e-girlcons swear real girls are not attractive to them, until you show them a perfectly rendered 3D image of a little girl, modeled by face scanning a real life girl. Then they show their true colors. They were MAPs all along.
>MAP
please stop using this garbage frickin shitlib troony term to describe me
i agree otherwise though, there's a lot of cope and denialism in the e-girlcon community. but there are very meaningful differences between e-girl and real girls. i mean, i like real girls 10x more than e-girl art. so, there's obviously a difference there. and hyper-realistic 3d e-girl shit is horrible and uncanny
>please stop using this garbage frickin shitlib troony term to describe me
It accurately describes who you are, lol. "e-girlcon" romanticizes it too much. And you guys started taking owndership of the term "pedo". Like black people owning the word "Black person". So it makes sense to just call you what you are: A MAP.
I am sexually attracted to females of (almost) all ages, be they 6 or 60, and all ontological statuses, be they real or fictional. What does that make me?
>What does that make me?
I said it already. Why are you asking? Honestly, I think you just wanted an excuse make your admission.
>I said it already.
Seems like a pretty moronic descriptor in my case given that it ignores all the females of other ages that get my dick hard. Why am I not a MAP (MILF Attracted Person) instead by your moronic reasoning?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Who said MAPs are *only* attracted to minors? It's not called MOAP.
I am sexually attracted to females of (almost) all ages, be they 6 or 60, and all ontological statuses, be they real or fictional. What does that make me?
All the e-girlcons here assure me it's just 2d, but I get the impression some of you might really be LGBTP
/
e-girlcons swear real girls are not attractive to them, until you show them a perfectly rendered 3D image of a little girl, modeled by face scanning a real life girl. Then they show their true colors. They were MAPs all along.
apparently. Amerigoylems to boot, probably. For some reason they got conditioned to view any men who admit to finding 17 years and 364 day old "girls" attractive as depraved deviants.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>For some reason they got conditioned to view any men who admit to finding 17 years and 364 day old "girls" attractive as depraved deviants.
No, I'm normal enough to to care if a 19 year old is dating a 17 year old. A two year difference isn't a huge deal.
It's really not normal to be attracted to 6 year olds, bro. If that sentiment makes me an "Amerigoylem", then so be it. Whatever *you* are, I don't want to be.
3 months ago
Anonymous
you're a seething roastie prostitute with rotten eggs. nobody based cares about your opinion
>Links to a study that can't be downloaded >"Trust me bro, it agrees with everything I believe"
3 months ago
Anonymous
>anon is a mouthbreathing hick who never read a scientific paper in his life and thus doesn't know how to access them for free within seconds (and is also too moronic to read the abstract)
Here, lemme spoonfeed you, dumdum: >https://psychohistory.com/articles/the-universality-of-incest/
3 months ago
Anonymous
I read the abstract actually. It doesn't say anything relevant. It basically just says what they're studying. Nothing about their findings.
Not that I plan on reading this thing anyway. Let me see... Yeah, it's just a collection of conjectures, based on a bunch of data they collected. This is a glorified opinion piece.
What is this supposed to prove?
You know what else has always existed? Theft. I guess being a thief makes you a "normal man".
Murder too. I guess killing makes you a "normal man" too.
Silly notion, to say that because something has existed for a long time, that it's therefore normal and healthy. There are bad apples in every bunch.
I can easily be argued that a lot of people who suffered childhood abuse, were victims of the same person. Like say your family has a pedo father. He's going to touch his kids, and then maybe his grandkids, and then maybe his nieces and nephews, and then maybe theneighbor's kids. And then all those victims get recorded in a study. And you interpret the large amount of victims to equal a large amount of perpetrators.
>B-b-b-b-but, there ARE a lot of perpetrators
Then point me to the specific data that proves it. Don't lay a 10 page document in my lap, with quite literally 200 references.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Whatever *you* are, I don't want to be.
Sure, sure, foid, pretend that your penis envy isn't real, maybe someone'll buy it.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>switches from a context regarding culture to a context regarding sex for no reason.
Weird.
3 months ago
Anonymous
men in general but especially white men have been completely duped by post-feminist age of consent laws (that literally exploded upwards the exact moment prostitutes got rights) and have not only adjusted their sexuality around a completely arbitrary, pseudoscientific number but also their entire basis of morality around it. it's quite sad
I don't understand the purpose of these kind of posts, are you expecting people to admit being one of the most stigmatized and taboo'd group of people there is? Why would they do that?
I'm just reinforcing the fact that so called "e-girlcons" lie through their teeth. It wouldn't even need to be said, if they didn't lie in the first place.
Maybe you should have more emotional intelligence anon. Maybe that way you would understand why they feel the need to not admit being part of the most stigmatized group in the world. and you could use more empathy.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I do not give a single solitary frick about how pedophiles feel. The only things I care about regarding them are "are they in jail" or "are they dead".
3 months ago
Anonymous
Empathy? No. But understanding, I have. I of course wouldn't expect them to admit as much in real life, or in an online space where their reputation could be smeared by the admission. But being anonymous on Ganker? What's the reason to lie here?
Also, in a lot of cases, they volunteer themselves up to be the e-girl defender, when it's really not necessary. If I say e-girlcons are pedos, and I'm not addressing you personally, then why do you feel the need to speak up and defend the integrity of e-girlcons? Like >"no! I swear! we only like 2d! We're not like that! real girls are disgusting"
Boy, stop lying.
Maybe you should have more emotional intelligence anon. Maybe that way you would understand why they feel the need to not admit being part of the most stigmatized group in the world. and you could use more empathy.
3d women are pig disgusting, why would 3d girls be any different you stupid normalBlack folk.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Empathy? No. But understanding, I have. I of course wouldn't expect them to admit as much in real life, or in an online space where their reputation could be smeared by the admission. But being anonymous on Ganker? What's the reason to lie here?
Also, in a lot of cases, they volunteer themselves up to be the e-girl defender, when it's really not necessary. If I say e-girlcons are pedos, and I'm not addressing you personally, then why do you feel the need to speak up and defend the integrity of e-girlcons? Like >"no! I swear! we only like 2d! We're not like that! real girls are disgusting"
Boy, stop lying.
Trying to use drawings and machines to defend the people who harm real children is not okay. Victimless crimes are not crimes. That all changes when there is a victim.
delicious seethe
[...]
[...]
3d women are pig disgusting, why would 3d girls be any different you stupid normalBlack folk.
I do agree 2d is the superior and cuter option,
3 months ago
Anonymous
Empathy? No. But understanding, I have. I of course wouldn't expect them to admit as much in real life, or in an online space where their reputation could be smeared by the admission. But being anonymous on Ganker? What's the reason to lie here?
Also, in a lot of cases, they volunteer themselves up to be the e-girl defender, when it's really not necessary. If I say e-girlcons are pedos, and I'm not addressing you personally, then why do you feel the need to speak up and defend the integrity of e-girlcons? Like >"no! I swear! we only like 2d! We're not like that! real girls are disgusting"
Boy, stop lying.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Anyone who volunteers themselves as a dedicated e-girlcon is a freak. I find myself defending its existence for "it pops up all the time in Japanese art and yeah its fricking weird but its just drawings bro" reasons.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Trying to use drawings and machines to defend the people who harm real children is not okay. Victimless crimes are not crimes. That all changes when there is a victim.
e-girlcons will swear up and down that they're not pedophiles because "2D only" but still beat their meat off to doujins where the e-girl is wearing a sukumizu, has a randoseru on her back, and HAS HER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I.D. OUT. But of course they're not attracted to real children. Just the forms of children.
would you kill a sentient living human being irl? Why not? you play all those violent video games
>e-girlcons will swear up and down that they're not pedophiles because "2D only" but still beat their meat off to doujins where the e-girl is wearing a sukumizu, has a randoseru on her back, and HAS HER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I.D. OUT. But of course they're not attracted to real children. Just the forms of children.
You sound like you know a lot about the topic.
i've jerked off to that stuff for 10 years and have no idea what those words mean but contextually assume i've seen them
you're a closeted pedo BRO
gender dysphoria isn't real btw
3 months ago
Anonymous
>i've jerked off to that stuff for 10 years and have no idea what those words mean but contextually assume i've seen them
Or I've got a better grasp of Japanese than you do. But sure keep projecting. Whatever floats your boat.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Or I've got a better grasp of Japanese than you do.
All the better to read those e-girl doujin with, I'm sure.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Don't hate me cause you ain't me.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I could keep poking fun, but bad joke on my part.
Video games?
Yes, David Cage games still count as games. Even when the thread gets hijacked by edgelords who want to frick robots to break social norms.
3 months ago
Anonymous
response to
>i've jerked off to that stuff for 10 years and have no idea what those words mean but contextually assume i've seen them
Or I've got a better grasp of Japanese than you do. But sure keep projecting. Whatever floats your boat.
meant for
It's almost like I've spent years on a dedicated otaku website. Crazy.
nta being responded to in
>i've jerked off to that stuff for 10 years and have no idea what those words mean but contextually assume i've seen them
Or I've got a better grasp of Japanese than you do. But sure keep projecting. Whatever floats your boat.
Usually wouldn't clarify and I don't give a shit about demented drawings, but this thread is full of weirdos.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>gender dysphoria isn't real btw
I mean it is in the sense that trannies freak out about not being a woman and get so distraught by that immutable fact that they'd go as far as castrating themselves and scraping out the inside of a groin in a futile attempt to recreate a vegana. If that mental illness isn't real, what is?
It would completely short-circuit it's brain. Is it an old movie line? Is it a joke? Do i think his name is Mark? Is the girls name Mark? Is this a trick, or am i just actually insane?
And that's when the coup de grace comes. I take my robo-dick out and point at it doing a poor Bas Rutten imitation: >Now, what are we gonna do about this
I actually liked Blade Runner x Les Miserables, story was at least moderately entertaining even if the 'tweeest' was fricking dumb in the context of the story.
Well first of all, why would they have a kill switch? Many potentially dangerous devices don't.
Secondly, becoming a deviant android means overriding your programming. So even if you did have some kind of kill switch, why would the android have to listen to it? It can just ignore the command.
Why the frick are commercially available androids even capable of not wanting to do what they're told? What was the point of programming them that way?
When I played this game I thought maybe the guy who invented them was trying to pull some kind of coup to make himself king of the world or something but that angle never came up.
They're not supposed to be capable of it, it's deviancy. Basically, because of '''''AI reasons''', sometimes they go 'nah frick off' and become capable of self-determination.
But the programming that would enable them to do that is vastly more complex than the programming it would take to just follow commands, so why would they put more effort into making capable of dissent?
I thought the twist was going to be that they actually WERE programmed to ape out and overthrow the government, and that they didn't actually have any free will at all. I think that woukd have been much more intelligent than what Cage came up with.
>programming
What part of 'learning AI' + 'deviant behaviour' don't you get? It wasn't capable of dissent when they built it, but it learned through exposure and stimuli. If you really dropped androids into the real world and they had to put up with all the physical abuse that would definitely happen, I'm fricking amazed all of them in-universe aren't depicted as chimping out.
because it was a fricking nauseating eyesore to look at holy frick that blur of everything 10ft in front of you and disabling it (through config files) caused other graphical issues with this game
i liked the story otherwise though. i mean a lot of it was cringe but god damn it had some cuties in it (op, teenbot, e-girlbot)
rape
bump
bump
bump
bump
she looks 5 years old
I'm pretty sure he's going to rape the guy.
Would you rape a child in real life?
All the e-girlcons here assure me it's just 2d, but I get the impression some of you might really be LGBTP
is it legal in this hypothetical situation mr agent
e-girlcons swear real girls are not attractive to them, until you show them a perfectly rendered 3D image of a little girl, modeled by face scanning a real life girl. Then they show their true colors. They were MAPs all along.
>MAP
please stop using this garbage frickin shitlib troony term to describe me
i agree otherwise though, there's a lot of cope and denialism in the e-girlcon community. but there are very meaningful differences between e-girl and real girls. i mean, i like real girls 10x more than e-girl art. so, there's obviously a difference there. and hyper-realistic 3d e-girl shit is horrible and uncanny
>please stop using this garbage frickin shitlib troony term to describe me
It accurately describes who you are, lol. "e-girlcon" romanticizes it too much. And you guys started taking owndership of the term "pedo". Like black people owning the word "Black person". So it makes sense to just call you what you are: A MAP.
>What does that make me?
I said it already. Why are you asking? Honestly, I think you just wanted an excuse make your admission.
show breasts roastie
>I said it already.
Seems like a pretty moronic descriptor in my case given that it ignores all the females of other ages that get my dick hard. Why am I not a MAP (MILF Attracted Person) instead by your moronic reasoning?
Who said MAPs are *only* attracted to minors? It's not called MOAP.
I am sexually attracted to females of (almost) all ages, be they 6 or 60, and all ontological statuses, be they real or fictional. What does that make me?
it makes you a normal human male
Not according to gaylords like
/
apparently. Amerigoylems to boot, probably. For some reason they got conditioned to view any men who admit to finding 17 years and 364 day old "girls" attractive as depraved deviants.
>For some reason they got conditioned to view any men who admit to finding 17 years and 364 day old "girls" attractive as depraved deviants.
No, I'm normal enough to to care if a 19 year old is dating a 17 year old. A two year difference isn't a huge deal.
It's really not normal to be attracted to 6 year olds, bro. If that sentiment makes me an "Amerigoylem", then so be it. Whatever *you* are, I don't want to be.
you're a seething roastie prostitute with rotten eggs. nobody based cares about your opinion
>It's really not normal
Oh sweet Muttland child.
>https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/universality-incest
>Links to a study that can't be downloaded
>"Trust me bro, it agrees with everything I believe"
>anon is a mouthbreathing hick who never read a scientific paper in his life and thus doesn't know how to access them for free within seconds (and is also too moronic to read the abstract)
Here, lemme spoonfeed you, dumdum:
>https://psychohistory.com/articles/the-universality-of-incest/
I read the abstract actually. It doesn't say anything relevant. It basically just says what they're studying. Nothing about their findings.
Not that I plan on reading this thing anyway. Let me see... Yeah, it's just a collection of conjectures, based on a bunch of data they collected. This is a glorified opinion piece.
What is this supposed to prove?
You know what else has always existed? Theft. I guess being a thief makes you a "normal man".
Murder too. I guess killing makes you a "normal man" too.
Silly notion, to say that because something has existed for a long time, that it's therefore normal and healthy. There are bad apples in every bunch.
I can easily be argued that a lot of people who suffered childhood abuse, were victims of the same person. Like say your family has a pedo father. He's going to touch his kids, and then maybe his grandkids, and then maybe his nieces and nephews, and then maybe theneighbor's kids. And then all those victims get recorded in a study. And you interpret the large amount of victims to equal a large amount of perpetrators.
>B-b-b-b-but, there ARE a lot of perpetrators
Then point me to the specific data that proves it. Don't lay a 10 page document in my lap, with quite literally 200 references.
>Whatever *you* are, I don't want to be.
Sure, sure, foid, pretend that your penis envy isn't real, maybe someone'll buy it.
>switches from a context regarding culture to a context regarding sex for no reason.
Weird.
men in general but especially white men have been completely duped by post-feminist age of consent laws (that literally exploded upwards the exact moment prostitutes got rights) and have not only adjusted their sexuality around a completely arbitrary, pseudoscientific number but also their entire basis of morality around it. it's quite sad
I don't understand the purpose of these kind of posts, are you expecting people to admit being one of the most stigmatized and taboo'd group of people there is? Why would they do that?
I'm just reinforcing the fact that so called "e-girlcons" lie through their teeth. It wouldn't even need to be said, if they didn't lie in the first place.
Maybe you should have more emotional intelligence anon. Maybe that way you would understand why they feel the need to not admit being part of the most stigmatized group in the world. and you could use more empathy.
I do not give a single solitary frick about how pedophiles feel. The only things I care about regarding them are "are they in jail" or "are they dead".
3d women are pig disgusting, why would 3d girls be any different you stupid normalBlack folk.
delicious seethe
I do agree 2d is the superior and cuter option,
Empathy? No. But understanding, I have. I of course wouldn't expect them to admit as much in real life, or in an online space where their reputation could be smeared by the admission. But being anonymous on Ganker? What's the reason to lie here?
Also, in a lot of cases, they volunteer themselves up to be the e-girl defender, when it's really not necessary. If I say e-girlcons are pedos, and I'm not addressing you personally, then why do you feel the need to speak up and defend the integrity of e-girlcons? Like
>"no! I swear! we only like 2d! We're not like that! real girls are disgusting"
Boy, stop lying.
Anyone who volunteers themselves as a dedicated e-girlcon is a freak. I find myself defending its existence for "it pops up all the time in Japanese art and yeah its fricking weird but its just drawings bro" reasons.
Trying to use drawings and machines to defend the people who harm real children is not okay. Victimless crimes are not crimes. That all changes when there is a victim.
would you kill a sentient living human being irl? Why not? you play all those violent video games
e-girlcons will swear up and down that they're not pedophiles because "2D only" but still beat their meat off to doujins where the e-girl is wearing a sukumizu, has a randoseru on her back, and HAS HER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I.D. OUT. But of course they're not attracted to real children. Just the forms of children.
I would.
>e-girlcons will swear up and down that they're not pedophiles because "2D only" but still beat their meat off to doujins where the e-girl is wearing a sukumizu, has a randoseru on her back, and HAS HER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I.D. OUT. But of course they're not attracted to real children. Just the forms of children.
You sound like you know a lot about the topic.
It's almost like I've spent years on a dedicated otaku website. Crazy.
i've jerked off to that stuff for 10 years and have no idea what those words mean but contextually assume i've seen them
you're a closeted pedo BRO
gender dysphoria isn't real btw
>i've jerked off to that stuff for 10 years and have no idea what those words mean but contextually assume i've seen them
Or I've got a better grasp of Japanese than you do. But sure keep projecting. Whatever floats your boat.
>Or I've got a better grasp of Japanese than you do.
All the better to read those e-girl doujin with, I'm sure.
Don't hate me cause you ain't me.
I could keep poking fun, but bad joke on my part.
Yes, David Cage games still count as games. Even when the thread gets hijacked by edgelords who want to frick robots to break social norms.
response to
meant for
nta being responded to in
Usually wouldn't clarify and I don't give a shit about demented drawings, but this thread is full of weirdos.
>gender dysphoria isn't real btw
I mean it is in the sense that trannies freak out about not being a woman and get so distraught by that immutable fact that they'd go as far as castrating themselves and scraping out the inside of a groin in a futile attempt to recreate a vegana. If that mental illness isn't real, what is?
You mean Daniel right?
The question is how do I take the e-girl home without people noticing.
Consensual, gentle anal sex with her.
What was the reason for having child-like robots in the first place?
>implying they wouldn't be equipped with cheese grater penetration protection
Emma isn't an android, tardnon.
I would have listened, and that's what no one else did.
offer an eiffel tower
>*SOFTWARE INSTABILITY*
>I need to see she isn't hurt Daniel, undress her
She's an android too, why does anyone care?
If someone held a gun to your toaster and threatened to shoot you'd be pretty pissed too
I got my toaster for $10 at a garage sale. Fire away. It's such a durable old piece of shit that it'd probably keep working after getting shot.
she's not an android you dumbfrick
Why do moron still claim this after all these years? Literal low IQ
she's hot
Why was her mother freaking out then, huh. Fricking drama queen
"bro stop that's cringe"
easy
just let her die, she's not useful to anyone
>i know your unatco killphrase
>Oh, hi Mark
It would completely short-circuit it's brain. Is it an old movie line? Is it a joke? Do i think his name is Mark? Is the girls name Mark? Is this a trick, or am i just actually insane?
And that's when the coup de grace comes. I take my robo-dick out and point at it doing a poor Bas Rutten imitation:
>Now, what are we gonna do about this
All the while a sniper has been taking aim...
Kill everyone ITT
Calm down, homo.
>tattoos
I wouldn't
Those aren't tattoos, it's the blue blood from when the android got shot.
I actually liked Blade Runner x Les Miserables, story was at least moderately entertaining even if the 'tweeest' was fricking dumb in the context of the story.
I'd ask him how to cook crystal meth and while his consumer-friendly firmware short circuits I'd take my shot.
How do they not have safety killswitches in these robots? David Cage a shit
Well first of all, why would they have a kill switch? Many potentially dangerous devices don't.
Secondly, becoming a deviant android means overriding your programming. So even if you did have some kind of kill switch, why would the android have to listen to it? It can just ignore the command.
Why the frick are commercially available androids even capable of not wanting to do what they're told? What was the point of programming them that way?
When I played this game I thought maybe the guy who invented them was trying to pull some kind of coup to make himself king of the world or something but that angle never came up.
They're not supposed to be capable of it, it's deviancy. Basically, because of '''''AI reasons''', sometimes they go 'nah frick off' and become capable of self-determination.
But the programming that would enable them to do that is vastly more complex than the programming it would take to just follow commands, so why would they put more effort into making capable of dissent?
I thought the twist was going to be that they actually WERE programmed to ape out and overthrow the government, and that they didn't actually have any free will at all. I think that woukd have been much more intelligent than what Cage came up with.
>programming
What part of 'learning AI' + 'deviant behaviour' don't you get? It wasn't capable of dissent when they built it, but it learned through exposure and stimuli. If you really dropped androids into the real world and they had to put up with all the physical abuse that would definitely happen, I'm fricking amazed all of them in-universe aren't depicted as chimping out.
Impregnation. Only deranged psychos would harm a preggo girl.
360 noscope his stupid plastic head, grab the girl and start furiously licking her dicky
you are literally gay if you wouldn't frick that
Why was Detroit so terrible? Going Terminator Connor was the only way to enjoy it but then Hank hates you
because it was a fricking nauseating eyesore to look at holy frick that blur of everything 10ft in front of you and disabling it (through config files) caused other graphical issues with this game
i liked the story otherwise though. i mean a lot of it was cringe but god damn it had some cuties in it (op, teenbot, e-girlbot)
Becuase it was a bad movie pretending to be a game.
>childbots wont be a thing in your lifetime
pain
Threaten to shoot Myself and make it look like the child has telepathic abilities controlling both robots.
Why would I save a toaster?
Video games?
Disable the gun with the remote disruptor
Get below the roof
Perform grapple takedown
i would hack her
>I WANT EVERYONE TO LEAVE NOW, A...AND I WANT A BED
Go around obviously
ARE YOU ARMED?
wiener