How come nobody went apeshit over this like they did with pronouns in Starfield?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
How come nobody went apeshit over this like they did with pronouns in Starfield?
How come nobody went apeshit over this like they did with pronouns in Starfield?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Starfield has more things to rage over than pronouns.
Only thing Bestialitygaytroony 3 did right was combat.
> did right was combat.
Lolwhat?
It's shit, bruh. This game is criminally easy
I was playing on tactician without multiclass and barrelmancy and the game was like a walk in a park. It's so easy that i've never used any consumables at all. Most fight were done in like 2-3 rounds. Even boss fights
There is a video of 1 lvl character killing Raphael.
The combat is boring as frick because if it
Starfield is for normies.
BG3 is for trannies.
Which group do you think will be annoyed if they are asked their pronouns?
It's bait anon don't engage.
wheres the part where you make it sound bad
>roll a dice, things may happen
Whoa, so cool
>press a button, things may happen
Whoa, so cool
>Bestialitygaytroony 3 did right was combat.
Black person please
Because only troons play this game in the first place.
They did.
Along with the fact that everyone wants to have sex with you.
And bestiality.
This game originally had a large portion of its audience being woke troons and other mentally ill schizoids.
So most of the players of this shit only support this decision.
Todd Howard's games have always been based and so to see this from him was a stab right in the heart.
Most of the audience of his games are based young people who support an adequate view of the world, such as that there are only two genders, that transgenders are sick people, that Russia is a based trad country.
Because it’s a fantasy rpg where people play as weird elves and shit
because starfield is being targetted by some shitposting campaign from some random company, probably cdpr , or chinese bots from BG3 share holder tencent
its really blatant botting too, so probably not china, or india, probably euro trash botters , russia based, makes the most sense, so likely its CDPR share holders spamming automated bot shitposts everywhere
Actually it was Sony attack on MS and everybody know about it prior to release
>xboxera
Shartfields main story is a bunch of hags berating and admonishing you, and telling you californisms like trust the science and mid twentieth century german dictator bad. Not to mention the fat grotesque nigs everywhere.
The pronouns are straw on the camels back.
They did. A video of one rage outburst about Starfield pronouns went viral. And it was Az, he's always angry about progressive, woke, sjw and all that stuff.
I have never cared what an internet manchild has to think. Guy should get a real job
It's because Starfield is shit and BG3 isn't
Because this is to be expected with nuD&D, people would be surprised if it wasn't pozzed. There's like 2 straight couples in this game lmao.
nuD&D deleted all orc lore because "rape is problematic", reworked drows because "dark elves being bad is racist", introduced fantasy wheelchairs, made elves able to change their sex at will and got rid of the "wall of the faithless" so reddit atheists stopped being butthurt at the fact that in D&D atheists were used as bricks after they died.
Basically this, mainline dnd was hijacked by homosexuals, trannies and other progressive scum, look up critical role.
dnd now is just "lol so randumb horny bard fricking dragons"
no one's kicking down your door and "hijacking" your tabletop game
then again you probably are a noob with no friends to play with LOL
Why are you so defensive about homosexuals? Stop projecting your pathetic life on me.
Also, everyone knows you can homebrew all the pozzed shit out, which is why i mentioned "mainline dnd" aka wotc garbage.
yeah i bet you do all sorts of based and redpilled roleplay with all those friends you don't have
ur a loser
Yeah it's insane how fricking gay this game is. Every 20 minutes you run into some homosexual couple and I genuinely think there is not a single straight deep gnome.
Yeah, literally every single deep gnome is gay, tieflings also have a lesbian couple, there's the aasimar dyke, every companion is technically gay and they will attempt to frick you if you just play the game normally, baldur's gate is filled with gay people there's even a dude crying because his wife left him for a woman, there's a drag queen in the circus and you can meet a literal troony in baldur's gate.
Companions aren't gay. They are player sexual, which is what I hate about modern rpg romance. It's not immersive and they really have no actual preference. You could make the biggest freak of a character, and as long as you pick the right options, anyone will want to sleep with you. Even Cyberpunk had romances with preference for opposite/same sex/body type/whatever. They really have no personality outside being frickdolls for you. You have a party after a successful major mission? The only topic you can talk about with everyone is who you will frick tonight/spend the night with and everyone else is jealous.
Not even Persona and other harem jRPGs are this juvenile and immature.
They made the companions frickdolls because they needed the coomer money.
Good gods being complicit in wall of the faithless was always moronic.
Gods in D&D aren't all powerful, if you spent your one life denying the gods then there's nothing the gods can do for your soul.
Why would actual living gods need any help with getting worshippers from that little project of Myrkul while IRL scammers with no powers can get millions of worshippers and make them indoctrinate their babies for countless generations?
That's the point, if you're so stupid that you actually deny the gods in a world with living gods then there's nothing they can do to your soul. Only these people go to the wall of the faithless.
Atheists need to apply their real life experiences and ideologies to fantasy because they are literal stupid fricking brainlets.
It would literally be worse with no wall, that's why they are complicit.
Paladins being able to use things like DIVINE smite,DIVINE sense and DIVINE health without you know worshipping a deity is beyond moronic. Are their powers supposed to come from the power of friendship and love?
In current D&D, it's force of will, basically. CHA translates to willpower so Paladins sworn to an oath WAAAGH themselves to power. It's moronic, and if they wanted to make willpower central to their power they should have done what Warcraft did. The Scarlet Crusade are undeniably doing evil deeds, but their paladins keep their power. Why is this? Because they believe with such utter conviction that what they are doing is right, they basically gamed the divine system. This is, of course, base WoW lore, I'm not considering any fanfic nonsense that came later.
Because it denies their "get woke go broke" narrative, much like the Super Mario Bros. movie when people were whining about girlboss Peach until it made like a billion dollars.
>can customize your wiener and balls
>everyone thinks its great
>no boobs or ass slider though, that would be wrong
what the hell is wrong with everybody
>that would be wrong
the issue is how it works with outfits.
it wasn't a moral reason.
starfield is aggressively mid and it's really funny seeing the xbros rolling out to run defense for it
Because you expect it from these games and fanbase. Starfield appeals more to normalgays
Because no one was under the impression that BG3 was anything other than a homosexual game.
For Bethesda there was hope that it wouldn't be.
theres no "they", there was one fat moron whose whole shtick is getting mad at things that went viral
>"they"
them*
It's a homosexual game for the mentally ill. Simple as
BG3 had a good game behind it so genuinely the "woke" shit doesn't matter. I think most honest anons only give a shit when it's clear LOOK HOW PROGRESSIVE WE ARE is more important then making a good game, oh and because you modded that in to shitpost.
1. Added after launch
2. Most people can forgive minor things like that when it's a good game
It was one beta basedcuck and he got dragged over Twitter about it for days.
Too busy whining about bear sex and whining about the devs whining about them playing as generic white human dudes
Real legitimate answer? No one ever uses it. The DM/Narrator always addresses you as "you" and all your companions directly talk to you.
i don't think it was in the game when I started playing.
>console troony
kys, zoomer homosexual
I did. But CRPGs are troony-shit for trannies so it's a given why no one would care.
>But CRPGs are trACK
Diablo 4 outsold BG3 2 to 1 at the least.
And yet Diablo 4 is already forgotten, whereas BG3 is a decade-inspiring classic
RPG dialogue the:
>a tough fight, but we prevailed over these disgusting monsters
RPG dialogue now:
>Hey, let's go back to the camp, there's going to be an orgy tonight and i'll try to fit my mage hand in your butthole
when's the last time we had a proper raunchy fantasy game?
haven't seen one since the Bard's Tale reboot.
Body Type at least offered more choices than just Male/Female for most races.
Pronouns aren't really something that comes up when people are talking to you, so why even care about it. Besides, you have to define that somewhere and the interchangeable crotches weren't helping. And it makes sense to refer to some character like Omeluum as an it.
Only thing that really bugged me was dealing with the purple drag queen. I guess they thought it was clever having one run a transdimensional circus, but I see their performance as more shock than showmanship.
Well basically BG3 won