It came Gankerros.
Made the thread the other day and it came.
4K 144hz 32" IPS monitor.
Looks great.
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
It came?
It came Gankerros.
Made the thread the other day and it came.
4K 144hz 32" IPS monitor.
Looks great.
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
if you're going to spend the money for a 4k desktop monitor why not go whole hog with that fancy oled display?
Entirely possible he's a moron who thinks OLED is bad, or just listened to the braintrust over on Ganker
Yep second vertical monitor, it’s a 41%er.
It's all good bro, notice the K120. None of that Tenkeyless shit. The second monitor is on an arm so it can float away from the desk.
All that money for a new monitor, yet your table is some old granny shit? And what's with the interrogation lamp?
Ultra bright lamp for work.
It's the old family dinner table made of solid wood, I have no reason to change it.
>notice the K120
Why did you point out the fact you're using a literal peasant keyboard on your tiny ass desk?
OLED IS bad though. Not so much for just watching the odd movie or playing games but it's nigh unusable for desktop/productivity.
Shame that local dimming is still WAY too fricking big, even with like 5,000 zones. It has to get to like 82,000 (a 10px by 10px zone) before it becomes somewhat viable, and more realistically, you'll need at least 300k (a 5x5 zone) before it's imperceptibly good. Less for 1440p.
Hopefully per-pixel MicroLED or ELQD becomes viable, or at the very least they use those larger versions of those technologies to drive the tiny dimming zones needed for true HDR appreciation in lieu of per-pixel brightness control.
I see you noticed the first burn-in on your oled and are starting to huff copium.
The monitors just arent close to the tv's in picture quality and while my 4 year old CX has zero burn in, on a monitor I want to be able to play mmo's or rts games for hours on end without worry
T. Own 3 oled tv's and returned my oled monitor for ips
because OLED is shit especially for a computer monitor
OLED pixels begin burning in as soon as they are used. It is a fundamentally flawed technology, and particularly bad for gaming (static huds, etc)
The HUDs are a non-issue. Static elements on a desktop are terrible for it. Scrollbars in particular. That was the first thing that burned in on my OLED. The panel has been replaced since then, but I baby the frick out of it and there is rarely a browser window (or anything productive) on it, I use a secondary monitor instead.
That's interesting and makes sense, and I take it you have the windows / whatever distro taskbar hidden?
Ps. Imagine if you played a particular game for more than 1000 hours. E.g. CS2. It would burn in the hud.
All this said I would get OLED for movies
>That's interesting and makes sense, and I take it you have the windows / whatever distro taskbar hidden?
I don't even have the taskbar on that monitor, I only have it on the secondary monitor.
>Ps. Imagine if you played a particular game for more than 1000 hours. E.g. CS2. It would burn in the hud.
Only if you played only that, and the HUD was completely static and opaque, and you never did anything else with it. The thing with OLED is that the pixels are aging, and you want them to age roughly evenly so that there isn't noticeably dim pixels in particular areas compared to the rest of the screen. With any level of variation in content, it won't be a problem. Scrollbars though? That shit is opaque, typically white, and static.
I use dark mode for my task bar and have my screen saver turn off the monitor in 30 minutes of no activity. I also keep my brightness at 75/100 because my eyes are old and hurt. The hidden taskbar setting annoys me.
>30 minutes
drop that to 5 minutes wtf lmao
if you're away from your computer you want it burning in an extra 25 minutes per time you do that for no reason?
I’ll change the sleep mode to shut off sooner but I’m not trying to drive myself nuts over the screen life, I hope to get about 5 years out of it, by then the graphics cards might be able to do 4k 240hz and I’ll pick up a new one. I figure using 75/100 brightness might help a little with the lifespan, what do you use yours at?
I just don't put anything on mine that isn't a game or video. I use a plain black background so that the pixels are not active when I'm not engaged with something. Sometimes I will turn on Wallpaper Engine, I made a hotkey for that, but that is wasting the screen's lifespan so it is stupid to do (but I like it anyway).
>5 years
>by then the graphics cards might be able to do 4k 240hz
Black person I get 4k 200hz on RDR2 on my 4090 right now
I mean on the new engines you shitter, the unreal 5 games are 40fps in 4k native.
UE5 with RT on and all settings maxed, 4k native. This is my low end. It usually hovers above 110.
That’s a cell shaded game, put on remnant 2.
>get 5 years out of it
THIS is exactly why OLED monitors are fricking moronic. You're literally okay with buying a DISPOSABLE monitor HAHAHAHAHAHA.
Then there's this guy who replaced his disposable monitor under warranty, but after that warranty ends? Guess I'll just chuck out another 1k for the latest monitor like a good goy while IPS and miniLED chads are gonna be winning. Oh wait, you bought a Samsung OLED like a drooling buffoon? Sorry, theirs doesn't cover burn-in! Google it, it's true!
if anyone has been reading this thread so far but is somehow still not convinced then let me spell it out for you. DO NOT BUY OLED, and 4K is based but only if you have a 4090.
If you're not prepared to spend $10k on a PC every year or two, maybe consoles are more your speed.
Maybe sucking wieners is more your speed OLEDgay, and your suction speed is fast, vigorous and unrelenting.
Sir, I am a MiniLEDgay, as shown here:
Despite its flaws, this monitor has put me past the point of no return. It must be at least 55" 4k165 from now on.
>Then there's this guy who replaced his disposable monitor under warranty, but after that warranty ends?
I actually had to replace it twice. The first time the whole fricking thing stopped working, not just the panel. The second time the panel started fricking up (not just burn-in) and had to be replaced. And no, I don't recommend OLED, and I especially don't recommend anything with Samsung products in it.
Yeah, Samsung has absolute dogshit qa on any of their monitors
I owned a Samsung Monitor and the backlight would always random start flickering until I turned it off and on again. I owned a Samsung TV that did the same thing. I don't know what the odds are that 2 products bought years apart would have the same problem, but they have got to be using shitty parts. They both somehow lasted for years, but it was fricking annoying.
Do you not buy a new cellphone every 5-7 years, or a new controller when the sticks are loose or the buttons stop working? I can understand 3rd worlders not wanting OLED because they want something to last until the day they die and then have their children inherit and use it their whole lives, but $200 a year for better colors isn't worth thinking about for me, I also expect I may get even longer out of my monitor. I'm not rich but my middle class life allows me to purchase indulgences like an expensive PC and monitor and expect that someday I'll replace it with something better.
My still use a HTC One M8 on LineageOS.
My last monitor before the XG2431 was the XB271HU which I sold 3 months later because it was too big and went back to my old VG248QE.
I spend more than those monitors cost in a week on food. People have all different sorts of income(or none at all) so I understand the frustration of people with OLED tech wearing out someday.
My condolences that you live in the EU. I bet the bureaucrats in Brussels are using 4090s in their computers and taking hot showers while they tell you to suffer.
>My condolences that you live in the EU
Regulations that affect the EU affect the worldwide market, because why produce a display you can only sell in a few countries? Which is why the only dual layer LCDs you can find are pro grade Sony shit.
In the U.S. of A. your still allowed to use as much electricity as you can afford.
My family costs money to feed as well. And laa-de-da, you eat le organic food.
It tastes better and doesn't cost much more. You're moronic if you don't.
>my family
Why are you on Ganker still?
>Why are you on Ganker still?
I've been here since I was a lad, over 20 years now. And there is no escaping GMOs, pestacides, and endocrine disrupting plastics.
Fat Black person lmao. I spend $100 a week on organic food.
>>Do you not buy a new cellphone every 5-7 years,
I spend 100 bucks on some flagship model from a few years back whenever the turd I own falls apart because the battery dies.
For me, the biggest consideration for a monitor is the hassle of moving it. 4k monitors are 13KG+, which is unwieldy to move. I don't mind buying a new one in a decade or so when 8k becomes viable and cheap, but the hassle of having to baby my monitor to eke out another few months worth of use before the picture is destroyed doesn't sound appealing. Right now I have a nice big black line right down the center of my screen for most of the day, I'd have to adjust my whole workflow and do moronic shit like hide the taskbar.
In an ideal world, I'd happily pay 2-3x more for a dual layer LCD instead for similar contrast without the burn outs, but they're 100x more expensive because of EU bans on power consumption.
>he can't lift 13kg
homie, hit the gym
The thing is, the time that your taskbar is displayed is cumulative even if your screen turns off every so often. Think of it like this: Every pixel can emit X amount of brightness across its life, and it will always be getting dimmer when it is displaying something. The brighter that something is, the dimmer that pixel is going to get.
Brightness is subjective. I used to run what would be 130 nits back when I was a teen. These days about 180-190.
>brightness at 75/100
I bet that's way too bright. I'm currently at 28/100 on my VA monitor and 50/100 on my OLED TV in SDR (and the latter's pushing it a bit anyway).
Resolution =/= screen technology.
OLED is basically for gays. And there's also no point in having a 4k screen at 32"
>But muh pixel density
Ok at the expense of visible detail.
>>But muh pixel density
>Ok at the expense of visible detail.
You literally do not understand what resolution is but you talk about it like you do.
>Ok at the expense of visible detail.
just move the monitor back lmao
why are you people so moronic?
OLED is good for one thing only, for periodical media consumption
It is not a good technology (yet) for a daily driver monitor that will be used for multiple hours a day every day
Now, for me? It's miniLED
I have a miniLED TV and I am truly convinced that miniLED/microLED is the future. OLED is already dead to me.
>desktop monitor
>oled
beyond moronic. oled is for tvs if anything
Pristine.
Pepsi can for size reference.
the bezel is paper thin but then suddenly
its oversized. explain
mm lime pepis, I like that flavour
New monitor, vs dirty cumstained old monitor.
Shit's big.
>IPS
People are still buying LCD?
everything is LCD or plasma
Beautiful.
Nice, would you ever go for a triple monitor setup or is 2 enough for you?
I prefer to have one monitor actually, it's why I like 4K and why I upgraded to 32". The 144hz gave me a good reason to upgrade too.
Might as well stick the old monitor to the side and use it whenever it's necessary.
Most of the replies recommending 1440p don't understand that I use 4K for productivity reasons as well.
>Life is Strange
What a homosexual
show us all the pictures in your desktop
You're going to replace those $5 keyboard and mouse too, right?
post your setup and I might consider getting a new keyboard if it impresses me.
Don't listen to this moron, I bought a mechanical keyboard once and sold it immediately the next day, how anyone can live with that God awful noise is beyond me
Are you unaware that there's like 500 different ways that a mechanical keyboard can sound, depending on the switches and keycaps?
Yes, if my keyboard makes any sound then it's defective
>moron
Peak projection coming from someone who bought a noisy mechanical keyboard only to then complain it makes noise. The average membrane makes more noise than a linear switch with dampeners.
>Tiny mousepad
>Shitty wired mouse from a meme company that is coasting by on good graces from 2011
>The tiny mousepad is also frayed as hell and needs replacing
>Tiny desk
>Shitty membrane keyboard (full size) probably $20
How the hell have you managed to purchase an expensive 144hz 4k monitor at 32 inches? There is NO FRICKING WAY you have hardware to even begin to approach that monitor's usefulness, because 1. you are a poor child, and 2. you clearly don't know what the frick you're even doing.
Go away
>32"
>useful
Funniest shit I've ever seen.
Would you use a 16" 1080p monitor? Of course not.
Oh wow so you don't like 32 inch monitors heh wow that's so fricking interesting guy I don't fricking know and will never fricking know and who even if I did know I wouldn't fricking care anyway.
God just frick off why are you like this
Do you like 16" 1080p monitors? Because that's what you're talking about right now, I know you don't understand it because you've got a brain the size of a fricking pea, but 4k starts at 40". Yes, maybe you can make 32" work if you sit a foot away like that moron you're quoting, but no normal person is going to ruin their eyes like that. When you use an undersized monitor, you are wasting pixels.
Way too close for an ips of that size. Move the screen further back or you’re gonna end up with that “ips glow” issue(not to mention having to constantly look around to see things at the edge of the screen.)
Yeah that's crazy close. My 24" display is 65cm away from the front edge
He should get a vesa arm mount, the desk is perfect for it.
jesus christ how disgusting
Your MEGA Link, drop it
Have some fricking standards, subhuman
OP, if murder was legal I'd begin with you.
Based Mike Adriano enjoyer
Now turn off the back blue LED lights. NOW.
oh shit, forgot about that.
yea they're gonna be turned off.
4k is a meme, you scammed, like the good goy sheep you are. did you post to the funny man on youtube's channel to let him you did what he told you to do?
Why do you poors constantly shit up threads with "lol meme goy paypig buyer's remorse shill pajeet" stupidity instead of just accepting your situation? Nobody who actually has experienced 4k says it's a meme. It's literally 4x the detail of 1080p that's clearly noticeable. You're also an ESL, which further confirms that you're a seething third worlder.
>Nobody who actually has experienced 4k says it's a meme.
thats because they're all homeless now after wasting their rent money on a meme monitor and getting evicted. you don't hear from them because they have no internet now.
is this poorgay projection or something? I spent $1000 extra just for a business class seat and it was over with in <24 hours total (round trip). Am I homeless now? Or perhaps it is you who is homeless if you think $1k is a lot of money
Serious poorgay cope here. I blew $2500 on my monitor plus $1900 on my GPU and didn't look back. I'm also not homeless, because $4400 isn't a large amount of money.
Single 55", ackshually.
>curved
Looks disgusting
More like looks amazing. It's curved like monitors and penises should be. You'll get there some day.
>$2500 monior
>$1900 GPU
>posts on Ganker
at least say you visit >>>/hr/
Nah. I do Ganker, /vr/, /vrpg/, Ganker, and occasionally coom in /b/.
It's amazing what a job and some direction can do.
what check cashing loan place did you get the money from?
I’m glad I went to see those in person, I almost fell for the curved meme as well.
I don't notice any distortion in general use and gaming, and I'm not a drawgay. It's sexo. Ignore how non-sexo my phone's camera is.
>weird homosexual also plays anime games
Like pottery
VG248QE with G-Sync mod still kino 10 years later.
Tony Taka has fappable art, and I bought that game specifically for that waifu, but barely played it.
I guess that’s the point, but I didn’t like the feeling of the monitor closing in on me, I liked the 1440p 240hz OLED better, 27” just felt right for desk viewing distance. Enjoy your anime waifus in 32” I guess.
55"!
literally just move the monitor back
why are you people so moronic?
Why do you morons think we didn't already try that?
Brb, just wheeling my chair 4 feet away from my desk so my ridiculous monitor fits in view. 27” is the best size monitor for using at a desk, unless the depth of the desk is larger than average.
how tiny is your desk?
to be fair, I am using a former dining room table.
My desk is not that deep, I bought one on Amazon for $65 because I finished my build and didn’t have time to get a good one.
>k120
cheapo King
I use a corner desk and put my monitor deep in the corner. That puts me 4' away or so while using KBM, and further when gamepadding.
i always liked that screenfetch showing the system info. how do you do that on windows?
https://github.com/JulianChow94/Windows-screenFetch
There's also a Neofetch one (picrel), but I don't like it as much: https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/issues/1670
thanks anon
This picture actually gave me PTSD. Samsung software is the fricking worst. Never again.
$1k isn't a lot of money. Get a job and stop throwing money at gachas or fortnite skins zoomie
My previous monitor is 4K, I can't go back to a lower resolution once I've taken a bite of the forbidden fruit.
Also I know that 95% of Ganker's opinion is hot garbage and not worth listening to.
4k is a meme
4k dlss performance is a 100 fps dream
I don't use DLSS at all outside of DLAA, but performance mode would likely be a billion fps at the cost of visual clarity.
Disable, Loser. Shit Sucks. (shot taken in Quality mode)
>4k
>144Hz
Pick one.
I pick 4k165.
i picked 4k 240hz, pound sand
How many 4090s does it take to drive that?
Depends on the game. A lot of the bad releases recently can't come close to that, but there have been some good engines in the past few years than can do 240+fps.
>t. doesn't have a 4090 and has never played a 4k game
my 6700XT runs it just fine. you dont need a 4090 just for 4k + high FPS, lmao
before you post a shitty cherrypicked benchmark, I dont play shite games
just one, obviously i don't hit it in every single game but i also don't care. it's my main monitor so it makes everything else silky smooth too.
4K is a waste of pixels your GPU will struggle
Should have gotten a 1440p OLED
1440p is literally this generation's equivalent to what 720p was to 1080p.
1440p is the cope resolution.
Except graphics cards were capable of 1080p60. 4090 doesn't even do 4k60
That's beside the point.
I'm not interested in 1440p, because I've already enjoyed what 4K can provide.
This proves you don't have a 4090, and are spouting lies.
im using a 4070 and get 4k60+fps
Except 1440p is better than 1080p dummy. 1440p enjoyers will be good to go with their 4090, while 4k chuds will be needing to upgrade to the 5090 next year to have good frame rates.
Imagine being so angry about being poor that you have to lie about things you can't afford just so you can feel better.
I can see your setup is primarily for wanking with the dual monitors and 32" size. Enjoy your deepthroating sessions chud.
grats but should have gotten the viewsonic. slightly better
My monitor was $700 CAD tax included. That one is $1,121.64 CAD not including tax. That big price difference is not worth it for me.
?
also, observe the 4.4 star rating
Is that USD or CAD? Give me the exact model number.
XG320U
973.67 CAD (google conversion)
Price looks like it's marked up in Canada
Thanks for the recommendation nonetheless.
Ark or nothin'.
I'd go for a 34 or 36 but not a 48 or whatever the frick that is
>150hz
how fricking moronic. not even a multiple of 24/60.
Imagine if there was a way refresh rates could vary based on the input framerate. That'd change things for sure!
>muh multiples of 24!!!
so what? films are 23.98 anyway, good luck trying to get that
To be fair, I kinda picked a 120 Hz for this reason. It divides reasonably well by 60, 30 and 23.976 in case you don't wanna VRR for whatever reason.
>tfw poorgay
have fun bro h-haha
>32"
Too big. 24" is still king.
king of the poorgay manlets or what? how tiny is your desk?
I'm 6'2 and my desk is 80cm deep if you must know.
I did. I uses it as a 2nd monitor but sold it after a few years. Single monitor gang.
>personal preference 'le BAD
Yikes. Let me guess. Your mouse is 35g as well? Lmao.
>Too big. 24" is still king.
this. get a seperate 120hz oled sony if you want a big image
>24"
monitorlet
>buying fricking IPS when 4k oleds just came out
Come on man, unless you're using it for like 8 hours of work a day plus gaming what the hell are you doing? The only reason I wouldn't buy one of those is I don't like 4K for pc gaming, I'm not upgrading every couple years just to get 60 fps
Unless you have 4090, otherwise 4k is a meme for gaming, imagine sacrificing framerate or graphics for resolution
It's also a meme because there are REALLY good 1440p oled monitors now for decent prices as well. OP basically got the worst of all worlds, it's 4K but it's shitty IPS and it has a fricking disgusting matte screen which ruins it even further. Someone with a 1440p glossy OLED is having a way better experience with higher framerates and better picture despite the lower resolution.
>super heavy matte
enjoy losing over half of all color value
One thing I've learned
anything with gamer aesthetic = garbage
If it doesn't look like something you could bring into work, it's overpriced bottom barrel quality.
9/10 youtube reviewers are also completely owned by the companies they're reviewing. Whether they even realize it or not. Favorable reviews means free stuff, and marketing agencies talk with google et al on who to push thru algorithms. If a youtuber is a good goy they get more money so long as they keep saying good things about literally any product.
You can't get honest reviews on anything anywhere anymore
Also applies to "TechTubers" as well.
I'm not poor but I've never used 4K simply because I like my games at 240+ fps.
And no, I'm not using your 32" TV as a display with troony upscaling shit.
>fell for the 4k meme
>only 144hz
>why yes, I do still use my no-name brand 1080p 144hz monitor from 2015 that only has vga/dvi inputs, how could you tell?
I have a similar model but it's the 1440p 165hz 27" 3 years ago. How badly did I FRICK up?
poorgays will say you made a good deal
but for me, I'll tell you that you fell for Ganker's peer pressure bullying into buying something that's not future proof.
I bought a 1440p 165hz ips like eight years ago, still use it today. I'm going to upgrade from it but at the time it was basically the best gaming monitor around. To be honest the matte coating is literally the worst part about it, I will NEVER use another monitor with that garbage on it
>8 year old 1440p 144hz
Disgusting response times
>Pepsi
>Zero Sugar
>Lime
BIG REMINDER: Anything $500 (probably on sale) - $800 4K HDR 400 - 600 is FAKE HDR even with a certified HDR sticker. 99% of those monitor don't have HDR hardware. You're being sold a literal scam monitor.
Extra: 99% of 4K (non-OLED) monitor don't do REAL 1ms without huge fricking ghosting or tearing. Those "1ms" are usually 4ms - 6ms for REAL usage. The monitor does do 1ms but not consistent and not for practical usage.
true HDR is blinding at the distances you use monitors anyway, there's no solution to this as yet so it's hardly something to warn people over
Get better eyes.
>Dell
I'm so sorry for your loss.
post backlight bleed
>144hz
>IPS
HAHAHAHA
>4k
You fell for a scam
>shit contrast
>edge lit local dimming that somehow makes it
even worse
>fake HDR
moron alert
Could have gotten a 55 inch TV that looks better for cheaper, why would you ever buy this monitor?
tvs have terrible pixel density, smearing, and refresh rates. They're basically giant shit VA's
Are you living in the year 2020 or what? Pixel density doesn't matter since you sit farther away. Smearing isn't an issue in modern VA panels, and basically every modern TV goes to 4k 120hz at least.
TVs are cheaper because more people buy them. Monitors are expensive because only autists buy them.
>density doesn't matter, just sit far away
>smearing isn't an issue in VA panels
>every tv is 120hz
are you living in the year 2030? show me these tvs!
Who the frick buys a TV that isn't an OLED these days? LCD always was and still is a terrible technology that only got its place on the market because of the low cost.
is this a response to my query? OLED sucks, case closed
In that case you need to shell out for a MicroLED because LCD sucks even more, by a gargantuan margin.
LEDs are infinitely better because they don't go bad from normal use. OLED might look better out of the box, but they're disposable tech.
OLED can't do heavy duty work. It's for light gaming and infrequent movies. It's going to last 1/4 of an LCD and 1/8th of a CRT.
It's a scam.
I also personally think it would be more enjoyable to have a massive 130" cinemascope + surround sound over an OLED for the same price. Better for movies.
120 was a common thing since Blu-ray debuted. It was a multiple of 24 and 30, making it easier to display film and NTSC video prints.
1000nit on this one, homey.
Why is everything on your screen bent?
clean your screen
Been meaning to. Got some screen cleaner and a microfiber cloth here, but it's so much work and I'm so lazy.
Cleaned it just for you.
Why do I have to do homework for you? Anyway, a TV can smear all it wants... it's still better than a shitty monitor with edge lit local diming and fake HDR.
as with what the other anon said, tvs are also cheaper because they subsidized with smart features and telemetry
there's a reason why people are willing to pay more for a monitor over a tv.
>IPS
Ouch.
>4K
Waste of money
I'm guessing it doesn't have the only feature that's important right now, BFI.
Anyone know when 24" OLED's are coming out?
>24" OLED's
What the frick is the point? Not in a normal IPS panel with HDR 1440p is worth it at that size
Because I like it and find 27" too big.
How come? There are OLED panels between 5-17" and 27"+ already.
Guess I'll just have to stick to IPS. At least no burn in.
never. they would end up costing you more than 27/32 anyways
>This moron bought IPS and still drinks the anti OLED koolaide
Go back to console. You're clearly double digit IQ and this hobby doesn't want you
You call him double digit IQ because he doesn't want to buy a monitor that risks getting burn in? You are weird.
>32"
good for 1440p, too small for 4k
>IPS
oh no no no no no!
>bragging about a non-OLED monitor
Lmao poorgays
>32
you poor?
>ips
rip
>if you don't consooooom you are poor
Holy frick what happened to Ganker
>144hz
lmao check out this noob
>gpu goes BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>4k 144hz
There are no cards that can run modern games at that resolution and framerate unless you use DLSS which looks like garbage. What is the point of these monitors?
OP is a homosexual
/v/irgins you fricking tourist
I kinda want a 4k 32" monitor for productivity (programming, reading pdfs) but my 4070 ain't gonna cope with it and as far as I know many programs still suck with scaling, such as Reaper.
Also a good one that's easy on the eyes is damn expensive.
Yikes you should've bought an OLED panel one since you're already spending so much, enjoy the backlight bleed lol.
Okay? Now go slit your wrists open in a bathtub.
>IPS
how can you stand looking at this?
literally nobody notices this shit you autist
Until you play a dark game and realize it looks like shit
I don't know either, it's clearly fricking horrible. IPS even sucks with mini-LED because the native contrast isn't good enough. I got a Mini-LED VA monitor and it's been great. In dark scenes it damn near looks like OLED.
Is that the rumored IPS Black mintor that has double the contrast of a typical IPS?
Enjoy chasing the dragon of high framerates with your wallet, moron.
>LOL U HAV MUN-E
>IN SOVIET RASHA, MUN-E HAZ U
Wait. That's a frickin Paladin from RWBY.
I heard that the model had been bought from a third party who still retained the rights to the original design, so it pops up at complete random sometimes.
Let me guess,
>Matte
I have been looking to buy a monitor and have been doing extensive research and now I can't get a monitor because they're all matte. You have no idea, I have a $2000 gayman laptop with a pretty good screen, but I always connect it to my at least 5 year old 1080p hand me down 32 inch scepter to watch porn, not just because the size increase but it looks SIGNIFICANTLY better.
How can it be? Is gloss that much of the reason? Is it a lot more nits??? I don't know but I want brightness, I want gloss. I am thinking of 42" LG C3, but I'm worried it won't be bright enough even though every owner of it says it's fine. Also need brightness for CRT filters as a emuchad.
Also, I actually played Remake almost entirely on that TV instead of my laptop with 165hz 1440p. The sceptre is 60 hz and surely slow response times. The size and picture were such a major upgrade that I easily preferred it over my gamer spec 17 inch screen. I just want an even better screen(picture) with the epic gamer specs. Just gloss up the fricking gaming monitors already I can't believe they are almost all fricking matte!
Gloss is fricking ass, and I say that as someone with a 43" gloss 4k monitor. There's way too much internal reflection.
Not in my situation. We are talking about gaming monitors, productivity monitors make sense with matte, not gaming ones.
>ambient light reflecting off my screen enhances the game
quite literally said there is no glare in my situation, do you homies not have tvs anywhere in your house?
I wonder how there is still such a massive market for tvs when such an egregious downside exists.
My TVs are not in my office, which is intentionally well lit.
Ok homie, then matte your life away. I want gloss.
I never see that shit. It's just not an issue in my situation, you want it to be so bad but same with you, go wild with matte. I want gloss and there should be a regular amount of entertainment monitors with glossy displays. They are doing this with OLED but they need to do it with mini-LED too, I mean shit they get really bright anyway which helps a lot of the issue with potential glare.
>I never see that shit. It's just not an issue in my situation, you want it to be so bad but same with you, go wild with matte. I want gloss and there should be a regular amount of entertainment monitors with glossy displays. They are doing this with OLED but they need to do it with mini-LED too, I mean shit they get really bright anyway which helps a lot of the issue with potential glare.
What a time waster
>quite literally said there is no glare in my situation,
Unless you live in a room where no light exists, this isn't possible.
Why exactly do you want a glossy monitor?
Did you not read my post? I mean it's objectively better picture regardless so why exactly would you ask that question. Why aren't phones matte even though it's often used outside in bright conditions? Oh shit, they have brightness settings to remedy that? Even though I don't have to worry about glare anyway.
>I mean it's objectively better picture regardless
Name 3 ways that it would give you a better picture.
glossy looks better. It allows blacks to appear darker and colours to pop more. The difference is like looking at a glossy magazine cover vs the matt inner pages.
>glossy looks better. It allows blacks to appear darker and colours to pop more
I see. If you had a matte monitor vs glossy monitor vs OLED, what's the % of difference between them?
I was just curious why it's meant to be better.
>If you had a matte monitor vs glossy monitor vs OLED, what's the % of difference between them?
Percentage difference?
I have a semi glossy LCD (FV43U) screen and a matt OLED (48GQ900) screen.
I prefer the HDR on the LCD. I prefer the colours and black levels on the OLED.
Overall I use the LCD 90% of the time.
So I use the LCD for HDR games and desktop use and the OLED for non-HDR gaming.
>Percentage difference?
I meant like how much better would you say glossy is over matte? 20% better? 50% better? And then the same for glossy vs OLED.
>Overall I use the LCD 90% of the time.
Oh damn.
No, I am already tired of Big Matte coming out the woodwork to defend their outdated sandpaper meme.
Are there even matte screens with the durability of modern phone screens?