Nope, never buying another Blizzard product again, you shill. They lost me forever with how dog shit Diablo 3 was. They clearly are out of touch and don't know how to make a good game anymore.
Path of Exile is better in pretty much every way. A bunch of kiwis in their garage did it better than an AAA studio lul
Mad, Blizztard? PoE is the reason Diablo 3 got seasons, moron. Blizzard had to copy PoE's challenge leagues lol. Sad!
More action oriented combat is better than pulling lever combat in poe. One-shot or get one-shotted is not really engaging. How ass hurt are you that a game that isn't even out yet tilts you into a frenzy? Maybe GGG has to deliver something again to get you back into their maze when diablo is going to take a huge chunk of the player base.
Oh yeah I love the action of travelling to blue/yellow packs, vacuuming, pop, rinse and repeat forever, interacting with literally no other game mechanic/systems because the game has none, with a handpicked set given to you by the game. Great shit.
And I have no doubt D4 will have a bigger playerbase than PoE. D3 already has. And the reason for that is the same reason it won't actually take any players from PoE: it's made for casual morons.
>Oh yeah I love the action of travelling to blue/yellow packs, vacuuming, pop, rinse and repeat forever, interacting with literally no other game mechanic/systems because the game has none
as i was reading this i was trying to figure out if you were talking about PoE or D4
omg i love having 10 abilities on cooldowns and doing the same slow finger walk across my hotbar in a prescribed loop because developers think im too dumb to have any actual agency in combat!!! i love waiting for cooldowns!!!!
>low mob density >low contrast/color gamma making our character literally blend in, sometimes making it hard to even see it, light radius currently gone >dungeons look boring >open world is nothing but a buzzword, game didn't need it, you'll constantly skip mobs just going from place to place instead of fighting enemies in your way organically >itemization looks boring as frick
Game looks okay at best, it's not shit but it's not mindblowing either, could evolve into something special in the future or get absolutely fricked by blizzard's israelitery
My bet is on the latter because I despise modern blizzard and do not trust them a single bit
>>low mob density
D3 was like that too until later difficulties >>low contrast/color gamma making our character literally blend in, sometimes making it hard to even see it, light radius currently gone
valid, I hate this shit
look boring
How so? I also like that dungeons with multiple levels now seamlessly switch levels as you traverse down from one level to the next >>open world is nothing but a buzzword, game didn't need it, you'll constantly skip mobs just going from place to place instead of fighting enemies in your way organically
It really depends on how much random stuff they cram into the regions to make exploring them worthwhile, and I hope events are actually good and not XIV FATE tier where unless you specifically need to do them for something like a relic weapon or event you just walk past every time
looks boring as frick
still better than D3's
>low mob density
That's a good thing >low contrast/color gamma
Also a good thing. >dungeons look boring
Not seen any, can't comment. But if they are anything like Lost ark, I would agree. >open world is not needed
Agreed, but I don't think it is necessarily a negative either. >itemization looks boring as frick
I've seen some items that had seemingly interesting mods. But I doubt it will be as good as it was in d2
Overall, it looks to be a good game. But it is blizzard, so obviously be cautiously optimistic.
The dungeons are indeed boring. Having played the beta I was quite disappointed that the objectives were basic at best. Basically “click these things to proceed.” There wasn’t anything unique about any of the dungeons but one of the things I did like was the random boss encounter (butcher would randomly spawn and wreck you). But I only saw the butcher in my play time and it was a small percentage of the dungeons. I would have liked to see more random things happening in dungeons, like having move quickly because it fills with lava, or avoiding cave ins, etc.
>low mob density
That's a good thing >low contrast/color gamma
Also a good thing. >dungeons look boring
Not seen any, can't comment. But if they are anything like Lost ark, I would agree. >open world is not needed
Agreed, but I don't think it is necessarily a negative either. >itemization looks boring as frick
I've seen some items that had seemingly interesting mods. But I doubt it will be as good as it was in d2
Overall, it looks to be a good game. But it is blizzard, so obviously be cautiously optimistic.
>literally b***hing about Diablo 4 having the same visual aesthetic as Diablo 2 when everyone b***hed about Diablo 3 not having Diablo 2's aesthetic
Only a Gankertard would think like this.
bitching about Diablo 4 having the same visual aesthetic as Diablo 2
That is incorrect, they are nothing alike.
Diablo 2 is full of color and contrast while having dark atmosphere.
Diablo 4 devs think that lowering contrast and saturation makes for "dark atmosphere" which is completely false and it also ruins visual clarity, where Diablo 2 is perfect in that regard.
Even the bad news about the game makes me more excited for it >watch some clickbait video about D4 being in "development hell" >it's a bunch of women and minorities crying about "crunch" because they wasted all their dev time crying that there's rape in the game instead of actually working
LMAO
>Literally shaking in fear that his poe achievements are going to vaporise once d4 comes along
>low mob density
That's a good thing >low contrast/color gamma
Also a good thing. >dungeons look boring
Not seen any, can't comment. But if they are anything like Lost ark, I would agree. >open world is not needed
Agreed, but I don't think it is necessarily a negative either. >itemization looks boring as frick
I've seen some items that had seemingly interesting mods. But I doubt it will be as good as it was in d2
Overall, it looks to be a good game. But it is blizzard, so obviously be cautiously optimistic.
>cautiously optimistic
As a boomer, I can say the same. If it is halfway decent, I will stick with it. And my friends will most likely be around too, compared to dropping out of poe which they deemed too complicated and time intensive. Understandably.
It's wild that companies just shill on Ganker
Anybody whose played Diablo 3 knows nu-diablo is shit, what's to get hyped for? Playing the same whirlwind barbarian you played in Diablo 2 then 3 again in Diablo 4? Having always online single player so you can't mod the game? Experiencing a "dark fantasy" that isn't really that dark because oh no the children?
Honestly any other game out right now would be better to scratch your isometric itch, Lost Ark has trade skills and boats and already does everything Diablo 4 will try to do. Last Epoch has new original classes that aren't the same recycled Amazon/Barbarian/Necro/Sorc.
Diablo 4 what a joke.
>Anybody whose played Diablo 3 knows nu-diablo is shit
Literally the exact opposite, everyone knows D2 is painfully slow trash and D3 is the best combat in an ARPG >Lost Ark gay
oh I see youre just moronic
>Lost Ark has trade skills and boats
and these suck >Last Epoch has new original classes that aren't the same recycled Amazon/Barbarian/Necro/Sorc.
not much original about LE classes
It's really simple shill-anon just mention one thing that diablo 4 does that's original that other isometrics aren't already doing. Certainly one original idea can't be that hard right?
>b-but these other games do that >those games are shit and diablo 4 does what they do way better >w-well it's still not original!
AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Mindbroken
>Lost Ark has trade skills and boats
and these suck >Last Epoch has new original classes that aren't the same recycled Amazon/Barbarian/Necro/Sorc.
not much original about LE classes
I do not get the appeal of diablo. When I played 3 I got a hammer spell on my paladin and a piece of gear that just let me spam it constantly and that's all I needed throughout the rest of the game. Shit was pretty boring.
Why does every arpg these days require an account and always online for a singleplayer experience? I seriously don't understand the point or the appeal of this practice.
>full price open world mmo live service game with battle pass and cash shop and high ESG score >with the gameplay of diablo 3
what about this is good exactly
the right is the newest one and will be what is on launch.
It did go through several versions - but I think that despite the graphical changes the current version is the best because it allows for more build diversity.
You sound like a marketer, but you do have quads.
Right one is the best either way, but Blizzard will only make games for casuals, as we will see again.
>normal battle pass >paid battle pass >microtransactons >70€ game >100€ for early access >game director has no clue what the competitors are, had no clue what path of exile even was >the crafting system is literally kanai's cube 2.0 >diablo 4 endgame is greater rifts 2.0 >world bosses are literally world bosses from WoW along with the time gating
What a clusterfrick
>need online connection just to play by yourself >enemy scales with your character ensuring that killing even the lowest level enemies still takes dozens of hits >paragon leveling
As long as the Diablo series keeps those 3 main deal breakers, the series will always remain shit.
preordered standard
will probably upgrade to ultimate before release
keep advertising like this and don't emulate the sad cope shit that the wow team came up with.
>paid battle pass in a 70$ game
>paid cosmetics
lol
name 5 things
Nope, never buying another Blizzard product again, you shill. They lost me forever with how dog shit Diablo 3 was. They clearly are out of touch and don't know how to make a good game anymore.
Path of Exile is better in pretty much every way. A bunch of kiwis in their garage did it better than an AAA studio lul
>Path of Exile is better in pretty much every way
Lmao, get into current times nostalgia homosexual.
PoE is current times. D4 brings literally nothing new to the table.
More action oriented combat is better than pulling lever combat in poe. One-shot or get one-shotted is not really engaging. How ass hurt are you that a game that isn't even out yet tilts you into a frenzy? Maybe GGG has to deliver something again to get you back into their maze when diablo is going to take a huge chunk of the player base.
Oh yeah I love the action of travelling to blue/yellow packs, vacuuming, pop, rinse and repeat forever, interacting with literally no other game mechanic/systems because the game has none, with a handpicked set given to you by the game. Great shit.
And I have no doubt D4 will have a bigger playerbase than PoE. D3 already has. And the reason for that is the same reason it won't actually take any players from PoE: it's made for casual morons.
>Oh yeah I love the action of travelling to blue/yellow packs, vacuuming, pop, rinse and repeat forever, interacting with literally no other game mechanic/systems because the game has none
as i was reading this i was trying to figure out if you were talking about PoE or D4
omg i love having 10 abilities on cooldowns and doing the same slow finger walk across my hotbar in a prescribed loop because developers think im too dumb to have any actual agency in combat!!! i love waiting for cooldowns!!!!
Sounds more or less just like current day poe. Not sure what you are on about.
>poe
>having 10 abilities
moron
what
Mad, Blizztard? PoE is the reason Diablo 3 got seasons, moron. Blizzard had to copy PoE's challenge leagues lol. Sad!
>PoE is the reason Diablo 3 is a piece of shit
You're not wrong
>Path of Exile
>nostalgia
underage b&
Nostalgia doesn't have a time requirement, you could be nostalgic for the breakfast you ate this morning
I still haven't played Diablo 3 and Stacraft 2. Fricking Blizzard and frick you too.
You bloody bastard fricking!
You bloody bastard b***h! Fricking your sister bastard!
>low mob density
>low contrast/color gamma making our character literally blend in, sometimes making it hard to even see it, light radius currently gone
>dungeons look boring
>open world is nothing but a buzzword, game didn't need it, you'll constantly skip mobs just going from place to place instead of fighting enemies in your way organically
>itemization looks boring as frick
Game looks okay at best, it's not shit but it's not mindblowing either, could evolve into something special in the future or get absolutely fricked by blizzard's israelitery
My bet is on the latter because I despise modern blizzard and do not trust them a single bit
>you'll constantly skip mobs just going from place to place instead of fighting enemies in your way organically
A true successor to Diablo 2.
>>low mob density
D3 was like that too until later difficulties
>>low contrast/color gamma making our character literally blend in, sometimes making it hard to even see it, light radius currently gone
valid, I hate this shit
look boring
How so? I also like that dungeons with multiple levels now seamlessly switch levels as you traverse down from one level to the next
>>open world is nothing but a buzzword, game didn't need it, you'll constantly skip mobs just going from place to place instead of fighting enemies in your way organically
It really depends on how much random stuff they cram into the regions to make exploring them worthwhile, and I hope events are actually good and not XIV FATE tier where unless you specifically need to do them for something like a relic weapon or event you just walk past every time
looks boring as frick
still better than D3's
The dungeons are indeed boring. Having played the beta I was quite disappointed that the objectives were basic at best. Basically “click these things to proceed.” There wasn’t anything unique about any of the dungeons but one of the things I did like was the random boss encounter (butcher would randomly spawn and wreck you). But I only saw the butcher in my play time and it was a small percentage of the dungeons. I would have liked to see more random things happening in dungeons, like having move quickly because it fills with lava, or avoiding cave ins, etc.
>low mob density
That's a good thing
>low contrast/color gamma
Also a good thing.
>dungeons look boring
Not seen any, can't comment. But if they are anything like Lost ark, I would agree.
>open world is not needed
Agreed, but I don't think it is necessarily a negative either.
>itemization looks boring as frick
I've seen some items that had seemingly interesting mods. But I doubt it will be as good as it was in d2
Overall, it looks to be a good game. But it is blizzard, so obviously be cautiously optimistic.
>literally b***hing about Diablo 4 having the same visual aesthetic as Diablo 2 when everyone b***hed about Diablo 3 not having Diablo 2's aesthetic
Only a Gankertard would think like this.
bitching about Diablo 4 having the same visual aesthetic as Diablo 2
That is incorrect, they are nothing alike.
Diablo 2 is full of color and contrast while having dark atmosphere.
Diablo 4 devs think that lowering contrast and saturation makes for "dark atmosphere" which is completely false and it also ruins visual clarity, where Diablo 2 is perfect in that regard.
Even the bad news about the game makes me more excited for it
>watch some clickbait video about D4 being in "development hell"
>it's a bunch of women and minorities crying about "crunch" because they wasted all their dev time crying that there's rape in the game instead of actually working
LMAO
>there's rape in the game
?????
apparently some side quests have a story about rape
i didnt read most of them in the closed endgame beta, so not sure if they were in that
Let me guess: You like D3 and have played most seasons at least a little bit.
D3 was the best diablo so yeah I did. The only people who didn't like it is this shithole.
I will definitely play it because i love numbers going up
you mean diablo 3.5?
the skill tree is literally nothing. also they removed runes because they were too complex for the mainstream audience.
Wait what runes are gone? Since when?
since people got to play the game and noticed they arent in the game anymore.
this
they never said a reason
more like nothing about diablo 4 looks good
>Literally shaking in fear that his poe achievements are going to vaporise once d4 comes along
>cautiously optimistic
As a boomer, I can say the same. If it is halfway decent, I will stick with it. And my friends will most likely be around too, compared to dropping out of poe which they deemed too complicated and time intensive. Understandably.
i have played poe for 50 hours XD
d4 just looked like fricking shit deal with it homosexual
It's wild that companies just shill on Ganker
Anybody whose played Diablo 3 knows nu-diablo is shit, what's to get hyped for? Playing the same whirlwind barbarian you played in Diablo 2 then 3 again in Diablo 4? Having always online single player so you can't mod the game? Experiencing a "dark fantasy" that isn't really that dark because oh no the children?
Honestly any other game out right now would be better to scratch your isometric itch, Lost Ark has trade skills and boats and already does everything Diablo 4 will try to do. Last Epoch has new original classes that aren't the same recycled Amazon/Barbarian/Necro/Sorc.
Diablo 4 what a joke.
>Anybody whose played Diablo 3 knows nu-diablo is shit
Literally the exact opposite, everyone knows D2 is painfully slow trash and D3 is the best combat in an ARPG
>Lost Ark gay
oh I see youre just moronic
>D3 is the best combat in an ARPG
oh i see you are just moronic
It's really simple shill-anon just mention one thing that diablo 4 does that's original that other isometrics aren't already doing. Certainly one original idea can't be that hard right?
HORSE RIDING
Not being p2w you sad little lost ark Black person
bro your battlepass?
cosmetic only like Fortnite, try again 🙂
>b-but these other games do that
>those games are shit and diablo 4 does what they do way better
>w-well it's still not original!
AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Mindbroken
> having 10 abilities on cooldowns
neither poe nor diablo are that
>Lost Ark has trade skills and boats
and these suck
>Last Epoch has new original classes that aren't the same recycled Amazon/Barbarian/Necro/Sorc.
not much original about LE classes
Turning it into a pseudo-MMO is pretty shit. Probably gonna have a cancerous cash shop too. Blizzard will find a way to ruin it. They always do.
We must all oppose this company on principle
Perish Blizzard
I do not get the appeal of diablo. When I played 3 I got a hammer spell on my paladin and a piece of gear that just let me spam it constantly and that's all I needed throughout the rest of the game. Shit was pretty boring.
Tiananmen square
It makes me feel a bit better when I realize other people spend money on shittier games than the ones I buy, please keep existing blizzbros.
>unironically giving nu-blizz money
I S H Y G D D T
Why does every arpg these days require an account and always online for a singleplayer experience? I seriously don't understand the point or the appeal of this practice.
the CCP, and western companies that are just like it, want to know everything about (You)
Elaborate.
I've seen the trailer and was unimpressed. Tell me why I should be excited about the company that created Diablo Immortal.
netease is not making it, vicarious visions is
>full price open world mmo live service game with battle pass and cash shop and high ESG score
>with the gameplay of diablo 3
what about this is good exactly
>we want the fortnite audience.
And that's good. I'd rather play with addict zoomers than get off my lawn boomers.
>prices are garbage
>cross platform immediatly means PC version will suffer
>paragon is back
>early access
Its shit. But its impossible to convince blizzard shills so I dont bother you guys will never lern
literally nothing looks good
Does it have controller support?
Yes
Nice, I'll pre-order it
>less soul with every update
Are you saying left is the new one?
the right is the newest one and will be what is on launch.
It did go through several versions - but I think that despite the graphical changes the current version is the best because it allows for more build diversity.
You sound like a marketer, but you do have quads.
Right one is the best either way, but Blizzard will only make games for casuals, as we will see again.
>normal battle pass
>paid battle pass
>microtransactons
>70€ game
>100€ for early access
>game director has no clue what the competitors are, had no clue what path of exile even was
>the crafting system is literally kanai's cube 2.0
>diablo 4 endgame is greater rifts 2.0
>world bosses are literally world bosses from WoW along with the time gating
What a clusterfrick
>need online connection just to play by yourself
>enemy scales with your character ensuring that killing even the lowest level enemies still takes dozens of hits
>paragon leveling
As long as the Diablo series keeps those 3 main deal breakers, the series will always remain shit.
>paragon leveling
that is completely different from d3 tho
Literally nothing about Diablo 4 feels right.
>Lilith isn't naked
>Succubus aren't topples
Trash woke game, call me if they fix those issues
preordered standard
will probably upgrade to ultimate before release
keep advertising like this and don't emulate the sad cope shit that the wow team came up with.
I heard reports from beta testers that PvP was shit.
It's expected but I was hoping this time would be different.