> implant clinics are the same thing as finding bobbleheads
this is what playing fallout 3 does to your brain. I genuinely don't understand the mental gymnastics F3 fans go through to justify why they like aspects of the game.
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
this video is for (you)
how can anyone talk about this for eight fricking hours?
he autistically and beautifully dissects/debunks every argument in the original video and doesn't leave any detail about the game out. Its one of the best reviews of a game and really puts to bed the topic of if Fallout 3 is a good game or not.
>ITS TOO LONG!!!!!
Not an argument
You can literally play and finish the game for yourself in that amount of time you fricking homosexual
maybe if you are a speedrunning little homosexual troon
Speedrun life, troony.
You can literally skip half the game if you know where your father went.
Yes it is. Why the frick do you need someone to tell you all this shit for eight hours, when you can just play the game yourself. It takes like an hour to realize most of FO 3's flaws and that's without playing NV. Back to the length, you can convince anyone on anything if you had eight hours to spew a bunch of bullshit. There's a reason that filibustering is a tactic used to debate legislature.
These morons sit there rambling about a fricking video game for eight hours. Not even the losers on evageeks were this fricking bad with Evangelion. The worst part is that people like you sit there and listen to this stupid shit instead of coming to your own conclusion. Jesus Christ, how fricking stupid are you?
It is easier to spew bullshit than disprove it.
The same way that people like alt history theorists can write multiple 500+ page books of their bullshit, or ancient aliens can manage like 15 seasons: it's easy to just keep talking and piling more arguments on top of each other until you have something so huge people can barely even begin to contend with opposing your position in a coherent way.
>X is better than you think
>Y is a masterpiece and here's why
>Stop doing Z!
>Why A is B
>The history of C games
>D iceberg explained
>Was E actually good?
>How F turned into G
>H lore explained
This shit is literally EIGHT HOURS LONG
>I, a good game, but a bad J game
>K, it's no masterpiece
>Is L still worth playing?
>playing M in [current year]
>has N aged well?
>OP is a homosexual, heres why
I was going to make this post here have a few more
>The Rise and Fall of X
>In Defense of Y
>The Problem with Z
>Why X is an overrated disaster
>Why X is an underrated masterpiece
>How Y ruined videogames
>Z must be stopped
>I was wrong about X
>The truth about Y
Video easays were a mistake.
Sadly even the comedy reviewers turned into essay c**ts.
Dont watch his new Videos, he shills hard in them.
Why did this happen though? We went from fun, creative, light hearted and humorous videos to dry boring video essays. What caused this?
Because writing good, creative jokes is harder than complaining about the 12 bugs you encountered during your gameplay or just straight up shilling.
In my example, he went full autist in his last No Man sky video and from then on just made essays, until his last video.
he got invited by the Devs of that game because he was one of the few people who reviewed the previous one.
So he went full shill for them.
I didn’t mean him is particular more YouTube in general. We had machinimas, Gmod Videos, dramatic reading of bad fanfiction, angry reviews, parody reviews (like RSJGaMeRPrO), sketch comedy parodies (like when people did parody versions of Zelda or Resident Evil in their garden) and of course YTPs. Now it seems nobody wants to make that kind of content anymore and most people just make boring dry videos essays. What happened?
people were just fricking around and having fun back then now everyone wants to make a career of their verbal diarrhea
Much better times, I wish we could go back to that carefree sprit and ideal of just making things for fun.
Youtube changed the algorithm for this cancer.
Also, 99% of these people don't really do anything but come on Ganker, Reddit, or autistic forums and steal the discussion points for themselves. Listen to them outside of their comfort zone and they usually sound like morons because they don't have an original thought. This means that they rarely have to write anything because some other autist basically did it for him.
Video essays are cancer! Can’t we go back to making sketch comedy, machinimas, angry reviews, parody reviews or YTPs instead of boring video essays?
It's all cancer. KYS
it's a simplistic and crude game that is yet providing a fps sandbox experience that will be forever cherished by people whose first game it was (of the series at least) but never developed a better taste
The main reason to appreciate Fallout 3 is as a tech demo/proof of concept for how a Fallout game would work in 3D. It's mediocre beyond that, with probably only a handful of real positives. Anyone who doesn't think that New Vegas is 20x better is in pure denial, or hasn't played them both recently.
>New Vegas is 20x better
They're mechanically almost identical.
Nta, but NV has a lot more opportunity for roleplaying in the sense of player choice in quests, as well as a wider selection of equipment. But the base mechanics are essentially the same, correct. It's the little things that make it better, though I probably wouldn't say twenty times better.
>way more weapons
>way more enemies
>dt/armor split
>big guns distributed to other weapon types
>tons of crafting including ammo crafting and additional ammo types
>reworked perks and added piles of new perks to change how weapon types like melee play
>explosives given its own dedicated weapons
>complete rebalance of xp distribution with a 50 level curve instead of 30 max
If you think they're mechanically the same you're just dumb
Everything you listed is a minor implementation detail that barely matters. The games look, play, and feel the same. The menus are the same, the combat is the same, VATS is the same, the skill/perk/leveling system is the same. They did add crafting, which sucked, so that's the one actual difference.
>play, and feel the same
They don't.
Just the fact that you can ADS in New Vegas makes it feel incredibly different
>ADS
Literally just a different visual for the same aiming mechanic. It does feel a little more natural, though, I'll give you that.
Nv had more weapon bloat, new enemy types but less enemies in general, more broken skills, broke vats more, stability issues, and a setting that lends itself to poor map design or just showed that obsiden count desgin a good map (ex more invisible walls than ever before).
>dt/armor split
>additional ammo types
These are the only new mechanics in this post, and neither of them change the game that much. The rest of the things you mentioned are a combination of new content that uses existing mechanics or rebalances to old content.
If you think those are mechanics you're dumb
NV is a proper evolution of 3 and whatever Bethesda tried to peddle as open world roleplaying with that and Oblivion. In the time it got it had more genuine choice and options for builds and interactions.
Is this game okay vanilla
if you have no reference to any of the other games its fine to play vanilla. Its just that literally every plot point falls apart if you think about it long enough. Combat is on a spectrum from unfun to totally broken
I'm too stupid to identify potholes, that's okay. Do mods/DLC make some alterations to the way the story plays out?
One of the DLCs changes the final ending, that being Broken Steel. Otherwise no.
That said, I think the DLC are all really good, maybe better than the base game, and worth checking out if you're curious.
Broken Steel literally fixes the ending and that's about it
Do you really not understand, or are you just being hyperbolic for the sake of emphasizing how you disagree?
Most people including me liked the atmosphere of Fallout 3, you dumb homosexual. To me it stands out as being more grim than the newer Fallout games (including New Vegas). OWB is my most hated DLC of all time due to the Reddit humor and awful tanky enemies and the shitty questline. Dead Money at least tried to tell a fricking story. However, nothing will ever beat Fallout 1 in terms of horror elements.
Nice rambling that had no point.
Your reply is just as pointless as mine then, troony.
"buhh new vegas has too many roads and you can follow them"
one of the lower iq takes this guy manages to spit out.
>my life is a videogame
Why do people LIKE THINGS!? Don't they know that THINGS SUCK and that there's BETTER MORE INTELLECTUAL THINGS!? Why do they keep having fun, I've made a huge list of reasons you shouldn't have fun and I even posted it to the internet! Why do they play the BAD GAME? Don't they know if they played the good game then gaming would only cater to MY taste? Don't they know that MY taste is founded on reasons and art (check out these internet posts for proofs!) But their taste is not founded on reasons and art, and keeps the video game genre backwards and savage! It holds back the hobby because I DON'T LIKE IT! Fricking Reddit. Fricking zoomers.
This. What is it about New Vegas that makes people such condescending homosexuals?
People that bark "DON'T CRITICIZE MY FAVORITE THING" is just as pathetic as all the people that make 8 hour hyperbole filled essays about 12 year old video games.
New Vegas is my favorite game. One day I hope to play it.
To be fair, if you're wearing a nose piercing to LARP as cattle you probably need at least seven hours to explain one coherent thought.
I've been replaying Fallout 3 within TTW, very lightly modded, and I've been having a blast, but I've always been a sucker for Bethesda games. I've never actually played FONV either, so I appreciate the the iron sights, and the ammo crafting, and the follower wheel isn't half-bad either.
Amazing how much different the game looks without the green gerber-baby food filter.
>a retrospective
>a character analysis
>a plot summary
>looking back on
>x was better than we thought
>all 3+ hours long
We get it, u took a writing class in university and the career didnt pan out. Do people really watch these rather than play the game and form their own opinions?
Fallout 3 will always have higher critic ratings and sales than NV, it is therefore the superior game. There is nothing you can do about this. Cope and indeed seethe.
>ITT midwits with the attention span of children
explain why I should listen to some homosexual drag his prolapsed diseased ego across the floor for eight fricking hours when I could spend that time playing the game and forming my own opinion
its only 4 hours at twice the speed
The problem is that most of those "Creators" pieces are worse than the subject they focus on.
so thats where you're wrong. Ive watched hundreds of "essay" youtube videos and have discovered that the quality improves the longer the video is.
Being able to edit together something like 8 hours of audio takes a certain level of intelligence that shows in the writing. Really, the people with the stupidest and worst takes are those moronic and lazy enough to make something that is no more than 2 hours long. Thats all their smoothbrains can handle.
If someone is autistic enough to edit together 6 hours of audio then its usually somewhat engaging.
Still as boring as watching paint dry, give me some good Gmod, Fallout or Oblvion machinima makers, or some people who does some “Resident Evil or Zelda in real life sketch comedy” or a good dramatic reading of a shitty fan fiction. Someone doing modern style AVGN or Nostalgia Critic reviews would be also good; in actual fact I actually would rather watch the Game Dude than any boring video essayist.
theres nothing wrong with those videos anon, you are just moronic and can't enjoy things that take a little effort
lol, it would take a normalgay four days to watch one of those 8 hour videos. your average normalgay has maybe 2 hours to themselves after working all day and then spending time with the wife and kids. do you really think they are gonna be like "today i will watch 1/4 of this extremely long video essay about a single video game, using up all of my alloted free time for the day"
frick no they aren't
No sane person wants to listen to some fat pig with a speech impediment rant autistically about a 12-year old game for 8 hours on end.
That's not all, this fat frick hosts a livestream with his furry friends where they just shit on other people for hours on end merely for having opinions they disagree with, peak schizoid autism
I have a long attention span but I use that for books or long films. YouTube should be about lighthearted fun content like machinimas, sketch comedy or fun reviews not boring video essays. If you want to express your view on something write an essay, have a discussion on a forum or write a book. If you want to learn something read an essay online, read a debate or read a book. It takes much a longer attention span to read than it does to listen to some homosexual ramble on for hours. These Reddit tear boring pretentious video essays are one of things that killed YouTube.
its literally not about that crap. The motto used to be "broadcast yourself." Youtube is for people to publish themselves and their ideas, comedy or otherwise.
machinma is fricking pozzed theses days anyways. Just look at how RvB ended
Never watched RVB so I don’t care how that ended. I am more into Oblivion and Fallout Machinima like Night Motherfathers, Halo Scrolls, KDMD, Bargonian Adventures and such. Also that doesn’t cover sketch comedy, parody reviews or dramatic fan fiction readings.
Also Videos essays are even more pozzed the biggest video essay makers are breadtube the woke preachers funded by the CIA and video essays as a whole are the most reddit thing on YouTube. Where do you think most of these pretentious stuck ups get most of there audience?
Most FO3gays can't make an argument beyond "muh atmosphere" (despite the fact that the atmosphere falls apart with like half the quests in the game), so it's not surprising that these people make moronic comparisons like that.
Nice spammed cherrypicked image. You got an actual argument?
tbf I like FNV better but F3 did have an awesome atmosphere and was fun to explore. Why can't people just like both games?
It didn't have a good atmosphere at all, like I said it fell apart with like half the quests in the game, and the exploration is dogshit because there's barely anything worthwhile to find. It's fine to like a bad game, just stop pretending it does these things well.
Dunwich Building wasn't fun to explore? Did it have bad atmosphere too?
I'm talking about the whole game here and I don't even remember that place so it couldn't have been that good.
Talking about 3 here, NV isn't part of the conversation. Unlike 3gays I can can make an argument without arbitrarily bringing NV into it.
Then explain how half the quests makes the atmosphere fall apart. Do you want to talk about all of the invisible walls FNV had? Isn't that "atmosphere breaking"?
Half of them are "wacky" bullshit. That stupid superhero one is so fricking moronic it alone makes anyone acting as if the atmosphere is "great" even close a laughing stock. Also again, NV isn't relevant, stop bringing it up, it's not impossible for this game to be shit on its own merits anyway.
>complains about unique characters in a post apocalyptic universe where people have brain damage from radiation exposure
Black person, the Fallout franchise is known to have "wacky bullshit" like that. Did you not play the first two?
Name 1(one) quest in Fallout 1 or 2 that comes even close to two "superheroes" fighting for essentially no reason beyond "haha they're not doing logical things in the wasteland XD" that isn't a rare random encounter.
killing the rat god
>rat grew big and smarter because it mutated
wow so "wacky" and totally comparable
>didn't play the quest
I did play the quest, it's one of the earliest in the game. That's all there is to it, it grew big and smart enough to talk because it mutated. It doesn't frick over the atmosphere the game has because it's entirely reasonable and not just there for a few laughs, even if it might give you some.
Yes, my argument is that the atmosphere in 3 turns to shit with quests like that, you can't have "dreary dark wasteland" in one are and "wacky fun times" in another, it's fricking stupid. None of the other games tried playing it straight the whole game but they had limits, which 3 clearly doesn't.
Two larping morons doesn't "break the atmosphere". If you can't accept that then you're the moron.
How does it not? Fallout 3 bends over backwards to try and put up this picture of how the wasteland is fricking terrible and everyone's barely hanging on, but then it has quests like that and an entire vault of clones that you basically can't take seriously whatsoever. You can't have both if you want a consistent atmosphere.
>Fallout 3 bends over backwards to try and put up this picture of how the wasteland is fricking terrible and everyone's barely hanging on, but then it has quests like that and an entire vault of clones that you basically can't take seriously whatsoever
Black person, like I've said EVERY Fallout game has shit "you can't take seriously". That's what makes people love Fallout. It can have quests where you can become a literal pornstar while still being able to hold a cruel and grim atmosphere. What the frick are you not comprehending about this? It sounds like Fallout games just aren't for you, go play your souls games or some shit, homosexual.
None of the other games compare to the dichotomy 3 has between the world and quests like that. Like I'm not gonna pretend Fallout is a super serious series but you can't look at me with a straight face and say that some less serious moments here and there are equivalent to the shit 3 pulls half the time. 3 has quite possibly the worst atmosphere in any game I've played, the game tries to make you feel bad about your fricking dad dying one second while having an entire vault of the exact same moron saying his name over and over the next.
I fail to see how two dipshits LARPing as superheroes is any more moronic than a whole army of dipshits who LARP as Romans while wearing football gear and chucking spears
>bringing up NV
>again
The two guys larping as hero and villain aren't doing it for any genuine reason. One is an engineer who was mildly autistic, the other is a woman who was raised around giant ants, learned to control them and started having them attack and eat random people. The whole point is both did it for attention and their interaction feels forced, poorly written, poorly voiced and the town they're doing it in...isn't even a town. It has 4 people living in broken glass houses with skeletons in their bathtubs.
Caesar uses a surface level knowledge of Rome to manipulate tribals who would've otherwise wiped themselves out in another conflict or cannibalized themselves for sustenance or outright sadism. Even he thinks its bullshit for a greater goal.
>The two guys larping as hero and villain aren't doing it for any genuine reason
They're doing it because they're radiated morons. morons dont need a "geuine reason"
Ghouls are more fried by radiation than they are yet almost all the ones you meet that aren't the generic feral ones speak rationally to you, hell one is even a companion with his own honor code. They're just two idiots in a mediocre questline.
>They're just two idiots in a mediocre questline
Okay, that's exactly what they are. Not everything needs a reason behind it, especially when you're talking about morons. But how does this single questline "break the atmosphere"?
>b-because they stupid
>they dont have uh reazonn
Theres multiple things that break Fo3's atmosphere besides that its just one of the more renowned reasons because its so tone deaf amongst everything else it tries to present. The quest is shit. Could it have been better? Not under Bethesda.
There are literal aliens in the Fallout universe but two morons larping is where you draw the line? You don't seem like a Fallout fan at all.
>and the exploration is dogshit because there's barely anything worthwhile to find
Same for NV, famalam
You're wasting your breath, NVgays can't stand it when someone even dares to suggest that a Beth Fallout may have done something just a little bit better than their precious FO3 asset flip
If the dude making the video is interesting I don't mind some of these extended answer type videos. You don't watch them of course they are just on in the background while you play low energy shit like civ games or Diablo
Today I remind them.
Literally doesn't mean anything.
Reminder that video essays are only made because they abuse the frick out of the al gore rhythm and you can jam like 30 commercials in there for maximum israeliteing.
Fallout 3 is just "fine", new vegas is just "good". That's it. They play the exact same. The only difference is that the story and themes of New Vegas are more faithful to classic fallout.
>ten fricking years of sycophants making 4+ hour long videos filled with hyperbolic statements and forced politics over buggy as frick games that weren't even that even that good to begin with
ENOUGH.
>They play the exact same
Almost true except the design in New Vegas is much better.
Fallout Boys, this can't be happening
tldnr
>game has tons of optional non mandatory collectibles
>guy decides to collect them all
>docks game points for all the pointless collectables
NV is trash.
NV trannies cope about how the legion can somehow contest with the NCR wearing football pads and swords.