is it fun and worth $10?

is it fun and worth $10?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Linzi is best waifu

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't frick books

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        coward

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fun
    yes
    >$10
    absolutely

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes because you can frick demons

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God the idea of her having gotten mating pressed raped by monstrous demons is so hot.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's pretty much explicitly implied that she does do that if you let her become corrupted again, when you meet back with her

        WILL I ENJOY THIS GAME IF I HAVE ONLY PLAYED DIVINITY 2 AND BALDUR'S GATE 3?

        No

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Stop being a cuck for a second and be the monstrous demon

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, I want the entire Abyss to have cummed in my wife Arueshalae. From the lowliest dretch to the most endowed Balor.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            they already did that

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How did you get these scenes?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You need to pass a persuasion check to convince her to frick you while shapeshifted

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ...Pathfinder did it first before BG3?
              Learned something new today.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yep
                No, it's just the regular sex scene but you can do it while shapeshifted, but the game doesn't acknowledge it in dialogue

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >God the idea of her having gotten mating pressed raped by one righteous paladin to seal their vow of holy matrimony is so hot
        FTFY

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes if you like build autism and succubus sex.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you're into CRPGs, yes
    If not, then no
    Pathfinder is about as overwhelming as you can get with CRPGs, as far as I know at least
    They're not particularly difficult, they just demand a lot of knowledge about their system and there's also a shitload of things to learn

    Also, it's exposition central, so expect every other question to go into 5 long paragraphs of events that could be summed up in two short paragraphs

    Other than that, probably in the Top 5 CRPGs out there

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >they just demand a lot of knowledge about their system and there's also a shitload of things to learn
      sounds kinda fun for the hours you get out of it at least

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's fun and not as complicated as some anons say
        If you're familiar with dnd and have played neverwinter nights for example, you're already halfway there

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is once you know what's what, and how to make builds really synergize with your party members, and what works and what doesn't, etc
        Until then it's agony, lots of googling, and praying you're not fricking your character up
        But I'm pretty sure you can reroll with the Pathfinder npc

        It's fun and not as complicated as some anons say
        If you're familiar with dnd and have played neverwinter nights for example, you're already halfway there

        Like I said, if you like CRPGs you're probably half way there
        But if you've only played like BG3 once or twice, or Dragon Age Origins, or no CRPGs at all, then you should avoid having Pathfinder as your first one
        You'll get overwhelmed and quit

        It's far from the hardest out there, it's just too much to dump on someone who's trying to get into the genre

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Also, it's exposition central, so expect every other question to go into 5 long paragraphs of events that could be summed up in two short paragraphs
      but enough about Pillars, this is a WotR thread.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What he said applies 100% to Pathfinder, even if PoE is worse, don't kid yourself

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pillars is significantly worse, but WotR also has that issue. Most CRPGs do, it's just that WotR has no excuse because it also has really interesting characters and lore but they fail to sell you on it through the dialogue
        As gay as BG3 and DOS2 can be, they at least figured out how to make conversations come off as natural and two sided, as opposed to one side having a manic episode and telling you their entire life story after meeting them for the first time

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          BG3 went way too far the other way, far past the point where I couldn't tell exactly what my goal was in a lot of the quests until I advanced them or in some cases finished them and read the journal entries (which were often wildly different to what had actually happened). 100% fullvoice in that game really sucked, CRPGs NEED a ton of expository writing regardless of how good you think your engine is.

          You know how in BG3 and DOS2 conversations feel relatively like conversations, as opposed to exposition dumps?
          This game is the opposite, every conversation is an exposition dump.
          If your zoomer brain is too fried to read several paragraphs over shit that has 0 impact on whatever is going on in game then skip this one

          I really don't think there's ever too much exposition in any of Owlcat's games, and I think you overrate how "natural" and flowing Larian's dialogues are. Just my opinion though.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't get how you can get confused by what is said during conversations or what happens during quests in BG3
            I went into BG3 understanding jack shit about DnD lore and came out fully apreciating what lore there was, the characters, and wanting to learn more

            Like, idk, whenever I see people defend the constant exposition dumps it just feels like excuses for dumb writing, to this day I still praise how DOS2 managed to convince me and fully immerse me in its world in less than 2 hours just by not dumping tons of info onto my lap and instead drip feeding me what was relevant and letting me figure out the extra as I went, to the point where I actually wanted to find more lore and history behind characters as opposed to dreading starting conversations due to questions dragging on for too long because someone felt it was relevant to tell me how they were molested by their uncle during our first ever conversation

            I think Pathfinder WotR is particularly awful at this, because I needed to use external sources to actually get invested in the lore, and some characters (particularly the ones with good alignment) are really not very good at making themselves come off as interesting

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Buy it for $10 for the sole reason that Persona 3 remake is $70.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I wish the DLC leaned into the mythics instead of making those shitty side stories. Maybe a short post game DLC per mythic like lich going on some kind unholy crusade against the living.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They already said they would never make a mythic path focused dlc

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thats really dumb

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the theory is that the core dev team was moved to rogue trader shortly after the game released. Given the complexity of the core game and its mythic paths, + almost guaranteed spaghetti code, the remaining devs tasked with the DLCs were unable to integrate new content into the existing mythics without breaking everything

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >core dev team
            The same one that released RT in a worse state than WotR?
            Owlcat is just incompetent

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              i mean we have to compare release state of WOTR to release state of RT, which to my knowledge is more or less comparable. WOTR was also a ridiculous bugfest at launch, as was kingmaker.

              i forgive them for it all though because their games are bugfests due to ambition rather than laziness.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nah RT was worse than WotR

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >post game
      You can literally end up becoming a god, or dead, or rewriting history itself, a post game dlc is impossible

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes and yes. get the bubble's buffbot mod, vanilla prebuffing will take 10hrs time of your run otherwise and i'm not exaggerating

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes and yes but play with quality of life mods. It's the most autistic when it comes to d&d. I played a character down the Azata path and by the end of the game I had 10 fricking skillbars worth of spells and skills.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it only 10 dollars right now?
    It is VERY fricking much worth 10 dollars, yeah.
    Normally I'd say "maybe", but 10 bucks?

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No to both

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do you enjoy casting buffs for three minutes before every single fight? Then this is the game for you.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    TURN TURN-BASED MODE ON IMMEDIATELY. i have no idea why it defaults to real time but it will get you to uninstall at light speed.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I dunno. I play turn based too as a personal preference but this game was clearly designed around real time combat. There is some annoying behavior if you go turn based that takes getting used to.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        its way too overwhelming when you know nothing and everythings just running around casting shit. real-time is for later to speed through encounters.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fun
    No
    >worth 10$
    Yes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A game that isn't fun isn't worth any money moron

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's so fricking bad it's unreasonable. Jesus I thought the first game had bad writing

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you like autistc crpg's, yea

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WILL I ENJOY THIS GAME IF I HAVE ONLY PLAYED DIVINITY 2 AND BALDUR'S GATE 3?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I DON'T KNOW, BUT CAPITAL QUESTION

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's pretty much explicitly implied that she does do that if you let her become corrupted again, when you meet back with her

        [...]
        No

        It plays very, very differently. DOS2 and BG3 let you dick around with verticality and environmental interactions, while the Pathfinder games reward abusing numeric mechanics.

        >baldur's gate 3
        The biggest difference between Dungeons and Dragons 5th edition (which BG3 uses) and Pathfinder system is that in Pathfinder you can use every buffing spell in the game at the same time, whereas 5th edition is limited by concentration.

        So in 5th edition, battle prep might be casting shield of faith on one person. In Pathfinder, battle prep could be casting Shielf of Faith and Blur and Heroism and Haste and Mage Armor and Bulls Strength and Cat's Grace and a dozen other spells on every single person in your party.
        Also, multiclassing on martials is insanely busted in Pathfinder. A character with a bunch of one level dips is like twice as powerful as a 1 to 20 fighter.

        Autism of that level is only needed if you play on the highest difficulty, though. For a normal playthrough you can just go straight through as one class and not worry about optimization. I personally consider optimization fun, though.

        You know how in BG3 and DOS2 conversations feel relatively like conversations, as opposed to exposition dumps?
        This game is the opposite, every conversation is an exposition dump.
        If your zoomer brain is too fried to read several paragraphs over shit that has 0 impact on whatever is going on in game then skip this one

        OKAY THANKS. I CAN HANDLE THE DIFFERENT GAMEPLAY AND AUTISM. BUT THE BETTER QUESTION IS: IS THERE GOOD SEX STUFF IN IT TO SATISFY MY COOMER BRAIN OR IS IT LIKE A 1 TIME THING WITH 1 CHARACTER?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this but unironically

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this but unironically

          There is romance and you have sex but it's always just fade to black, nothing graphic. There's no animated sex scenes like BG3

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Even BG3 barely has any sex scenes, and only Minthara gets a proper one

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          There is romance and you have sex but it's always just fade to black, nothing graphic. There's no animated sex scenes like BG3

          While they all fade to black. the implications are insanely hotter than anything BG3 or DOS2 had going for it
          People meme about BG3 being all about poorly hidden fetishes but in WotR there's a exhibitionist serial killer who likes to frick after killing , a sub who is powersexual, as in demands you to dom her 24/7 or else she'll leave to someone who will, and an actual succubus
          My one issue with Larian in regards to their romances was making them so boring in comparison

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Wendy is a fricked up gross little mutant of a spidercat, but her true love path is actually kind of cute.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >a sub who is powersexual, as in demands you to dom her 24/7 or else she'll leave to someone who will
            I failed like a single persuasion check and this creature leaves in the middle of the night for some demon
            It felt good to kill her when it was time to become a Lich

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What part of "24/7" did you not understand, bonehead?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It plays very, very differently. DOS2 and BG3 let you dick around with verticality and environmental interactions, while the Pathfinder games reward abusing numeric mechanics.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd say pathfinder's combat is more about having fun blapping people as a spooky scary lich etc rather than presenting a puzle to be solved. That kind of power scaling results in the fights which are intended to be difficult not so much being intended to be resolved using smarts but by sheer overwhelming force.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >baldur's gate 3
      The biggest difference between Dungeons and Dragons 5th edition (which BG3 uses) and Pathfinder system is that in Pathfinder you can use every buffing spell in the game at the same time, whereas 5th edition is limited by concentration.

      So in 5th edition, battle prep might be casting shield of faith on one person. In Pathfinder, battle prep could be casting Shielf of Faith and Blur and Heroism and Haste and Mage Armor and Bulls Strength and Cat's Grace and a dozen other spells on every single person in your party.
      Also, multiclassing on martials is insanely busted in Pathfinder. A character with a bunch of one level dips is like twice as powerful as a 1 to 20 fighter.

      Autism of that level is only needed if you play on the highest difficulty, though. For a normal playthrough you can just go straight through as one class and not worry about optimization. I personally consider optimization fun, though.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't a 1-20 Cavalier capable of deleting enemies from existence on a charge even on high difficulties?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          a level 20 martial isn't "bad", it's just that they're substantially weaker than an optimal build. You'll be able to one-shot most fodder enemies with any halfway competent build.

          One of the biggest advantages of multiclassing in pathfinder isn't the damage boost, though; it's the saves. Your saves will be much, MUCH higher on a multiclass character than a "normal" one because every class gets a large amount of saves on level 1. Failing a save can be really crippling, especially if you aren't save scumming. Plus you'll have a

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You know how in BG3 and DOS2 conversations feel relatively like conversations, as opposed to exposition dumps?
      This game is the opposite, every conversation is an exposition dump.
      If your zoomer brain is too fried to read several paragraphs over shit that has 0 impact on whatever is going on in game then skip this one

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      BG3 has very high production value so temper your expectations a little

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He said he played DOS2, that game doesn't even compare to BG3 in terms of produciton values

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you like autistic buildhomosexualry, then yes, it's a dream come true.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fun
    For a few dozen hours, then you realize there's nothing to the game but theorycrafting builds, which would be fine were it to have good gameplay - it doesn't.
    >worth $10
    No. Still got items, feats and class features not working properly 2 years after release.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Should I get the DLC? the $12 is easy, but I dunno if the expacs are necessary.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The DLC is neither necessary nor recommended. Though if you pick up Kingmaker, make sure it includes Wildcards.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I will just pick up the $12 base game in that case. Thanks friend.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Only the last sarkorians
      Maybe the lord of nothing if you want 15 new class archetypes

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    people think depth means you need a phd to play it but that just the morons who put the game on unfair difficulty before understanding the systems and then have to bruteforce through by copying some OP build and then perpetuate the myth of the game being impossible

    in fact the depth of the system means you can play it 100 different ways, unlike shallow systems and games like 5e/bg3, where you have no choices no options and the character building is incredibly shallow

    in pf games you can be a martial 2h, martial dual, martial crit fish, a summoner, a DC caster in a bunch of different schools, a touch caster, a debuffer, a dispeller, a vital striker, etc etc etc. and that's all without the additional options you can do with the mythics paths and even mods. The fun of this game is coming up with new builds and bringing them to fruition - morons think this is "optimizing", it has nothing to do with optimizing, it's the opposite: creativity, which other games completely lack in comparison

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think my favorite build concept is the maximum natural attack build.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rate my build

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Suicide worthy

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You did Ascend with your mom/wife, right?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, I specifically went out of my way to play demon and fulfill all the secret requirements and then I went legend because my succubus gf begged me to, just to make her suffer the *hits pipe* copypasta

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, dropkicked her son's soul back into the garbage. Ruining her plan was too hilarious.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    RT unironically has more build variety than Pathfinder. Everything plays the same here

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I still like pathfinder but you're right
      I don't know if they created this system from scratch or borrowed it but it's my favourite rpg system in recent memory or even ever
      Balance isn't great but quantity of different options and possibilities is just 10/10

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pirate it and find out

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you like power fantasy where you played as a powerful being as opposed to being instant killed from choices, sure.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No to both
    Pathfinder is a godawful system and Owlcat are incapable of making a good game, it's also still bugged to hell and and back, pirate it first

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >buying games
    You fricking sheep.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I maintain that's better than bg3 in most aspects

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *