It's even but for me its 2.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's even but for me its 2.
It's even but for me its 2.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
which map did you like more, Ganker?
Both are very good but I think 2 wins out.
In 1 locations had soul and felt like little pockets of the wild west unfolding on my screen
In 2 I felt like I was going through a movie set about cowboys fighting tuberculosis
I love how different the two maps are. Ultimately I prefer 2 but its hard to beat the experience of playing RDR1 the first time and arriving in Armadillo, it's probably my favorite town counting both games.
I think the first time experience with RDR2 was better but RDR feels more replayable
I wish I could replay 1 but I have nothing to play it on.
I liked 2's story and Arthur better, but it's a lot more tedious to 100%.
I 100%ed RDR1 in ~60 hours whereas RDR2 took me more than twice as long. I spent a whole month hunting animals to complete the trapper outfits.
Emulate it. I played it on PC with mouse & keyboard on Xenia and it was a lot more playable than the PS3 version I own. Sure it dips below 40fps in towns but on PS3 it's below 30 everywhere.
>on Xenia
how playable is it? does it have bugs and stuff? would a 5600X and 3070 be enough?
I reckon so. With my 1080Ti I managed a solid 60fps in the wilderness with dips to around 30 in towns (Blackwater and Escalera are the worst).
You're gonna want a high DPI setting if you want to play with mouse and keyboard, aiming sensitivity is really low otherwise.
I think it only crashed on me twice during a full 100% run of both the main game and Undead Nightmare. So pretty stable.
Yup! I prefer 2 but my god main story took 50-60 hrs (which i loved) but when i 100% the game i was at 128 hrs mainly due to bad animal spawns… that fricking long side quest where you had to collect feathers/furs for the gay in saint denis
I played 130 hours on one save and only got to 89% but I never really tried to get 100%
I played another 150 hours on another save where I haven't even played past chapter 4
if your pc can play games from the last two decades on decent quality and you live in a country that isn't strict about piracy, you can play it on PC just fine.
what version of the game should I emulate? the game of the year edition or normal? does it not matter?
got any settings guides? I think I'll try this
GOTY has Undead Nightmare I assume which was a really good expansion.
I have only tried the normal version and undead nightmare separately, don't know if the game of the year edition works.
I haven't found any detailed guides, but you can optimize the emulator on a xenia txt file called xenia.config or xenia-canary.config
yeah but mouse aim is shit.
if I emulate it, I'll just use my dualshock 4
I only replayed rdr1 once after playing rdr2 and having played 1 in 2010. I replay rdr2 yearly because Arthur is a much better character than John
A double Feature
which should I buy? I heard 2 is pozzed and slow tedious gameplay
The gameplay is legit ass. It's just a boring cover shooter where all you do is wait for the stupid easy AI to show up and you easily kill them with the auto-aim, and no turning off auto-aim doesn't make the gameplay any better when the enemies are boring to fight. The game is pretty and there's some cool story moments but everything else sucks
Eh, the auto-aim is fine if you're using a controller, playing in third person and want to roleplay a gunslinger. But playing on PC, in first person, keyboard and mouse, without auto-aim. That's a whole other experience.
The game is much better with the auto-aim turned off, the game gives you deadeye for a reason. If you gonna play with auto-aim, better to just watch the cutscenes.
It really depends anon. I think 2 is a immersive as hell, I love it, but immersion comes with annoyances. If you don't mind a few bits of tedium for realism's sake, you'll like 2. If you just want the gameplay, story and setting, without over the top atmosphere, go for the first.
RDR2 has the worst, most boring opening sequence ever conceived. It also controls like total fricking ass. And the menus suck. Story is probably shit too, I couldn't stomach more than a few hours before I uninstalled.
RDR2 is much better as a game. I can go back to RDR2 and have fun just fricking around, but the first game after doing all the challenges and stranger missions is just no fun to mess around in the world.
But the random events don’t respawn in 2. No unlimited duels or bounty missions like in 1 either