I wish we had a "Wind type" instead of Flying type.

I wish we had a "Wind type" instead of Flying type. Making it so air manipulation is tied to being a bird while simultaneously having it where being a bird isn't enough to be mono-Flying type is weird.
I wish we had more cool air elemental outside of Tornadus and maybe Castform

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rookidee and Corvisquire have no right to be pure flying

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're not normal birds lol

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how so?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      FPBP. Makes sense for Tornadus to be pure Flying, not so for Rookidee and Corvisquire.
      Even if it doesn't matter much, the same goes for which ones have Flying in Type 1 or Type 2.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would it resist or be immune to fire

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That might have happened if GF stuck with Bird-type in Gen 1. Either that or we'd get weird shit like bugs and bats and owls being Bird-type.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >implying owls are birds
      GF would never be that moronic... right bros?

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, I like flying always being tied to another type. Makes the type more interesting.
    I see it as the opposite of normal. Normal should ALWAYS be mono type, and flying NEVER should be

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What about Pidgey then?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Okay, retype every single Normal/Flying Pokémon then.

        Normal flying the one exception

        >t. Thinks normal means "typeless"

        It should. Otherwise it's not normal

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why would flying be acceptable, but not Normal/Fighting?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Okay, retype every single Normal/Flying Pokémon then.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Thinks normal means "typeless"

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Flying shouldn't even have been a type, it should have been a tag like levitate was.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lots of flying types aren't birds THOUGH

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are so many birds Normal / Flying instead of just Flying? To buff Fighting?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No just autistic obsession to keep things the same on game freaks part

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If we take the "wind" away from flying type, what else does it have? Removing the core identity of a type just to add another very similar type seems fricking moronic

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      of course it seems fricking moronic when you don't read it correctly

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would be cool if Dragons were super effective against wind type

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *