshifts into a bear
>Good because he was originally a man and can consent, he's also not real and is a videogame
>Same man shapeshifts into a little girl
>Noooo, that is bad, fricking pedo die die die!!!!
Many such cases...
It's important that everybody brings up this game whenever people try to shit on anime fanservice
I don't need to counter that with anything more than "don't care, like it" though
It is, that's why I like that it's so popular.
>he thinks they're shitting on anime for logical, moral reasons
You're going to be in for a shock.
I easily refute your argument by saying that this scene is very easily skippable and avoidable, you just don't pick the "frick the bear" option
Whereas most fanservice in anime is completely unavoidable, they will just shove shit right in your face at every possible opportunity to the point of being obnoxious
>Whereas most fanservice in anime is completely unavoidable
LITERALLY JUST DON'T LOOK AT THE PANTIES FOR THE THREE FRAMES THEY'RE VISIBLE
Yeah and for every scene that exists that's just someone with visible panties you have millions of other scenes that's some YAAAAA ECCHI shit that involves breasts and panties constantly getting shoved in your face
I'm not saying sex bad I'm saying there is a time and a place for it, having fanservice shoved down your throat all the time isn't "hot" it's annoying and often clashes with tone, aesthetics and thematics. There is a big difference between a quiet scene where you talk to your lover and have sex, and a game where everyone is a stripper with giant distracting honkers that constantly shove them in your face wherever you go, even when you're trudging through dangerous and treacherous lands
>Yeah and for every scene that exists that's just someone with visible panties you have millions of other scenes that's some YAAAAA ECCHI shit that involves breasts and panties constantly getting shoved in your face
Name the game.
I can only think of shit like Senran Kagura where that's the point.
Games that are going to be like that are really easy to spot before even playing, it's your fault you're having a bad time
That's just moving the goalpost. We're not talking about the amount of fanservice or dicks and pantsu that there is in each game.
>Whereas most fanservice in anime is completely unavoidable
It's unavoidable because it's a TV show, anon. You can avoid shit in BG3 because it's an interactive video game.
Also, there's a bunch of shows without fanservice. Watching anime with fanservice and then complaining about the fanservice is like watching a gay porno and complaining there's gay porn in it. The fanservice in many anime don't clash with the tone because it was made with fanservice in mind. It's your fault you're a moronic casual who can't even do basic research, bare minimum research. Literally all you need to do 90% is look at key art, character designs and read a brief description if you want to avoid fanservice shows. You're on the same level as a video game journalist with how dumb you are.
You can easily avoid the fanservice (god forbid a medium services the fans) by just not watching the anime.
when your fans are weebs, the standards of fanservice fall so hard they make a crater
>uguiiiiii the cute girl acts like she's talking to meeeee
>tee hee hee she fell on her head and now her kawai panties are showing
>uooh she accidentally spilled her drink on her shirt and now she is screaming and blushing
Better content than lgbt representation in games btw
but tranime has had lgbt representation since old times
That's not a troony, that's an effeminate man. Funny enough, that depiction was often used to portray a sadist.
Are you seriously complaining about there being things in the universe being made that don't cater specifically to you and therefore they should be removed?
You are a genuine moron.
You mean how Ganker screams about how the bear scene should be removed because it doesn't cater to their tastes specifically?
Want it removed because that would be fair
More like should be removed in order to comply to the moral standards of the people that made the game. You aren't a hypocrite, are you?
I don't want it removed, I want the hypocrisy acknowledged.
>LOOK LOOK YOU HAVING A JOKE IS LE BAD ME BEING A LITERAL PEDO IS LE GOOD
/pol/tard culture warrior make an argument that isn't NO U challenge level IMPOSSIBLE
>nooo you have to only make bad arguments so I can win
>NOOOO I need to spam the board with my culture war shit so I can win
Go woke go bro...
NOBODY wants you here /misc/ tourist since it's clear as day you don't actually care about your pedo shit and just want to own da libs
Yeah man haha it's just a joke I don't even really like bear cum normally haha
So why are incels here so desperate to be offended about it?
This thread is worthless bait but I would like you anons to know that I am currently furiously jacking off to toddlerfurs on inkbunny rn I'm only reading this until the rest period is over
So that means my 10000 year old e-girl dragon wife is ok too.
It's always been okay. Nobody has ever said it wasn't okay.
Many have and still do at every opportunity.
Nowi caused seething when her game first released and she still causes seethe amongst all the nuFE fans
This argument doesn't make sense, even if it's not a real bear you actively choose to engage in intercourse with someone looking like a bear. This choice clearly shows come attraction to animals, as such is it bestiality.
OK. In that case
A e-girl is not a child.
A e-girl is not a child.
A e-girl is not a child.
I'm not ok with that.
I've come to realize from these threads is that all the outrage here is just pedos being upset.
It's the clearest example of a situation with no explicable difference that's treated the opposite way, pedos should be upset
Nah it's just that most arguments in favor of that kind of sexual freedom can be argued in the same way for pedophilia, except pedophilia is strongly frowned upon, so it's funny seeing the people advocating zoophilia and other fricked up shit crumble when they realize they therefore also support pedophilia
Steam allowing bestiality will open up for other sites to allow it as well.
The reason why people don't allow these things being postwd on their sites is because the server hosts and payment companies doesn't allow it.
So this is Gabe breaking ground yet again.
If they take on the physical aspects of the creature, does that mean they have bear sperm as well? Could a druid in bear form knock up an actual bear? What would the resulting child be? Is this how owlbears came about?
Owlbears came about because Wizards in DnD are the embodiment of "Only thinking about if you can, not if you should"
why does the druid turn into a bear anyway? why doesn't it transform into a mare?
Bear is more identifiable to homos
>Would you frick him as a bear?
>Would you frick him as a mare?
>Would you frick him as a fox?
>Would you frick him with two wieners?
>I would not frick him here or there.
>I would not frick him anywhere.
People are aware that its called beastiality when its with a beast, an animal without the intelligence, sentience and communication to deliver intent, right? People also know about the harkness test, right?
>Does it have human intelligence?
Uh oh women..
It's not a fictional creature, it's literally a bear. According to this logic we could have tons of scenes with people fricking e-girls in a game, so long as the e-girl is "actually 9000 years old".
>logic
Why do you think that's relevant
Sure we could but nobody would buy it because they don't want to look attracted to e-girls
I only like bear wiener ironically
It's a druid shapeshifted.
Into literally a bear
Retains all sapients of himself. Still a druid.
Pedos really are seething.
>Retains all sapients of herself. Still a dragon.
Interesting how you already acknowledged it was a child. Pedo.
Read the rulebook. Druid wildform retains all intelligence and wisdom.
>rulebook
lol no
Why does halsin turn angry and moronic when he shapeshifts into a bear in the game if thats true? Is he just putting it on?
Halsin is a man of passion. He has a lot of rage and turning into a bear is USUALLY an act of war. It'd be like thinking a warrior turns into an idiot by drawing his sword. The warrior is not any less intelligent, he's just no longer interested in talking.
If he did turn stupid when he shapeshifted would you concede that its beastiality?
>noo you can't point to the actual rules that hurts my epic pedo seethe.
Sure hypocrites.
Pedo absolutely ass blasted.
explain how the two are not the same
Simple ones not pedophilia.
then it's simply zoophilia. explain better
Nope. Nice cope though Pedo hypocrite.
>having sex with a bear in fiction is perfectly fine!
>if you suggest otherwise you're a pedophile!
Very interesting debate technique.
Thanks I learned it from you gays.
>Interesting how you already acknowledged it was a bear. Zoophile.
Halsin turns moronic and angry like a bear when he shapeshifts into a bear.
Yeah, and the child he's fricking right now is actually a dragon!
Also correct what is your point?
Its fiction, age is literally just a number and apperance is arbitary. The only thing that matters for things that are visually human you should be judging them on is their behaviour. If it acts and behaves like an adult and they say its an adult? It's an adult.
Wanna bet you advocate for censorship when it's a japanese product?
Yet you're advocating of censorship when it's western.
Why are all weebs such blatant hypocrites?
I'm not advocating for anything, I'm just calling out hypocrisy when I see it.
just advocating for an admission that it's the same thing
Why would I do such a thing? Sounds like you are projecting to me, anon
harkness test is gay reddit shit also I have returned after my nut to furry toddler ass on inkbunny how are you anons doing?
Humans banging pastel ponies is considered bestiality on e621 despite said ponies being intelligent, so idk
>You swap the brains of a bear and a human
>You now have a human with the brain of a bear and a bear with the brain of a human
Which case is beastiality?
Define an adult beast
We're all animals.
So what do these people say about 500 year old e-girls?
Has that same "a troony is a woman!" energy, just psychopathic nonsense by lefties.
People are aware that its called bestiality when its with a beast, number 1, the greatest, right?
When they shapeshift into an animal they turn nearly as moronic as that animal. Like Halsin becomes a stupid angry bear when he shapeshifts into one. So I don't think you can fully consent in an animal form, it's like getting drunk.
If a druid is not an animal then a 1000 year old vampire e-girl is not a child
See
If you think there are not subconscious things at play when you watch something... well all I'd say is do more research. Here's a tip, your brain can not separate what it sees on screen and what happens in real life. Have you ever seen an action film in the cinema, and felt more awake, energised, excited walking out, and for a significant period of time afterward? Serial killers usually start out hurting animals, just for the joy of it. Child sexual abusers usually start with e-girl and child porn, zoophiles and furries usually start with furry porn, and then do shit to real animals. Acquiring, seeking out, and keeping that kind of porn is a transgressive act that emboldens them if they get away with it. They test the waters, they build up their confidence, then they move on to more serious things.
Fricking a bear with the mind of a human: cringe
Fricking a human with the mind of a bear: BASED
This is irrefutable.
Fricking a human with the mind if a bear would make it beastiality
Who cares? My bear-minded waifu would be protective of our kids and would never want anything more expensive than a nice salmon. Perfection.
/vpol/ still eternally upset by bear sex?
I AM A DRUID
I AM A DRUID
I AM A DRUID
January 2010
>I find horse porn and entire threads dedicated to sharing horse porn and tips on how to for real frick a horse
August 2023
>The same exact place is going apeshit over a shapeshifting Human shifting into bear form for kinky sex. The west has now fallen and billions must die (not me or anyone I care about)
how many of those in the horse threads had an issue with other forms of degenerate threads?
I don't see anyone here doing that. Your issue are employed people doing a job for money. I'm not those and neither is anyone here. People are shitting on you as payback for your shitting your pants over the bear because you thought your "/v/ros" 100% supported you.
tell the truth now, if I check the archives am I going to find that the frequency of posts containing "that's a child" or "pedo" didn't increase until after the bear trailer day?
You're gonna find a lot of people doing that because you pearl clutched first and they wanted to give you a taste of your own pearl clutching medicine.
so you think I WON'T find those posts started well before the bear then?
It's not hidden man
>Ganker never hated furries
No one mentioned furries. Furries are anthromorph people who wear fursuits and talk about their cartoon personas and conventions. Not a literal horse. Are you ok?
Transforming into an animal is just wearing a really good fursuit. Doing it for perverted sex reasons just reinforces the furry label.
>No one mentioned furries.
Oh, now we're pretending furries don't want to frick animals. Got it.
Druids were such a cool class until furries and beastiality fetishists got a hold of them.
Frick those who ruined druids in the zeitgeist
I like how quickly this goes from "DEGENERACY! I'M M-MAD CAUSE UM...WHAT ABOUT DA CHILLIN'?! DA CHILLIN' WILL BE CORRUPTED BY IT! #TRADLIFE" to "I'M JUST MAD PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT THE BEAR SEX BUT SOMEONE CALLED ME A PEDO BECAUSE OF MY ETNA DAKI!"
I just want consistency
Either weird sex shit in games is cool in all instances or in no instances.
>Blah blah blah le pedo
Yes. Now approve my e-girls.
Open up a game company and do it yourself
>NOOOO THEY'LL SUE/MURDER ME
If Tyrone v Cops and Elden Bling can do it, so can you.
Explain me how a druid is not a bear when he turns. Is it just an illusion? Even if he has druids mind he is still physically a bear! Youre fricking a bear, you put a bears wiener in your ass!
Fricking an animal isn't what makes something beastiality, as humans are animals and fricking a human isn't beastiality. Fricking a stupid animal that can't consent is beastiality. If there was a non-stupid bear it would be ok to consenually frick it.
So potion of animal speaking and consenting a horse is not bestiality?
Im sorry but its wrong and this adding of consent sounds like rationalization. The defenition is plain and simple and you you want to have sex with a non-human animal you are a zoophile
So you think that humans having sex with humans is beastiality? As humans are animals, so would fit that definition.
No humans are ascended animals it's a different thing
Well now the druid is an ascended bear. Explain why that's not valid.
Nope cope harder horse frickers
No argument. Begone with you.
A human intelligence bear would be an ascended animal.
>ACKshually humans are TECHNICALLY animals
peak autism
American/Israeli moment
>Why doesn't the dictionary take into consideration fantasy scenarios in which a druid can turn into an animal?
The mental moronation of this board knows no bounds.
>A druid is not an animal
>But a 1000 year old dragon shape shifted into an anime girl is totally irl CP
Why should anybody care what these people think?
LMAO another pedo posting the exact same thing. What do you guys share the same programming?
Don't you have school tomorrow
Don't you pedo? Bet you slow down in school zones.
Yeah? It's the law.
Sure pedo
I'm Greek homie show me your butthole
>slowing down
>ever
Nah, those kids are about to get a lesson in survival of the fittest
And maybe physics
>everyone calls me out on the same thing. Clearly I am in the right
It's funny.
>all that text
he mad
Would it be wrong for a druid to turn into a panda bear and frick some females, to help save the endangered panda species?
lmao at the little chuddies seething about fricking a bear, get real
I don' t think anyone is seething about the bear specifically, they're seething about the hypocrisy.
No it started off over the bear but later changed to hypocrisy. Had they started with "lol hypocrites" instead of "DEGENERACY" you'd get less people fricking with you. The hypocrisy thing is also weak because you're sort of deciding if this one random journalist from BYTEDANCE or some shit says something, then that means everyone else not you also agreed.
>The hypocrisy thing is also weak because you're sort of deciding if this one random journalist from BYTEDANCE or some shit says something, then that means everyone else not you also agreed.
Who is the hypocrite? No one is saying what you are claiming.
It started off with the bear but did you really not notice that the bulk of the posts about it were basically paraphased anti-e-girl arguments? It was about hypocrisy before resorting to using the word hypocrisy
>be morons for a week shitting on this site saying you want degeneracy removed and Gankers soul killed
>surprised people now just mock you non stop and will forever over this issue
Give it up, you fricked up with the kneejerk /misc/ shit and this topic will never be one people will support you on again. Next time think before doing the knee jerk
>we have to frick animals to spite the /misc/ interlopers
I haven't played BG3 so all of this for me has been from the sidelines but just about everything I have seen regarding beargate has specifically been about hypocrisy by western devs and game journos who condemn even mild sexually provocative material in games but those same devs and journos heaping praise on BG3 and it's sex scenes.
Now maybe I have things wrong but is it not the case that nearly all the talking heads in the industry that seethe about stuff like DOA or Senran Kagura are now holding water for BG3 doing the same thing?
>and saying fricking little girls is bad in the same breath? The hypocrisy is about fricking little girls, right?
What the frick are you even talking about?
nah none of that happened it's just /misc/tards
>nah none of that happened it's just /misc/tards
Really?
Are you perhaps exaggerating?
So you're telling me that if I were to painstakingly go through every single article praising BG3 and compare them with articles complaining about DOA or Senran Kagara there would be absolutely zero names in common as the writers of those articles?
Yeah sure that's exactly what I'm saying
and what strawmen are stating this hypocrisy? The trannies? The redditors? Who is praising the bear sex and saying fricking little girls is bad in the same breath? The hypocrisy is about fricking little girls, right?
So, would you frick a man if he used magic to turn into a woman?
No one takes you seriously because you tried the wrong strategy first. You should have lead with "WHY ARE THESE HYPOCRITES NOT LETTING ME FRICK LITTLE AMY?!?" instead of "SWEET JESUS THIS IS SINFUL AND OBSCENE! IT MUST BE BANNED UNDER THREAT OF MILITARY FORCE AND WE MUST KILL BILLIONS TO SAVE OURSELVES FROM LEGENERECY!"
Ok, you all convinced me. It's immoral to frick a druid that has turned into a bear. I'll stick to fricking regular bears instead.
A e-girl is not a real child
A e-girl is not a real child
A e-girl is not a real child
>Taking dog dick is okay if it's a guy turned into a dog
Alright I'm gonna be real with you anons should I jerk off a third time to inkbunny tonight or go to bed?
The druid is in an animal form tho
The druid is in an animal form tho
The druid is in an animal form tho
And there's no problem with that.
It's nothing more than putting on a magical bear costume.
>mne mneh dragon e-girls
If your dragons want to put on children costumes, that's all perfectly legal too.
A druid is not an animal but it is animal-coded.
>The penis is shaped like the one of a bear
>It tastes like one
>It smells like one
>It moves like one
>It's attatched to a real bear
>It's not zoophilia because the druid kept his intelligence ability score!
What are these people on?
In that case, there's no real moral consequence of it being zoophilia.
You can't just say it's bad because it is. You have to explain why things are morally positive or negative.
The guy in the op pic is denying that it's zoophilia, not the morality of it
>wrote an entire post about bear wiener
As is typical of projecting zoophiles
What if two druids turned into bears and fricked? Does that change things?
Hey OP, did you know that the opinions of literal whos from other communities don't belong here?
If I wanted to know what some random stupid frick had to say on the Steam forums, I'd hang out there, but I'm on Ganker because I hate these communities and try to avoid them. Stop bringing your garbage bag to Ganker you stupid fricking attention prostitute b***h.
>female form sexy
>straight up bear not sexy
It's worrying that you disagree
>female
It's undeniably an expression of the female form
it's a man
Completely irrelevant to what was said
>if it looks like a woman it's ok, even if it is a man
If literally the only thing left from the past life are the memories, yes.
I don't support trannies but i'm fine with an unrealistic fantasy.
>I don't support trannies but i'm fine with an unrealistic fantasy.
>tranime poster
????
Exactly, fantasies are okay, wanting to wake up magically turned into a little girl is fine, putting on a wig and mutilating yourself is not, why is this so hard to understand.
There's trannies that look more woman than your average woman. You just keep making endless exceptions so that you don't have to accept how you are the biggest degen of them all.
>There are druids that look more bear than your average bear
The point is this guy is fine with his fantasy but then the other fantasy is somehow not fine.
>100% a women vs a butchered man
There is a big difference.
Trannie men will always perform like a man, in sports and in science.
I would be fine with killing them and placing their memories in a new body, that's the only proper way that might be possible in the future.
If I saw such a troony and said they were attractive I wouldn't try to take it back afrer learning the truth
Wouldn't frick it but if it looks good, it looks good
If it looks like a woman then it shows the female form you fricking moron
>the form is all that matters
Not only are you gay and delusional, you are also shallow
Literally always has been. The butchering that trannies do to themselves doesn't make them a woman. A magical crown that magically changes your body does.
No, it doesn't
>Msle human turns into a bear
>Bestiality
>MALE dragon turtle turns itself into a female human
>NOOOO IT'S NOT THE SAME THING BRO!!!
Yeah and I bet it's also not gay.
Stop being moronic, pls
The original form doesn't matter
>bear
Bestiality
>female human
Straight
It's that simple
No, you're the one playing coy. If you turn a bear into a human, it's still a bear.
>if you drink up a full glass of water it's still a full glass of water
I hope this is a joke.
People are attracted to the body, not the brain.
It doesn't matter if a e-girl is 10 or 1000, she is sexy in the same way.
>It's not a bear it's a druid in bear form
>It's not a child, she's actually 1000 years old
...
how many zoosadist logs have to be leaked before people understand that zoophiles are 100% of the time also pedophiles ?
how many more times does it need to happen?
>plenty of forum moderators and members of steam support
>that single Spider-man dev
lmao
> It's not a child, it's akshualeee a thousand year old vampire!
Getting DRUIDED is the same as getting BLACKED IRL. Is that also zoophilia? Checkmate, atheists.
If only it was an actual bear you seduced with Animal Empathy. Would have been far hotter.
it's an extremely simple argument and you're all fricking moronic
if the "bear" has an adult human mind, it can consent
if an adult human shapeshifted into a child, it can consent so it's fine for the fictional characters involved
however if you, the person in the real world, are jacking off to a child, you're being aroused by a child and by definition a pedophile
you all actually understand this and are just pretending not to because you're pissed the left made better art than you for the thousandth time
And you in the real world are the definition of a zoophile.
If the guy druid turned into a bear woman with big breasts, ass, thighs and belly like in those furry drawings you jerk off to, Ganker would celebrate and call BG3 a masterpiece
It is simple as pic provided.
They are all over the plebbit 2.0
So is it cool if a druid can shapeshift into an underage girl then? Since it's not a real girl
>This thread again
I would open your skull with a sledgehammer
I know
I don't care what you are, stop making the same fricking thread
Stem forums is just Reddit 2.0
It's not in a way that you don't get banned for being against certain content in videogames.
It's extremely fun to make leftoids seethe to hell and back.
Made several of them admit they are okay with CP in games.
>Gamer de esquerda
>PT sonic
this is 100% a trollpost
It is and there's nothing wrong with it. It being GAY on the other hand is where the true evil is from.
stop making a thread over some random internet dumbass that made you seethe
No, I find those very funny
>For gays, being seen means fricking and sucking out in the open and being as promiscuous as possible at all times.
Ya know I'm starting to think that being gay may be a fetish that lumps with others such as humiliation, exhibitionism, voyeurism, and whatever the frick fetish explicitly remove monogamy and romance.
And of course virtue signaling for those good goy points
Bro do you actually spend time reading steam forum posts just so you can screencap them and bring them back here to circlejerk with the schizos?
And you have the gal to call anyone mentally ill.
It's just funny to me.
I love seeing all those gays get triggered at the simple fact that people don't want to see gay shit in games.
And I share it
i dont think its the feralgays calling you pedos on Twitter, Ganker.
mostly because they probably make feral cubs anyway
>the freakiest thing they can imagine is "drawings don't have feelings"
Oh boy, I'm so far to the left of this graph you'd go over the res limit trying to draw me.
An adult bear has the capacity to consent
A child does not
Cope pedos
A child does.
I dont think it can.
a regular bear does not pass the harkness test
>An adult bear has the capacity to consent
No it doesn't
I forgot that all bears rape eachother in the wild. We should stop that.
Humans can't communicate with bears, bears can communicate with each others
>Humans can't communicate with bears
Wrong
There's a bigger problem in real life with child abuse than with people trying to frick bears.
>Hey guys did you know that fricking a bear is not bestiality?
But it is very gay.
Guess these people support 1000 year old petit women too, right?
These people will say the druid is not an animal when he is clearly in an animal form to justify their sickness but will then will say the 3000 year old dragon in human form that just so happens to look like a little girl, aka e-girl, is pedobait.
It's so odd how degenerates fight among themselves to try to claim legitimacy for their degenerate bullshit.
Pedophilia is worse than bestiality.
>same people who whine constantly about 1000 yrs old e-girls
Woah what an original post pedo.
cope, and I'm not a pedo, I'm just saying.
You're just saying you're a pedo yeah.
In the recent steam thread a couple of libtards went into the "if they exist they have to be represented" argument.
OP asked them if they would argue in support of pedo representation on that criteria alone.
One of them went into deflecting without answering the question and the second one went
>aaahh um welll
And fricking admitted he would be okay with it
am*ricans are so insufferable
You know you're dealing with someone completely derange when they start chanting...
A druid is not an animal the same way a drawing of a child is not actually a child
A transwoman is not a woman
A transwoman is not a woman
A transwoman is not a woman