There's plenty of lazy talented people who die in obscurity, and there's some non-talented folks who get ahead via underhanded means like getting lucky and coasting on brand recognition and mass market appeal. Their ideas can be shit but they can still be "successful" if the metric for success is money.
"talent"
"motivation"
"stubornness"
"less agreeable than a woman"
"Not be born in China"
"Preferably born in America with the rest of the western world as 2nd choice, but not a Black person or you will forever second guess yourself if it is genuine or because of mandates and numbers"
So ehmm about 1 sixth right I guess.
No, he's a little b***h. He's a fricking police officer, he's already more successful than most other people. He's just a homosexual whiner who would find 5000 yen and b***h it wasn't 10,000.
Talent in itself doesn't honestly mean much, it's basically just a form of potential, and potential isn't always met for one reason or another.
As per usual the real answer is sort of boring and honestly not really that simple if you want to get into it on a deep level.
Success is a subjective view you gauge yourself by, nothing else. So he's wrong. If I consider myself successful for having a roof over my head then I'm successful, regardless of what others say.
Talent itself is a concept that doesn't really exist, of course you need to learn, practice, and apply yourself. But anyone parroting that "it's just hard work" is full of bullshit. Even with the same socioeconomic starting point, not everyone is going to have the potential or capacity to learn and get good at the same things with the same amount of work, and thinking so is just naive.
50/50
It's an oversimplification, but broadly speaking yes
There's plenty of lazy talented people who die in obscurity, and there's some non-talented folks who get ahead via underhanded means like getting lucky and coasting on brand recognition and mass market appeal. Their ideas can be shit but they can still be "successful" if the metric for success is money.
So he's technically wrong.
The same threads. The same images. Every single day. For years.
Missing out looks, but yeah kinda.
"talent"
"motivation"
"stubornness"
"less agreeable than a woman"
"Not be born in China"
"Preferably born in America with the rest of the western world as 2nd choice, but not a Black person or you will forever second guess yourself if it is genuine or because of mandates and numbers"
So ehmm about 1 sixth right I guess.
There have been many successful Black folk before being a Black person came with social advantages
Adachi could actually live good quiet life with no worries. He could even succeed but he was thought he was owed something greater.
No, he's a little b***h. He's a fricking police officer, he's already more successful than most other people. He's just a homosexual whiner who would find 5000 yen and b***h it wasn't 10,000.
Talent in itself doesn't honestly mean much, it's basically just a form of potential, and potential isn't always met for one reason or another.
As per usual the real answer is sort of boring and honestly not really that simple if you want to get into it on a deep level.
> Slurrrrrrrrrppppp……
Success is a subjective view you gauge yourself by, nothing else. So he's wrong. If I consider myself successful for having a roof over my head then I'm successful, regardless of what others say.
sounds like some hardcore coping
Speak for yourself
Pretty sure he just did.
Adachi is an Incel-Simp who ruined his life over a woman.
That's the real Redpill
Imagine being a cop in Japan and thinking you have a bad life.
Talent itself is a concept that doesn't really exist, of course you need to learn, practice, and apply yourself. But anyone parroting that "it's just hard work" is full of bullshit. Even with the same socioeconomic starting point, not everyone is going to have the potential or capacity to learn and get good at the same things with the same amount of work, and thinking so is just naive.