Magic destroyed the world

This video is interesting in its concept (the game is crap) what are some world where magic literally destroyed the world?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/319050/Chaos_Reborn/

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Might and magic.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    is googling "magical apocalypse" really that hard bruv

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Real world.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Real life lol

    Trust the science at your own peril

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      How many simple physics tricks would get your burned at the stake?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >How many simple physics tricks would get your burned at the stake?
        All of them ask Galileo.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          "Why yes, the earth revolves around the sun"
          "CONTAIN HIM"

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            He wasn't arrested for that. The church didn't actually care about heliocentric vs geocentric. He was being ritually humiliated for criticizing the pope.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >The church didn't actually care about heliocentric vs geocentric
              Is this some catholic revisionist history? Every book I've ever read on it said that shit was important.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’ve read that Galileo specifically claimed that his discovery invalidated the Bible and the authority of the Church, and refused to recant

                So like him or not that’s at least a little more rational than attacking the guy purely to silence the underlying discovery

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                People claimed that, but Galileo wasn't one of them.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Responding to mounting controversy over theology, astronomy and philosophy, the Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633, found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", and sentenced him to house arrest where he remained until his death in 1642.

                Some points:

                1) Copernicus wrote about heliocentrism like a century before Galileo and was never censured by the church.

                2) It was the pope who commissioned Galileo's research to begin with.

                3) Because the research paper hadn't been invented yet Galileo's book had the heliocentric and geocentric models debated by two characters. The character arguing for geocentrism was named "simpleton". The pope, who supported the geocentric model, was personally offended by this.

                4) Galileo spent his house arrest living with a bishop who supported him.

                5) Galileo did NOT prove heliocentrism. His model did not resolve or even account for the issue of the stellar parallax. The reason geocentrism had been the scientific consensus since the Greeks is that no one could figure out why the stars weren't moving in the sky as the earth moved from one end of its orbit to another. They were, but the shift is so small no one could prove it was happening until the 19th century. The argument against Galileo wasn't "the bible says so".

                tl;dr the entire thing was about hurt feelings and 16th century Italian political cliques

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tim O'Neill has more info on his historyforatheists blog.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Anyone who calls or styles themselves an atheist, unironically, is automatically a pretentious fricking goof of an individual, and I pity them the same way I pity outward theists.

                What is a god is a matter of subjection. It's the same with magic. Good fricking lord. God can exist and simultaneously be thought of as "just a sufficiently advanced extradimensional being that's a bit TOO involved in earthly matters".

                These are the same sort of people that say "philosophy is dead" without realizing modern science -stems- from (natural) philosophy, and -has- a (natural) philosophy. Dumb fricks.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                cringe fencesitter

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >cringe fencesitter
                BASED.
                Agnostics are next level moronic.

                Anyone who calls or styles themselves an atheist, unironically, is automatically a pretentious fricking goof of an individual, and I pity them the same way I pity outward theists.

                What is a god is a matter of subjection. It's the same with magic. Good fricking lord. God can exist and simultaneously be thought of as "just a sufficiently advanced extradimensional being that's a bit TOO involved in earthly matters".

                These are the same sort of people that say "philosophy is dead" without realizing modern science -stems- from (natural) philosophy, and -has- a (natural) philosophy. Dumb fricks.

                Agnosic scum!
                >What if I take a religious word and twist it into crazy? (good = aliens)
                That is crazy.

                Why are agnostics like this?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Agnostics are likewise pretentious as well as moronic. They believe in the existence/non-existence of a flying spaghetti monster! (lol)

                Listen. God to the physicist is an extradimensional "godlike" being. God to the Christian is simply He, Yahweh, Jehovah, God, etc. To the Christian physicist, it is both. Perspective.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Agnostics are likewise pretentious as well as moronic. They believe in the existence/non-existence of a flying spaghetti monster! (lol)
                Exactly.
                How do you worship and not worship jesus at the same time?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                The same way people celebrate Christmas without actually being Christian. Religion is art. You can absolutely mold your life around a set of narratives and morals. There's a very old israeli joke about how two rabbis proved the non-existence of God, but still went to the synagogue the next morning. "What does his existence have to do with it?"

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The same way people celebrate Christmas without actually being Christian
                I'm an atheist and I do not celebrate Christmas. I mean why the frick would you?
                >Ah yes we must arrange lights on trees for no fricken reason!
                >Also we must lie to our children that a magic man brings them presents and not us!
                >And we all will exchange random presents of crap that we do not know if the other side even likes!
                >So that the corporations make even more money!
                >Hail consumerism!
                WTF?!
                https://slate.com/human-interest/2021/12/stop-giving-gifts-to-adults.html

                >There's a very old israeli joke about how two rabbis proved the non-existence of God, but still went to the synagogue the next morning. "What does his existence have to do with it?"
                Real fact most israelitesh are SCHIZOPHRENIC!

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ask Jordon Peterson...

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Ask Jordon Peterson...
                LOL great punchline. Jordon Peterson is schizophrenic however!

                ?t=295

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >cringe fencesitter
                BASED.
                Agnostics are next level moronic.
                [...]
                Agnosic scum!
                >What if I take a religious word and twist it into crazy? (good = aliens)
                That is crazy.

                Why are agnostics like this?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous


                Watch this NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON!

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't even like christians but this 'diagram' has always been funny to me. Historically technological 'progress' has ebbed and flowed based on a number of factors, ie a more centralized state could disperse more advanced technology across a wider range, otherwise various different places have to figure it out, and the rise of christendom coincided with the general fall of most large empires within europe. It wasn't the cause just like there's almost no single cause for any large events like the fall of rome or whatever. It's not like china had a dark age at the same time

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Roman Empire falls
                >DARK AGES
                >Meanwhile, a bit further east, the Byzantine Empire...

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I know atheists(RATIONALISTS) who say that however Rationalists are fricken insane and rationalists also insist on the
                >Awchually I'm an agnostic!
                name game.

                I truly hate rationalists.

                As for this picture it is stupid.
                Plate armor advanced in technology during the middle ages. I also like to point out that the up axis literally has no scale and is not explaining what le technological advancement is.

                The burning of the library of Alexandria is not that interesting since we can can be 100% sure over 99.999999% of the stuff there would have bean worthless superstitious trash like
                >Astrology
                >Religious texts
                >Crazy philosophy

                i mean now I'm like 0.1% interested to read some old shit in there however I'm 100% sure it will be worthless trash. Like this:

                https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MFtmozvGtEA
                Or anything Plato wrote...

                In other words worthless trash.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the entire thing was about hurt feelings
                Yes. Now shut the frick up.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The character arguing for geocentrism was named "simpleton". The pope, who supported the geocentric model, was personally offended by this.
                Man some things really don't change.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                [...]
                The Tl:dr of it was
                >The Church held hearings on heliocentrism vs geocentrism
                >At the end of said hearings the Pope went, "Huh, well, you've disproven geocenterism, but your heliocentric model has hiccups though, so we can't accept it as fact, but maybe with more funding and research...."
                >Galileo quickly writes a book involving a brilliant, handsome astronomer nonstop bashing an ugly, stupid Pope named Sempliciotto (Italian for Simpleton) for not immediately taking said astronomer's heliocentric ideas as fact
                >Pope went "....Alright, house arrest it is, we'll still fund you if you want to do research though"

                Why are you defending the Church's butthurt by overcomplicating things?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >why are you providing context??
                >why isn't it as simple as it is in my head???
                >you're overcomplicating things! just blunder through life patently misunderstanding events!

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’ve read that Galileo specifically claimed that his discovery invalidated the Bible and the authority of the Church, and refused to recant

                So like him or not that’s at least a little more rational than attacking the guy purely to silence the underlying discovery

                People claimed that, but Galileo wasn't one of them.

                The Tl:dr of it was
                >The Church held hearings on heliocentrism vs geocentrism
                >At the end of said hearings the Pope went, "Huh, well, you've disproven geocenterism, but your heliocentric model has hiccups though, so we can't accept it as fact, but maybe with more funding and research...."
                >Galileo quickly writes a book involving a brilliant, handsome astronomer nonstop bashing an ugly, stupid Pope named Sempliciotto (Italian for Simpleton) for not immediately taking said astronomer's heliocentric ideas as fact
                >Pope went "....Alright, house arrest it is, we'll still fund you if you want to do research though"

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Responding to mounting controversy over theology, astronomy and philosophy, the Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633, found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", and sentenced him to house arrest where he remained until his death in 1642.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Okay. He was arrested for saying it like a dick. There, happy? You can be an butthole and -still- be correct.

              Fricking prick.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's Islam.
            I'm surprised how often Islamic history in Afghanistan is projected onto Europe. You probably don't know muslims burned libraries for their refusal to remove books they didn't like.

            >The church didn't actually care about heliocentric vs geocentric
            Is this some catholic revisionist history? Every book I've ever read on it said that shit was important.

            You fell for Hollywood hook, line, and sinker.

            [...]
            Some points:

            1) Copernicus wrote about heliocentrism like a century before Galileo and was never censured by the church.

            2) It was the pope who commissioned Galileo's research to begin with.

            3) Because the research paper hadn't been invented yet Galileo's book had the heliocentric and geocentric models debated by two characters. The character arguing for geocentrism was named "simpleton". The pope, who supported the geocentric model, was personally offended by this.

            4) Galileo spent his house arrest living with a bishop who supported him.

            5) Galileo did NOT prove heliocentrism. His model did not resolve or even account for the issue of the stellar parallax. The reason geocentrism had been the scientific consensus since the Greeks is that no one could figure out why the stars weren't moving in the sky as the earth moved from one end of its orbit to another. They were, but the shift is so small no one could prove it was happening until the 19th century. The argument against Galileo wasn't "the bible says so".

            tl;dr the entire thing was about hurt feelings and 16th century Italian political cliques

            Cap this.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Probably none. Most of them were discovered by members of the Church and mass-printed once the printing press got cheap anyways.

        >How many simple physics tricks would get your burned at the stake?
        All of them ask Galileo.

        He didn't die at the stake although?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          ask Giordano Bruno.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >He didn't die at the stake although?
          Because he recanted. They dragged him into court and he basically pled "it's only a theory, lol" "you weren't supposed to take it as true, it's just a convenient model" and "boy, I sure love Jesus" and they let him go.
          Supposedly, as he was walking out of court, he muttered "still, it moves" as a last "frick you" to the authorities that had dragged him in there to humiliate him.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            The story I read in college was that the Church protected him from angry students who wanted their money back.
            Also he said it was only a hypothesis, not a theory. The Church treats hypothesis and theories as two different things.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Darksun.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Dying Earth.
    Scientists invent magic (basically, they discover a way to contact extra-planar entities and make deals with them, and apparently had some of them make alterations to our universe's physics) and this eventually leads to a setting where the sun is dying and may wink out like a candle at any second, and most of the people of the world live in despair or constant end-of-the-world revelries. while monsters of various long-forgotten origins haunt the strange wastelands and the ruins of great civilizations long dead.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Scientists invent magic (basically, they discover a way to contact extra-planar entities and make deals with them,
      Interesting however while listening to that thriller I did have like a idea.

      What if standard sword and sorcery....
      However magic is like poison for reality....
      All magic....
      Basically using magic creates pollution that damages reality itself and makes it more chaotic since magic is bending reality..

      Basically in the end wizards use magic so hard and for so long that reality breaks...
      And now we live in a magical wasteland....
      Basically the world geographically makes no sense whatsoever. We are talking the sun got shattered like it is some cartoon.

      The world are these floating islands who do not map to cartesian coordinates between themselves (graph or even more chaotic nonsense) and sometimes even on one island.
      Like this:

      The day/night are more like a permanent skybox around a map or something like that.

      And the best part is that the only way to live in this world is to use magic to defend yourself.

      What do you think of this world building?
      Any suggestions for it?

      PS: If you do not get the picture it is a reference to this

      ?t=19
      Basically magic creates pollution that damages reality.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Literally quantum AIs. Are you even trying?

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are we talking about a video game on /tg/?

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I am tired of your 'isms.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Says the one shilling agnosticISM!

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous
  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah because he’s just like you, a massive tard who can’t compute that their limited perspective isn’t absolute.
    >”I am who am”
    >”says fricking who?”

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >>”I am who am”
      >>”says fricking who?”
      Imagine being so ignorant.
      Imagine dick sucking what essentially are generations of people rewriting the same story into nonsense.

      You realize this story was basically rewritten so hard because long after it was written israelites decided that using the name of their god (YHWH or Jehova) was super forbidden, so they started to censor their own texts with that name.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sure, but that hasn’t stopped christcucks from banging on about how their god has the super extra unbreakable double plus good shield of Truth and Logos and whatever other concepts they butchered from the Greeks.
        >Nooo bro it’s not a demiurge because... because it just isn’t, okay?

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >traditional games

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *