im not buying anything for another two years
i have a laptop 4090 and a 3070 in my desktop
i play in 1080P
everything looks nice
4k is honestly kind of shit
call me when these support 20k
>im not buying anything for another two years
why are buygays like this
FOMO is one of the reasons why hardware is so expensive. I only upgrade when my PC will absolutely not run games I want to play, not when some arbitrary time comes up so you are "future proofing"
Happy with my 3070 for 1440 indies, will probably last me as long as 970 did, think i'll go for 6070 next, unless nvidia actually puts enough vram (doubt) in 50xx
i wouldn't expect xx70 to be ever under 600 from now on, xx60ti would maybe go as low as 450 at some point, but for 300 i wouldnt hope for anything but xx60 a year after release
Got a 3060 Ti FE for MSRP two years ago.
I'm happy with it vidya-wise, but I'm also interested in running local AI stuff and 8GB VRAM is way too little for that.
I was going to get that one but got a better deal on a 7900xt, don't really care about ray tracing, I would have turned it off on a nvidia card to fpsmax anyway
This is the issue with PC gays. They're all so dedicated to getting the craziest performance and the can't settle with anything less once they do. This is why I have stuck to 720p over the past 10 years despite PC being capable of much better resolutions
>720p
Why? Even the absolute cheapest cards in the market right now can at least give you respectable 1080p performance. I used to play at 1080p with a GT 1030 of all things.
For those of you who think $2k for a GPU is an extreme purchase, remember there are guys that spend $120k on speakers: https://www.martinlogan.com/en/product/neolith
Again, it's not wasting money if it's not outside my means and it benefits me. The prices seem stable on the top end as well (the 4090 was a price drop from last gen). A 8800GTX was $600. 2 of them adjusted for inflation is $1897.42, which is actually higher than the $1599 MSRP for the 4090.
Nobody says YOU MUST BUY THIS, but some people want it. There's no reason to get pissed that people buy enthusiast gear.
a 4090 won't be obsolete moron. I keep my GPUs for at least four generations before upgrading. My old 1070 worked fine, my 4090 will work fine until I'll upgrade with a 8090 probably
your 4090 won't support the new and enhanced version of DLSS. the architecture is shifting tremendously towards frame gen that cards will be getting obsolete soon and last only a couple of generations.
your 4090 won't support the new and enhanced version of DLSS. the architecture is shifting tremendously towards frame gen that cards will be getting obsolete soon and last only a couple of generations.
. devs are making games which rely more on hardware optimization, paying minimal heed to code optimization now more than ever. you will be lucky if your card lasts you 3 years before it becomes unable to run newer games.
You mean I'll only be able to play 99.99% of the games ever made? FRICK
And that's bullshit about new games. Everyone is gonna need a $2000 GPU to play games in a couple years?
You don't understand market at all then.
You can't release a game that only a small percentage of people can play, you need to have minimum requirements for as many people as possible, and aiming for your game to only be playable on new cards is not viable. There are games released to this day that still just ask for 1xxx series cards.
That's just for "recommended" requirements, but the games run fine at lower settings. Having the game heavily rely on HW that most people don't even have is a surefire way to flop.
Look at pic related, notice how all the top cards are all xx60/xx50 from at least a generation behind.
lol imagine believing this when every recent AAA game runs bad at anything less than 30 series.
There can easily be found plenty of videos on yt of people running recent titles at low settings using a 1060 and still getting 40+ fps.
That's 3 games from the top of my head:
Ghost of tsushima
?t=1348
Cyberpunk 2077:
?t=122
Helldivers 2:
?t=30
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
It is not uncommon for monitors to be 240hz, 300hz, and even 500hz. I actively avoid games that limit me to sub 120hz as a bare minimum.
40 fps is cope city. Nobody actually plays on low at 40 fps. It is not bearable.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Nobody actually plays on low at 40 fps. It is not bearable.
I unironically played Monster Hunter World like that on my 1060, not great but doable.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
my gf is playing CP2077 with no issues with an ancient 1050Ti using FSR
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
what are you smoking? the frame drops and awful pixelation by FSR make AAA games unplayable in 1060. I personally have experienced how bad they play in it.
People been saying that for years, its a fricking meme now.
Funny how you can still run new games on a 1070/1080.
The architecture changed but they still run
your 4090 won't support the new and enhanced version of DLSS. the architecture is shifting tremendously towards frame gen that cards will be getting obsolete soon and last only a couple of generations.
Even if a 4090 quickly becomes a mid-range GPU, it's still better than the current consoles (as my 1070 was way better than XBone,PS4), so it will run every games, maybe not at ultra settings but who cares. I literally had 3 GPUs in my life and I'm 27, never skipped a game because it couldn't run it
Who cares? Sell the card and buy a new one.
I will admit I am an upgrade prostitute, but it is not that big of a deal to spend < $1000 every couple years on something you use constantly. The only thing that truly pisses me off is this new PSU standard required by Nvidia because changing out the entire PSU is a fricking hassle, and that actually is something that should last forever
>release 12GB 4070ti >due to how shit games can be it isn't enough >now have to get a super just for a bit of longevity >1070ti was half the price of either back in 2018
>New games are visual clusterfricks that only look good in screenshots >-100fps to put ugly shadows that fizzle out around every object >mfw playing every game in 480p with FSR and I don't even have a gpu on my linux computer
The 4060TI 16gb is honestly terrible value, and the 8gb is just ass >barely outperforms the 3060Ti >tiny ass memory bus cucks at 1440p - even at 1080p it can be an issue in games that love memory bandwidth >doesn't really have the raw juice to make use of DLSS3 since that requires solid performance from the beginning >regular DLSS is kinda dicks at 1080p
If you wanna go Nvidia, it's hard to recommend anything below the 4070(S) this generation
a secondhand 2080Ti will give you the same performance as the 4060Ti, with an acceptable amount of vram, for much cheaper, and without choking on its memory bus
a used 3080 will be the same price and will just outperform it in every way
if you wanna buy new, I'd much rather recommend an RX 6800
That's why I was thinking of getting the 16GB version, the problem, you see, is that I'm br*zilian so the market is much more expensive and limited here, for example I can't find the 2080ti anywhere that isn't ebay (which wouldn't be a problem were it not for my country's import tax laws). 4060TI 16GB is already 100$ over msrp in here and any of the 4070 series are at least 200$ to 390$ over the 4060ti's price
Ah yeah, in that situation then it might not be such a bad idea
It's not a bad card in a vacuum tbh, it's perfectly fine at 1080p (the 16gb even more so, at least you'll have vram for days, and the bandwidth is less of an issue, at least for now) and it's not inept at 1440p when it doesn't get cucked by said bandwidth
You can also see if you can find 6700XTs for considerably cheaper, but otherwise the 4060Ti might be an interesting enough option for you yeah
I currently have a 1080p monitor so that isn't a problem for me really, still I'm going to see whether I will go for the 4060ti or save some more and either get the 4070 or the 4070 super, I'd rather get something that won't have any problems down the line. Also, aren't amd gpu's worse for emulating? I remember seeing that somewhere, if that's true then I'm not getting one.
I'm pretty sure that's no longer the case. It used to be that AMD CPUs sucked at it (and even first gen Ryzen wasn't particularly amazing for emulation) but now they're perfectly fine
GPU wise I'm pretty sure both sides are perfectly fine
I haven't had any issues with my 5600XT/6700/7800XT but I also admittedly haven't really tried emulating anything more demanding than the 3DS or PS2 - that being said I'm pretty sure anything modern will handle PS360 and Switch emulation without an issue
its still kicking
I remember being aghast at the $700 price.
I absolutely will not pay asking prices for GPUs now. Guess I'm done with video games when this one kicks the bucket.
I'm planning to build a pc buts it's mostly for meme games with my friends such as Apex Legends and competitive stuff like Street Fighter, would guys rather recommend the 3060 or the 4060 for it?I don't think I'm going all out.
the 4060's slightly faster and has DLSS3 + frame generation, but its shitty bus width and 8GB VRAM means it's the worse option if you play at higher resolutions, not that you should be using the 4060 for anything above 1080p anyway
meanwhile the 3060 is slightly slower and doesn't have frame generation but it has more VRAM(12GB)
I remember when I started paying attention to gpus one of the threads on Ganker I entered had an op pic of a 780ti sli set up. that was probably 2014.
tell me Ganker, what games made after 2014 are you playing that require a gpu stronger than a 780ti? bear in mind that all games made after 2011 are shit.
I have a 1660TI and it runs everything I want to play. The only game it struggled with was palworld but I still got good framerates on medium settings.
I do notice that games are just now starting to come out with 20xx cards in min reqs but there's still nothing I want to play that badly to justify an upgrade.
TWWH3 at 4k and max-ish settings drops to like 70-80FPS at times, obviously it's not bad but my monitor is 160Hz so there's certainly room for improvement. Darktide with RT requires all kinds of DLSS (scaling + frame gen) to get good FPS with 4k video output, a 4090 is obviously very far from running it native. Cyberpunk is even worse, also requires scaling + frame gen so the 4090 is far below what it would take to run a game like that native, you would seriously need something like 3x faster to run native 4k with the RT bells and whistles turned on. Dragon's Dogma 2 also hit 100% GPU load outside the city and it wasn't getting super high FPS, I mean it was 60+ but not super high. VR is also quite demanding and very sensitive to any performance issue.
Basically any demanding-ish game requires some form of scaling or frame gen with a 4k monitor, or could at least benefit from higher FPS with a faster graphics card. The games that actually hit my FPS cap of 155 have pretty basic graphics and low requirements, like AoE4 or Barony. Anything remotely demanding or fancy-looking is instantly GPU bottlenecked at 4k, even if some run very well (I don't mind being GPU bottlenecked at 100+ FPS, for instance).
>is a 4080 super worth it
Not really, save yourself $200 and go for the ti super, the performance gap doesn't really justify the price premium. Pair it up with a 7800X3D, especially if you can get the Microcenter bundle.
Got one in April after my used 1660 Super was on its last legs. Games on this thing run like butter and 3D modeling/printing is a dream! But after the major tests I just started a Con-man run in New Vegas.
got one pretty cheap
runs 98% of all games in 4k without any issues
however can't wait to sell it and get a 5080
im not buying anything for another two years
i have a laptop 4090 and a 3070 in my desktop
i play in 1080P
everything looks nice
4k is honestly kind of shit
call me when these support 20k
>im not buying anything for another two years
why are buygays like this
FOMO is one of the reasons why hardware is so expensive. I only upgrade when my PC will absolutely not run games I want to play, not when some arbitrary time comes up so you are "future proofing"
I have more.
Yeah, the 4090 is a better value to me.
I got the same one, great gpu.
Happy with my 3070 for 1440 indies, will probably last me as long as 970 did, think i'll go for 6070 next, unless nvidia actually puts enough vram (doubt) in 50xx
1070ti is all you realistically need.
The 3070 is the best bang for bunk right now.
I won't be touching another card until something big actually happens.
Get ready for the 5070
It will be the new 10xx series
only if it's 300 or less
im not paying any more for a gpu that i do not need right now
i wouldn't expect xx70 to be ever under 600 from now on, xx60ti would maybe go as low as 450 at some point, but for 300 i wouldnt hope for anything but xx60 a year after release
>8gb vram
still runs on max settings with 1080p
O.o
>1080p
why would I need more?
most games are upscales of 720p
Most games are upscales of 480p
I only play rpg maker hentai games though.
If basement dwellers with soldering irons could give their 3070s 16GB VRAM then why the frick couldn't Nvidia?
To halve the 3070s potential lifespan so you buy another card (Nvidia of course despite you falling for their planned obsolecense trap)
Got a 3060 Ti FE for MSRP two years ago.
I'm happy with it vidya-wise, but I'm also interested in running local AI stuff and 8GB VRAM is way too little for that.
5090 when?
Either late 2024 or early 2025
Also, current rumor is that the 5080's launching first
I need less. I'm still gaming at 1080p in current year
No I do not.
>t. 1080p/60fps chad
December (source: my ass)
I'm still rocking the 2080 and it's holding up just fine
And so it will. As will the 4070TI super. Only thing is how much vram it has and what res you play at.
My 4090 is directly underneath a brown NH-D15 as well.
>brown NH-D15
That NH-D15 is probably older then some anons here
4090 chads, are we getting the 5090?
I'm kinda afraid it won't even be readily available because of the AI memes
I'm getting one, but waiting for an ASUS model with an extra HDMI.
>RX 6800XT
>16 GB VRAM
>Shart tracing
>Multi gambling flame generation
Well, you have VRAM for cheap.
I want flame generation. Imagine being able to create Rip Taylor with a GPU instruction.
Any anons fall for the 12GB vram meme
>3080 12GB
Yeah
>imagine choosing the gimped 8gig Ti over the 12 gig model
I was going to get that one but got a better deal on a 7900xt, don't really care about ray tracing, I would have turned it off on a nvidia card to fpsmax anyway
I technically need a little bit less
my exact gpu
I need a 5090 for my dual 4k monitor, a 4070TI isn't cutting it for the heavier stuff
I don't think you have a grasp of what the word "need" means
got more on both cards, 3090 & 4090
hi fellow SUPRIM chad
Good Goy
>civilized shitposting about video cards
>seething poorgay comes in raging
Every time.
>seething
Not at all my good goy. Please buy more. Next gen has a 2% performance increase
I am a goy. I'm not a fricking israelite like you.
Heya poorgay
I need a 5080 to play my old MMOs and browse image boards, looking forward to launch!
Yes, not enough vram. Hell the 4090 doesn't really have enough.
Imagine buying a MSI card. Bottom of the bin
Hold my beer.
8GB VRAM isn't enough, no.
the 4070 TI super has 16GB?
I couldn't tell it was a Ti Super from OP's tiny picture for Ant-Man
How good are Founders Edition cards? I like the way they look.
A lot of people swear by them, but I don't trust 2 fans. The way the fans are placed is wonky as well.
>not playing everything at 1440p/165hz with DLDSR scaling for KRISPY visuals without the absolute dogshit AA blur
i can't go back
i won't go back
This is the issue with PC gays. They're all so dedicated to getting the craziest performance and the can't settle with anything less once they do. This is why I have stuck to 720p over the past 10 years despite PC being capable of much better resolutions
It's an enthusiast thing. Car people, home theater people, music people, etc are the same way.
Wait until you see what audio gays are like.
>720p
Why? Even the absolute cheapest cards in the market right now can at least give you respectable 1080p performance. I used to play at 1080p with a GT 1030 of all things.
i used to game on a T430 thinkpad on the living room coffee table while in uni, now i'm doing alright I deserve the upgrade
show your Xbox360 bro
Why do you govern your life based on what other people do?
First time?
Usually at least half these threads are homosexuals crying about or insulting other people's hardware
most pc mustardracers are favela-dwelling morons using ancient laptop hardware
>1440p
4070TI at 1440p I'm happy
>Oh, your music speakers are $3k a pair? How quaint.
I bought my 3700X in 2019 and at this rate I'll be using it in 2029.
bro
5800x3d
NOW
>ASUS TUF
>misread as Astroturf
I know It's not your fault but this made me laugh
>Your subwoofer is cute. Oh, that? That's my fricking BASS TOWER.
>I love my neighbors
>I even share my music with them
For those of you who think $2k for a GPU is an extreme purchase, remember there are guys that spend $120k on speakers: https://www.martinlogan.com/en/product/neolith
>sure there's morons, but there's also bigger morons
You want me to validate your moronic decisions and I'm not going to. You're an idiot.
It's not moronic if it's within your means and you enjoy it. It'd be stupid for me to not buy the best thing I can to support what I enjoy.
>wasting money on overpriced bullshit isn't moronic! the merchant man told me it makes me feel good
Again, it's not wasting money if it's not outside my means and it benefits me. The prices seem stable on the top end as well (the 4090 was a price drop from last gen). A 8800GTX was $600. 2 of them adjusted for inflation is $1897.42, which is actually higher than the $1599 MSRP for the 4090.
Nobody says YOU MUST BUY THIS, but some people want it. There's no reason to get pissed that people buy enthusiast gear.
no, I need lower prices
Im playing 4k 240hz
>he bought before Nvidia stock boom
enjoy your dead in the water card. 50 series is going BTFO 40 series.
I dont believe this. Itll be 10-15% better.
Plus I wouldnt exactly call them dead. You would probably swap your left bollock for a 4090
>Itll be 10-15% better.
50-70%
The 4090 was nearly double the performance of the 3090Ti. I expect a similar jumo for the 5090. The lower ranges won't get as much of a bump, though.
lmao. keep up with the cope cause that would be the only thing keeping you from the rope when the next series of cards drop.
Im the guy who posted the 3090&4090. I will be buying the 5090. I game in 4k so itll be interesting to see the gains
Im not the poorgay anon
a 4090 won't be obsolete moron. I keep my GPUs for at least four generations before upgrading. My old 1070 worked fine, my 4090 will work fine until I'll upgrade with a 8090 probably
your 4090 won't support the new and enhanced version of DLSS. the architecture is shifting tremendously towards frame gen that cards will be getting obsolete soon and last only a couple of generations.
It feels like nvidia has been pumping out new card series every year now compared to how much time they spent in the 10 series
What? The 4070 is just gonna stop working when the 5000 series comes out?
see
. devs are making games which rely more on hardware optimization, paying minimal heed to code optimization now more than ever. you will be lucky if your card lasts you 3 years before it becomes unable to run newer games.
You mean I'll only be able to play 99.99% of the games ever made? FRICK
And that's bullshit about new games. Everyone is gonna need a $2000 GPU to play games in a couple years?
>memegen
So it's all gonna go to shit, got it.
You don't understand market at all then.
You can't release a game that only a small percentage of people can play, you need to have minimum requirements for as many people as possible, and aiming for your game to only be playable on new cards is not viable. There are games released to this day that still just ask for 1xxx series cards.
Anon, for the past 15 years everyone has been targetting 5% of the market and blaming the remaining 95% for product flopping.
That's just for "recommended" requirements, but the games run fine at lower settings. Having the game heavily rely on HW that most people don't even have is a surefire way to flop.
Look at pic related, notice how all the top cards are all xx60/xx50 from at least a generation behind.
Define "runs bad"
lol imagine believing this when every recent AAA game runs bad at anything less than 30 series.
There can easily be found plenty of videos on yt of people running recent titles at low settings using a 1060 and still getting 40+ fps.
That's 3 games from the top of my head:
Ghost of tsushima
?t=1348
Cyberpunk 2077:
?t=122
Helldivers 2:
?t=30
It is not uncommon for monitors to be 240hz, 300hz, and even 500hz. I actively avoid games that limit me to sub 120hz as a bare minimum.
40 fps is cope city. Nobody actually plays on low at 40 fps. It is not bearable.
>Nobody actually plays on low at 40 fps. It is not bearable.
I unironically played Monster Hunter World like that on my 1060, not great but doable.
my gf is playing CP2077 with no issues with an ancient 1050Ti using FSR
what are you smoking? the frame drops and awful pixelation by FSR make AAA games unplayable in 1060. I personally have experienced how bad they play in it.
People been saying that for years, its a fricking meme now.
Funny how you can still run new games on a 1070/1080.
The architecture changed but they still run
Even if a 4090 quickly becomes a mid-range GPU, it's still better than the current consoles (as my 1070 was way better than XBone,PS4), so it will run every games, maybe not at ultra settings but who cares. I literally had 3 GPUs in my life and I'm 27, never skipped a game because it couldn't run it
480p upscaled to 4k is unironically going to be the future. the seething repliers don't have a clue.
Who cares? Sell the card and buy a new one.
I will admit I am an upgrade prostitute, but it is not that big of a deal to spend < $1000 every couple years on something you use constantly. The only thing that truly pisses me off is this new PSU standard required by Nvidia because changing out the entire PSU is a fricking hassle, and that actually is something that should last forever
no, that's exactly the card i have
bought two, one for me and one for my wife
Yes.
I'm gonna get a 5090 too.
Are there any games you play that really push it to its limits? For example heavily graphically modded like Skyrim or something.
the 5090 will be 50-60% better than the 4090 and it'll come with GDDR7
everything else will be 10-20% better but much more power-efficient
>tfw 12gb 3060
Good enough for furry porn generation if you ask me. I don't play anything but modded minecraft anyway.
>3090 24gb
Generating big titty gilfs all day
>1070
Is this a good upgrade?
I don't know this channel, but this is a 14 game comparison: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQyxE9BBa1A
>release 12GB 4070ti
>due to how shit games can be it isn't enough
>now have to get a super just for a bit of longevity
>1070ti was half the price of either back in 2018
What the frick game were you having problems with? Running everything at 2k max settings without DLSS
Unless hes playing skyrim with about 300 mods I am wondering that myself
skyrim doesn't use the GPU for shit
thought it used the vram
I think its limited on CPU core and Vram usage because of shitty old engine?
Its the mods that use the vram on the gpu. they use so many it literally can go up to like 10.5 plus usage
https://forums.nexusmods.com/topic/12871368-vram-usage/
probably just tlou
I actaully have a little bit more.
*less
The 4070S is more or less as powerful as the 3090 : https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-4070-S-Super-vs-Nvidia-RTX-3090/4154vs4081
I didn't see the "Ti Super" on the OP picture
I'm happy with my 1050Ti
No, thats exactly the card I got
*coil whine noises*
No, it's what I have except I went with Gigabyte instead of Asus
No, I dont even need that, regular 4070 is great enough.
>New games are visual clusterfricks that only look good in screenshots
>-100fps to put ugly shadows that fizzle out around every object
>mfw playing every game in 480p with FSR and I don't even have a gpu on my linux computer
I need less
cute
yeah
Is upgrading from a 2060 to a 4060TI (16GB) a worthwhile upgrade?
Oh so basically double the power, that's nice, any reccomendations for which version to buy?
honestly I don't know I've been debating buying a 4070/7800XT for like 6 months
The 4060TI 16gb is honestly terrible value, and the 8gb is just ass
>barely outperforms the 3060Ti
>tiny ass memory bus cucks at 1440p - even at 1080p it can be an issue in games that love memory bandwidth
>doesn't really have the raw juice to make use of DLSS3 since that requires solid performance from the beginning
>regular DLSS is kinda dicks at 1080p
If you wanna go Nvidia, it's hard to recommend anything below the 4070(S) this generation
a secondhand 2080Ti will give you the same performance as the 4060Ti, with an acceptable amount of vram, for much cheaper, and without choking on its memory bus
a used 3080 will be the same price and will just outperform it in every way
if you wanna buy new, I'd much rather recommend an RX 6800
a 3060 12 gig solves all your problems at 1080p.
That's why I was thinking of getting the 16GB version, the problem, you see, is that I'm br*zilian so the market is much more expensive and limited here, for example I can't find the 2080ti anywhere that isn't ebay (which wouldn't be a problem were it not for my country's import tax laws). 4060TI 16GB is already 100$ over msrp in here and any of the 4070 series are at least 200$ to 390$ over the 4060ti's price
Ah yeah, in that situation then it might not be such a bad idea
It's not a bad card in a vacuum tbh, it's perfectly fine at 1080p (the 16gb even more so, at least you'll have vram for days, and the bandwidth is less of an issue, at least for now) and it's not inept at 1440p when it doesn't get cucked by said bandwidth
You can also see if you can find 6700XTs for considerably cheaper, but otherwise the 4060Ti might be an interesting enough option for you yeah
I currently have a 1080p monitor so that isn't a problem for me really, still I'm going to see whether I will go for the 4060ti or save some more and either get the 4070 or the 4070 super, I'd rather get something that won't have any problems down the line. Also, aren't amd gpu's worse for emulating? I remember seeing that somewhere, if that's true then I'm not getting one.
I'm pretty sure that's no longer the case. It used to be that AMD CPUs sucked at it (and even first gen Ryzen wasn't particularly amazing for emulation) but now they're perfectly fine
GPU wise I'm pretty sure both sides are perfectly fine
I haven't had any issues with my 5600XT/6700/7800XT but I also admittedly haven't really tried emulating anything more demanding than the 3DS or PS2 - that being said I'm pretty sure anything modern will handle PS360 and Switch emulation without an issue
its still kicking
I remember being aghast at the $700 price.
I absolutely will not pay asking prices for GPUs now. Guess I'm done with video games when this one kicks the bucket.
>imagine paying 2x for half the performance of a 3070.
>3070
Hello vramlet. Just remember to scale down to 1080p eh
jokes on your morono, my monitor goes up to 1080p anyway.
I'm planning to build a pc buts it's mostly for meme games with my friends such as Apex Legends and competitive stuff like Street Fighter, would guys rather recommend the 3060 or the 4060 for it?I don't think I'm going all out.
a 4060 is faster and supports frame generation, if you want a bit more you can get a 4060 ti
the 4060's slightly faster and has DLSS3 + frame generation, but its shitty bus width and 8GB VRAM means it's the worse option if you play at higher resolutions, not that you should be using the 4060 for anything above 1080p anyway
meanwhile the 3060 is slightly slower and doesn't have frame generation but it has more VRAM(12GB)
pick your poison
Reminder.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/12gb-4080-unlaunch/
>3080, 1440p
don't need more
even the vram scare is sort of a meme since ive played TLOU and le harry potter game just fine
>nvidia drones paid 700$ for 12gb of vram
Oh no no no hahahahahhahhahahahahahahahaa
The one in the OP is a ti super so 16GB
Never had a problem with the 12gb. Maybe will eventually, but by then I will just buy a new gpu anyway
I have a 3060 Ti it runs everything so imho anyone buying anything more expensive then that is moronic
I got the two fan version
5060 bros they wont mess it up right?
If 5060 won't be a scam I will be surprised.
I remember when I started paying attention to gpus one of the threads on Ganker I entered had an op pic of a 780ti sli set up. that was probably 2014.
tell me Ganker, what games made after 2014 are you playing that require a gpu stronger than a 780ti? bear in mind that all games made after 2011 are shit.
I have a 1660TI and it runs everything I want to play. The only game it struggled with was palworld but I still got good framerates on medium settings.
I do notice that games are just now starting to come out with 20xx cards in min reqs but there's still nothing I want to play that badly to justify an upgrade.
>tell me Ganker, what games made after 2014 are you playing that require a gpu stronger than a 780ti?
Games?
I have 4080S but tbqhwy senpaitachi methinks I should’ve went with 4070TiS
I've got a 4090 and some of the games I play could frankly use even more performance than that.
what do you play? So far I had to use DLSS only for alan wake 2 and cp2077, both with path tracing
4k skyrim with duel monitors and 230 sex mods and 14 texture mods
TWWH3 at 4k and max-ish settings drops to like 70-80FPS at times, obviously it's not bad but my monitor is 160Hz so there's certainly room for improvement. Darktide with RT requires all kinds of DLSS (scaling + frame gen) to get good FPS with 4k video output, a 4090 is obviously very far from running it native. Cyberpunk is even worse, also requires scaling + frame gen so the 4090 is far below what it would take to run a game like that native, you would seriously need something like 3x faster to run native 4k with the RT bells and whistles turned on. Dragon's Dogma 2 also hit 100% GPU load outside the city and it wasn't getting super high FPS, I mean it was 60+ but not super high. VR is also quite demanding and very sensitive to any performance issue.
Basically any demanding-ish game requires some form of scaling or frame gen with a 4k monitor, or could at least benefit from higher FPS with a faster graphics card. The games that actually hit my FPS cap of 155 have pretty basic graphics and low requirements, like AoE4 or Barony. Anything remotely demanding or fancy-looking is instantly GPU bottlenecked at 4k, even if some run very well (I don't mind being GPU bottlenecked at 100+ FPS, for instance).
I require more
No i don't, but I'm not gonna overpay for that thing either
>need more than a $800 card
No actually, I need less, but unfortunately all current Nvidia cards cheaper than $600 suck shit.
If im doing a new build after 8 years of 970 + i5 6600k is a 4080 super worth it?
>is a 4080 super worth it
Not really, save yourself $200 and go for the ti super, the performance gap doesn't really justify the price premium. Pair it up with a 7800X3D, especially if you can get the Microcenter bundle.
>Microcenter bundle
My man
I pity people that don't have a Microcenter near them
I don't even live in the US but my buddy got that bundle for me, shit's great.
Only place I go for PC parts
Their return policy alone puts them at S tier
good morning sirs. please redeem intel battlemage graphic cards. thank you.
I am seriously hoping that it shits on the garbage that AMD and Nvidia put out with their latest gen.
Shit, if they can release a 24GB card for ~$800 I'll gladly give them my money.
I'm just hoping for something decent in the 300~400 range, god the 7600 XT, 4060 and 4060 ti are ass.
hmm I don't know. I'll believe it when I see it.
I'll pass, having seen the A770 subreddit which was a cope shed for literal cuckolds who bought an "early access" gfx card lol.
A770 was terrible on release but it's a pretty solid card right now IF you don't want to play the handful of games in which it still shits itself.
I heard it has issues playing even old games and also in emulators.
Got one in April after my used 1660 Super was on its last legs. Games on this thing run like butter and 3D modeling/printing is a dream!
But after the major tests I just started a Con-man run in New Vegas.