>Nearly 10 years apart
what the FRICK is going on?
![]() Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
![]() Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
![]() Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>Nearly 10 years apart
what the FRICK is going on?
![]() Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
![]() Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
![]() Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
what am i supposed to be pretending to be outraged about here?
I feel so sorry for zoomers knowing that they will never experience true graphical leaps over time
Companies realized they can all do what Fifa does and just make slop.
What did you expect once they started prioritizing skin color, gender, and sexuality over actual talent in the workplace?
Same time between games as the OP (9 years)
Why don't autists understand that it's much easier to take massive leaps in development early in a medium's lifespan than it is later on?
Yes, no shit there was a ton of innovation in the 90s and 00s when gaming was getting its first dose of major financial backing and investment.
It's called REFINEMENT. That's what's happening now, mostly. Innovation always slows down.
It comes in leaps and spurts.
>It's called REFINEMENT.
Sweet, when will it happen?
?si=li8rh0c_LM51yde1
This is a joke at this point
>that dive
The splash animation isn't in sync with the actual dive, making it look like some cheap outsourced pajeet shit, which it probably is anyways kek.
The reviews I've seen are weed. Praising it because it plays exactly like a ps3 era AC game. Is that really what people wanted?
What reviews are you watching? The ones I've seen are claiming that was all marketing crap and that it's glorified Valhalla dlc. And that's exactly what it looks like, the stealth and combat are nothing like the original ACs
well according to this video
it plays exactly like the original ACs. I think you are confusing the story being a glorified DLC for the gameplay. It looks like they just reskinned AC 1
>It looks like they just reskinned AC 1
Honestly wish they had, AC1 was great.
AC1 was legitimately the worst fricking game I've ever layed. Absolute fricking trash. I don't know how anyone enjoyed that pile of shit. 2 was okay, the games after 2 were derivative shit.
cringe
That video doesn't show stealth and combat
?si=3aY9TdbCTrHb-L_Z&t=320
Combat is nothing like the originals, it's more rpg crap
>Is that really what people wanted?
Yes. People have been wanting a return to classic AC since Odyssey happened. Guillemot had to outright damage control about there being a "Unity within an Odyssey".
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/why-ubisoft-isnt-abandoning-its-open-worlds
The problem is this is more like Valhalla DLC (Which it is) and has a bunch of stuff from that instead of a return to classic AC.
The entire AC franchise sucks ass. Even the first one was garbage.
> Praising it because it plays exactly like a ps3 era AC game.
That's the thing, it doesn't, it plays exactly like Valhalla, just without RPG elements.
there were only 4 years between gta sa and gta 4
>first screenshot is looking at a huge plaza
>second is looking at a wall 5 feet away
come on Ganker, do better
Here you go moron
https://www.youtubemultiplier.com/651f8e3f79999-assassins-creed-mash.php
>php
Odyssey is still the best one, prove me wrong.
ESG happened
Baked lighting vs global illumination
shit vs shit (both look the same) 9 year gap.
>ancient devs with dreams made the first AAA games
>solid work made the games fun and good looking
>those devs left to go make new original content
>publishers hired code monkeys to make sequels
>all soul is lost and game quality drops
you know its weird how when AC unity first launched, it got shit on because the massive amount of bugs in the game. like cyberpunk tier.
but at the same time, it also visually looked better (when everything finally worked) and had better animations compared to the more recent AC games.
was unity worked on some new team that only worked on that game alone? i feel like it was just super buggy because they were experimenting with a bunch of stuff.
Co op matchmaking was also shit. You could barely find matches that didn’t take you less than 5 mins DESPITE having friends ready to play, among those bugs and problems.
oh, i dont care about the actual gameplay. just commenting on how it visually looked.
Unity was the first gen 8 AC game so they put a lot of effort in to it. They had a separate team working on it since Brotherhood.
It's disingenuous of you to pick a shot set in shadow for Mirage. Due to how non-rt lighting is done in open world games objects can't cast additive shadow within shadow.
the socialist dream
This is why people argue the 360 isn't retro when the SNES was retro not even a decade later. Nothing has fricking changed for 15+ years.
noooooo why are graphics plateauing, why did chasing the realism dragon actually back it into a corner, there's supposed to be a huge leap every five minutes or else I'LL LOSE INTEREST!!!!!
VIDEO games
i'm not supposed to play those i'm supposed to get hard to their graphics!!! the realism!!! but then when i'm about to cum i should get soft again because the NEXT BIG GRAPHICAL LEAP is right around the corner!!!! i'm supposed to be kept in a perpetual state of graphical gooning!!!!!
cringe
>this braindead pic again
it has nothing to do with polygons anyway
don't post proof or anything, don't even make an argument
Diversity hires instead of people skilled.
>incredibly low quality screencaps from a video
So disingenuous.
Wait I thought we all hated BG3 for being too cinematic and graphic focused?
ass creed was never good