LCDs are better than CRTS.
LEDs are better than LCDs.
OLEDs are better than LEDs.
We don't talk about plasma.
LCDs are better than CRTS. LEDs are better than LCDs. OLEDs are better than LEDs. We don't talk about plasma.
LCDs are better than CRTS.
LEDs are better than LCDs.
OLEDs are better than LEDs.
We don't talk about plasma.
CRTs blow fuses without even being moved and randomly shit the bed with an uneven power supply.
Blows my mind the industry still hasn't solved this issue.
>OLED is better than LED
For approximately 6 months until the burn-in gets too awful.
LEDs and LCDs are the same thing but with different backlight technologies
CRTs are memes that do one (1) (uno) thing better than LCDs that MAYBE matters in highly specific scenarios.
I am observing the display market and keeping particular eye on ELQD and MicroLED, hopefully the hype behind them is true, but we'll see. Also hoping someone makes a MicroLED-backlit QD with tiny dimming zones as a stopgap for true emissive pixel displays.
redpill me on microLEDs
They're like LEDs but smaller.
Are they cute?
are microled and miniled displays different from each other?
they're like oled but 10x the price
oh
damn
yeah I'll take LEDs in the meantime.
Like OLEDs, but without the burn-in, so sayeth the marketing departments of Samsung.
>Your microLED solution is still a in development technology and far away from reasonable prices at the main market.
For pure, per-pixel microLED. My "stopgap" would be to use larger, single-color microLEDs as a FALD for a transmissive technology. It wouldn't be as good as per-pixel dimming but the tech exists right now to provide 10^2px or even 5^2px dimming zones for a 27-inch 1440p display using single-color MicroLEDs, which would be vastly superior to even the high-end FALDs currently on-market. I'm talking 80,000 or even 300,000 LDZs compared to a "huge" 1,000 LDZs. And I have to imagine it would be far cheaper to manufacture 373,248 monochrome pixels than it would be to manufacture 9,331,200 3-color pixels.
No you fricking homosexual this is an extremely moronic idea, MicroLED are too expensive because the manufacturing process is essentially "lmao like just individually place and align them without making any errors lol", you need a more "automatic" approach like vapor deposition or some shit that would yield better results for faster and for cheaper. Our stopgap should be what Hisense was working on the monochrome Doble layer LCD that got canned for alignment issues (and even that wasn't that hard to align btw)
each subpixel is a solid state LED that won't degrade like OLED.
currently it's too difficult to make millions of tiny LEDs and place them close enough together for a consumer television, so they're only available as massive commercial displays that you can see the gaps in if you are at typical TV distance. also they're a foot thick because they need big cooling.
Your microLED solution is still a in development technology and far away from reasonable prices at the main market. We're progressing for sure, but CRT advantages for gaming are still to be surpassed.
>LEDs and LCDs are the same thing but with different backlight technologies
No, LEDs and LCDs are different things entirely
LEDs are a backlight technology for LCDs
LED displays are self-emissive so they have no backlight
>LEDs are a backlight technology for LCDs
>LED displays are self-emissive so they have no backlight
Yes.
But within common marketing parlance "LED displays" have commonly referred to LED-backlit LCD displays, with the actual emissive LED displays being referred to as MicroLED or OLED or something other than just "LED". Doesn't mean it's the correct usage but that's what most people will think of when you say "LED display".
>MicroLED-backlit QD with tiny dimming zones as a stopgap for true emissive pixel displays.
Are you fricking moronic or something? MicroLED are self emissive and they're a b***h and a half to produce, you're thinking of MINILED you fricking imbecile. And yeah, once we figure out GaN nanorods then we'll get hyper small leds and then we'll just use Quantum Dots for filtering, making the LCD layer irrelevant and the Organic part inexistent, leaving us with the perfect "oled" without any burning and with massive brightness. However israelites won't let us enjoy that too quickly for they need to slowly weed out their LCD factories first
>CRTs are memes that do one (1) (uno) thing better than LCDs that MAYBE matters in highly specific scenarios.
You mean autistic speedrunners?
>We don't talk about plasma
Uh, ya' KINDA' just did...
Plasma burns the phosphors too so don't get too existed, also it's antisemitic stop asking about it
LCD/LED are the bottom of the barrel.
>We don't talk about plasma.
Because they're better than all the rest, and you idiots didn't back the winning horse.
Is your only argument that you're a weak twink who can't even handle picking a CRT up?
>OLEDs are better than LEDs
They aren’t
LED displays aren’t in the market yet
All ’’LED Displays’’ are really LED-backlit LCDs
LEDs are only available as ultra-expensive MicroLED Video Walls
I like CRTs the best
>but muh pixels
Don’t care
pov: you are in wrongworld
bring back SED/FED
what is a good cheap tv for video games? I have IPS monitor right now but I dont like how it cant make real dark colors
used LG CX
ips is completely fine with a gloss coating, infuriating that 100% of game monitors have matte, not even semi gloss.
> LEDs are better than LCDs.
There is currently no such display technology as "LED", well not counting those giant LED display walls.
>LCDs are better than CRTS.
>no glass screen
If LCD/LED had that they'd be.