b***h please. >RX 570 >No SATA III ports >PC can't handle hair graphics >Cyberpunk 2077 can play Ultra setting but has to remove shadows + pixelated hair.
>Doesn't 570 have 4GB RAM?
There's an 8GB version as well. >Can you even run Windows?
Windows takes like 200MB of VRAM, but it depends on what you're running. Hardware acceleration = runs on the GPU = requires VRAM. In other words, watching a video on YouTube eats a bit of your VRAM.
Most AAA games released in 2020-ish and earlier rarely require more than 4GB of VRAM. Unless you use (often optional) 4K textures.
>Most AAA games released in 2020-ish and earlier rarely require more than 4GB of VRAM
just lower texture quality, i dont know why would you need 8k textures on 1080p monitor
Gtx 1070
I'm thinking of getting an entirely new build but I really can't justify the cost.
Ultrawide monitor ~1000 CAD
GPU ~1000 CAD
Mobo (ecc capable, bluetooth) ~1000 CAD
That's 3k CAD out of the gate and I haven't even included CPU, storage drives, enclosure, PSU, RAM, peripherals.
>israelite tactic
The leaks actually say that it should have higher performance and lower MSRP than 4070 Ti. Now how that will translate to the distributor price is another question. I do think it will be higher than 4070 TI but still much cheaper than 4080 (and same RAM).
Nvidia cards not called 4070 and 4090 are selling like shit. And the 7800XT is competing well with the 4070, Nvidia had to lower the price of the 4070 recently.
Imo, the 4070TiS and 4080S will be a lot better than the current models because no one wants them. The 4070S on the other hand will be a minor improvement.
Because if they announce a price cut, they are admitting this generation was a flop. It shows weakness. So they launch new products to replace the older ones, so the company looks stronger + users are more inclined to buy a "new" product than a cheaper old product (even if price-performance is effectively the same).
>Most AAA games released in 2020-ish and earlier rarely require more than 4GB of VRAM
just lower texture quality, i dont know why would you need 8k textures on 1080p monitor
You don't even have to lower textures, most games from last gen max out at 3-4GB of VRAM. You don't need more. Towards the end of the generation they started releasing games that make use of 6-8GB of VRAM, usually in the form of optional 4K texture DLC packs.
This generation, 6-8GB is the bare minimum. You can't lower texture quality because 8GB is the minimum already.
Studio Wildcard is run by incompetent morons. Why would I ever touch their new shit? At least I can mod and tweak the old Ark to my liking and make it bearable. Back on topic though, I want faster load times and seamless gameplay for said games. Especially 7DTD. I get horrible stuttering and pixelation during horde nights.
A 970m. Still runs great but I feel like I need to upgrade for better load times on the games I've been playing recently (Stellaris, Wartales, Kingdom Survival and Civ6).
Don't spend money on a fancy GPU for games that won't utilize it, wait until there's a new GPU-intensive title you want to play that'd actually make the upgrade noticeable
I recommend going with an RX 580 and deciding how much to spend on the CPU (7600/7600x as the absolute ceiling, to get in the door for future AM5 releases even worst case) based on whether or not you see yourself dipping your toes into AAA gaming in the foreseeable future or not (probably anything would be better than your old laptop CPU), your use case doesn't need much
Been using these for like 5 years now, i do have enough money to upgrade despite being slightly below middle class, but i really dont care for modern triple A grafixslop gaming, the good games run fine and above 60 fps anyways
>gt 1030
are you moronic? even nvidia realized that card does not deserve the gtx tag and called it gt lmao, im honestly not sure if 3200g integrated gpu isnt better
>im honestly not sure if 3200g integrated gpu isnt better
Vega 8, probably not.
But keep in mind there are two versions of the GT 1030: a GDDR5 version, which is... bad, but not THAT bad. And a DDR4 version, with the same exact name, with half the performance.
gt1030 had 80$ msrp, you could easily find a gtx 970 or something similar for that price which would absolute shit on that card in terms of performance we are talking 3 or 4 times the framerate
I'm not saying the 1030 is a good card, but it's not THAT bad. Maybe the DDR4 version is, but definitely not the GGDR5 version.
During that same period, a new RX 580 was like $130 by the way. And Vega56s were selling for around $250. AMD cards went on a fire sale in 2019, after the mining boom the year prior.
So a used 970 wasn't even that great of a deal compared to what was available on the new market.
no it wasnt, you could easily buy older ryzen 5 1600af(aka 2600 without integrated gpu) instead of useless 4core 3200g to save money on cpu and buy a better gpu, probably still have better performance, that """"GPU """" was also overpriced pile of trash you could find better with minimal effort.
Why would anyone buy a 4070 over a 7800XT? You get more VRAM, more power, more cache, driver level FSR frame gen and upscaling, etc for same price if not lower. A Powercolor or Sapphire card also has a beefier heatsink than your typical Nvidia partner card like Gigabyte or MSI.
I'm on 5704g. It's alright. I can play all the new resident evils with only a bit of stuttering and a few crashes, which is mostly my shitty fx8350s fault anyway. I wish they would fix the newer drivers so they don't instacrash your pc if you try to overclock this card though. I'm missing out on performance in some games by having to use an older driver version.
wow man you are so cool to be playing on outdated hardware. I just have to validate you.
Thanks man. I really appreciate it!
>tranimals
kys
*fards and shids on your forehead*
Only Black folk and Chinks dislike animals.
>Verification not required.
>immediately sniffs his own shit
rent free
mad respect from me too fellahs
FSR3 Frame Gen mod will help you bwo
b***h please.
>RX 570
>No SATA III ports
>PC can't handle hair graphics
>Cyberpunk 2077 can play Ultra setting but has to remove shadows + pixelated hair.
Doesn't 570 have 4GB RAM? Can you even run Windows? 😮
570 4gb
Really serious. It took me an hour until I found what caused those lag on UserSettings.json.
>It took me an hour until I found what caused those lag on UserSettings.json.
what does cause lag?
help a 1650 laptopgay out
>Doesn't 570 have 4GB RAM?
There's an 8GB version as well.
>Can you even run Windows?
Windows takes like 200MB of VRAM, but it depends on what you're running. Hardware acceleration = runs on the GPU = requires VRAM. In other words, watching a video on YouTube eats a bit of your VRAM.
Most AAA games released in 2020-ish and earlier rarely require more than 4GB of VRAM. Unless you use (often optional) 4K textures.
>Most AAA games released in 2020-ish and earlier rarely require more than 4GB of VRAM
just lower texture quality, i dont know why would you need 8k textures on 1080p monitor
Are you serious you can run cyberpunk ultra? Not even my GTX 1070 can.
Gtx 1070
I'm thinking of getting an entirely new build but I really can't justify the cost.
Ultrawide monitor ~1000 CAD
GPU ~1000 CAD
Mobo (ecc capable, bluetooth) ~1000 CAD
That's 3k CAD out of the gate and I haven't even included CPU, storage drives, enclosure, PSU, RAM, peripherals.
If you wanted to play Ark or 7 days to die, would you get a 4070TI or 7900XTX ?
I'm waiting for the RTX 4070 TI Super, should release by end of Jan if the leaks are true
expect it will be overpriced to hell.
Yeah I also think so. But it will be a much better value regardless I'm sure. At least it has 16 GB RAM over 12 GB that the base Ti has.
>Ti Super
wtf is this israelite tactic, why not just make it 4080 already
>israelite tactic
The leaks actually say that it should have higher performance and lower MSRP than 4070 Ti. Now how that will translate to the distributor price is another question. I do think it will be higher than 4070 TI but still much cheaper than 4080 (and same RAM).
>higher performance and lower MSRP than 4070 Ti
i do not believe that for a second, especially from NVISRAEL
Nvidia cards not called 4070 and 4090 are selling like shit. And the 7800XT is competing well with the 4070, Nvidia had to lower the price of the 4070 recently.
Imo, the 4070TiS and 4080S will be a lot better than the current models because no one wants them. The 4070S on the other hand will be a minor improvement.
Because if they announce a price cut, they are admitting this generation was a flop. It shows weakness. So they launch new products to replace the older ones, so the company looks stronger + users are more inclined to buy a "new" product than a cheaper old product (even if price-performance is effectively the same).
You don't even have to lower textures, most games from last gen max out at 3-4GB of VRAM. You don't need more. Towards the end of the generation they started releasing games that make use of 6-8GB of VRAM, usually in the form of optional 4K texture DLC packs.
This generation, 6-8GB is the bare minimum. You can't lower texture quality because 8GB is the minimum already.
no
the new Ark sucks and the old one and 7 Days to Die can run comfortably on poverty cards
Studio Wildcard is run by incompetent morons. Why would I ever touch their new shit? At least I can mod and tweak the old Ark to my liking and make it bearable. Back on topic though, I want faster load times and seamless gameplay for said games. Especially 7DTD. I get horrible stuttering and pixelation during horde nights.
Will a high end GPU necessarily fix that?
What do you have now?
A 970m. Still runs great but I feel like I need to upgrade for better load times on the games I've been playing recently (Stellaris, Wartales, Kingdom Survival and Civ6).
Those games' load times are CPU-bound
Don't spend money on a fancy GPU for games that won't utilize it, wait until there's a new GPU-intensive title you want to play that'd actually make the upgrade noticeable
I recommend going with an RX 580 and deciding how much to spend on the CPU (7600/7600x as the absolute ceiling, to get in the door for future AM5 releases even worst case) based on whether or not you see yourself dipping your toes into AAA gaming in the foreseeable future or not (probably anything would be better than your old laptop CPU), your use case doesn't need much
i hope you are using SSD otherwise you wont see any improvement
gtx 970 and theres no game i want to play i cant run.
hey his lil ear is wearin the santa hat
Been using these for like 5 years now, i do have enough money to upgrade despite being slightly below middle class, but i really dont care for modern triple A grafixslop gaming, the good games run fine and above 60 fps anyways
>gt 1030
are you moronic? even nvidia realized that card does not deserve the gtx tag and called it gt lmao, im honestly not sure if 3200g integrated gpu isnt better
>im honestly not sure if 3200g integrated gpu isnt better
Vega 8, probably not.
But keep in mind there are two versions of the GT 1030: a GDDR5 version, which is... bad, but not THAT bad. And a DDR4 version, with the same exact name, with half the performance.
gt1030 had 80$ msrp, you could easily find a gtx 970 or something similar for that price which would absolute shit on that card in terms of performance we are talking 3 or 4 times the framerate
I'm not saying the 1030 is a good card, but it's not THAT bad. Maybe the DDR4 version is, but definitely not the GGDR5 version.
During that same period, a new RX 580 was like $130 by the way. And Vega56s were selling for around $250. AMD cards went on a fire sale in 2019, after the mining boom the year prior.
So a used 970 wasn't even that great of a deal compared to what was available on the new market.
its absolutely abysmal, even 5 year old mid range GPU would shit on it
Not moronic, just poor lol, it was my best choice 5 years ago
no it wasnt, you could easily buy older ryzen 5 1600af(aka 2600 without integrated gpu) instead of useless 4core 3200g to save money on cpu and buy a better gpu, probably still have better performance, that """"GPU """" was also overpriced pile of trash you could find better with minimal effort.
Why would anyone buy a 4070 over a 7800XT? You get more VRAM, more power, more cache, driver level FSR frame gen and upscaling, etc for same price if not lower. A Powercolor or Sapphire card also has a beefier heatsink than your typical Nvidia partner card like Gigabyte or MSI.
have fun with your shitty performance on ray tracing and supersampling anon
cope and seethe
> disable ray tracing
There, not a problem anymore. A better argument would be driver support.
I have a 960 I think, that's gotta be worse. But I'm upgrading soon because it got damaged.
If you buy a used RX 6600 at 200 USD and play at the same graphical fidelity it would amortize itself after:
at 4 hours gaming a day:
at 0.10 USD per kw/h: 13.5 years,
at 0.20 USD per kw/h: 6.75 years,
at 0.30 USD per kw/h: 4.5 years,
half for 8 hours gaming a day,
a third for 12 hours gaming a day.
This is like being on an earlier pentium 4 system in 2012
rx 480 is basically same card as rx 580 which is legendary and probably lets him play most games even today.
I'm on 5704g. It's alright. I can play all the new resident evils with only a bit of stuttering and a few crashes, which is mostly my shitty fx8350s fault anyway. I wish they would fix the newer drivers so they don't instacrash your pc if you try to overclock this card though. I'm missing out on performance in some games by having to use an older driver version.