How come there's no game about having sex
No, I mean it, I'm serious, sex is a huge part of life yet no one has actually attempted to make sex mechanics in a video game. The best you get is an animation of sex, or if you do get to "play" it, maybe you press some buttons to control the speed or you drag the penis with your mouse. Those aren't very deep mechanics. There's no 'Tony Hawk's Pro Skater' of sex games.
This isn't a troll thread, see, I didn't even attach a lust-provoking image.
Same reason there's no in-depth mechanics for shitting
It's just a normal body function everyone experiences regularly, no need for a game
I am now going to make a game where you control a sphincter manually.
Push too hard, you get hemroids and die.
Push too little, and you can't poop so you die.
>There's no 'Tony Hawk's Pro Skater' of sex games
But if there was it would be called Tony wiener's Procreator
Because Americans are extremely prude and they still set the industry standards due to their superior purchasing power.
Violence and gore is good.
Romance and sex is bad.
I mean, for many people sex is no different from watching a cutscene anyways. Unless both parties want to be really active it might as well just become an animation for one of them.
Some "games" have spank buttons so I assume one of the main reasons there isn't any very in-depth stuff like pull hair in all 6 degrees of freedom is because games are usually made for profit to a wide audience.
Things might be considered "way too kinky" or something so they don't want to scare off people from buying the game.
Things are either so timid its a bore or so fricked up its beyond comprehension.
>sex is a huge part of life
not any more
Physical expression of love.
Sex being gamified represents another step in the horrid huxleyan affliction affecting the west whereby sexual intercourse is a mere activity one can perform with a partner rather than the expression of mortal partnership.
You may as well make a game about getting married.
Creators and censors probably don't explicitly understand this, but they have a vague enough idea to ward off attempts.
>the horrid huxleyan affliction affecting the west whereby sexual intercourse is a mere activity one can perform with a partner
casual sex is not a new thing by any stretch of the imagination
>appeal to tradition
Slavery games when.
Slavery games exist and have much more depth in their mechanics than sex games
Name five slavery games that aren't jackie chan.
Koikatsu exists.
>sex is a huge perilous part of life
This shit will never not be funny to me, either coming from dumbass incels that think all their problems will be solved by having it, and living trainwrecks that think they have it all figured out because they had it.
>either and
cállate
Imagine: Mario’s big Bing Bing Wahoo. Would sell like cakes