How would you rank all the current Pokemon gens? Mine would be
4>7>1>3>6>2>8>5
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
How would you rank all the current Pokemon gens? Mine would be. 4>7>1>3>6>2>8>5
6, 7 and 8 being the worst
Legends is good though, the first good game since B2W2
This is true. But you can add the 5 starters to the mix even if the games aren't that bad. Emboar/samurott was the beginning of the end.
they could be better sure but gen 6 starter trio was the start of the trend we have today
5>=7>3>4=8=6>2>=1
Lower games aren't necessarily bad, just outdated and/or weaker than what is above.
3>4>1>5>2>6>7>(powergap)>8
3>4>5>6>8>7>2>1
3>6>7>1>8>2>4>5
(1-2) > 3 > 6 > 7 > 8 > 5 > 4
3>4>7>2>8>5>1>6
1>2=3>7>6>8>5>4
3>2>5>6>8>4>7>1
I don't care and it doesn't matter how you rank them but if you don't have 8 as dead last then you are a fricking homosexual and not a pokemon fan. Also it means you don't belong here.
5>4>3>7>2>6>8>1
For all its myriad flaws, the game is still held together by design, bad design maybe, but design, compared to gen 1 which is held together by bugs.
2 > 3 > 4 > 5 > 1 > 8 > 6 > 7
Gen 5 > Gen 4 > Gen 3 = Gen 6 > Gen 2 > Gen 8 > POWERGAP > Gen 7 > Gen 1
>We're getting a non-mammal fire type starter for the first time since Charmander
Firebros, how we doing?
Wait, I'm a moron. Chickens aren't mammals.
Torchic isn't a mammal
Jokes on you, I caught myself being a fricking idiot one second before you did.
Gen 1 is last. It’s broken and a dogshit game. Don’t let nostalgia blind you
3 and 4 are the best.
3>4>1>2>6>5>7>8
3 > 4 > 2 > 1 > 5 > everything else
Going solely off community and the games(sidegames included) that were released per generation, from what I know I'd rank 4>6>8>3=5>1=2>7
But although I was alive during gen 2 and got to play/watch it as a kid, I wasn't really part of a broader community, so I might raise that higher if I really were an older person.
2 = 5 > 1 = 7 = 8 >>>>>> 4 >>>>>> 3 = 6
4 and 7 were the most fun, along with 5 and 3. Then comes 2, 6, 1 and lastly 8(except for PLA)
4 > 1 > 2 > 3 > 8 > 5 > 7 > 6
2>5=4>3>1>6>7>8
4chads we where at?
1>>
GAP>>
else
3>5>2>4>6>1>7=8
3>4>2=1>5>>7>>>6>>>>8
3 has the best version of Kanto (FR/LG), runs the smoothest at the highest frame rate, and is not absurdly broken. Introduction of double battles the best gimmick in the franchise. And the Colosseum games with all double battles show a great way to design a good hard mode in future games.
4 started the slower frame rate, has severely glitchy screen transitions, and Diamond and Pearl are atrociously slow games. But the Pokémon designs are solid, HG/SS are solid games, Platinum is a good experience, and the physical/special split makes a lot of Pokémon more viable. Overall, very positive despite the bad start.
2 is very similar to 1, acting as a fix to the glaring issues. But the game suffers too much from sequel-syndrome, and is not as fun to play casually.
5 I can respect for avoiding Gen-1 pandering and making you use all new Pokémon for the first games, and doing a real sequel instead of a 3rd version. The art style just started failing, the shading and scaling was screwed up, and the games will chug at points.
I haven’t played PLA yet. Maybe that will improve my views on 8. But the base game was more expensive for less content than 7, has the audacity to charge for online play (which 7 didn’t do), and it killed itself before a 3rd version or sequel, which I want because the wasted good characters (Ball Guy, Marnie, Sonya) on such horrible writing. At least 6 wasn’t wasted potential.