Stupid brownoid. No one is making up new pronouns for the English language, but the problem is that the mentally ill homosexuals who are enabled by israelites are not taking their schizophrenia pills. Grammatical correctness doesn't mean that you can change your biology. Also what kind of subhuman language do you speak where you don't have gendered words?
Walk down to your bank and start screaming. Scream out all your illusions of simulated failures in the matrix. That's real air, but you aren't breathing. My suggestion is to fill your cup up more.
Funny how all these relevant pieces of dirt keep writing awesome books with 666 in the barcode. Or maybe just a few of them. I've been filing cold screams of the twisted ethos all night under the pale poon. Nobody is even reading this. I'm the only real one in hell.
it's strange how both of these replies are completely irrelevant to what the guy posted. this place is filled to the brim with schizos or bots at this point
first one is a schizo for sure. second one is a reasonable reply. it explains that women aren't outnumbering men in the age bracket that matters for bot the internet and for "human beings who are relevant". there are more women because men die sooner. the surplus women are beyond retirement age so no shit they aren't on the internet and they aren't accomplishing any grand feats society takes note of. absolutely a relevant point to bring up.
All pokemon should be 100% females.
Their existence sustaibed by being bred by human men.
Over time they'll evolve into the perfect mates for human men.
We need to form a team that eradicates all male pokemon, NOW.
It actually isn't because of the explanation you gave and there was absolutely no gameplay bearings on the pokemon gender in gen 1 when coming up with it.
The idea was that boys played videogames significantly more than girls and boys would want their starter mon to be their best bro to go on adventures with.
The only Pokemon with a gender in Gen 1 were the Nidoran evolutionary lines you LARPing newbie.
Gender was only introduced in Gen 2 alongside breeding mechanics.
They have had 30 years to correct it and they haven't. They've double down by making some pokemon 100% female like salazzle as well though I bet you aren't complaining about those.
Face it, gender ratios are cannon and no amount of coping will change that.
With how the games internal data works if they "corrected" it suddenly your starters you transferred over from a previous title would flip flop genders half the time.
>In-game gender ratios are skewed for gameplay related purposes
Nah that's moronic.
It was actually skewed because in the 90s pokemon looked at the demographic of videogame players and realized an overwhelming majority of their potential demographic to sell the games to were boys and boys are afraid of cooties so they made the ratio skewed to heavily favor the starters being male so little Timmy wouldn't quit the game when he realized the badass Charmander he just recruited was a girl. Since boys played with action figures and not barbie dolls.
There is no gameplay reason making it "harder to breed starters" was absolutely not on the minds of anyone when making the original Pokemon games.
1 to 1 gender ratios in nature already result in harems
1 to 7 would just be a fricking nightmare that makes zero sense whatsoever
what fricking moron approved this shit and what fricking moron wouldn't just fix this while using some special code to preserve the genders from older games
They can reproduce with other species in the same egg group and most species are 1 to 1 so having a few species with more males than females isn't really a problem.
each female of the species would have to make at least 7 eggs and pokemon have been shown to be more affectionate thus less likely to shit out eggs like actual animals
they'd go extinct in a few generations
Starters seem to be exceptionally rare in the wild, implying either a protected status or that they've been domestically bred and the sex ratio was manufactured.
The good thing about male mons is that you can cuddle up with them under a blanket and share all your warmth and watch the starry sky together without it being sexual and degenerate like doing the same thing with female mons would be.
Gender is a mechanic that purely exists to be annoying in these games. It doesn't make breeding more difficult just more annoying than it already is. I don't want to see stupid little pink and blue icons next to my pokemon's names. I hate coming up with a good nickname but it doesn't match the gender of the pokemon I actually caught. If I want my pokemon to have a gender I'll just impose a gender on it myself, I don't want the game to do it for me.
If I ever make a pokemon romhack my first romhack will be a gender removal romhack.
The problem isn't gender itself but that there are too few genders. They need to add more different genders like trans male, trans female, demigender, genderfluid and agender so every Pokémon can feel represented.
Gender isn't even relevant for breeding anymore, because now there's a way to give pokemon egg moves without having to hatch a new one. There's one move that relies on gender and two abilities. That's it.
Damn, I've been lucky enough to hit that 12.5% EVERY SINGLE TIME
My starter pokegfs have always had RIPE, PUFFY PUSSIES, and basically, I'm just a chad?
Back when they looked like generic monsters it didn't matter. Now that there are obviously obviously female looking ones like Primarina or Meowscarada it's a little annoying having to soft reset.
This is true too and we also had it for the mons where it was obvious they were one gender or the other, it was 100% that they were that gender. It was also never supposed to be a serious thing, mostly jokes. >Mr. Mime is obviously male, 100% male ratio, no females known >Jinx is 100% female >Froslass 100% female
Now we got Pokemon that are obviously designed with female in mind, but because they are starters, they have to have this stupid gender ratio, not only for tradition, but also because it would be too easy to get more and limiting their egg groups would feel like shit.
The ratio for the gender for the starter was always just there to make it harder to get more starters. It isn't indicative in universe that males are more prevalent or that because it is more prevalent in game, it must mean that it is gay to look at the pokemon as attractive. Honestly, if I had my way, the entire breeding shit would be overhauled and certain pokemon would just be 100% female.
12.5% isnt 0%, which means that female versions of those pokemon DO actually exist, theyre just rare. I dont get this meme where their ratio being 1/8 means that pokemon is ONLY Male.
Their argument isn't that, it would be dumb if it were. It is that because there exists the possibility of them being male, just liking the design makes you gay.
>reset
>gender
bullshit made up by a israeli pederast.
Cut the 51% of users that chose "female" and we're about right
In my language there is no difference between gender and sex, it's one and the same thing. Male or Female. Beat that loser.
>in my language
who cares? you bow down to the superior language. yours is irrelevant.
>the superior language
Ah yes, the language that is adding new pronouns every day?
Stupid brownoid. No one is making up new pronouns for the English language, but the problem is that the mentally ill homosexuals who are enabled by israelites are not taking their schizophrenia pills. Grammatical correctness doesn't mean that you can change your biology. Also what kind of subhuman language do you speak where you don't have gendered words?
>Stupid brownoid.
This. Americans should just shut the frick up. I hate those Black folk.
damn what a big chicken
It was comical to find so much israelites that started the “gender”, “culture”, “sex” etc deconstruction.
Yes, indeed, it is us, the israelites!
Now what are you gonna do about it, weak gamer goy?
>Now what are you gonna do about it, weak gamer goy?
Mama didn't raise no quitter. That 'mon better be ready to be a girl by the time I'm done with him.
based
I beat the odds
Implying I would not happily suck his penis.
Doesn't have to be female to be my wife
The female that you get just feels that much more special.
Walk down to your bank and start screaming. Scream out all your illusions of simulated failures in the matrix. That's real air, but you aren't breathing. My suggestion is to fill your cup up more.
What proportion of males are qt traps?
This is relevant to my answer.
all of them
>Hey Ladies 🙂
Respond by giving him a big fluffy hug and gently caressing his soft fur and nuzzling his face.
>wanting female pokemon
You're the homosexual b***h and i would beat you up at the playground
troony
Those women need to service ALL OF US
>catch first possible 'mon
>store starter
As easy as that.
This world is 52% female but everyone online as well as any human being that's relevant is male
Funny how all these relevant pieces of dirt keep writing awesome books with 666 in the barcode. Or maybe just a few of them. I've been filing cold screams of the twisted ethos all night under the pale poon. Nobody is even reading this. I'm the only real one in hell.
it's strange how both of these replies are completely irrelevant to what the guy posted. this place is filled to the brim with schizos or bots at this point
reminder that hiro removed poster count a month ago
first one is a schizo for sure. second one is a reasonable reply. it explains that women aren't outnumbering men in the age bracket that matters for bot the internet and for "human beings who are relevant". there are more women because men die sooner. the surplus women are beyond retirement age so no shit they aren't on the internet and they aren't accomplishing any grand feats society takes note of. absolutely a relevant point to bring up.
There more older woman but less young ones.
I am a girl though
All pokemon should be 100% females.
Their existence sustaibed by being bred by human men.
Over time they'll evolve into the perfect mates for human men.
We need to form a team that eradicates all male pokemon, NOW.
You sound like you desperately need wiener correction.
this translates to 87.5% male, 12% mentally ill male and 0.5% female
The male mons are just so much better!
That 12% is all trannies, by the way.
I exclusively catch males.
Wild pokemon population numbers, its no surprise all the females left the wild for human men
In-game gender ratios are skewed for gameplay related purposes and are therefore not canon
I am the one skewing gender ratios.
>T-t-the gender ratios are not canon, b-because I say so.
have a nice day now and then try nofap, pornbrain.
I'm trans btw, forgot to mention.
we know
No, it's because of the explanation I gave. Turn-based battles are also not canon.
It actually isn't because of the explanation you gave and there was absolutely no gameplay bearings on the pokemon gender in gen 1 when coming up with it.
The idea was that boys played videogames significantly more than girls and boys would want their starter mon to be their best bro to go on adventures with.
The only Pokemon with a gender in Gen 1 were the Nidoran evolutionary lines you LARPing newbie.
Gender was only introduced in Gen 2 alongside breeding mechanics.
>not cannon
They have had 30 years to correct it and they haven't. They've double down by making some pokemon 100% female like salazzle as well though I bet you aren't complaining about those.
Face it, gender ratios are cannon and no amount of coping will change that.
With how the games internal data works if they "corrected" it suddenly your starters you transferred over from a previous title would flip flop genders half the time.
Didn'tthat happen with Merrel? Its evolutions had different gender ratios so it could change genders when evolving?
>In-game gender ratios are skewed for gameplay related purposes
Nah that's moronic.
It was actually skewed because in the 90s pokemon looked at the demographic of videogame players and realized an overwhelming majority of their potential demographic to sell the games to were boys and boys are afraid of cooties so they made the ratio skewed to heavily favor the starters being male so little Timmy wouldn't quit the game when he realized the badass Charmander he just recruited was a girl. Since boys played with action figures and not barbie dolls.
There is no gameplay reason making it "harder to breed starters" was absolutely not on the minds of anyone when making the original Pokemon games.
I don't. I just continue fapping away to dicks, because everyone is a man.
This is why vidya is dying
>NOOO EVERY WORK OF FICTION MUST APPEAL TO EVERYONE EQUALLY.
with my dick
pick the cool starter instead of the furry ones
>skeledirge
>cool
ugly bald clown
1 to 1 gender ratios in nature already result in harems
1 to 7 would just be a fricking nightmare that makes zero sense whatsoever
what fricking moron approved this shit and what fricking moron wouldn't just fix this while using some special code to preserve the genders from older games
They can reproduce with other species in the same egg group and most species are 1 to 1 so having a few species with more males than females isn't really a problem.
each female of the species would have to make at least 7 eggs and pokemon have been shown to be more affectionate thus less likely to shit out eggs like actual animals
they'd go extinct in a few generations
Starters seem to be exceptionally rare in the wild, implying either a protected status or that they've been domestically bred and the sex ratio was manufactured.
Skill issue, I got mine
The good thing about male mons is that you can cuddle up with them under a blanket and share all your warmth and watch the starry sky together without it being sexual and degenerate like doing the same thing with female mons would be.
homosexual
Couldn't you think of anything better?
Also I am asexual.
>asexual
double homosexual!
You are boring me. Come up with an actually creative insult now or I will stab ur family in their sleep.
I just believe in the power of my love for Meowscarada still couldn't get her female shiny though.
Frick the male anyway.
12.5% is not 0%
My Swampert IS female and I WILL make dozens of mudkips with her
>Verification not required.
When I was a kid, I only kept male pokemon
>fe(male)
Gender is a mechanic that purely exists to be annoying in these games. It doesn't make breeding more difficult just more annoying than it already is. I don't want to see stupid little pink and blue icons next to my pokemon's names. I hate coming up with a good nickname but it doesn't match the gender of the pokemon I actually caught. If I want my pokemon to have a gender I'll just impose a gender on it myself, I don't want the game to do it for me.
If I ever make a pokemon romhack my first romhack will be a gender removal romhack.
The problem isn't gender itself but that there are too few genders. They need to add more different genders like trans male, trans female, demigender, genderfluid and agender so every Pokémon can feel represented.
Gender isn't even relevant for breeding anymore, because now there's a way to give pokemon egg moves without having to hatch a new one. There's one move that relies on gender and two abilities. That's it.
too bad the rest of the games are shit now so it doesn't matter
Breed male with Ditto until get female.
Ditto isn't even particularly hard to get in most games, so there's no reason to be mad.
PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP
GET MPREGNANT GET MPREGNANT GET MPREGNANT GET MPREGNANT GET MPREGNANT GET MPREGNANT
you had six tries to spell "pregnant"
moron
>he doesn't know about mpreg
oh no no no no
I was a happier person mere minutes ago.
this but I'm getting plapped
>not taking turns
what are you, gay?
>throw a skirt and some panties on it
That's enough girl for me. Whatever's actually under those panties is irrelevant.
The regions regulate tightly who ever gets a female of the starters, as they obviously don't want to loose their regional powerhouses.
I always choose the most sexually attractive starter & gender doesn't matter to me because starters never have sexual dimorphism.
>turns out it actually IS a girl
What now, homos?
Just fricking reset.
Or in case of Eevee, kill it instead of catching and get another one.
If people here are talking about boywifes and crossdressing male Pokemon, consider the following reverse scenario:
>tomboy Pokemon
Female Machoke is a thing.
Actually a lot more common that female Sylveon.
>Gonky
Man these JP names are lame as hell.
Imagine the pussy clench.
She'd snap your dick clean off bruh.
hot
Female Gallade upset by her flat chest would be hot
Any inherently masculine looking Pokémon is basically this already.
Use it to breed an army of sexy males obviously.
The real question is, once she gives birth to said sexy males: are they in addition to you still fricking her, or instead of?
Damn, I've been lucky enough to hit that 12.5% EVERY SINGLE TIME
My starter pokegfs have always had RIPE, PUFFY PUSSIES, and basically, I'm just a chad?
Who gives a shit about sex when almost all Pokémon look the exact same whether male or female? The anus and mouth stay the same.
does anyone actually seriously interact with that? i assumed everyone just knows it's a dumb meme
Meowscarada(male)((wife))
"Excellent. I want a manl Charizard. Female dragons remind me of the one from Shrek. It creeps me out."
Back when they looked like generic monsters it didn't matter. Now that there are obviously obviously female looking ones like Primarina or Meowscarada it's a little annoying having to soft reset.
This is true too and we also had it for the mons where it was obvious they were one gender or the other, it was 100% that they were that gender. It was also never supposed to be a serious thing, mostly jokes.
>Mr. Mime is obviously male, 100% male ratio, no females known
>Jinx is 100% female
>Froslass 100% female
Now we got Pokemon that are obviously designed with female in mind, but because they are starters, they have to have this stupid gender ratio, not only for tradition, but also because it would be too easy to get more and limiting their egg groups would feel like shit.
The ratio for the gender for the starter was always just there to make it harder to get more starters. It isn't indicative in universe that males are more prevalent or that because it is more prevalent in game, it must mean that it is gay to look at the pokemon as attractive. Honestly, if I had my way, the entire breeding shit would be overhauled and certain pokemon would just be 100% female.
>Honestly, if I had my way, certain pokemon would just be 100% female.
MURDALIZE ALL COOMERS!!!
12.5% isnt 0%, which means that female versions of those pokemon DO actually exist, theyre just rare. I dont get this meme where their ratio being 1/8 means that pokemon is ONLY Male.
Their argument isn't that, it would be dumb if it were. It is that because there exists the possibility of them being male, just liking the design makes you gay.
Can someone explain to me why so many "people" obsess so much about MUH FEMOID POKEYMANS? What's so special about them?
>Only 1 in 8 of you will ever be a woman.
just get the female one though
I get lucky.