moronic americans thinking freedom of the press means they can jack off to kids
11 months ago
Anonymous
They're jacking off to cartoons.
Imagine a low IQ individual, such as yourself, confusing scratches on a cave wall with flesh and blood children.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>i-it's just a d-drawing guys, n-nothing wrong w-with that h-haha
11 months ago
Anonymous
>it's just fiction guys, nothing wrong with that
Correct, as anyone with a firm grip on reality will tell you.
11 months ago
Anonymous
reality isn't real
11 months ago
Anonymous
kys pedoshit
11 months ago
Anonymous
Then you are a mass murderer for every game and fictive work you've engaged with that details murder
You cannot hold the two apart arbitrarily
Either I have sex with children by fapping to hentai AND you are a heinous murderer or neither of us are anything but people looking at fiction >inb4 doublethink twitter cope
Go back to your sinking ship, rat
my guess is no
abe said incest bad so if siblings are blood related you have absolutely zero chance of them fricking
the censorship for this is on same as gay shit in china and I wish I was kidding
Can these shitty VN even be called games if there's no choice to be made?
I remember being memed into playing one where you own a coffee shop and it's LITERALLY just a book but you can bounce their breasts.
No but since VNs are a sliding scale that can go from actual video game with story told in VN format (Baldr Sky, Rance) to purely kinetic novels with no choices (Umineko, Nekopara I guess) it makes the most sense to just keep all of them on the video game board since that's the format they're sold as.
This, same with useless guides baiting for Steam points for whatever moronic reason people use them, I don't even care about the review score or anything I'm just sick of these unfunny people
>those fricking eyes
Jesus Christ in heaven, how come not every blender porn artists learned how to avoid uncanny undicky heh valley,
reminds me of early overwatch porn
Have a base format and an optional whatever you want to type format. Be able to filter between the two. With the base format asking:
Do you recommend it? y/n
Did you have technical problems? y/n
Optional: personal system specs.
With the review showing hours played and date purchased (within the month).
I'd like the ability to report shitpost reviews, but its not practical to get a real person to do it. I wouldn't want someone's actual review removed accidently by an automated system either.
The reviews are nowhere near accurate because all people do is shitpost like a bunch of homosexuals.
[...]
I like this. Publishers would cry and Valve would never do it though.
DLC and companies policies feel too meta. If it isn't directly related to the release title it's bloat. Dlc's often have their own reviews anyway, so just vote negative there.
Maybe instead add a third option that asks if you got what was advertised. A large number of release titles would get No from that, which would cover your gripes while still focusing on the game, right?
>DLC and companies policies feel too meta. If it isn't directly related to the release title it's bloat
the point is to "redirect" all the people complaining about those to a separate score, so they don't lower the actually game's score
You're saying you can only select one method of scoring? Because otherwise the people who vote negative there will almost always be voting negative over all. It seems redundant.
steam reviews are fine
there are shitposts, dumb templete reviews, and repeating memes, but you still can find ones with helpful information, and the fact that it's shows how much reviewer actually played the game, and shows on timescale when reviewbombing/boosting accured, it lets you easily search if something important happend to game
they are better then metacritic
I'd like the ability to report shitpost reviews, but its not practical to get a real person to do it. I wouldn't want someone's actual review removed accidently by an automated system either.
The reviews are nowhere near accurate because all people do is shitpost like a bunch of homosexuals.
tbh there should be 3 completely unrelated scores
>the actual game score >performance score (bugs, crashes, denuvo, etc) >business practice score (launch price, dlcs, ingame purchases, etc..)
I like this. Publishers would cry and Valve would never do it though.
Zoomer detected. A decade ago this wasn't a problem, reviews exclusively discussed the content. Then your generation grew up and just post words like "sex" and bog it all down.
Remove the "funny" reaction, triple the price of emoji reactions.
Seriously, could you imagine if something like Amazon products had a "funny" reaction?
Started a couple months ago, some moron just spammed it in enough threads and it eventually caught on. Basically the same origin as every other Ganker meme.
Dont. >someone made a funny review
This has so little bearing on the overall score that its irrelevant, and it can even be considered a genuine review since they clearly liked it and have given their thumbs up.
YOU should be able to have the capacity to actually read and discern what information is useful and relevant, dont happer peoples ability to tell their perspective even if its shit.
Have you noticed how memes are most of the time unfunny shit, but they're used because they're repeated as hell and make people feel part of an in-group?
25 hours played minimum before you can post, ban unicode characters so people are less likely to spam ascii shit, require posts to be 3 paragraphs minimum in coherent language, and the fewer reviews you have written the less likely they are to be shown. also, remove reddit awards entirely.
that's true. another anon mentioned there should be a separate review type for tech problems which could work. i think there should be stricter requirements for reviewing the actual content of the game though
Ability to report and ban people who post a review with no content related to a game.
it's related in this specific case
https://store.steampowered.com/app/899970/NEKOPARA_Extra/
bottom review. it violates us law so it should be taken down
>it violates us law
Which one?
the one where you get children preganat
And what children does he get pregnant?
those in his head
zombie zombie
>it violates us law
No. No it does not
moronic americans thinking freedom of the press means they can jack off to kids
They're jacking off to cartoons.
Imagine a low IQ individual, such as yourself, confusing scratches on a cave wall with flesh and blood children.
>i-it's just a d-drawing guys, n-nothing wrong w-with that h-haha
>it's just fiction guys, nothing wrong with that
Correct, as anyone with a firm grip on reality will tell you.
reality isn't real
kys pedoshit
Then you are a mass murderer for every game and fictive work you've engaged with that details murder
You cannot hold the two apart arbitrarily
Either I have sex with children by fapping to hentai AND you are a heinous murderer or neither of us are anything but people looking at fiction
>inb4 doublethink twitter cope
Go back to your sinking ship, rat
pedocope
murdercope
What kids? I call bullshit.
das da skyrim book font
and you care why?
Ganker isn't your personal army, troony. Frick off.
There is no sex in Nekopara Extra.
spotted the anon
congratulation! You have autism!
It describes the game perfectly
I haven't played Nekopara since the second one, did the MC bang his sister yet? I'll pick it back up if so.
my guess is no
abe said incest bad so if siblings are blood related you have absolutely zero chance of them fricking
the censorship for this is on same as gay shit in china and I wish I was kidding
Can these shitty VN even be called games if there's no choice to be made?
I remember being memed into playing one where you own a coffee shop and it's LITERALLY just a book but you can bounce their breasts.
It's not a game, it's VN. If there's a choice to be made, then it would be called "VN Game"
No but since VNs are a sliding scale that can go from actual video game with story told in VN format (Baldr Sky, Rance) to purely kinetic novels with no choices (Umineko, Nekopara I guess) it makes the most sense to just keep all of them on the video game board since that's the format they're sold as.
wtf is wrong with gamers? I don't want to be associated with these kinds of "people" any longer.
You're on Ganker bro... You're too far gone.
mashallah
I thought they couldn't get pregnant by human sperm
>he doesn't know
El Hamdouli'Allah
Nekopara is safe horny game for ironic weebs
it's literally a porn game
not this one which is kind of a spinoff but most of them are full blown porn
Banning and reporting pedos like this to authorities.
This, same with useless guides baiting for Steam points for whatever moronic reason people use them, I don't even care about the review score or anything I'm just sick of these unfunny people
sound good, at least until gays start mass reporting any review that they don't like and some moronic mod bans people for no reason
>Ability to report and ban people who post a review with no content related to a game.
this but for Ganker as well
What's wrong with that review? It describes the game perfectly
What game?
Battletoads
extremely cringe, kill you'reselves
Plapposting is based. Go back.
Its literally troons who post that shit and it originated on twitter. Kys.
plapposting is literally a forced vtuber meme kys
game?
Gonna leave this review to TLOU when it goes on sale and i play it.
she looks like the ceo of something, but I can't put my finger on what that might be
CEO of my wiener
CEO of Dietz Nuts
CEO of PITBULLED INC.
CEO of Being a Good Girl That Goes To School and A Has Friends
>those fricking eyes
Jesus Christ in heaven, how come not every blender porn artists learned how to avoid uncanny undicky heh valley,
reminds me of early overwatch porn
Could be an old one I didn't check the age
same I way I won't check or care about Sarah's age
no memes allowed, you need to play 25% of the game to post a review.
Bro sounds like a PS2 megaman boss
>"funny" now lowers review visibility like "not helpful" does
>common copypasta reviews can now be reported for spam
doesn't seem very hard
Have a base format and an optional whatever you want to type format. Be able to filter between the two. With the base format asking:
Do you recommend it? y/n
Did you have technical problems? y/n
Optional: personal system specs.
With the review showing hours played and date purchased (within the month).
tbh there should be 3 completely unrelated scores
>the actual game score
>performance score (bugs, crashes, denuvo, etc)
>business practice score (launch price, dlcs, ingame purchases, etc..)
DLC and companies policies feel too meta. If it isn't directly related to the release title it's bloat. Dlc's often have their own reviews anyway, so just vote negative there.
Maybe instead add a third option that asks if you got what was advertised. A large number of release titles would get No from that, which would cover your gripes while still focusing on the game, right?
>DLC and companies policies feel too meta. If it isn't directly related to the release title it's bloat
the point is to "redirect" all the people complaining about those to a separate score, so they don't lower the actually game's score
You're saying you can only select one method of scoring? Because otherwise the people who vote negative there will almost always be voting negative over all. It seems redundant.
no, people can vote either one non exclusively.
so for example:
>anon with good pc, not caring about money
good game, good performance, no vote on business
>brazilian poorgay with a toaster
good game, bad performance, bad business
>average anon
good game, good performance, bad business
this way, the game will be considered unanimously good, while if you use a single score it will be mixed
steam reviews are fine
there are shitposts, dumb templete reviews, and repeating memes, but you still can find ones with helpful information, and the fact that it's shows how much reviewer actually played the game, and shows on timescale when reviewbombing/boosting accured, it lets you easily search if something important happend to game
they are better then metacritic
>one $0.03 cs go skin has been added to your inventory
I'd like the ability to report shitpost reviews, but its not practical to get a real person to do it. I wouldn't want someone's actual review removed accidently by an automated system either.
The reviews are nowhere near accurate because all people do is shitpost like a bunch of homosexuals.
I like this. Publishers would cry and Valve would never do it though.
Zoomer detected. A decade ago this wasn't a problem, reviews exclusively discussed the content. Then your generation grew up and just post words like "sex" and bog it all down.
Remove the "funny" reaction, triple the price of emoji reactions.
Seriously, could you imagine if something like Amazon products had a "funny" reaction?
What's the origin of this new meme
Started a couple months ago, some moron just spammed it in enough threads and it eventually caught on. Basically the same origin as every other Ganker meme.
Steam reviews are unironically the best aggregate user review system for vidya out there.
I trust them the best outside of my own judgment and Ganker.
I don't trust Ganker; hardly anyone here can adequately process information, and either pretends to be moronic, or is actually mentally deranged.
>visible toes
life is good
>average Ganker Tourist post
I will PLAP PLAP PLAP! An anti-PLAP-PLAP-PLAP! gay and get them pregnant!
Dont.
>someone made a funny review
This has so little bearing on the overall score that its irrelevant, and it can even be considered a genuine review since they clearly liked it and have given their thumbs up.
YOU should be able to have the capacity to actually read and discern what information is useful and relevant, dont happer peoples ability to tell their perspective even if its shit.
what game ?
Any man that can make a grown man type like this is worth playing.
>Any man
weird lapsus anon... wanna share something?
>Any man that can make a grown man type like this is worth playing.
gay
>grown man
But the profile clearly states female
>my pronouns page
what the frick is that shit?
Clicked on it and it sent me here
so it IS a grown man
>mx.
>heterosexual
>comrade
a communist troony, jesus frick.
Redundant
>anime lover
>troony
>my pronoun page
wtf, a full PAGE of pronouns?
Hey man sometimes you gotta put down every pronoun just to be sure
you cut off the best group ever
>1000 groups
What the actual frick
>troony is a pedophile
what a surprise
Have you noticed how memes are most of the time unfunny shit, but they're used because they're repeated as hell and make people feel part of an in-group?
That’s pretty much the definition of an inside joke.
why do Gankerers think it's funny to larp as muslims? way more cringe than any steam review
>This thread
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation
>Weak Force
>causes fundamental particles to transition
If these are supposed to be reviews then:
1. set minimum number of characters to 500
2. ban everyone for lorem ipsum
You can't fix something that's always been and always will be terrible. Steam reviews are shit because Steam users are largely braindead.
25 hours played minimum before you can post, ban unicode characters so people are less likely to spam ascii shit, require posts to be 3 paragraphs minimum in coherent language, and the fewer reviews you have written the less likely they are to be shown. also, remove reddit awards entirely.
>require posts to be 3 paragraphs minimum in coherent language
I don't know sometimes
"It didn't work" is enough as a review
that's true. another anon mentioned there should be a separate review type for tech problems which could work. i think there should be stricter requirements for reviewing the actual content of the game though
>ban unicode characters
>so people are less likely to spam ascii shit
american moment
They should also show how many achievements the reviewer has of the game it's reviewing. There are people who only leave the games idle
what game?
name?
The only Steam reviews I trust are negative ones made by schizos with at least triple digits hours count
you should trust positives ones too.
prepare to be disappointed
if the review is true. is still a win.