Did everyone buy up all the good graphics cards again after one single 3% green candle for ETH? It doesn't look like it. Stop being such a petulant poorgay then and save up for a 6600XT minimum.
if by "2022 gaming" you mean games made in in 2022 then not very good. but for 1080p 60fps i think it should handle things like witcher 3 pretty well
if you play mostly older & indie games its far far enough
just dont count on playing elden ring or it lasting for something elder scrolls 6
The GTX 1650 Super might have a similar name to the 1650, but that’s more for marketing than anything else. The 1650 Super is an altogether different GPU. It has substantially more CUDA cores than the 1650, as well as a higher clock speed and 50% faster memory. It’s a big upgrade. On paper, it’s within striking distance of a stock GTX 1660.
I have two 4k monitors that I want to record side-by-side within a 7680 x 2160p canvas, no gaming, just desktop graphics (charts and text), is a 1650 SUPER sufficient for this purpose?
Will the low amount of VRAM (4GB) be an issue?
HDD space is not an issue.
According to https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia-video-codec-sdk#NVENCFeatures Turing NVENC chips support up to 8192 x 8192 H.265 (HEVC) 4:4:4 12-bit encoding.
I don't even need a demanding encoding profile, even lossless would do, as I am already doing 4k60 indistinguishable h264 with CPU but this is about 24% of my CPU processing power, I just need to offload my CPU as much as possible to do 2*4k60. I would then transcode later with handbrake if needed.
if you need a budget card, buy (in order of poorhomosexualry) a rx 570, rx 580, 1080ti, rx 6600xt
the 1650s is not a good deal unless you can spot it for really cheap
for 1080p its fine.
if you can find a 570 with 8gb you will be even better
nah, the 570 is weaker than the 1650s. The 1650s sits between the 580 and 590.
Anything under 6gb VRAM will have problems so unless you're ok with low 1080p get something else
Sure if you don't mind low settings or just playing indie games
Yes don't listen to these autists
Its worth no more than $100 brand new, if you go by 2016 GPU performance level, and thats with Nvidia tax.
>IF I GUD TUUUURN BAG TYYYYME :DDD
Just go intel arc at this point
is outclassed by regular 1650
it's fine for games (1080p 60fps) up until Elden Ring, maybe upgrade by 2024
the non-Super is fine for me, but I game in 2012.
Great for all worthy games.
Did everyone buy up all the good graphics cards again after one single 3% green candle for ETH? It doesn't look like it. Stop being such a petulant poorgay then and save up for a 6600XT minimum.
I have one, works fine but I don't max out games on AA/AF and play @ 4k.
1080p is generally fine high/medium in most titles with 2-4AA/2-4AF and 50-60FPS, often I just bump to 900p for smoothness
Upgrade to a RTX 3060 at least
what's the difference between the single and double fan 1650 super
I guess if you live in some shithole that is 40c+ all summer the double fan would be good
The fans
Anything 4gb will be dead soon
at least it's GDDR6 vram
no
if by "2022 gaming" you mean games made in in 2022 then not very good. but for 1080p 60fps i think it should handle things like witcher 3 pretty well
if you play mostly older & indie games its far far enough
just dont count on playing elden ring or it lasting for something elder scrolls 6
>elder scrolls 6
that's gonna need RTX 6060 when it comes out in 2029
wrong, will need a RTX 9090 Ti Platinium Ultra OC Founders Edition
The GTX 1650 Super might have a similar name to the 1650, but that’s more for marketing than anything else. The 1650 Super is an altogether different GPU. It has substantially more CUDA cores than the 1650, as well as a higher clock speed and 50% faster memory. It’s a big upgrade. On paper, it’s within striking distance of a stock GTX 1660.
I have two 4k monitors that I want to record side-by-side within a 7680 x 2160p canvas, no gaming, just desktop graphics (charts and text), is a 1650 SUPER sufficient for this purpose?
Will the low amount of VRAM (4GB) be an issue?
HDD space is not an issue.
According to https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia-video-codec-sdk#NVENCFeatures Turing NVENC chips support up to 8192 x 8192 H.265 (HEVC) 4:4:4 12-bit encoding.
I don't even need a demanding encoding profile, even lossless would do, as I am already doing 4k60 indistinguishable h264 with CPU but this is about 24% of my CPU processing power, I just need to offload my CPU as much as possible to do 2*4k60. I would then transcode later with handbrake if needed.
if you need a budget card, buy (in order of poorhomosexualry) a rx 570, rx 580, 1080ti, rx 6600xt
the 1650s is not a good deal unless you can spot it for really cheap
amd shills never sleep