>Clusterfrick small maps >Only runs smoothly because it looks like shit >Generic choice of weaponry locked behind classes that apart from medic are just excuses to tie weapons to roles >Limited customization options for these >Movement is absurd >TTK is absurd
Also the fact they openly copied things from battlefield and morons still lauded it as unique and a new formula shows how shilled this game was. Glad to see the hype died down and took the game with it
Battlebit bro's i thought we were going the distance...?
Laughable how hyped battlebit was and already noones playing it
[...]
Btfo'd. Also even BF5 has 20,000+ players on steam which doesn't take into consideration people playing on EA Play and on consoles. I'm going to say something controversial, I have enjoyed just about every modern slop fps game and I think most people's gripe with battlefield and cod is microtransactions which has very very little to do with whether the game is good or not
Only reason why BF2042 has that many players is because it's free during the weekend. It usually hovers around 6-8k players. EA lost.
Btfo'd. Also even BF5 has 20,000+ players on steam which doesn't take into consideration people playing on EA Play and on consoles. I'm going to say something controversial, I have enjoyed just about every modern slop fps game and I think most people's gripe with battlefield and cod is microtransactions which has very very little to do with whether the game is good or not
It doesn't even run well
I have a 3070 and an i7 8700k and it stutters for no reason on any settings
I know it's not my system because every single other game I play is completely fine
The player limit was the only reason I first got the game. I don't know how to explain it, but the maps and/or the game do not utilize the high player counts well. Either way, I refunded the game.
It's just that there's no flow
Even BF with its high playercounts had a flow, it's just absolute chaos in BB and the low TTK doesn't help things at all
It's not, you have maybe one good map per title, something like Amiens or Seine Crossing and then the rest are just fricking garbage merry go rounds, huge open flat fields, or chokepoint nade spam.
The reason why you and so many others had issues with maps in Battlebit is because the maps gave you options, they put cover everywhere and said you, yes you, get to make your own path through it. Unfortunately the braindead masses would still clump up at one spot and ram their balding heads into eachother because that's all they know how to do. This is also why people got so fricking mad about back capping because the concept of JUST GO AROUND THEM HOLY FRICK was beyond their comprehension and instead of just doing it they'd cry their eyes out that someone else didn't join the moron blob in the middle of the map.
absolute fricking morons
8 months ago
Anonymous
That's a lot of words to just dig yourself into a deeper hole lil bro
BB lost
8 months ago
Anonymous
>he typed with tears in his eyes, fingers shaking
8 months ago
Anonymous
>>he typed with tears in his eyes, fingers shaking
8 months ago
Anonymous
Yes exactly, thanks for proving what I said to be correct.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>Yes exactly, thanks for proving what I said to be correct.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Glad to see you understand, Battlefield maps really are atrocious.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>Glad to see you understand, Battlefield maps really are atrocious.
On one hand I like how the game is formed that it can have maps densely populated with buildings while having full destruction but man you can get just some of the nastiest angles in this game and kill so many people who have NO clue where you are.
It didn't. People just pretended it did because le ebin gamer rage vendetta against the BF franchise and its recent flops. Now that people stopped trying to ownzone Battlefield, the playerbase evaporated as Battle Bits mediocre gameplay design made itself obvious.
It didn't. People just pretended it did because le ebin gamer rage vendetta against the BF franchise and its recent flops. Now that people stopped trying to ownzone Battlefield, the playerbase evaporated as Battle Bits mediocre gameplay design made itself obvious.
Every BattleBit match is both teams picking what control points they are going to take in the first 30 seconds, followed by 30min of them taking potshots at each other from those points. Also any game that allows snipers to play in comfort will become a game exclusively for snipers.
Because the Battlefield franchise mag-dumped their own foot.
It just focused on gameplay, performance, and level design. The things DICE forgot about in their pursuit of graphics and gimmicks.
It's ok but it has the same issues of too much shit to unlock like BF4.
Yeah it does a lot of things to improve upon battlefield but idk why they decided to copy it's progression system
>getting a 9x frag grenade
>the loud ass sound it makes
>wakistan
>bridge
>my farm
EVO goes brrrrrt.
Does the game support controllers?
Everything on steam supports controllers. If you mean aimasist, no there are no cheats for controller gays.
>Clusterfrick small maps
>Only runs smoothly because it looks like shit
>Generic choice of weaponry locked behind classes that apart from medic are just excuses to tie weapons to roles
>Limited customization options for these
>Movement is absurd
>TTK is absurd
Also the fact they openly copied things from battlefield and morons still lauded it as unique and a new formula shows how shilled this game was. Glad to see the hype died down and took the game with it
now post BF 2042 after their last update and 2 years+...
Battlebit bro's i thought we were going the distance...?
Laughable how hyped battlebit was and already noones playing it
Only reason why BF2042 has that many players is because it's free during the weekend. It usually hovers around 6-8k players. EA lost.
Btfo'd. Also even BF5 has 20,000+ players on steam which doesn't take into consideration people playing on EA Play and on consoles. I'm going to say something controversial, I have enjoyed just about every modern slop fps game and I think most people's gripe with battlefield and cod is microtransactions which has very very little to do with whether the game is good or not
It doesn't even run well
I have a 3070 and an i7 8700k and it stutters for no reason on any settings
I know it's not my system because every single other game I play is completely fine
The player limit was the only reason I first got the game. I don't know how to explain it, but the maps and/or the game do not utilize the high player counts well. Either way, I refunded the game.
It's just that there's no flow
Even BF with its high playercounts had a flow, it's just absolute chaos in BB and the low TTK doesn't help things at all
BF maps are just people running in circles or metro meatgrinders, literally the worst map designs in the FPS genre.
Ok no one asked bozo
It's better than BB
It's not, you have maybe one good map per title, something like Amiens or Seine Crossing and then the rest are just fricking garbage merry go rounds, huge open flat fields, or chokepoint nade spam.
The reason why you and so many others had issues with maps in Battlebit is because the maps gave you options, they put cover everywhere and said you, yes you, get to make your own path through it. Unfortunately the braindead masses would still clump up at one spot and ram their balding heads into eachother because that's all they know how to do. This is also why people got so fricking mad about back capping because the concept of JUST GO AROUND THEM HOLY FRICK was beyond their comprehension and instead of just doing it they'd cry their eyes out that someone else didn't join the moron blob in the middle of the map.
absolute fricking morons
That's a lot of words to just dig yourself into a deeper hole lil bro
BB lost
>he typed with tears in his eyes, fingers shaking
>>he typed with tears in his eyes, fingers shaking
Yes exactly, thanks for proving what I said to be correct.
>Yes exactly, thanks for proving what I said to be correct.
Glad to see you understand, Battlefield maps really are atrocious.
>Glad to see you understand, Battlefield maps really are atrocious.
>no shotguns
it's not
On one hand I like how the game is formed that it can have maps densely populated with buildings while having full destruction but man you can get just some of the nastiest angles in this game and kill so many people who have NO clue where you are.
It literally does not, this game combines the worst gameplay features of the series.
it's pretty fun but it does get a bit boring quickly, maybe the lack of vehicles on maps or lack of maps in general
low ttk is the only thing that I hate about this game.
2042 is better
By being 20% as good as old battlefield
this
Make it looks like BF2 instead of roblox then we talk.
It didn't. People just pretended it did because le ebin gamer rage vendetta against the BF franchise and its recent flops. Now that people stopped trying to ownzone Battlefield, the playerbase evaporated as Battle Bits mediocre gameplay design made itself obvious.
I fricking hate roblox zoomers
Every BattleBit match is both teams picking what control points they are going to take in the first 30 seconds, followed by 30min of them taking potshots at each other from those points. Also any game that allows snipers to play in comfort will become a game exclusively for snipers.
The snipers are ridiculous
The SCAR is the best feeling rifle
No black "nonbinary" trannies for a start. That immediately improved it tenfold
Battlebit was dogshit.
Lack of content, it was literally a parody demo
YOU moronic FELLED FOR IT KEKW
BIGGEST SHEEP OF FRICKING NORMIES AND I THOUGHT /V HAD HIGH IQ