if you have access to a focal point of vision, it doesn't affect you negatively to have more vision.
Having 360 degrees would be the best, if confusing for a while.
Actually, I have a question: if women prefer to breed with the guy on the right ( and presumably, it's been true throughout the entire human history) I would expect to see model looking dudes more often. But that's not the case.
This incomplete information. The important thing for a predator is the ability to "lock on" to prey. To do this, you need to accurately measure distance, which you can only do when both eyesights intercross.
Prey doesn't need to do that, they just need to spot danger and run, so they have side facing eyes.
Lmao imagine being an animal that gets eaten so frequently that the only survivors that breed are those with ugly ass mutant long faces so that their eyes can perceive potential predators while eating shitty grass.
Come to thing of it gets worse because your eyes are so unfocused and shit and can't perceive colors so you can't distinguish shitty food from nice food so you've doomed yourself and your descendants to persist on fricking grass while constantly being scared of predators ready to ambush you and eat you
No.
predators having better depth perception and prey animals having a bigger FoV?
absolutely true
You don't look at a monitor with the extreme peripheral FOV. You look at it with both eyes.
That doesn't even make sense
It's just contrarian homosexuals trying to justify why being worse is good
16:9 is predator and those homosexual triple curved monitor setups are prey
How about a compromise of 3 4:3 monitors?
Darius is great
What game is this?
Animal Crossing
Napoléon (1927)
prey would be an ultrawide, 16:9 is the predator
Ultrawide is prey.
16:9 is the ultimate format. Movies should be 16:9 too. I don't care how long they've been wider than that, it's still wrong.
16:9 is too thin
16:10 is the closest to human fov
If 16:10 became the standard I would be fine with that but 16:9 is close enough for me.
Close enough.
if you have access to a focal point of vision, it doesn't affect you negatively to have more vision.
Having 360 degrees would be the best, if confusing for a while.
This is the truth.
the phoneposter evades the ban faster than the sexual predator
that's 9:16 you fricking moron
Now it's 3:4 and 16:9
why is the prey running from the smartphone now?
Its running from the predator.
data collection
The guy on the right looks familiar. Guy on the left looks very generic
Actor from Lost
Actually, I have a question: if women prefer to breed with the guy on the right ( and presumably, it's been true throughout the entire human history) I would expect to see model looking dudes more often. But that's not the case.
> on the right
On the left, of course.
historically frick boys usually got themselves killed in any manner of moronic ways, still true but to a lesser extent
Left looks part asian more than anything else. Those aren't "hunter eyes" they're slanted slit eyes akin to what you see in asia.
his eyes are looking ultrawide
ultrawide chads confirmed hunters.
Yes
Yes
Are you stupid?
If you think predator eyes make it impossible to fully view a 16:9 monitor I suspect you have some sort of mental illness.
Of course not.
This is merely an unhealthy coping mechanism.
OP is out there with fricking blinkers on like a horse
4:3 in nearly every single game is just 16:9 with the sides cut off
Good, gives you the most relevant information and nothing more
more like gives you tunnel vision
imagine being so fricking blind that you can tolerate that shit
16:10 is the best aspect ratio.
unfortunately media nowadays is designed around 16:9.
I actually agree but I knew this pic would rustle jimmies so I made the thread anyways
This incomplete information. The important thing for a predator is the ability to "lock on" to prey. To do this, you need to accurately measure distance, which you can only do when both eyesights intercross.
Prey doesn't need to do that, they just need to spot danger and run, so they have side facing eyes.
Lmao imagine being an animal that gets eaten so frequently that the only survivors that breed are those with ugly ass mutant long faces so that their eyes can perceive potential predators while eating shitty grass.
Come to thing of it gets worse because your eyes are so unfocused and shit and can't perceive colors so you can't distinguish shitty food from nice food so you've doomed yourself and your descendants to persist on fricking grass while constantly being scared of predators ready to ambush you and eat you
The top is binocular field of view
The bottom is aspect ratio on a device that gives a monocular field of view
The two are completely unrelated
Cooler plays Quake at 4:3 so yes it is true.
I'm using a 4:3 monitor to post this
4:3 rocks
If you’re not using a 4:3 CRT, you just can’t compete, sorry.
why not both?
i have my old 4:3 crt as my second screen and my 16:9 main monitor.
Yes. This is also why I turn down my FoV in shooters to the minimum. I ain't no beta cuck.
For animals, yes.
For monitors, makes no difference unless you're not human, you complete fricking morons.
What does that makes me?
>even number of monitors so the middle is literally between screens.
this makes me mad.
>monitors behind his back
>literally does the s0ipoint
>looks like a s0ijack
this guy isn't for real is he, he can't be so s0i unironically
>he hasn't evolve extra eyes yet
the normies on this board I swear to god
I wish someone would do something like this and then fire up Doom or something.