ITT: Things shills successfully shilled to Ganker
>That voice acting matters and you should know the names of voice actors and care about their pay and working conditions
>Calling yourself a "gamer"
>Graphics whoring
ITT: Things shills successfully shilled to Ganker
>That voice acting matters and you should know the names of voice actors and care about their pay and working conditions
>Calling yourself a "gamer"
>Graphics whoring
Atheism
That autistic soi/woke games like Outer Wilds and deltarune are good and should be discussed seriously here.
>Outer Wilds
I thought I downloaded the wrong game when I booted that piece of shit up and went "THIS is what people have been raving about for months?!". The standards for indie games are in the fricking gutter.
It's the devs making daily threads shilling the game. It's ALWAYS the exact same kind of posts and replies.
>Outer Wilds is garbage
Thinhs that NEED to be said.
Only people getting this autistically upset about outer wilds are adhd homosexuals who've never enjoyed a slow-paced game in their life.
>Wherever I go, i must shill.
I don’t have a problem with the pace of the game. I don’t mind a slow-paced game. My main problem with the outer wilds is that people on here talk about it like it’s the second coming when it’s not a special game. It’s a myst-like game with the main twist being from Majoras mask. It’s also loved by redditors.
I wanna call you out on your shit reasoning but that is the exact same shit argument style I use to shit on DKC tropical freeze.
All I'll say is that it's a good adventure game in an age where people don't really make that genre anymore. People get excited when people redo something that hadn't been done in a while, like when demon's/dark souls did ps1/ps2 style design and eschewed difficulty options during the peak casual era.
>reddit likes it
Reddit likes everything, awful metric
Why didn’t you like dkc tropical freeze? It’s a fine game
Outerwilds is not an adventure game. It’s an exploration game with puzzles. If you are going to get paid to shill, at least look up the basics of the game beforehand, Ranjesh.
I wish it was like myst. But the puzzles are almost non-existant after you get on the ship. Then it becomes a bad first person platformer where you read walls of text and then go where those walls of text tell you to go. The "puzzle" is just figuring out when in the timeline the location in the wall of text will be open. For people who haven't played it, imagine zelda tears of the kingdom if the entire game was waiting around for shrines to open and then doing that shrine to get some paragraphs of text. And then, all the shrines are "walk and jump from point a to point b"
>taking a 30% cut is unacceptable (but only for one store)
>That you never owned anything
>That cheap games are cheap and bad and mediocre $70 games are good because they cost so much (must mean they put alot of effort into it!)
>That multimillion dollar companies dont want to pay $1000 to mr. Ranjeesh and his marketing company to "talk" about their upcoming project in the internet using AI, because that would be illegal and immoral! (Its not illegal)
>That siteowners dont get paid to let shill bots in or loosen the restrictions
>That review sites are not bought and even the customer reviews start to matter less and less day by day everywhere, even on steam.
One look at the state of the site everytime theres a "major" release coming should tell you otherwise but you are too damn naive to accept you live in a world where money rules everything
Did you already forget Sarfield and CP?
My favourite was when you could literally bait automated responses from Capcom shills on DD2 threads before release
I can’t believe people disagree with any of these. Btw right now Kingdom Comes Deliverance 2 is getting shilled very hard. There’s been at least 1 thread up for at least a week
>That cheap games are cheap and bad and mediocre $70 games are good because they cost so much (must mean they put alot of effort into it!)
This is true to an extent.
If you put tens of millions of dollars into a game, it's impossible for it to be "bad". Suicide Squad is a mediocre game, but it's not Superman 64. When you have hundreds of people and all that money, even complete morons will produce something that's at least mediocre-fine. People have forgotten what "bad" games are.
Bro did you not read?
>Did you already forget Sarfield
Starfields greatest crime is being extremely boring. Technically and mechanically, it's passable.
>Starfields greatest crime is being extremely boring. Technically and mechanically, it's passable.
In other words it's bad.
How old are you guys? Go back and play some PS2 movie tie-in games and tell me Starfield is a "bad" game. It's boring as shit, but the word "bad" has lost all meaning on Ganker.
>"old things were bad, therefore new things can't be bad"
FRICK OFF EMIL
>How old are you guys? Go back and play some PS2 movie tie-in games and tell me Starfield is a "bad" game. It's boring as shit, but the word "bad" has lost all meaning on Ganker.
Old enough to not consider the PS2 an especially old console. But on your advice I decided to go back and play some bad PS2 movie tie-in games, and once I was finished Starfield was still a bad game. Can you please help explain this discrepancy?
I can play demos that are free that are technically and mechanically passable
Doesnt mean theres any game there
But Sarfield costs $70 and isnt labeled a scam should tell you everything about todays "gamers"
Or just the fact that marketing > your opinion
You got memed into hating the game. Objectively its superior to skyrim and fallout 3 and about equal to fallout 4. I can understand people preferring oblivion, morrowind over starfield though, those are in many ways objectively better than starfield
>You got memed into hating the game
Ive never played Todds games after playing Oblivion and FO3 as a teenager because the games never seemed to change (they use the same fricking trash engine still)
I already knew enough from seeing 10 seconds of Bethesdas OWN trailer for the game where they showed some guy pewpewing some brainless bulletsponge enemies
I didnt need anything else to know it was the same shit, all over again
I was not interested in buying the game before the trailer and they managed to make me lower my expectations for the game EVEN MORE
This discussion is like trying to explain to a scatgay why i dont get a boner from watching people eat shit
This is very shitty bait
>it's impossible for it to be "bad".
>It's boring as shit, but the word "bad" has lost all meaning on Ganker.
>Objectively its superior to skyrim and fallout 3 and about equal to fallout 4.
>I can understand people preferring oblivion, morrowind over starfield though, those are in many ways objectively better than starfield
Black personcattle
I wonder if shills are more successful nowadays because zoomerinos are more vulnerable to propaganda and are afraid of having the "wrong" opinion. Not like millennials are any better, they treat whatever the media and experts™ say as a gospel.
Yes this is probably correct. Zoomers are the dumbest generation in recorded history. Dumb people are more likely to accept anything as fact even in the absence of concrete evidence.
>"they treat whatever the media and experts™ say as a gospel."
>Millenial: "you have a source for that? SOURCE? SOURCE? SOURCEEEE?!"
Yup, studies show that 76% of people who regularly engage in political discourse online will believe in a piece of information, solely based on whether it backs up their preconceived notions or not.
>I wonder if shills are more successful nowadays because zoomerinos are more vulnerable to propaganda
There's no dumber generation than boomers, they would believe anything the TV said to them and they would gladly sacrifice their kids to aid Israel because man on TV said so
>brings up and seethes about zoomers for no reason
I genuinely think you are pathetically obsessed and probably are responsible for half the "anti-zoomer" posts on this board.
That starfield is worse than skyrim
Good morning, sir
Im a nord
I can smell the curry on you from here
I literally only use salt on my food, not even pepper
>salt
Why would you bother? You’re getting more than enough sodium in the cum you guzzle down every day.
Skyrimdrones are deranged
>insipid food
checks out
Its tasty with a lot of saturated fat and a lot of salt
Then was your ass Ranjesh. Go to the Ganges, maybe it will help get some of the smell off
>VA
Almost nobody on this board cares about VA at least in English
>Calling yourself a "gamer"
No
>Graphics whoring
Only as a shitpost. 99% of games talked about here don't look like they'd be impossible to run on a 7th gen platform.
Shills fail so hard I'm starting to think there are more shill roleplayer being lolcows on purpose than actual shills.
shills somehow convinced Ganker preorders were a good thing. 10 years ago preorders were mocked viciously and now its a badge of pride to own da haterz
a 30% cut is acceptable (but only for one store)
Why are valve drones like this?
But it's acceptable for all stores, including Steam?
Its only for stores that made their own console, valve didn't make PC so they dont deserve 30%. They deserve 10% at best
>Stores that made their own console
So, steam. They have made two.
And did steam optimize every game on their platform to run of these? No! So they dont deserve 30% for laziness
>And did steam optimize every game on their platform to run of these? No!
Yes, they're literally in the process of optimizing games on Steam to run on the Steam Deck lmao. You can't be this moronic, especially considering that Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo aren't even optimizing any of the third-party games on their platforms.
>So they dont deserve 30% for laziness
What they charge to use their service has nothing to do with whether they're lazy or not; they could do literally nothing and charge 70% if they wanted to.
That doesn't make a lick of sense. If anything, because they already got money for the console, they should be charging less in their stores.
All console manufacturers except nintendo sell consoles at a loss
I still think the % deserved arguments are fricking moronic thoughever. Gog is the only digital platform that deserves my money because game ownership
>All console manufacturers except nintendo sell consoles at a loss
Doubt.jpg
>bro thought selling a gaming computer with a 2070 gpu equivialent for 500 dollars (when it was new) was profitable
>It's impossible for these massive companies to get good deals on hardware components thus they're selling it a loss
Nah, if you're saying something specific like this anon you have to prove it with a source. I can easily imagine all kinds of scenarios as to why a consoles are cheap despite the hardware.
You can google something so easily before being moronic, selling at a loss is one of the most known things in the industry
I'm happy to admit that you're right if you would just post a source to your claims.
>All console manufacturers except nintendo sell consoles at a loss
So the two least successful consoles sell at a loss? How does that support your argument?
The idea that liking furries is okay if it is human male on female anthro
>Erotic furries are "Objectively good character design" for non-erotic action games.
>That if you used any strategy other than the caveman strategy, you "Didn't beat the game".
>"Professional" voice acting is a must and they must be extremely overpaid as opposed to just getting random people already on the team to do the voice acting.
>I'm a nord
>That voice acting matters and you should know the names of voice actors and care about their pay and working conditions
this wasn't successful at all, what the frick. in fact this past year has probably been the hardest ever for VAgays
>doublepaw
is this AI? AI is getting too powerful if so.
If the women aren't explicitedly designed to give you a boner, they're woke or badly designed. Everything either needs to be questionably a troony, or bordering on softcore pornography, and if it isnt people will try to assign it to one of the two anyway.
Modern gamers confuse old 80's-90's guy stuff like generic "epic" fantasy art and lara's breasts as pornographic, when the former was male power fantasy (in the genuine sense, not the modern "man = bad" sense) and the latter started as a joke.
That everyone who I don’t like is “brown” or a troony. Or that people who express even the most remote appreciation for Bethesda games are all Indians.
Helldivers 2
>If a game is bad, you got filtered
>If a game is good but hard, it's bullshit artificial jank difficulty