None of them better than the originals. Waste of dev time, they could've created new games inspired by the originals, not lame remakes.
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
None of them better than the originals.
None of them better than the originals. Waste of dev time, they could've created new games inspired by the originals, not lame remakes.
|
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
2r mogs OG as a game despite being a lackluster remake.
>2r mogs OG as a game
moronic zoomer.
Exactly. They are good games sure, but was it really necessary?
Saved how? RE sells one bajillion copies no matter what.
I like them both (minus 3 remake, which is garbo). I'm just saying it's a waste.
>2 and 3 I get because they're aged like shit
Seriously, have a nice day.
>I like them
>it's a waste
wat
What didn't you understand?
>I liked entertainment
>Why did they waste their time making entertainment for me what a waste
ok moron good thread buh bye
we're all gonna pretend this moron didn't just say this shit?
It's best to just ignore them hopefully he'll forget his helmet on his next community outing and never come back.
OG 2 is a dogshit game.
True dat homeslice. These stupid boomers dont know nuffin. Remakes be bussin for really never cappin 24/7
You should have a nice day
the jump from ps1 quasi 2d to modern 3d is so huge in gameplay and presentation that I think you can justify reusing those premises, a resident evil 3 remake that was actually good and expanded on the original material I don't think would lose much novelty compared to an entirely new premise, the only downside would exist outside the game, not adding any new canon to the series.
re canon is so bloated and filled with pointless ill thought out shit now that frankly i'd say that's an upside
They foresaw that no other acceptable video games were coming out in the years that they would be releasing, so capcom had to put something out quickly and efficiently.
I unironically agree. I've been questioning what is even the point of all this. Were the games fun? Yeah. Are they so good that people overlook the original games? Frick no.
4 was the only waste, 2 and 3 remakes are way supeiror obviously
seek help anon
only 2 is great
3 is aids
4 is aight
these games saved the franchise
it was either remakes or nothing
can't you like both of them?
I still don't get why they remade 4. 2 and 3 I get because they're aged like shit, but 4 still holds up.
I don't get why there hasn't been a REmake remake.
4 has always been shit.
4 is the reason the franchise completely derailed into crappy action games, it took it away from survival horror towards cheesy action with crappy QTEs all over the place. 4 was garbage and still is.
OG 1-3 were best RE.
>RE2 and RE3
>not action games
you never played them
They obviously had action, but were still survival horror, unlike 4.
Classicgays are the worst part of the fanbase, I swear.
The series shifted into more action oriented games because people got tired of fixed camera shit and stopped buying them.
Its all just rose tinted anyway the series started its shift to action in 2 and 3 added a dodge system, people will pin re1 as some sort of creeping dread game when you can be armed with a grenade laucher and shotgun within 20 minutes.
Blame tendie troons for this
>playstation idiots ruined gaming
The jpg
>2 and 3 I get because they're aged like shit
Tell me why they aged like shit without going "muh tank controls" as if that fricking means anything.
Muh tank controls.
Because 4 was not a horror game and the dialogue was dogshit
>Bu…but…bu…but…my hecking “no way, bro” and “ballistics”
KYS
the troonymake didn't solve any of those problems
Feel free to actually play the game yourself. But you can’t make it past the starting area because you can no longer rely on the “shoot head+roundhouse kick everything” combo, so you resort to just using buzzwords to prove your point
>Feel free to actually play the game yourself.
Nah. I would rather play good games instead.
>shoot head+roundhouse kick everything
Oh so you didn't beat the original on professional, alright.
I accept your concession
I accept your concession of being male.
But that also applies to the remake.
It doesn’t, but feel free to keep bumping this thread
I'm sorry, do you actually think RE4R is a horror game with you going around suplexing dudes and parrying people like you're playing fricking Sekiro?
Of course it is I feel fear everyday because it revealed how much of this board has shit taste in games, truly existential dread.
Too bad, guess you have no option but to have a nice day then.
What a moron
Not everyone's into playstation tier graphics, and voice acting.
I am, but not everyone else is, so I get it.
4 really didn't need remaking at all. The base game holds up fine. They were just being greedy at that point.
4 sucks balls in terms of story and writing which is why i prefer the Remake, consistency is also welcome which they shat on and catered to the mutt audience to make Leon muh super one line machine from his 2 self.
>4 sucks balls in terms of story and writing which is why i prefer the Remake
frick, i need to leave this place. such shit taste nowadays.
go back to plebbit then, i heard RE4 is quite popular in there and echo chamber is welcome..
Reddit lives in your head rent free, sounds like you belong there. It's a crazy thought but your opinion might just be garbage
nah if you're so angry about my opinion maybe you shouldn't be here at all, i haven't said its trash game i just said i dislike the story and writing but a as a game its great while still prefering the Remake.
Noones angry at your opinion, can't be upset a moron is acting moronic it's just their nature.
ok chang
>i heard
that's because you're a tourist from there you dumb demake Black person
illiterate shitskin pajeet
obese mutt Black person. go back
nice try troony but thank god i am not mutant like you
why are amerigolems so obsessed with troony shit. is it because capcom paid trannies to shill the demake to you?
fricking lol they know their audience
wouldn't know because i am not mutt unlike you israelite troony supporter.
>im not a mut
>yet im obsessed with mutt politics
mentally ill muttbrained homosexual. i can see why these demakes appeal to morons like you
>obsessed
i am not the one living in echo chamber
give it up freak you cannot win a fight against reality itself.
>i am not the one living in echo chamber
says the dumb demake Black person who admitted to coming from plebbit
>admitted
huh? you really are illiterate huh well you're shitskin what to expect
now you’re asking to suck my dick? wtf is wrong with you disgusting demake Black folk
no (you)s for you anymore zoomer
>I heard
Sure you did
It's supposed to "suck". It's called camp. If the giant robot statue didn't tip you off on what they were doing with that game, I don't know what to tell you.
I am aware of the camp but i don't like it or atleast i don't like it with the mix in with the horror survival game its supposed to be, granted it is action game more than survival one but still i just don't feel like it fits for me personally.
It seems like the reason 4 was remade is they are redoing the story arc of the series with character development being wildly different to the originals if 5 gets remade it will prob be significantly changed.
This is fricking moronic both are good and you should have a nice day.
The over-arcing RE storyline has literally always been shit, and is pretty much irredeemably shit though. Who even cares? Just have fun with it.
>Bllllaaaaaaarg le Umbrella corporation who are evil because they just are!
>Oh no! It's le Wesker! He wears sunglasses!
>Now solve a series of cryptic puzzles to open the door to this police station corridor
It's fricking bollocks, m8.
I didn't say it was an amazingly written story or needs to be changed just its clear that capcom wants to make an attempt to change it
All three of them are much better than the original games and I have yet to hear a single reason they are not that isn't the "soul" meme or "they cut completely stupid and pointless content"
mmmm
1 > REmake
2 Remake > 2
never played RE3 Remake
4 Remake = RE4
>1 > REmake
You are insane anon. The Remake was great.
crimson heads are annoying, there's less variance between chris and jill's routes, the door breaking is annoying as hell, the color tone is far more muted. the OST is great, but the original's OST was too. The cheesy VA from the original is gone, which sucks. Also shotguns aimed up don't guarantee a critical hit anymore. So yes, the original game is better.
Skill issue
You never played the original, shut the frick up zoomie
You are actually a spastic if you don't think REmake is the gold standard and what remakes should aspire to be improved everything while maintaining the original vision and also adding great content.
And yet... you never played the original, so shut the frick up zoomie.
I'm not the original guy you were replying to you homosexual, I'm not a zoomer so unlike you I understand how good this shit was on release it's only dickheads who came into the series late who pretend that REmake was a downgrade and not just a definitive version of the game kys
As being on the outside as possible the only good remake out of these 3 is the Re4. Re2 the only thing it does better is have fun gameplay. Every other thing such as Horror, Story, Enemy Variety, AB is shit compared to the original. We all know whats wrong with 3. 4 is the only good remake because while its different in tone completely everything else is there. Despite it being the best its completely forgotten now. I played it a few times and I went back to the original.
capcom should have gone under after the early 2010s yet somehow they're still alive.
NOOOO THE SHITTY MOTH BOSS FIGHT THEY REMOVED IT NOOOOO
At least it had it. Lol remake wiener suckers always trying to say less is better with these chud remakes.
>a-a-at l-least it had a lame boss fight wich is the equivalent of me eating a fresh turd! DEMAKEDEMAKEDEMAKEDAMKA!!!!1!
Lmao you stupid gay
>boss
Was it even really a boss? It was just some stupid thing hanging around, do you even have to fight it?
It was so actively out of place and pointless that removing it takes away nothing from the game. I guess it would have been nice to see it revamped into an actual boss fight, but removing it is the next best course of action.
This what make me like real life moths as a kid, also you are moronic. It wasn't a boss, just an optional secret enemy you can totally ignore.
Wow, a girl chases one bug and then she is known as a bug chaser.
There's barely any good Ashley porn either
Do the originals have high poly jiggly naked breasts? No, didn't think so.
I disagree. 2 and 4 remake were pretty good and I will continue to pre-order to encourage this new direction.
>NOOOO THEY ARN'T SHITTY PS1 GAMES ANYMORE
Remake haters are uniconally chud tier
>Remake haters are uniconally chud tier
you frame it like it's a bad thing, you fricking troony
2R is WAY better than OG 2. OG RE2 was always lame and forgettable. Easily the weakest of the OG trilogy.
3R is just kind of botched in general, kind of ok, og is better.
4R is better than OG 4. Fight me.
>Fight me.
Ok
This. Maybe if they made actual remakes instead of The Last of Us clones with RE characters.
I have to assume people who say this stupid shit haven't played either the nu REmakes nor TLoU. The similarities are all pretty surface level, where you could only really come to the conclusion that they're the same by looking at screenshots or short clips of gameplay. Actually sitting down and playing them you realize they're nothing alike.
3 has some really bad naughtydog ripoff cinematic sequences but that's more of an uncharted thing than tlou.
>
>I have to assume people who say this stupid shit haven't played either the nu REmakes nor TLoU. The similarities are all pretty surface level, where you could only really come to the conclusion that they're the same by looking at screenshots or short clips of gameplay. Actually sitting down and playing them you realize they're nothing alike.
2 and 4 are great remakes.
3make is an abomination that never should have happened. They should have ported the original 3 rather than that butchering.
Nicholai was pretty great in the remake though.
1, 2 and 4 are all high quality remakes. 3 you could just immediately tell it was handed off to the b-team. I would still say 4 OG is worth playing though. The experience is different and it's still an amazing game even by today's standards.
Village was good
Yes but Dead Island 2 is shit only due to it's character designs
Four is good too, but unplayable on xbox gamepass(just like Village)
Xbox keeps sucking dicks
That's how you get crap like The Evil Within.
Im glad 4R flopped, not even 4M sold lol
Ahem. That was after 1 week.
2 is better, 3 is a downgrade and 4 I can't really compare, both original and remake are good each on their own way
I enjoyed my time with RE2:Make, especially the RPD section, but everything after it felt lackluster and the AB route thing was such an afterthought it was a let down.
My whole second playthrough I just wanted to play the original again instead.
Didn't bother with RE3:Make. They were so true to form it was a rushed asset flip just like the original. For some reason despite getting Mr.X to work like Nemesis, then they changed Nemesis to work like Mr.X in some kind of downgrade.
I'm so apathetic I haven't even looked at 4. Just give me a new fricking game already.
Yeah, I actually liked it. Wasn't the best, but at least it was fricking something.
At this point I'd rather do a fresh 6 playthrough then sit through another fricking remake.
They could add RE6 movesets to RE:Remakes but pro wrestling moves in can be crazy
>despite being born in 91 never played a RE game til RE7
>loved the remakes
>not gonna play the originals
Feels good
>despite being born in 91 i grew up to be a massive homosexual
>gonna make bait posts on Ganker
>not gonna have sex ever
Feels good
remakes bring new money and new interest
new interest means new money to new releases
capcom could very well release OG RE ports going forward, even in the SE6 arcade.
capcom is doing what a lot of these companies should be doing, and what nintendo has sneakily done for years, releasing the same game telling geniuses they're new
Claire.
>t. seething boomer who can't handle the fact that nobody wants to play his ancient garbage anymore
I will never play the originals. Cope abd seethe.
Another episode of Ganker doesn't like good things because other people like them. What's new
The only new thing is redditors coming in droves surprised at this opinion, to the point they need to seethe about it every day.
The only reason I keep coming back to this shithole is alternative chans are long dead.
What do you want me to say? That I'm glad you shit all over this place and the jannies don't clean up?
I think you are talking to the wrong person you don't have to be a redditor to take 2 seconds to call the op a homosexual for doing the usual bullshit. This shit has been going on before redditors even started migrating.
demake seething is a tremendous amount of shit, dumptrucks every day stfu
Hes just doing the job of screaming about reddit im convinced these c**ts are being paid at this point.
I hope Capcom is paying you more than our jannies
I wish, they are too busy paying trannies like sphere
Another episode of fanboy/shill doesn't like people being critical about Product™. What's new
why make new games when you can sell morons the same ones twice?
Village was inspired by 4 and you gays hated that as well. Be honest, you don't actually want them to create new games either, you probably don't even enjoy gaming
Village enemy is shit compared to 4, they're not as fun to shoot as the ganados and too much linear section
"inspired by" does not make a game good, and if that is your only criteria to hate Ganker I'm guessing you bought Forspoken and Gollum.
Tell me the last game you enjoyed playing
Hellblade: Senua's sacrifice
>walking sim
Opinion discarded
Scared of strong women, got it
Theatrhythm
Kill demakes. Behead demakes. Roundhouse kick a demake into the concrete. Slam dunk a demake remaster into the trashcan. Crucify filthy demakes . Defecate in a demakes food. Launch demakes into the sun. Stir fry demakes in a wok. Toss demakes into active volcanoes. Urinate into a demakes game case. Judo throw demake into a wood chipper. Twist demake players heads off. Report demake to the IRS. Karate chop demakes in half. Curb stomp pregnant black demakes. Trap demakes in quicksand. Crush demakes in the trash compactor. Liquefy demakes in a vat of acid. Dissect demakes. Exterminate demakes in the gas chamber. Stomp demakes skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate demakes in the oven. Lobotomize demakes . Mandatory abortions for demakes. Grind demakes and remasters in the garbage disposal. Drown demakes in fried chicken grease. Vaporize demakes with a ray gun. Kick old demakes down the stairs. Feed demakes to alligators. Slice demakes with a katana.
4 remake is better
funny to see this thread, I'm playing all the RE games in release order right now.
I was suprised by how easy 2 is. now on to 3
Don't do it they have to maintain the rose tinted illusion of what RE was
1 and 2 aren't bad they are fun so far, just kinda easy
I was born in 2001
So you are a zoomer, what were you trying to say?
the major games that have an actual level of difficulty is going to be code veronica and zero.
Did you play the original American ps1 version of 1? Its a lot harder than the rereleases.
In what way, I've played all versions and haven't personally noticed the difference except for the clown music in dualshock
None of the games are difficult, what is wrong with you brain rotten zoomers? That's literally all you think about.
Blame fromsoft dark souls did irreparable damage to the brains of zoomies
they are difficult to braindead zoomers
Only 3 is an actual fail. The two others are good despite their own set of flaws.
moronic boomer frick off, games won't be made with you in mind anymore. Its our time now.
2 and 4 were better. 3 was bad but the boomers making constant 20-30 minute videos about it can suck a fat shit from my ass. The original RE3 wasn’t even half as good as they think it was
What's hilarious is the majority of complaints about 3r would also apply to 3 on release
Not sure how you figure, though most of my complaints are how about they completely butchered and ruined every single aspect of Nemesis. Though that's kind of a fricking problem when it's his game, he's on the box art, he's the first thing you see in the game and the main menu and the main selling point. 3make was blatantly an afterthought for their shitty DoA asymm game
Reused assets, shorter campaign with less options, more action. And yeah I agree its a victim of stupid fricking execs pushing the moronic dbd clone. Unfortunately what's there is good but the cut content made the game have a lot of missed potential.
>Reused assets, shorter campaign with less options, more action.
Mostly true. Doesn't stop me from liking OG 3. I think the decision system was specifically to try and pad out potential replays because there was less going on overall. But at the end of the day, this game was trying to tell me it was Resident Evil 3 and if it wasn't doing that, I would have been fine with it. But it is nearly undeniable that Nemesis was ruined. Introduction, gameplay implementation, perceived threat level, actual threat level, general design. The closest thing they had was the flamethrower boss fight in the construction tower but it was ruined by an awful preamble scripted 'chase' that can't possibly kill you and just when you think you might at least enjoy the actual boss fights against him since his chases are limited they turn him into A BIG moronic DOG
Both of you interpreted what I said as I dislike re3 og when thats not the case, its just that the exact same complains can and were levelled against it when it first came out, and suprise suprise it was also a victim of the same problem with CV being the intended third numbered title and nemesis being rushed to fulfill contractual obligations.
you're being disingenuous. if 3make merely cut some corners and was a little more action focused compared to 2make people wouldn't dislike it the way they do. it completely botches nemesis which the original didn't do and is all around very dumb and charmless.
I think people are just out of touch and overly dramatic when it comes to the comparisons, when you say nemesis is botched if its because he was scripted that would be exactly the same as the original just on first playthroughs it didn't seem like it with how he was placed, the dog form is fine and fits in to make a more logical progression towards his final metamorphosis it's just unfortunate that the game didn't have enough time to fit in the form before that. His combat is pretty much the same as original except that in original you could easily get him stuck on shit and knife him to death.
>Exactly the same
Dude, Nemesis attacks you fricking twice, three times at absolute maximum in the remake. Like, actual, non on-rails hold forward to get away segments, you in actual gameplay. How on planet earth do you think that compares to the original? Obviously he's fricking scripted in both games in some fashion, but the entire original game is meant to make him seem like a credible threat, like how he catches you in areas where fighting him is infeasible and even in places that are good to fight him it's going to be a massive resource drain.
>but he's easy if I exploit a bug that fricks up his pathfinding
as opposed to being easy because you throw ONE FRICKING GRENADE AT HIM and he's down? How is that a fair comparison? It's not the game's fault or a lack of challenge that you choose to exploit a glitch in the few areas where his AI doesn't correct itself (because it DOES try to do that if it thinks he's stuck in a loop) Seriously. Let's even ignore the gameplay aspect of this for a second. He's still ruined. He is not a threat. He is not treated like a threat. He is quipped at, he is insulted. He's a punching bag who does not establish himself as the unstoppable monster he's meant to be, he doesn't even kill Brad, he kills one random fat frick who really blows himself up and tyrell but at that point it's too little, too late, he's the moronic dog, he's not even nemesis anymore. The namesake of the game is a punching bag to get bullied verbally and physically by carlos and jill. They treated Nemesis like they treated Dante in the DMC remake
He's as credible a threat as he is in the original game this is rose tinted as frick and his attack patterns are extremely similar with the remake at least giving him an extra layer of attack in that he can jump in front of you as opposed to just letting you run away to the next room. The later part of your comment doesn't make sense the characters aren't running as much but the amount of punishment nemesis takes along with the new mutation still rams home that hes an unstoppable monster with the only reason jill is even able to put him down being right place right time. As I said the dog form is a good middle ground between regular tyrant and his final metamorphosis.
>He's as credible a threat as he is in the original game
>You just got done saying you had to exploit something clearly unintended by the developers to safely beat him
>I just got done saying I throw one (uno) (1) (singular) (two if I'm playing on nightmare or inferno I guess) grenade and the encounter with him is instantly solved
Yes, these are clearly comparable things and I'm the one being delusional, you're absolutely right. Clearly the remake is the better survival horror and action game because it allows me to solve my problem with an opportunity cost of none at all, I get to collect my shitty box of shotgun shells because even the devs knew you shouldn't be rewarded for beating their worthless pussy homosexual version of nemesis and Jill can gingerly walk away and laugh at him for being a failure.
>the characters aren't running as much but the amount of punishment nemesis takes along with the new mutation still rams home that hes an unstoppable monster with the only reason jill is even able to put him down being right place right time
Am I supposed to feel scared of Glass Joe because he got fricking knocked out in punch out 99 times and keeps getting up? It does not matter one fricking iota how many times he can come at you he doesn't have one single thing underneath his belt to warrant respect. Can't possibly understand defending the fricking dog form either. It's not even the same character at that point. There's nothing there, it's just a stupid rabid beast, an unearned transformation of him falling into a river after looking like a complete fricking loser and an atrocious gimmick fight to boot
>hyuck hyuck I'm gonna do a fun little run in circles around this boss arena I hope you have the SPECIAL MINE ROUNDS that are only in this fight and never appear again, don't worry, I'll recycle this gimmick the next time you see me and it'll be even less fun that time
Kek yeah after you have gotten all the weapon upgrades yeah you will be getting you shitty box of shotgun shells. I think comparing for the goal of finding a better version is moronic you have a tank controls og take and a third person shooter take they are both fun to play, as far as the horror aspect this is purely nostalgia talking and how scared anyone will be is on the individual I personally don't find og nemesis scary as he's easy to manipulate but the series is pretty heavy on the action so ultimately it becomes more about the spectacle of the mutations and experiments.
You know you can clear the fight with other weapons as well, besides what are you even comparing this too the complex boss fights of og where nemesis does the same thing he does everywhere else but inside a specific room?
>It's just a rabid beast
What do you think nemesis turns into in the original?
>Reused assets
you briefly return to the police station and there's like a couple reused streets early on. the asset reuse is basically indistinguishable from obvious fan service anyone would want from the concept anyways.
>shorter campaign
that fully explores its scenario, many great games are short, what's nice now is you no longer have to pay for it.
>with less options more action
it's not that much different than re2, there's a big opening labryinth, then a few more straightforward gauntlets to end it out. like 2 action picks up in the second half.
This and locations. 3 had so much of the town to explore and had a nice mix of "oh frick, zombies burst in" and "it's just you and the music" moments that sometimes would be interrupted by Nikholai's bullshit or Nemesis. I found the town really "comfy" and liked finally getting to see what shit looks like outside of RPD. In 3make everything advances way too fast and suddenly you're in the sewers.
>tfw when they get to remaking outbreak, they'll frick one important aspect of it up while getting everything else right
At the very least, they'd better not frick up character designs, voices and specials. I'm going to roll my coin and you are going to like it.
We are never getting another outbreak and its a fricking crime
>None of them better than the originals
i know. 7 and 8 are also utter garbage
What's wrong with 7 and 8? 7 emulated the shit out of re1 complete with lifted puzzles and 8 has great environments with a based c**t building fleshrobots.
where is my OUTBREAK remake?
Correct, never played any re before and decided to play og re4 before the remake and its just better than the remake.
You really think the bosses in OG were better?
Remake improved some bosses for me, salazar fight is quite fun compared to his og counterpart, krauser as well. I don't know what to feel about saddler.
Yeah saddler I'm on the fence about but feel like the arena is better. Bridges in OG were a pain in the ass but its kind of a non issue with how cheap launchers are.
You must be new here if you don't think threads like these are a trend. Motherfrickers around here saying Godhand is trash its all bait nowadays.
2 remake is good. Didn't touch the rest.
2 and 3 are totally different takes, but 4 has no reason to exist.
No, 2 and 4 are different takes, 3 has no reason to exist
Honestly I never understood the rabid love for the original RE2. It's a really cool 3-4 hour campaign that they make you play 4 times over with like a 20% max difference per scenario to give you the illusion that you're playing a much longer game because they had to slap it together in under a year after they scrapped the original build. It's a smart idea that obviously worked since it became the sacred cow for series oldgays, but as I've gotten older the game has become less impressive the more I've thought about it. A shame that they didn't actually take the time to flesh out the zapping system in the remake and do some cool shit with it, because it suffers from the same problem with the added bonus that they didn't remake everything so you're missing the iconic marshalling yard and the lab feels like it's five minutes long.
>It's a really cool 3-4 hour campaign that they make you play 4 times over
No one is making you do anything.
If you want to experience everything, yeah you're going to play LA/CB/CA/LB.
See
All the RE games are made to be played multiple times so your point is moronic. If you play any RE game once you aren't getting your moneys worth.
The difference being the length of the campaigns. Sticking to classic style only, RE1 is like 2-3x the length of 1 RE2 scenario, RE3 is like 2x, and CV is like 4-5x. Yeah they're all made to be replayed but RE2 is the only one where you're playing a single 3 hour campaign that had like a quarter of its content chopped up and sprinkled into 3 slightly different other replays of the campaign because they didn't have time to make more content and they knew a single 3 hour campaign wouldn't have looked good to players. It's not a bad game by any means, but I don't think it's the transcendental masterpiece the fanbase makes it out to be. It's impressive what they did with the little time they had, but the game was rushed and it shows.
Its not a masterpiece because of the 4 scenarios, 4 scenarios are just the bonus. And even if they are largely the same, they still added variety in small details that don't matter to most people, but it still shows that it was done with love. For an instance, Ada's death scene has a different soundtrack piece in LeonA and in LeonB. You notice these things only when you've replayed the game a dozen times.
And even if its largely the same, RE2 is still fun to replay and many classic fans revisit it regulalry. I don't see the remake ever becoming something that fans replay annually or whatever.
Wait so if the game just made claireA/LeonB a single campaign vs playing the mix and match you would be fine with it?. The 2 campaigns together are definitely a similar length to re1.
She will never frick you
That's a man right???
>Waste of dev time, they could've created new games inspired by the originals, not lame remakes.
Dear OP. The theme, remake, whatever was not the problem. The problem was the incredibly low quality of those titles. It doesnt matter what Resident Evil game Crapcom makes next. They dont call em CRAPcom for nothing.
No one calls the crapcom anymore
2 has some merits, still prefer the og but remake had enough differences to make it worthwhile
3 is a shitshow
4 is just completely useless
They are tho.
>None of them better than the originals. Waste of dev time, they could've created new games inspired by the originals, not lame remakes.
Why would they? People complain about the fricking flood of remakes (in general, not just Capcom) yet so many remakes review and sell extremely well.
Companies will stop milking their old games when people stop buying them.
RE2make overall is better than the original with the exception of somehow cut scenario events.
RE3make isn't a bad game in itself and i enjoy some of the included things like more character for the other mercenaries but other than that it is inferior.
RE4make is better than the original in every way because i myself never liked 4 and though it is heavily overrated by people who haven't even touched any of the previous games, 5 remains the best out of the action trilogy.
A man of culture
>5 remains the best out of the action trilogy.
Based. Can't wait for the remake.
>All of them better than the originals
Agreed.
>marvin you're not looking to good you need to eat something
>no claire save it for yo-
>*chewing* ok.
2 is pretty good, but in different ways
3 has too much cut stuff, downgrade
4 plays almost exactly the same and is a sidegrade, the most pointless by far
So yeah only RE2make should exist, rest were a waste
4 didn’t need a remake. But thinking this somehow makes it inferior to the OG is a brainlet take. Only reason to play the original is because of the price
Can't look as Ashley's panties in the remake.
perverts (you)
>”mmm…yummy pantsies *licking noises*”
connoisseurs (me)
>”fine leggings, with a bit of tear…beautiful”
Connoisseurs? Is that another word for gay? Sure seems like it with that example.
>reddit tier tranime
Speaks for itself
>DBZ
You sure you are old enough to be here champ
Can't play 2 & 3 since I don't have a PS2 and the games are expensive as hell to buy (don't talk to me about emulators).
Unless the release a digital version I can download then I'll skip them for now.
Why don't you want people to give you the best solution which is just to emulate?
Emulation, and even if you don't want to you still use the fricking official PC versions that've been fixed up for years
>resident evil 4 has trees in its logo
H O L Y
S H I T
>MUH REMAKES
You wanna know the funny part
RE has always been the same game for most of its existence, remake or no
Well yeah. The sequels are different games. That's how a series works.
Funny, but you know what I mean
RE has never changed, outside of RE4 and later RE7. all the "Sequels" are just the same game with some new coats of paints
Not really, no. Pretty much every RE game had some new thing they were trying, in fact. Even the remakes are significantly different enough to the base games, that they should be considered meaningfully separate games. Original RE didn't have the Crimson Head zombies, which completely change the way you think about approaching that game, for exmaple.
2 and 4 are better
3s are equally trash and 3 in general is a soulless asset rehash of the second, both OG and remake
Ugly scanfaced women, didn' play. never will
Even with the loads of cut content in 2R its still better than the original, which I played on the gamecube when it was a kid. 4R and 4 are much closer and is a toss up for me, both have their strengths and weaknesses, and both have distinctly different tones. 3R is an abomination.
RE1 on GameCube > rest
Where do I start if I'm new to Resident Evil? The sequels seem to change the core concept constantly.
just play them in the release order
Play those that look interesting to you. I recomend Remake 2 and 4. Avoid 6 like the plague
RE4R shits on the original though.
Literally played them both SIDE BY SIDE.
2 and 4 are better than og 8 was shit compared to them so it's no way a waste of time