Let me guess, you need more?

They keep moving the goal posts and you only fight the last move, until you lose and then you fight the next one. This has been going on for a very long time now.

I don't think I do, I've seen things change for the worse my entire life and I know it happened way before I was alive too.

funny you say that when Im pretty sure there's more race reactivity than class reactivity. Playing a drow is completely different since the goblins are friendlier to you

>Play the unfinished EA version and spoil the game for yourself
Stfu moron

So you admit it's less mechanically faithful.

Not the subject of discussion. You're deflecting.

No statement about the quality of the previous games was made, only that they were less faithful. You're making much to do over nothing.

>already admitted it's less mechanically faithful
>B-BUT THE SETTING THO
>B-BUT THE STORYLINE (even though I know nothing about it)
BG3 is very connected to the previous games, and that's just based on information from the early access.

Hard facts aren't coping. Ignoring them in favor of delusion is.

How about facts like there still being more bhaalspawn in the world than just the MC from the previous games. How about the cult of the dead three popping back up. How about Jergal himself.

Now who's coping, homosexual.

BG Storyline is literally a continuation of a Wizards storyline though?

Bioware are not the writing geniuses you think they are. They have been recycling the same story for literally every game they make.

They did it in BG2
I meant literally every game.

>You're out of your depth anon.
Sort of a dumb thing to say, like I'm supposed to know what is and isn't inside that single brain cell of yours.
By the way, Ed Greenwood is a lore consultant on BG3.

Seems to me like you're coping even harder now.

>me no like wotc, not enough old thing
Ok it literally has the creator of the forgotten realms on board
>NOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT
This is just another old good new bad situation isn't it
It could literally be the old bioware team using infinity engine but you'd still piss and shit and throw a tantrum

And how does it piss on the original games? And don't say some variation of "continuing the story", that's moronic and you know it.

And who says it has to be the same character? There are still plot elements that can be used to continue off of.

So basically you can't put it into words and are eternally seething over nothing. Nice.

You so dumb. I guess Neverwinter Nights 2 and Icewind Dale 2 shouldn't have been made either. moron.

>They are completely unrelated stories.
Isn't this why you're complaining about BG3? Because it is not a direct continuation of BG2. Make up your mind troon. You can't be in the middle. You're either a man or an abomination. There is no inbetween.
>inb4 this is not what i was talking about
It literally is. You just complained that BG3 was not directly linked to BG2. Are my eyes wrong?

>The Illithid plot point is a direct continuation of the unresolved "mind flayer conspiracy" beneath Athkatla in BG2.
Was that confirmed or is it just speculation? If there is official confirmation link it up please.

>If you just stated
But it wasn't.

Those have been a thing for ages now.

How about troony dwarves?

>255 posts
>83 IPs
The shills are working overtime, huh.

>You're the homosexual. Now go choke on a wiener.
Now here you go with the grooming, for shame, shill. For shame.

>black elves have been around for decades
>this is Larian's fault

>Zoomies don't play old isometric shit.
I don't? Damn, that's news to me.

If you ignore the Beamdog companions, skip the Siege of Dragonspear, and mod the cutscenes back in, then there's literally nothing wrong with the EE.

>somehow I doubt he did half of that.
I did though.

You fricking clown. I'm

>somehow I doubt he did half of that.
I did though.

AND

If you ignore the Beamdog companions, skip the Siege of Dragonspear, and mod the cutscenes back in, then there's literally nothing wrong with the EE.

Do you know what a generalization is, zoomfrick?
You have to be 18 to post here btw

you're literally in a thread about the baldur gate series. how fricking contrarian can you be?

I wasn't arguing it wasn't? Try and keep up anon.

First off, read the post right above yours. Second, I don't care if you don't like Minsc. If anyhting you should be more annoyed they decided to contrive him back into the scene. Third, arguing they're going forward with beamBlack person shit isn't a good look, nor did they actually do anything to Jaheira.

>Not only was BG not unfaithful, D&D isn't just dice rolls.
The only thing that is objectively "D&D" is its mechanics, meaning dice.
Everything else varies from a group to a group, from a setting to a setting, from a scenario to a scenario.

It's kind of baffling to me how theyre still sticking to the premade character concept even when working a completely different game. RPGs have always been about making your own character and story.

>So then make your own character? Nothing is stopping you
Except all the content theyve put into their OC characters instead of making the custom character experience better.

You can experience that content by having that character in your party, numbskull.

Plus Custom Origin character have their own unique content.

In an ideal world it would be nothing special, but every other crpg on the market currently has much less reactivity

There is only one game that has comparable amount of reactivity and story flexibility and that's Divnity:Original Sin 2.

its combat is better than any "true dnd" "true rpg" one. I just wish it was harder with the way ai intentionally makes stupid tactical decisions so you could win. I dont need any of this shit.

no its not. I dont need some stupid useless spells and abilities that do nothing, i dont need a chance they will work or chance that i will hit or miss. I dont need limits per day on how often i can cast. This shit doesnt belong in a videogame.

stick with a slot machine if you like chance based gameplay

you are either a shill (most likely) or an extremely gullible idiot
the beginning of the game always has the most effort put into it
you can expect much less "reactivity" further down the line

This is a moronic arguement and its going nowhere. You've assumed things that have never been said like how its against beauty to have more options for a character creator for little to no reason besides a boogey man you've created inside of your, clearly, non-american head.

>Like the fact your character can only look athletic and in shape and you can't transform beauty into ugliness with one slider.
You brought it up first and used nearly the same wording that they are hand in hand. I'm done arguing with you otherworldly troglodyte. Go play barbie in the sims or something.

not entirely his fault

I've been here since 2007 you dumb underage. Ganker has been wizard central since forever. /tg/ likes the meme classes and /misc/tards are the ones larping about being paladins.

I doubt it. Like manlet, Farquad is a narcissist that absolutely has to let people know who he is, even if doing so will make everyone instantly ignore everything he says.

No.

That's hypocritical.

No it isn't.

See [...]
I think major cities on the Sword Coast can handle more than one protagonist's epic, especially with a century between.

IT's not about the city. It's about the implication that BG3 is a continuation of BG1&2, which it plainly isn't. It's not the same story. It's not the same edition. It's not the same gameplay. It's not even the same aesthetic or setting, if you look at the material they put out for "3", you'd never think it had anything to do with 1 or 2 if not for the 3 at the end. It's deceptive and malicious.

>It's about the implication that BG3 is a continuation of BG1&2
There is a tenuous link, but it's there. Also every single person who did play BG1+2 knows CHARNAME isn't the protagonist of BG3, nor was that ever a selling point. Who is getting deceived here then, except people who never played BG1+2 thus have no reason to bring up continuity?

That's hypocritical.

>I think major cities on the Sword Coast can handle more than one protagonist's epic, especially with a century between.
this

IWD2 & NWN2 are identical to their predecessors, not remotely similar comparison. Calling BG"3" is like calling Dark alliance BG3.

are you pretending to be stupid? they're literally the same game just a different module

NWN 2 isn't even on the same edition as NWN1. moron,

>The "CHARNAM" troony hasn't even played any of the other FR games that he keeps talking about
Holy shit

What does BG2 have to do with BG? You have to be a full-on moron NOT to realize the BG1&2 games are not about BG but about CHARNAME. You could make a better argument for it being about the time of troubles than for it being about BG, which again doesn't even feature in the second game.

BG1 is whimsical, BG3 is raunchy at BEST. Larian can't write nuanced characters for shit, let alone interesting characters. But hey, at least you can have anal sex with Shadowheart

You know, those sex storyboards never include half-size people, I wonder why. Sounds like heightism to me. Does Larian need to be cancelled for not even entertaining the idea halflings, gnomes and dwarves are sexual beings as well?

I'm pretty sure that some of the base work for sex scenes with halflings/gnomes/dwarves was leaked. So you can be a gnome sexing Shadowheart.

Depends if the scene is fully implemented.

>You can have sex with Minthara in EA right now
This shit has never not been cringe in any RPG.

They're belgians but even so they probably aren't stupid enough to publish material that could be used to simulate something illegal.
Probably.

I'm not familiar with belgian law but what I am familiar with is modders and fantasy rpg games like skyrim.

That's because manlets don't get any pussy.

>NOOOOOOO IT'S NOT POZZED IF YOU IGNORE ALL THE DISGUSTING SHIT
BG3 is troonycore and you ought to know that, Lariantroon.

I am going to play the frog and frick the autist and maybe the halfling werewolf grandma.

the idea that the secret route content would be femdom shit is laughable. not unlikely, just hilarious and apropos for their homosexualry.

nah I just worded that fricked up. I was referring to path based content, as in red prince making liggers kneel and such.

yeah that's cool, and red princes backstory was searching for Sadha. but his path content has putting liggers in their place. that the frogs might just be femdom with other companions is a hilarious thought.

Nice.

you're the one defending these writers lmao

Children are not special. If anything they are worth less than adults as they do not have skills and abilities.

but having several different options to lick hairy goblin feet was top priority
because that's what most players would want to do

As it turns out, handling a hostile party through diplomacy, trickery, subservience or violence is a pretty common scenario. Child murder on the other hand, well you kinda have to dig deep to find people really into that.

Child murder is basic evil. Its generic and expected.

>It's a little cartoonishly evil
It's a shame the game doesn't let the player role play as cartoonishly evil

It's a shame in that the game has offered the player n choices instead of n+1 choices. Shame, really.

That's what I mean. Its one of the first things people think of when they think "Evil." Its why many games that let you be evil avoid adding in children that you can interact with. Its to avoid people whining that you can kill kids. Just look at Fallout, people could not shut up that the kids were invulnerable.

Either allow it or disallow it but if you disallow it do not pretend like it is an option and do not give the player a reason to want to kill the kid.

I use it as a standard because the ways that the game let you interact with it is already supported. No new systems need to be made. Its not like asking them to create realistic market forces and the systems to take it over and ruin the lives of millions for profit.

>violence
Which the game fails to simulate

It's shame the game doesn't simulate that scenario

It doesn't. The game is forced to break its own internal rules and make NPCs invulnerable

A total failure of simulation.

Similarly, we can't deny the existence of its failures.

"Plenty of people" will always, by definition, be satisfied by merely sufficient. The elect, however, will always attempt to soar to greater heights, as unreasonable as that may seem to lower types

The aforementioned "lower type"

The failure is indeed there.

And no failure without the shadow of success, to quote yourself.

>reality: x degrees of freedom
>simulation: x-1 degrees of freedom
>simulation fails to simulate reality by 1 degree of freedom
It's really that simple.

No they're not. Only the sociopathic minority tries to murder children first things first to check if they're hard coded to be immortal.

Sociopaths tend to be pretty high IQ and manipulative, just devoid of a concern for normal human emotions. They wouldn't rabbit punch a kid trying to pickpocket them, because that doesn't benefit them.

>Sociopaths tend to be pretty high IQ
This is a myth. Serial killers actually have a below average IQ

Name a cRPG where you actually have to defecate and keep personal hygiene by default.
Wait, are you trying to tell me that a cRPG is supposed to include things YOU personally like, to be called a cRPG? Daaaaaaaayum.

> Next question.
Name another cRPG where you actually have to defecate and keep personal hygiene by default.
Wait, are you trying to tell me that a cRPG to be a cPRG has to be Kingdom Come: Deliverance? Daaaaaaaaaaaaayuuuuuuum...

And you asked for another question.
So I'm asking for another title. And I'll ask for another. And then, it might occur to you, that the games that cater to very specific needs and tastes are scarce and few, depending on whom you ask. Which is absolutely wrong to make standards of.
So, another title, if you please.

I pick both.
> VERY specific kind of violence.
As I already said, violence is there. Evil is there. Just not the kind of violence and evil you search for.
Try to survive this blow to the core of your "self". In the meantime consider not playing the game until someone releases a mod, where you can run around and kill children, which seems to be the golden standard you search in games.
I have similar problem with NPCs or (gasp!) protagonists that I can't strip naked, and I don't play cRPGs until the correct patch is released. It's that easy.

You'd have to kill a child first to strip its body naked, Anon. And this is your realm. I definitely don't entertain this kind of activity.
This is rocket science to you?

Yes. I find it breaking my immersion where I can't loot dead body off of everything, his or her underwear included.
...but to do that to a child NPC you'd have to slay it first, and this is what you and the likes of you enjoy. For whatever reasons they might be.

>Name a cRPG where you actually have to defecate
to defecate or not to defecate
truly deep role playing, homosexual

you are the one who focused on shitting when the discussion was about killing people

personal hygiene could be a choice
everyone shits, hence there's no possible role playing aspect to it, you moronic monkey

The game is a handful of months from release and the first act is "completed" as presented.

They can of course add more later but this does not garner hope. It also does not help that the game only pretends to care about your race. I picked a Drow and every NPC spends a paragraph acting like I am literally Hitler but even more evil and then ignore the fact I am a Drow offering to teach me or sell things to me or find their missing grandma.

the game is literally written by trannies who call themselves "the cuck squad"
you lost your dick, you lost the game, you lost the thread, you lost at life