>no original games
>only sequels and remasters
Gaming is collapsing
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
>no original games. >only sequels and remasters
>no original games
>only sequels and remasters
Gaming is collapsing
|
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
What the frick
Then learn to code and make an original game
>all this already came out
>we still have armored core and starfield in a couple weeks
best year of gaming in a long time tbh
most gotys have been sequels
Like half of these are actually fun at least. That's better than most years
here's your new IP
shovelware
Glad we're finally acknowledging that 90s-00s was the gaming golden age.
>bruh take off your nostalgia glasses frfr
Broccoli-headed Black personhomosexual.
Why are you so obsessed with this tiktokBlack person? Is it because you fell for his shitcoin pump and dump? I'm 100% convinced it's only 1 person spamming this moron around Ganker
remove the 5th and 7th gens.
only 4th and 6th gen are golden age.
>complain that only remakes and remasters are getting made
>people point out that new games in existing franchises are still made all the time (like TotK and Diablo 4 and Rogue Legacy just on that list alone)
>shit and scream that sequels are also bad, conveniently ignoring the existence of lauded sequels like Majora's Mask and Diablo 2
Curious
>Hogwarts Legacy
>Hi-Fi Rush
>Castillo Protocol
>Forspoken
>Atomic Hearts
It's almost like sequels and remakes already experimented and failed before, and should have idea of what to avoid by now, while also being affected directly by hype from fans
New IPs have the burden of the first game basically being a proof of concept, as almost every series starts out. If it's lucky to get an improved sequel, depending on the reception of the first game, may doom the 2nd game, even if the 2nd game is better in comparison.
Legacy
>>Hi-Fi Rush
These games did well, Hogwarts especially
>Make an original game
>Fans hates it
No wonder remasters and remakes or iterative sequels are the way to go
>less RPG mechanics than every other FF
>less depth than the action games it tried to copy
>>less depth than the action games it tried to copy
Clive is better than Nero or Viola.
to think an indie game made it onto such a chart is mind blowing in itself, everyone else is just sperging out
Starfield is an original IP and it will get a 98
In less than 2 minutes someone will reply to you calling Starfield Fallout 5 while having zero self awareness about their moronic post
>original IP
You mean the fallout 4 mod?
you mean fallout 5?
>and it will get a 98
Rumao.
TW3 "remaster" came out last year. What are you hiding?
>only good game on a top 10 is Tetris
SAME AS IT EVER WAS
>industry larger in revenue than movies, tv, and music combined
>failing
There will definitely be studios bought out, projects canceled, and more original ip if this year of remakes is a flop, but to say the whole industry will collapse a la 1983 is fake and gay.
Instead of crying how about you play 1 game. There is no point in crying all day every day.
The Top 9 best-selling PS2 games were just sequels to ps1 games
>The Top 9 best-selling PS2 games were just sequels to ps1 games
The Top 9 highest-rated ps2 games were just sequels to ps1 games as well
Tell it to hurry the frick up
rogue legacy is so out of place lmao
Its literally a great game. Does what Dead Cells tried to do but better
can't wait for starfield to get perfect score
Original IP is overrated. Oppenheimer and Barbie are based ona book and a toy and yet both are highly creative and passionate films. The best anime of last year was based on the Cyberpunk anime. Being based in something is not an obstacle to creativity. Baldur's Gate 3 could have been an original fantasy game and that wouldn't make it better.
Oppenheimer is mediocre. Barbie is woke slop. Edgerunners was good, but you sound like you barely watch anime if thats your favorite.
It's literally not a sequel to any game nor remake.
>doesn't know what IP means
I said nothing about IP and neither did OP.
It's literally not an original game if it's based on something else.
Didn't know Rowling came up with the idea, structure and gameplay for the game in the books.
That literally applies to sequels.
Every game mentioned in the OP has near identical core gameplay as previous one.
Is there any Harry Potter game that plays even remotely similar to Hogwarts Legacy?
That feels like calling Battlefront unoriginal, just because there are movies and other games that might be in entirely different genre like KOTOR.
>Metroid prime remastered
>Trash game at the end with artifact hunt is a snoozefests
>Better than re4 remake
>better than sf6
>Better than Xenoblade 3
>Better than Diablo 4
>ZELDA NUMBER 1!
Nintendo fans.
Todd will save us
I cant wait for the remake remake
It's always funny seeing morons genuinely shitting on Konami for not remaking MGS1
Already happened with Myst
I remember I wanted to take a piece of this guys mgs4 mgrex v ray fight video for the footage of ocelot running away and laughing and when I got it into sony vegas I realized that this colossal homosexual moron puts a fricking watermark over his footage
Sequels makes sense because it's the combo of a more refined formula and a recognizable IP.
Remasters is just depressing though, even when they're well-made.
this is why starfield is the only game im hype this year.
For me, it’s
Starfield
RoboCop
Hogwarts
Reminder that if you play Diablo 4, you're spiritually brown. Be better, anons
If a game takes 7 years and billions of dollars to develop most companies will want to hedge their bets on more sure sales which comes easy with an established IP, or if one is luck an auteur director
>metroid 94
It was my first metroid and I really don't see how anyone would put it above 85. The ending artifact bullshit really drags it out and the final boss fricking sucks
Games are too expensive to take risks. One flop can tank your entire studio. Companies won't release many new IP.
Yes, the golden age of gaming is over in terms of AAA titles. But indie is literally and I ironically carrying gaming on its back.
AAA games are genuinely for casual normie homosexuals now. If you want creative, unique, innovative, risk taking, experimental, original games then it's all indie stuff.
Is rogue legacy 2 really that good? I remember being underwhelmed by the first one but seeing it that high on the list has piqued my interest.
Besides indies there are some AA games which come out and are good.
>Sequels are LE BAD
brainlet detected. Go back to r*ddit
>This is new to done
People said the same thing about the movie industry where most films are either sequels, prequels, adaptations, reboots. It's a safer investment when you know it's part of an established brand with a successful past. That's how the money game works. And still, there are original films that kick fricking ass.
Likewise, vidya. It costs a lot both in terms of money and time, so it's easier to ask "should we invest in this new experimental thing that we don't know whether it'll have an audience, or in this derivative of a thing we sold well already?" and go with the latter. Still, new stuff comes out, indie or not, there's good or at least new shit out there, and there will always be.
Everyone: old thing good new thing bad
Game industry: okay we'll bring back old thing
Ganker: NOOOOOO REEEEEEEEE YOU CANT JUST BRING BACK OLD THING THATS LE BAAAD
You should have a nice day since it's obvious you'll never be able to feel joy again
>no original games
I JUST POSTED BULLSHIT....WITH MY FREAKING MIND!
noooo not sequels to beloved franchises im going insane
I'll take worthwhile sequels to cult titles from the 90's to modern-day skinner box live service bullshit any day.