I'm more surprised by the volume of damage control. Literally thousands of pajeets on all social media platforms trying to make Starflop look not so bad
> landing and taking off from planets reduced to cutscenes like it was 2004 > can't land where you want > no land vehicles whatsoever! have to walk all the time gets boring, no rovers > no alien races, just boring humans > no real space flight, just a hd screensaver as you fly towards infinity > cant swim or do underwater activities > loading screen for every single building > literal ripoff of Kotor starmap storyline > only 4 cities out of a 1000 planets, rest are barren wastelands > cant walk around planet > basically, not even a real space sim but just fallout in fake space with more loading screens > atrocious combat and AI > every planet drenched in a mega generic shader filter making it look like a cheap movie > animals look like really poor version of skyrim fauna > woke characters that all speak english with moronic accents > hypergeneric design, somehow looks more soulless than no mans sky > hit F to harvest, press X to mine material npc game loop > literal sounds in space, unrealistic > no children across 1000 planets > idiotic hypercheesy tropes about star maps and finding alien life > overall aesthetics literally leaves no impression, everything looks and sounds bland > no sex scenes or even romances, literally not even bare breasts or even a single strip club across 1000 planets! > appears to run like trash, framedrops galore, 30 fps max on console
Hey look the protagonist main character who you look at for 100% of the game has more detail and effort put in than an NPC in an open-world game the size of a universe. How terrible.
>bethesda game can't even achieve PS3 level of detail
Meanwhile shit like RDR2 looks straight up better than Starfield despite being a last gen game that runs at native 4K on One X.
>look this pre-rendered promo pic looks better than an in-game screenshot
games are getting worse but it’s like you’re trying to disprove that by making a shitty argument
>compare a game made by some of the most talented devs to ever enter this industry to bethesda garbage
Yeah I wonder what's the difference between the two.
The thing I just don't understand is how Bethesda has somehow made skin and clothing textures look like plastic / play-doh in Fallout 4 and now Starfield.
I think they're just afraid of adding blemishes and things to make the characters look real, they just look off putting. I don't know if it's the lighting or something, but that issue seemed to have carried over for the skin and face textures.
This isn’t about lack of artistic talent… well it is but it’s not the main contributor, that would be the fact that these companies are cutting as many corners as they can to save a buck.
I've had more fun playing this game made by one Fin with 10 cases of hootch in a shack in the middle of nowhere than every single AAA game since 2012. So yea, completely.
Why do people always act lile graphics are everything? Who cares if starfield isnt as graphically intense as RDR or other games? I genuinely can not understand it. WHO FRICKING CARES SO MUCH ABOUT GRAPHICS????
I bet Starfield still doesn't do subsurface scattering, which is something even Skyrim mods solved ages ago. Probably one of the main reasons why characters look like plastic dolls.
people seriously still think bethesda is good for some reason and I don't know why
redditard mentality accounts for 90+% of the gay ming market now. it's going to keep getting worse.
we went from ironically praising Todd to people unironically praising Todd because of memes.
They market their rpgs as YOU CAN DO ANYTHING and people fall for it.
>see that mountain? xD
Molyneux lives on in Todd Howard
name one modern game/rpg where you can enter every single house or building.
What's the point, do you roleplay as a burglar every playthrough?
>what's the point in making the world feel more lively?
Shadows of Doubt
Literally every single building, and every single room in those buildings it accessible, usually by several means.
I'm quite mad this kept crashing, even with GE-Proton. maybe I'll be able to get out of the first house by the time there's a full release.
RDR2
AC Unity?
blame redditards and pc gamers hyping this garbage company because MUH SKYRIM SO LE HECKING COOL WITH 6044 MODS
I'm more surprised by the volume of damage control. Literally thousands of pajeets on all social media platforms trying to make Starflop look not so bad
>Muh obsidian
>Muh star wars slop
>Muh troon vegas
KYS
> landing and taking off from planets reduced to cutscenes like it was 2004
> can't land where you want
> no land vehicles whatsoever! have to walk all the time gets boring, no rovers
> no alien races, just boring humans
> no real space flight, just a hd screensaver as you fly towards infinity
> cant swim or do underwater activities
> loading screen for every single building
> literal ripoff of Kotor starmap storyline
> only 4 cities out of a 1000 planets, rest are barren wastelands
> cant walk around planet
> basically, not even a real space sim but just fallout in fake space with more loading screens
> atrocious combat and AI
> every planet drenched in a mega generic shader filter making it look like a cheap movie
> animals look like really poor version of skyrim fauna
> woke characters that all speak english with moronic accents
> hypergeneric design, somehow looks more soulless than no mans sky
> hit F to harvest, press X to mine material npc game loop
> literal sounds in space, unrealistic
> no children across 1000 planets
> idiotic hypercheesy tropes about star maps and finding alien life
> overall aesthetics literally leaves no impression, everything looks and sounds bland
> no sex scenes or even romances, literally not even bare breasts or even a single strip club across 1000 planets!
> appears to run like trash, framedrops galore, 30 fps max on console
...and the shills still eat it up.
its been regressing for a while now
Nobody would be complaining about Starfield if it was also on Playstation.
new bethesda drone cope
>c-cope...
was PS2 killzone good at all? i want to play some old games on pcsx2
Nobody would be complaining about starfield if it was called
>the legend of zelda: No breath in space
Hey look the protagonist main character who you look at for 100% of the game has more detail and effort put in than an NPC in an open-world game the size of a universe. How terrible.
hahahaha cope!
>bethesda game can't even achieve PS3 level of detail
Meanwhile shit like RDR2 looks straight up better than Starfield despite being a last gen game that runs at native 4K on One X.
>open-world game the size of a universe
>the size of a universe
The universe is larger by a magnitude of literal trillions, morono.
>look this pre-rendered promo pic looks better than an in-game screenshot
games are getting worse but it’s like you’re trying to disprove that by making a shitty argument
m8.. i mean the 360 and ps3 have shit in game resolutions but the model looks like that.
Anon, his his beard looks like he’s wearing that black ice shit black people were to fake their hairlines. That looks so low quality kek
It's not pre-rendered.
Left is RDR2, obviously.
If you insist...
>compare a game made by some of the most talented devs to ever enter this industry to bethesda garbage
Yeah I wonder what's the difference between the two.
How much worse does RDR2 make Starfield look?
What will be the hardware requirements for right?
2080 but knowing how shit bethesda are its probably a 3060 - 3070 requirement.
>defined motion-captured protagonist in a movie game
VS
>NPC modeled using in-game character creation in a huge RPG
>one of the best artists in the industry
vs
>todd slop
AAA gaming has been "regressing" for a long time now. Stop giving these slop factories money.
looks better than starfield tbh
The thing I just don't understand is how Bethesda has somehow made skin and clothing textures look like plastic / play-doh in Fallout 4 and now Starfield.
I think they're just afraid of adding blemishes and things to make the characters look real, they just look off putting. I don't know if it's the lighting or something, but that issue seemed to have carried over for the skin and face textures.
his head looks too big
Why does this game look so bad? It looks somehow more jarring than FO4, especially faces looking like plastic.
How did they forget how to make decent looking hair? They already had that figured out in FO4.
>ps3 hair
lil bro doesn't remember how bad FO4 models were.
Judging from the blur this is base PS4?
Anyways on PC they were better than ones in Starfield. Notice the skin and the hair and compare it to Starfield
This isn’t about lack of artistic talent… well it is but it’s not the main contributor, that would be the fact that these companies are cutting as many corners as they can to save a buck.
Yeah, unironically yeah
damn that beard looks like shit
Wierd fetish but thanks for sharing.
The west is declining homie
Jews forced too many immigrants in
Yeah, but Rockstar games have always been boring. Starfield will at least be fun.
Todd literally said Rockstar was the great dev in the world lmao
>procedurally generate garbage
>fun
No.
Niᥒtend𐐬 convinced everyone that high graphics is a meme while child-friendly, safe gameplay, and gay colors are what important in video games
Were they wrong?
No, nintendo proofed that great games
hardware.
If your console is 1/10th of the power but still has some of the bests games of that generation, you proof that gameplay>>gfx
Always has
>you
I'm not even going to play starfield, but if you think a screenshot graphical comparison is proof that gaming is regressing you should stop now
Millenials and their laziness is killing it.
I've had more fun playing this game made by one Fin with 10 cases of hootch in a shack in the middle of nowhere than every single AAA game since 2012. So yea, completely.
PS2 games look like THAT?
>regressing
>Bethesda
they always were in decline, op
>predefined character looks good
>character made by jiggling sliders everywhere looks bad
Woah
Why do people always act lile graphics are everything? Who cares if starfield isnt as graphically intense as RDR or other games? I genuinely can not understand it. WHO FRICKING CARES SO MUCH ABOUT GRAPHICS????
I bet Starfield still doesn't do subsurface scattering, which is something even Skyrim mods solved ages ago. Probably one of the main reasons why characters look like plastic dolls.
Yet another snoy cope and seethe thread
Keep those salty tears flowing.