still better than cyberpunk and a better rpg . gameplay is also superior to bg3
if the devs got their heads out of their asses and didn't abandon the game day 1 we'd have a great game by now and most issues would have been addressed
I immediately dismiss those who say that Cyberpunk is a better game as having horrible taste (its a fake RPG). As for BG3, I haven't played it, but it looks to me like a return to form for RPGs, so I cant blame them for saying its better.
leaker man said they couldnt get space flight to work how they wanted and it was in development hell. this was like 2 years before release. It looks like he was right and they just put loading screens between everything to compensate because they never got it working well.
no i wont post source because i didnt save it but he said a bunch of stuff that was proven true and i believe it was an actual bethsesda employee now.
>let's make a game that won't use the best strengths of our studio
They could barely make a city. The biggest map they ever did was F76. What the frick went on their heads to tackle making a game about traveling multiple worlds.
What a moronic fricking idea for this very specific studio. The suits in charge should have just said a big fat "NO!" to Todd.
Gem
No. Design. Document.
mods will fix it
>
xD
still better than cyberpunk and a better rpg . gameplay is also superior to bg3
if the devs got their heads out of their asses and didn't abandon the game day 1 we'd have a great game by now and most issues would have been addressed
hello sir
listen I'm a Bethesda fanboy but Cyberpunk and BG3 are way better, Starfield was beyond boring, and boring is maybe the worst thing a game can be
cyberpunk is much better wtf are you talking about
and why even bring up bg3, it's basically a completely different genre
SIRS….
I immediately dismiss those who say that Cyberpunk is a better game as having horrible taste (its a fake RPG). As for BG3, I haven't played it, but it looks to me like a return to form for RPGs, so I cant blame them for saying its better.
Cyberpunk it's so much better it's not even funny. The real joke is this game trying to compare itself to it.
not even real art
Starfield is a great game
oof
>beta tests for minor bug fix patches
do bethesdadrones really?
usa games are so shit now. todd should commit a hara-kiri kek
Is it not serving its purpose? You know, as a barebones space sandbox for modders to frick with.
Todd is the only one making great games
Are those games in the room right now?
i dont get it this was suppose to be his passion project right?
was it microsoft meddling in some way ?
leaker man said they couldnt get space flight to work how they wanted and it was in development hell. this was like 2 years before release. It looks like he was right and they just put loading screens between everything to compensate because they never got it working well.
no i wont post source because i didnt save it but he said a bunch of stuff that was proven true and i believe it was an actual bethsesda employee now.
Microsoft was behind the pandering to the woke crowd.
I think deep down Todd + Emil make for very dull tastes. Other games they worked on are better worlds they didn't make.
I heard they are the low fantasy hard scifi people who nudged out all the high fantasy low scifi people after morrowind
Todd's "vision" just isn't that good
combine that with Emil bogging it down with borderline AI generated writing and you get Starfield
>let's make a game that won't use the best strengths of our studio
They could barely make a city. The biggest map they ever did was F76. What the frick went on their heads to tackle making a game about traveling multiple worlds.
What a moronic fricking idea for this very specific studio. The suits in charge should have just said a big fat "NO!" to Todd.