Looks gorgeous.
ARPG with Souls combat.
Stuff to do and build at hub.
Made by the Ori dev.
Why so little hype?
>inb4 Not paying for earlyaccess betatest.
>inb4 Release WARSOUP
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
>early access
>soulslop
miss me with it
oh, it's early access? YES. YES, I WILL PAY FOR THE PRIVILEGE TO PLAYTEST YOUR GAME FOR YOU.
>generic slop UI
Demon's Souls got this right ALMOST 20 YEARS AGO.
Still going to try it though.
DS had a better, fitting font.
>Souls but with god perspective rather than third person
This might be a million dollar idea honestly, even if this game doesn't blow up Path of Exile 2 is almost doing the same thing so perhaps we'll see more iterations of this in the future
Grim dawn new patch, lol
The point of GD """roll""" is to repositionate yourself without having to click at some point and wait until your character is done running to attack again.
homosexual.
Might pick it up but honestly this year is so stacked already I can feel my backlog piling up again
>what if..
>we do grimdark fantasy..
>wow..
>with a spreading corruption/plague..
>woow....
It works for this kind of game. Do you have a better idea?
No invasions no buy
Not paying for earlyaccess betatest.
>EA
Call me when it's done, which is never.
no we won't
you will come crawling
BEGGING us to let you in
>ARPG with Souls combat.
AHHHHHHH WHEN WILL IT END AHHHHHHHH
>I want another decade of ARPGs being "the true Diablo 3" that always devolves into some 200mph screen saturating frickfest where the highest level of mechanical skill is pressing right click every second
Ok homosexual
yeahh im not playing this
Does anyone actually believe that looks good?
Yeah yeah, we get it, you're cool and edgy and don't care about anything, because liking thing sis for gays.
Don't worry, you won't be 16 forever.
he's probably over 30, fat, bald and virginal, years of discord and Ganker made him like that.
i just watched the trailer and it legit looks like dogshit
>over 30
If you are not over 30 you should leave. Or not have an opinion since it's worthless. be my guest.
how do games keep regressing
Amazing animations, mid artstyle, shit gameplay
>Amazing animations
The bar is that low huh :/
>mid art style
Black person slang, Black person opinions
AAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
buying day 1, looks great
Janky ass phone game.
>souls shit but like, from isometric view 🙂
are you fricking kidding me?
I still don‘t understand why people prefer roulspamming over parrying. It makes no fricking sense
Most games that have one nowadays have both, like this game.
I assume it works like in dark souls though where you can parry maybe once or twice and then run out of stamina rather than dynamic back and forth combat like sekiro
Rolling creates space between you and the enemy while parrying leaves roots you in place. Constantly stepping in and out to deal or avoid damage is a lot more engaging than standing in place pressing one button.
Except rolling is just used for i frames and not to position yourself most of the time
Which direction you roll matters when there are multiple enemies on the screen, you can also choose to roll towards the enemy for a more high risk/offensive playstyle or roll away to be defensive.
Standing in place pressing one button has no strategy at all and I have no idea why some people prefer it.
>standing in place pressing 1 button
in many games you cant do that against multiple enemies, because they attack in different directions and you dont get iframes on parry
This is where dashes with low iframes combined with parries becomes great
The souls games already work like that, I assume what the other anon was suggesting is Sekiro combat where you parry your enemies to death, not pressing another button until there's some prompt on the screen telling you to jump.
sekiro still has that when it comes to ganks
>Except rolling is just used for i frames and not to position yourself most of the time
Did you even play any Souls game? Did you play Dark Souls at all?
Against bosses you roll sideways and against mobs you roll away from them. That‘s it.
no, try again
You can do the same with a regular dodge move, no need to roll for this shit
There is both dodging and dodge rolls in this game depending on your equipment weight.
Partying just makes it more transparent you're playing a glorified rhythm game.
Which is completely fine. Everyone already knows souls combat is rolling to the rythm of the enemy and then attack once after every 6 rolls. At least with parries you get to attack more often
Stop being obtuse. You roll away or to the side of an enemy 99% of the time and that‘s it. There‘s no startegy in this shit either
No, you roll away or to the side of an enemy 99% of the time. Playing like a shitter isn't proof of a bad combat system.
rolling is more active, missing a parry makes you feel bad while missing a roll makes you blame the game so gamers prefer it
>roll spam over parrying
>parrying over roll spam
I like both and do both, now what?
pure trash
ori is one of the prettiest games ever but the aesthetic just doesn't look good if its a 3d game.
I think the issue is that touchups that you can spend time on in 2D can't be done in this game since it would take far too long for a 3D game. So it's probably close to what a "first pass" of Ori looked like. Couple that with the more generic world and player character and it just doesn't standout that much. BF and WotW actually manage to use Ori himself as part of the spectacle with the way he adds light into the room
Looks boring, hate the art style, and the combat looks tedious. Maybe I'll give it another look when they actually finish it, I don't buy early access games anyway.
>make Diablo clone
>but instead of fast paced Diablo combat it's slow 1v1 Dark Souls fights the whole way through
I can already tell this game is a slog. Enemies look spongy too. I think the animations and art are nice, they clearly put effort into that aspect, but I don't think it will be very fun.
It looks genuinely bad.
Obvious marketing thread. Herbed.
Wow finally some enemies that look interesting to fight at last
looks kinda cluttered, if you consider how big the character models are compared to the arenas. A lot of how well received this game is will come down to how responsive the controls are, and how precise the hitboxes are. So basically, we'll get a true verdict on whether it's worth playing or not based on gameplay
looks like shit
>people acting as if this is somehow bad
this looks great, idk what you rproblem is.
click click click combat is the worst part of the ARPG genre and diablo 2 purists have done more damage to the genre than anyone else.
The best ARPG there is is champions of norrath
This board is full of D2 suckers, they're behaving pretty much like expected.
manchildren who can't let go of the only time they've ever been happy
Every genre touched by blizzard is plagued with this shit, it's no coincidence that these communities are the most hostile. It's all Blizzard's fault.
Artstyle looks nice, but im sick of soulslikes, especially shitty nonfrom ones
this is the first soulslike from a respectable developer since Nioh.
I do think they might be into something with the gameplay, altho it does seem like they failed to achieve the height they could've.
But that artistyle is vomit-inducing. Half the pixels are wasted on post processing. Bloom tuned up to the 11
Would you like some game to go with all that bloom? Jesus.
>Go from making kino metroidvania to soul slop
What a shitty way to end up as a dev
>metroidvaniaslop
>kino
>mettroidvania
>soulslike
>roguelike
these need to be made illegal for like 5 years at MINIMUM
>EA slop
no thanks
love Ori tho
I didn't like the 2nd one as much. Dropped it half way.
I watched streamers play it ages ago. The bosses die in 5 hits and do barely any damage. It made me lose all interest in the game.
>you HAVE to fund millionaire e-celebs if you want to buy the game cheaper
Whose idea was this?
Personally, I'm quite interested.
>private division
I really don't trust them.
will check it out if it's piratable otherwise not interested
>EARLY ACCESS RELEASE after a year.
yeah I'll wait maybe 2-3 more years.
basically every e-celeb on the planet has or is going to be paid to promote it which is the single biggest red flag a game can have nowadays
i expect it to be barely functioning unfinished trite
>>inb4 Release WARSOUP
Hi to you too Thomas, I will not be buying your new early access game because Ori 2 was underwhelming and a technical mess at launch on top of that, sorry!
>Still no mention of how long the content at release will be
This shit is going to be like 32 dollars for 4 hours of content. For this type of game I'd want atleast 8 for "act 1"
I wish they would copy the souls multiplayer as well, it's the best part of those games.
>multiplayer
>best part of dark souls
Yea what's the point of creating fun builds if I can't use them on other people? Strangers like you in particular.
point is using them for the actual game, moron
The game gets boring after finishing it once or twice, pvp remains entertaining for way longer.
there are far more entertaining things to do with your time than souls pvp
It's either souls pvp or heroin, I don't feel like becoming a drug addict just yet.
This OP made sure I'll never play the game. Thanks m8
>Why so little hype?
I mean, you answered your own question already
>ARPG with Souls combat.
>early access trash that looks like generic mobile game
gee i wonder
>roll spam
>twitch drops
>extremely soulless UI
>random bland weapons with bland affixes
>press button to consume food that heals you for 999999% health
>private division
>early access
i dont think this will hold a candle to Ori
>ARPG with Souls combat.
You mean every modern ARPG for the past 5+ yeasr?
>ARPG
Puke.
>Souls Combat
Puke
It's no BloodBorne. It's not Diablo I
bloodborne is a souls game and it's not that good you snygger
buy an ad
So they're going to push the genre forward by...creating a top down dark souls....with semi-random loot.
uhh, cool I guess? The game comes out in 3 days so we'll really see if there's anything more but they've done an awful job because it literally just looks like dark souls with maybe 1 extra attack option
It's amazing how little it takes to push the ARPG genre forward, it's really that shitty.
>Souls combat
Imagine thinking the worst part of that dogshit franchise is a selling point.
Its a huge improvement over the usual Diablo/PoE clicker combat, so obviously its a big selling point.
This game might be the thing that will finally move the action RPG genre forward after its been stuck in trying to copy Diablo 2 for two decades.
The only way to upgrade from Souls combat would be to use Nioh's combat system, but I dont expect that would sit very well with isometric perspective, and also it overwhelms the normies usually
Its not like theres that many other games with good melee combat tbh
Sifu has amazing combat that noone tries to copy for some reason. People just want braindead iframe roll spamming
Early access with only one chapter available. Its not even a early access is the like an early access demo lol.
Hades also started like that.
Hades plays just like a shitty Flash game. How Curious!
autistic obsessed ori fan here
qualities i see
>sacrament might be cool
>good moves in some trailers
>enemy design for melee foes seems very oppressive and above standard, which is excellent and might unironically carry the combat
negatives i see
>roll spam
>absolute dogshit composer that made slop for the last 10 years, wont hold a candle to gareth coker, some exceptionally bland bossfight tracks
>kinda too overbloomed, some aspects feel like a misuse of o2's graphic style
>INSANELY SOULLESS derivative ui that is a massive step down from what Ori had, not only in game but most notably the menu
>too much "press lever" or "interact with ladder" or
>boring loot, press x to grab random plant on the ground prompt 999x over
>twitch drops
>devs were extremely defensive over being questioned whether their game is a live service, honestly implying the devs themselves are ashamed of some aspects of their product
>extremely small feedback for getting hit when struct by some spin2win sperglord elden ring boss
*impressive??
>game is a live service
Pass
>>devs were extremely defensive over being questioned whether their game is a live service
defcon 1 level red flag, avoid avoid avoid
>autistic obsessed ori fan here
absolutely based, thanks for the info, fren
design for melee foes seems very oppressive and above standard, which is excellent and might unironically carry the combat
It seemed too tame and downtuned to me in comparison to the player. The healing animation is too fast and most enemies I have seen don't chase after you if you heal
>>roll spam
The actual issue is that after a dodge it does a normal attack, while it should do a weak shorter range attack
There doesn't seem to be much of an incentive besides saving stamina to not dodging right now.
Why does that image seem to be praising LOTF which is worse in every way?
It doesn't, range is important in these games
>The healing animation is too fast and most enemies I have seen don't chase after you if you heal
i forgot to mention something in the post you replied to
the healing just seems super bland to me. cook food that instantly heals you for a frickton of HP is bland as hell
lets hear your great healing ideas
NTA but they could just do the estus thing, there's no point reinventing the wheel. Especially if you're gonna make it worse.
and estus system is not bland?
No, it creates some intricacy because you need to create space and time your heals in between enemy attack patterns instead of just pressing an instant heal button and wait for the cooldown to expire.
it's not instant, there's like a 2-second eating animation where you can't move. how long was soulsborne's? I dont remember
I wasn't aware of this, that's great. Now just reduce the healing value and get rid of the cooldown and we're golden.
wait a minute, here's a clip of a guy healing and he's definitely walking around while doing it. It doesn't even reduce your walking speed.
Why would you lie like that?
idk I just looked at a playthrough and it seemed like he was not able to walk in that. I guess it's the same as souls then, whatever.
The early souls games root you in place while healing and the later ones makes you slow down to around 30% walk speed whenever you heal so you're wrong again. You don't seem like a very trustworthy source of information.
and you sound like a pedantic person
you both are being moronic
it might be related to carry weight, or the player being bad and not walking when he can
checked and it's also like 2 seconds, and you can actually walk in dark souls unlike wicked. wicked's is more punishing lol
>Now just reduce the healing value and get rid of the cooldown and we're golden.
why would that be better? it's not like the cooldown is that long anyway
I'm sure it's fine the way it is, you are making too many assumptions without even touching the game when the people who decided on this system have probably been iterating on this system for thousands of hours.
A man's gotta b***h about something to keep the thread alive
you are a literal special super-cool magic superhuman fighter in this game god damn it, it doesnt have to be something all that humanly fitting, so you can do just about anything for ACTUALLY ENGAGING WAYS TO HEAL that interact with the combat and your own attacks/enemy attacks instead of just "press x to 70% health" and "your healing is actually just a secondary healthbar"
>you can do just about anything for ACTUALLY ENGAGING WAYS TO HEAL
Like what?
the first obvious idea is some inherent way to heal from combat, where it doesnt heal you for huge chunks of your health and can only be done while fighting, but also isnt in a fixed limited ammount. It could even be just akin to eating food like focusing in hollow knight
that way your health state doesnt instantly go from 0 to 100, your healing isnt a pure secondary healthbar with a limited existence, and fights actually have real back-and-forth. You will never feel like your attempt is already lost because you got hit too many times early. You will never feel like the end of the fight is completely stale and devoid of tension because you got hit too few times early.
Want some better and more interactive examples that arent about pressing button to do nothing but heal? Just think of literally fricking anything then, thats more fun than pressing a limited button to heal 90% health
>some way to make your weapon able to life leech
>some limited magic that requires buildup that both damages and heals
>some spell or magic to temporarily convert damage taken
>perks about mitigating health loss such as healing a portion back if you strike someone quickly after getting hit
the first vague example & all these things are better in several manners. It allows you to make enemies that are more oppressive that will always kill you if you play poorly for too long, instead of being able to tank a frickton until you run out of your limited totally-not-estus. It lets you make bosses around actually having an oppressive moveset and fricking you to death instead of just having to focus on the player running out of their total health
Yeah, uhh alright. You're hired I guess.
Not paying for earlyaccess betatest.
I think it looks pretty fun, I’m new to this genre of game. I hope they port Ori to PS5.
Because the character looks like garbage.
>gorgeous and unique art style for the game
>UI looks like this
why?
>Woke troony devs
eat shit
homie these are literally the austrian devs that joked about killing israelites and scared snowflake pussies out of their workplace
>CEO is a gigachad that openly says to people that "theyre moronic"
>allegedly called someone a homosexual as well
>"woke"
Okay anon
So it essentially uses Wo Long skill system, every weapon has a number of slots for weapon arts + RNG skills, plus there are boss weapons with unique stuff.
How the frick do you do aireals
this looks fun as frick. didnt Ganker tell me this game was shit?
>Ori devs
>UI is lazy and generic as you can get
>Gameplay is waiting for the enemy to attack and roll
>Characters look horrible
So did they get lazy and went full moron or did they fire someone
is waiting for the enemy to attack and roll
how would you design it?
Enemies should be able to parry and counter and more movesets
buy ad
>rts style camera
aaaaand dropped
give us a proper soulslike style 3rd person camera. i wanna be able to see my little dude when i play. the artstyle is pretty, though the constantly flashing lights are a bit much. here is hoping this is mostly just early concept type shit and they can make it playable before launch. it doesnt look presentable as a final product in its current state.
>give us a proper soulslike style 3rd person camera
eat shit consolegay, you wont get to play for another 2 years anyway
i have never owned a console in my life. what now?
yeah right, that's why you're a mgsgay?
yes, and? controllers are best used on a PC
ever hear of something called emulation? or are you the kind of zoomer who is computer illiterate?
>wannabe consolegay
that's even worse.
I have a degree in CS btw
why limit the games available to play? the entire point of pc is freedom it gives. besides, what kind of dummy gets a degree in counterstrike?
>why limit the games available to play?
because consoleshit sucks
says the guy who got mad when i insulted rts camera...
yeah sure thing gay
?
You know this game has wasd movement and is best played on controller right?
Who is this girl and why she is beaten up and chained?
Digital DogChinese Art is so souless.
According to the leaks a few years ago, I think she was supposed to be a rape victim kek (I'm just guessing it was her). They had to convince Mahler to give up the rape idea. Sure would have been controversial
She looks beaten to shit and back and chained in the trailer, rape would've been expected honestly
mahler tried way too hard to have rape in one of their stories kek, based autist
Based on trailers she seems to be a figurehead of the rebel faction,
tfw no rebel tomboy gf
She owes me being raped
Game is EA, call me when they launch it.
sag
Your game artwork and in-game shouldn't look worse than a 30 year old game. This is not an Independent developer.
how blind are you that that looks better to you than this
It truly does. That picture reminds me of trannies avatars, like how they always use pictures that look deformed/out of proportion.
Probably due to their own perception of the world. No sense of scale, depth, everything is post processed to hell
looks soulless
>starts rambling about trannies out of nowhere
You homosexual should be locked together with the mentally ill from another side, away from normal humans
Game Development and America has a HUGE mental health problem.
You can literally see how it sips trough the cracks in
Visit a local mental asylum before you hurt someone
what the frick are you on about?
Game looks like it was made by Trannies devs and Chinese artists.
For a Dark Soul Copycat (a dnd copycat) it looks souless and out of place. AND it has no furry bait so no free sales.
I give it 1 month before it appears on the XBOX gamepass with all the other troony souless garbage. From my POV it already came out a year ago, maybe 5, my mind is mixing all the troony chink slop together and it's giving me a migraine.
>BUT LE BUDGET FROM AA GAEM
Dark Souls probably had 1/10th of the budget. Armored Core probably had like 1/1000th of the budget.
Buy an AD, not fooling anyone. Or give me a key, either one works.
this is what mental illness looks like
Yeah exactly now you are getting it. And they are the ones making these games.
I was actually talking about you
extremely rude
Steelchill? Is that you?
Nah I doubt it, last thing known about steelchill is he shits up an indie game discord. what you should be asking is about gloamlet, that guy HATED palworld to the core and was making threads here daily.
>realize gloamlet was a huge elden ring fan
>he went after palworld for ripping off pokemon
>this game is absolutely on his rader
Holy shit are we about to see gloamlet again?
the king will return and we will laugh at "them"
He's being contrarian on purpose. Nothing you say will change his mind, he will just keep parroting that old does look better because it's old.
At most, you can expect him to move the goalpost to "it doesn't look like 30 years worth of progress"
And you are defending what looks like a horrible and predatory (EA) product simply cause it's new and i'm old.
>brings up EA out of nowhere
Game being early access has nothing to do with anything and nobody is telling you to buy it before it's fully out.
Of course you probably already bought multiple EA games of shit you shill.
ill play it when its fully released. i try to avoid early access slop
>Why so little hype?
I don't care if its made by the Ori devs. I will not support early access, simple as.
Probably because the game industry has lost an enormous amount of good will with customers.
Why would I buy or care about this game when it probably hates white people, hates sexy women, etc?
Your screenshot is of a literal burkha, where are the bikini women?
Fricking hate soulslike. Why the frick did we get an era with only Bamham combat and now with only soulslike combat but no era with DMC stylish/character action whatever the frick you wanna call it, games? I mean, indie games of course, the PS2 was full of budget DMC, now THAT was a good era for hack n slashes. I might still pick this up because Ori was cute, but meh, probably wait for a sale.
I think i just vomited in my mouth, imagine putting all that effort in the artstyle and then shitting out the most inoffensive, generic UI possible because something stylish would offend normies, not picking it up, hope it flops
>caring this much about muh UI
holy autism
muh UI is the latest "critisism" from pretentious gays when they want to sound sophisticated.
It's reaching artgay levels of annoying.
Not buying homosexual
>games shouldnt have great artstyle on the UI
>it doesnt matter if the game's atmosphere gets constantly brought down by a hideous ui
frick yourself
it matters but not to to point of dropping the game for it, autist
meant to reply to
i wasnt the one that wrote that post but im forever seething at how dogshit the UI is
Is there a demo or a torrent somewhere? I remember the reveal trailer looking interesting, but I'd rather die than give money to an early access title
Lmao the homosexual devs made it seem like it was some sort of cinematic action adventure top down game, but it just looks like soulslop
>walk slowly through empty areas
>no music
>collect le loot
>boring characters
>mc is a self insert
>rollslop
Woke. Let it bomb.
It looks derivative of everything else in the industry, and the dev interview confirmed that their inspiration was to combine elements of games that they liked. Which is fine, but hardly inspiring. It looks like a concentrated distillation of every AAA trend pumped into a game masquerading as an indie release.
Or as the cool kids say, soulless.
>no character creator
>no co-op
im not running around as pewdiepie with this birds eye view slop
>no heaving cleavage
could've had fable tier COOM with that artstyle too
this game is dead on arrival
>>no character creator
there is a character creator
>>no co-op
coming with the first patch
>>no heaving cleavage
we don't know what kinda armor they have in store, but the booba is there
Ok thats actually sick artstyle
>that character creator
You just reminded me that they put assmongloid hair for le epic funny moment.
>monke owes me sex
why does she have lanky kong's arms?
all chars do, it's the art style
At this point From Software should just patent some of their mechanics, every fricking action adventure game coming out is ripping of at least 50% of souls mechanics
MAKE SOMETHING NEW YOU FRICKS!
I'M TIRED OF SEEING A BONFIRE EQUIVALENT IN YOUR GAME AND INSTANTLY KNOWING HOW THE GAME IS GOING TO FUNCTION
The insane amount of imitations only serve to advertise Fromsoft, showcase their superiority, and continue to keep them in the public discussion. Why stop that? And every once in a while a worthy copy might appear, like Lies of P.
no interest in playing quarter a game then waiting for the rest to release
I'll play when it's out.
give me a key and I'll consider playing it
Looks like indieslop
Vaguely interested in it a year or so from now on account of the devs(it's the Ori team, apparently).
Otherwise I don't really think much of it.
I WAS interested
>Early access
Yeah, they can frick off
>T-this game looks bad, bro!
>It's shit!
I read a lot of copes from people who are in pure terror of getting filtered by it before trying.
i was so ready to try a new arpg and when i saw it was a twinstick controller soulslike bs im no longer hyped for this
>and when i saw it was a twinstick controller soulslike bs im no longer hyped for this
What's wrong with that? That's how PoE2 will work too.
its not what i look for in this type of game (and if poe 2 will have this system i will keep playing poe 1)
PoE 2 lets you choose if you want to play it like a traditional clicker arpg or a twinstick game, they have said so in the past
>implying Poe2 wont end up like any other top down hack'n slash
You gays are so fricking deluded
ironic
>early access slop
>souls slop
you slop on those BBCs too shill homosexual lmao
it's early access and something about it smells of GAAS
If you‘re making an isometric soulslike why not commit to it instead of shoving pointless arpg loot garbage into it?
They need the dopamine rush and constant feeling of "progression" for subhuman third world esl
>Ori: Play as awesome light spirit forest creature that shoots light and can practically fly through rooms
>This game: Play as generic sword guy that will feel like a discount Fromsoft character
It doesn't stand out at all
>awesome light
you sound like a homosexual
What happened to neat shooter these guys were making that was from a similar perspective? Did that project become this one?
>DUDE WHAT IF THIS GENRE WAS ALSO DARK SOULS
ENOUGH
People are railing on Dragons Dogma 2, but I am just thankful to have an action RPG that isnt trying to be Dark Souls, Im sick of this shit to the point where I see it and just drop whatever it is in.
What are you talking about? Dragon's Dogma 2 is just Dark Souls with monster climbing.
>Dragon's Dogma 2 is just Dark Souls with monster climbing.
It is absolutely not.
It’s not. Dragon’s dogshit has you beat on something, take a big hit, start beating some more, then climbing.
Not at all, I would go so far as to say I want more games to rip off Dragons Dogma combat.
It's probably more like going back to its roots, twin stick shooters. Nobody would give a shit about yet another grinding experience.
At least the camera can't be shit like MyaBlack person games.
THIS
my exact thoughts, maybe NOW with a FUNCTIONING CAMERA soulslop can be fun again
>inb4 you get one shotted by enemies outside the screen
If I can't summon giant spiders and overwhelm my enemies with hordes of insects, you can miss me with that gay shit.
>That'll be $39.99 or $31.99 with "affiliate discount ™" for early access
fricking payBlack folk lmao
> "affiliate discount ™"
Huh?
buying it through a streamer gay's link
I hate modern gaming. Why do i need to pay extra if i don‘t want to give money to a streamer? What the hell is this
in other words, the game was supposed to cost 30 but they upped it for the "streamer ads"
Zoomer slop
Why the people who made a success like Ori need early access to fund this game?
They need early access because they need feedback since they have no idea how to make an arpg
i love the souls games but ive had my fill with fromsoft and i severely doubt anyone is going to top them. only way i would care if it was good and had seamless co-op although i doubt i could get anyone to get it with me. if it comes out good, cool, but otherwise whatever. add it to the sea of other souls clones.
>Black folk still struggling with souls camera in 2011+13
lole.
keep sucking it
keep sucking what? i haven't struggled with this in years. stop locking on to gigantic enemies for no reason you idiot
can't hear you slopping on FROM's dick too much
you are bad at playing video games. it is what it is
you are delusional, it is what it is
Just poured a bunch of popular genres concepts into a trough. Like palworld but for incels. Well, not quite as palworld actually had a lot of content (to say nothing of its quality) when it first came out and this seems it has basically nothing.
soulslikes are holding back videogame combat
100%
Soulslike combat is an objective improvement to conventional Diablo style combat in every way.
it's actually a plague that's stifling innovation.
Sure it held it's spot a decade ago, but we're in 2024 now.
We need to build on what we already have. Focusing dodge roll. Focusing parry, whatever is old.
Innovating on perfection is a nigh impossible task, many have tried and failed to do that over the years with nothing to show for it.
>hack slash need to evolve into soul slop to stay relevant
>genre that relies on gaining more power and killing enemies in masses
You don't even understand what genre is and you talk about it's evolution?
Frick off, you're stupid and uncreative as the devs are
I understand that the genre is dogshit and needs a breath of fresh air
albeit this game however is a breath of malodorous air though
That remains to be seen, at least it doesn't appear to be facetanking, ability-spamming click to move shit from the 90s like every other ARPG.
>breath of fresh air
More like the same old rancid burp that infiltrates the mind of any dev who want to make an action game.
Looks AI.
>rollslop with diablo loot
we already have Nioh 2, the superior diablo souls game
>ARPG with Souls combat.
so an ARPG with a single dodge button.
this game is Dead on arrival.
Go woke go broke simple as
Nothing woke, nothing broke here, I guess.
> Souls combat
You mean attacking and blocking?
If it's a soulslike then why the UI so soulless?
You played elden ring?
it's a joke autismo
its true tho. at least ER continues From's tradition of making the UI very "lightweight" so that it doesn't take you out of the game.
People like Dark Souls 'combat' because weapons feel like actual objects that have huge impact on the way you play, so much so you can get attached to your favourite one.
No one makes "weaponfu" threads for DD because in that game weapons are just cosmetic + damage boost (just an example, I like DD for what it is)
Have they elaborated any further on the type of multiplayer they're planning to implement? they were quite vague about it in the preview.
If it's invitation only multiplayer then I'm not interested.
He skipped leg day.
>generic black and white squares UI
pass
>of all the things dark souls did well, from weapon weight, to movesets, to the simple but in-depth combat system that rewards player knowledge, to creating fun to explore areas, to creating an explorable seamlessly connected world, to the surprisingly in depth character building, morons on the internet will associate anything that has rolling or a stamina bar with dark souls
theres a reason why souls has a negative reception in places like ITT. Somehow so many devs rip off the bad parts and ignore the good ones.
It's not that they ignore the good parts, it's that they simply lack the talent and creativity to emulate the good parts. Creating an intricate, interconnected, and fun to explore map is one of the hardest parts of game design.
check out hollow knight tbh, its the only game i believe compares to DS1's world
its interconnection / world has the opposite flaws and qualities of ds1
>dark souls' non-linearity mostly stops once you reach sens fortress -> anor londo -> lordvessel areas
>hollow knight's non linearity takes a moment to begin without exploits, but once it starts it doesnt really stop
>dark souls' sense of scale is somewhat watered down by comically convenient and cheap elevators that skip huge fricking journeys, and tons of areas that would geographically intersect if things didnt get loaded and de-loaded
>HK's map (mostly) fits within itself and has more organic interconnection methods that mantain sense of scale, and its very fast to go across in lategame, but the early-middlegame makes it necessitate some fast travel (it has more interesting and fitting means than bonfire teleports to compensate)
Already played it, didn't care for it. The Tim Burton Hot Topic aesthetic ain't it for me, plus the combat/boss fights sucked. The level design was alright though.
I wanted more games liked Dark Souls with fun levels to explore and be blown away when finding shortcuts.
What I didnt want was every developer thinking I wanted bonfires, attack moves that track you, all enemies respawn on death, stamina and a story thinner than air soup. For all of From's faults what also saved them from eternal whipping for having a ton of instant deaths was the player message system, which emulates going online to talk about the game, but cutting down the middle man. It could helpful or misdirecting. These games often dont have any player interactions and just leave in the obtuse parts.
>ESG UI
>Fake isometric tilt shift camera (no level design, exploration, or cool vistas)
>Spammable iframe dash (GARBAGE)
>Bland lore/story
im sick of souls shit. the only time its worth a damn is when fromsoft makes them and even then its consistently been a 50/50 on quality.
>Black folk
>ugly women
>"souls clone"
>early access
>>ugly women
homosexual
Yes, you are. Yikes.
>Yikes
troony detected, opinion rejected
All women are ugly I want to frick men.
>posts an ugly boy in hideous Cal Arts style
>calls others a homosexual or troony
lmao
yes, you're a homosexual troony
what the frick is Cal Arts style if you think THAT is Cal Arts style
moronic on both accounts
>Why so little hype?
What is it even about? I liked Sands of Aura and Dungeon Siege 3, what does this one offer?
Oh boy can't wait for spend $20 on yet another game that just isn't as good as what's already available, grim dawn and path of exile
remember last epoch's launch?
Why did developers stop putting texture in their ui?
i just hecking LOVE numbers numbers go up stats go up i love number go up
I hope they add invasions
You really think the developer of fricking Ori is going to do something that based? No at most they're gonna let you cooperate with your friends, maybe pat them on the head in a violent way if they sign a contract of consent.
I dont remember the context of this.
these are both cofounders, i cant tell whether theyre having bants with eachother or refering to what an employee said
it's banter, but it shows they're not the easily offended type.
They‘re both morons that constantly fight and insult each other. 1 is an israeli which is why the other is making israelite jokes
>They‘re both morons that constantly fight and insult each other.
it's called banter, moron
Great, does this mean I can have invasions?
yes, you'll even get to rape the players
>let the israelites work themselves to death
the moon studios directors always wanted some good violence and oppressive-ness, they have fancy and wholesome with Ori and they also had the main guy with an autistic desire to have a brutal story with rape
i 100% believe they have the testosterone to make a game with crushingly based invasions. One of the few things that can make up for issues like
The problem is that they talked about multiplayer in the gameplay preview and they only said you could play with or against your friends, which implies that multiplayer is invite only.
I doubt they have any set-in-stone plans for PvP.
If enough players want it, they might add invasions or whatever
If that's the case then you better put in a good word for me on the steam forums or whatever.
you can do it yourself, dont need to buy the game to make topics on Steam
every game that tries to copy darks souls just ends up being dark souls but shittier
I can't tell from gameplay if they nailed it, I have to test it hands-on, hopefully in a few days.
All we have seen is Warrick, and he was way too telegraphed and slow. Impossible to discern how it will react with a player that actually runs and moves out of attacks, but I hope they amp up boss fights with area of effects attacks and combos since the guy playing it was literally just timing rolls in random direction and doing just fine like it's pre-PTDE Dark Souls
can't get into top-down arpgs anymore, i used to think they felt like arcade games because they reminded me of the 1-4player Gauntlet arcade games like Gauntlet Legends. But now, they remind me of mobile games - and not that i play mobile games - but they have that look. Someone posted this in another thread an hour ago and i'm gonna check it out after work https://store.steampowered.com/app/2299900/Felvidek/
Why does this game cause so much seethe? compared to everything else it at least has a somewhat differing look.
Not sure about arpg loot, when the autism overcame the fun part of arpgs they lost any fun factor for me.
Every single western game causes seethe on here
Why the animetroons ever acted surprised over being ousted from everywhere I will never know.
Loot is anti fun. Its just tedious. I'd rather just have 1 sword, 1 gun, 1 axe, 1 bow and so on. Rather than having 100s of swords with stupid numbers stats shit.
Not paying for earlyaccess betatest. Frick your inb4.
see you at 1.0 when you come crawling back to purchase it
see you at 1.0 when you come crawling back begging them to let you purchase it while I enjoy my early access discount and early access-only armor, suckers
>early access-only armor
>early access discount
Actual sorry existence.
>Not paying for earlyaccess betatest.
Correct.
No, i dont buy or care about ea slop, frick off
Any torrent so I can shit on it with full knowledge of the facts?
hope you catch a virus homosexual
Rude.
Didn't Moon Studios get cancelled over something a few years back.
it was a nothingburger
>EA
>streamer slop
Day 1 pirate
So far my opinion is no EA and also the name sucks ass
?si=enJjdwaw4DGukWuZ
That one came to my mind immediately as well.
>Why so little hype?
Because you didn't say what the game was called, you tard
It's called No Breast for the Wicked
>no breasts
Then why would I play
Just don't be wicked
why do Ganker trannies shit on literally everything? how do you not just end up killing yourself?