>mom said playing war thunder wouldn't be useful.
Dumb b***h
What other war games can I play to be ready for real combat?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>mom said playing war thunder wouldn't be useful.
>mom said playing war thunder wouldn't be useful.
Dumb b***h
What other war games can I play to be ready for real combat?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>T-90M
>T-90A in pic
>M2A2 ODS
>M2A3 in pic
morons, also the T-90Ms gun elevation was fricked by an FPV drone or ATGM hit prior to the fight, so the bradleys could just hit it freely since the barrel was stuck pointing too high, they definitely fricked the turret ring more though since it started spinning, the T-90M crew were pretty smart to stop it with a tree so they could bail out.
It's the first time in the history of ever that a Bradley managed to do something even somewhat useful, let it have its moment.
holy moron
He doesn't know about Operation Desert Storm lel.
>the T-90M crew were pretty smart to stop it with a tree so they could bail out.
How the frick is it bait? They couldn't bail out with the turret spinning like that, the driver would be decapitated, they hit the tree, stopped the turret, backed up and all 3 bailed out.
>has to brag about the crew panicking and ramming their tank into a tree because their modern russkie supertank just got its ass handed to it by America's hand-me-downs
We are reaching levels of cope unknown to humanity.
>T-90M
>super tank
>with that reverse speed
lmao, I'm not saying that at all, the crew literally couldn't do anything anyway because the elevation was jammed from a previous hit, and moronic Russians refuse to add more reverse gears to their transmissions even when poverty ukrainians can make reversable ones for the Oplot.
>behind them
>when you can see them turn in the video
>T-90M reversing that fast when it's stuck with the same 4kph reverse gear the T-64 has
why are you even replying when you don't know what you're talking about?
>Russian tincans are blind, deaf and have zero situational awareness
T-90M certainly isn't it has everything and more that other modern MBTs have when it comes to situational awareness
>Laser warning recievers
>CITV
>3rd gen Gunner thermals
and some stuff even the abrams and leopard don't have like automatic target tracking for the gunner in the FCS, what fricked up the T-90M was being alone, because russian commanders are fricking morons.
>that last turn
doomed the crew, makes me wonder if something was wrong with it since the Nakidka is dangling off and the commander is turned out instead of using the CITV.
>the T-90M crew were pretty smart to stop it with a tree so they could bail out.
yeah, they totally saw that tree behind them with spinning turret. Russian tincans are blind, deaf and have zero situational awareness, they were running away until hit very first obstacle
>the apc won
Facepalm emoji joy emoji 100 emoji
>IFV
>APC
Vehiclet
Bradleys knocked out more tanks in desert storm than the Abrams
>equip vehicle with anti tank ammo, and atgms
>vehicle knocks out tank
>WOAH BRO THAT'S CRAZY
Nooooooooo! The sun was in our eyes, there were 2 Bradley and only 1 T90, 2on1 it isn't fair! This was fake anyway CGI footage, I can't belive you think it was real, It was actually a Ukrainian T90 and 2 Russian Bradley's.
itty bitty cannon
Bradley, an IFV defeated a T90 MBT
When will Congress do something about war thunder? They leak confidential military information and give unfair advantages to soldiers.
Ban please.
>tanks
imagine being this far behind. the future is kinetic
?si=NxIWIj179TLguKAY&t=28
Those tards are too obsessed with their little army men skirmishes. They've been fed GI propaganda their whole life, they want to be the little ant dude.
>What other war games can I play to be ready for real combat?
Other games? Why? If you played War Thunder you are probably ready for combat right now. Your vast knowledge base easily puts ahead of standard grunts, you could probably lead veteran special forces into combat. That is just through your intellectual training, if you worked out physically too, you would be unstoppable.
But if you must continue your education, I recommend the Command and Conquer series, playing that should be all the preparation needed to become at least a 2-star General.
>What other war games can I play to be ready for real combat?
what the frick are you on. go sign up to fight russia or something
>Bradley defeats a russian tank
holy shit just like in my Conflict Desert Storm 2 vidya
i like big tanks and i cannot lie
Fake and gay
Tanks dont just explode like that like some cheap bollywood movie
>Tanks dont just explode like that
so you didn't watch much combat footage
where the frick have you been for two years, russian tanks have been turning their crews into cosmonauts for pretty much the entire war
What would you expect to happen when an AT mine blows the tanks ammo stache?
the ammo turns black and nothing more, just like in war thunder
That sounds like they decided to design a tank to be a sherman tank in the worst way for mines.Did anyone get that joke?
the joke stopped being funny after countless historians and tank autists disproven lies about Sherman being easy to blow up. Sherman had first wet stowage in a tank
Legitimately asking what's the story with this video?
tank runs over mine, goes boom
what is there to explain
I like how after Desert Storm all commies were crying that Iraq T-72 were monkey models, unlike good Russian models. Then it turned out that Putin is a monkey and there's nothing but monkey models
Iraqi T-72s were literally monkey models, that doesn't make the normal T-72 a good tank, it was a pretty good tank for the time with good protection and firepower, and was a lot cheaper than the T-64. This thread has fully captured my autism so I'll reply like you're being genuine. Russian T-72s are T-72B3s, T-72B3 has a few serious flaws, some of which are very old being
>unsafe ammo storage (not the autoloader, the auto loader is actually not very likely to explode, it takes serious frick ups like the T-90M being hit earlier in this thread to achieve that, what does explode is the lose ammo and propellant stored in the hull making penetrations anywhere likely to cause a catastrophic detonation).
>terrible reverse speed
>terrible commanders optics (unstablised TKN-3M with no thermals)
>ERA gaps because UVZ are cheap morons and the MoD rejected the B2 with relikt for being to expensive
Now this doesn't make the T-72B3 a bad tank, just a very mediocre one, the main issue the entire war that has caused B3s to pop constantly is the horrible coordination, supporting with infantry is very hard in an artillery war, but Russian tanks shouldn't be leading armoured charges across open fields without sufficient counter battery, or defences against FPV/Dropper drones.
Back to Iraqi T-72s, Iraqis had T-72Ms and their own domestic variant, and even those were just for the republican guard, most Iraqi tanks were actually T-55, Type 59, and T-62, even Kuwait had Yugoslavian M-84 tanks which are their domestic variant of the T-72M with an upgraded power pack and a superior FCS (automatic lead) which performed pretty decently.
>Mine
incorrect, it was hit by a Stugna ATGM.
forgot to say, Russians are also using a shitload of older T-72Bs, which again were decent for the time, and better than anything Iraq had, but are horribly outdated now protection wise, onpar with Ukrainian T-64BVs.
People often forget that the T-72 was largely intended for 2nd line units and as an export tank to replace the Pact’s aging T-55s.
In a hypothetical WW3 Soviet formations facing CENTAG were equipped with the T-80 and formations facing NORTHAG were equipped with the T-64
>In a hypothetical WW3 Soviet formations facing CENTAG were equipped with the T-80
those T-80s?
The T-80 didn’t have to dodge Javelins and drones in the 1980’s
M47 Dragon would work just fine
>Dragon
>a wire guided missile with limited penetration would work just fine
shamelessly stolen to show the ATGM, play the webm back in .5 and you'll see it.
T-80BV is atrociously out of date by modern standards, for the time it's FCS was very good, protection was good, its power to weight was good, and it has the best reverse speed of any Russian tank, T-80BV does have the same flaw as the T-64, being that it's autoloader is impossible to armour in the same way the T-90Ms is as it sits central to the tank, instead of lower profile like a T-72 style one, meaning any penetrating hits can cause a catastrophic ammo detonation. T-80U had much superior protection, and the UK model even had thermals (which should have been mass produced for the normal U, but the soviet union was busy collapsing). Russia stopped upgrading the T-80 until the BVM, because morons decided the turbine was the problem for them getting obliterated in Chechnya, not driving armoured columns directly into grozny when the enemy your fighting knows that's exactly what you'll do, can hit you from above, and has shitloads of AT weaponry. Ukraine is a horrible environment for tanks, because artillery can be very accurately guided by drones, and abandoned tanks can be taken out by a $200 drone after the fact (a lot of tanks on Oryx's list were abandoned before being destroyed btw).
>dragon
>less than 400mm rha penetration
>even dragon 2 is only 600mm
>against Kontakt-1
shiggy diggy.
SPECIAL
3
DAY
OPERATION
Call a Doody